Hi there. If fossil fuels are “killing our planet,” why then has the globe greened?
Image from Chris Martz (@ChrisMartzWX)
United Nations (@UN) profile pictureUnited Nations
@UN12h
“Fossil fuel interests keep making a killing - while killing our planet.” At the #COP31 Climate Conference in Türkiye, @antonioguterres demands that those who profit most from fossil fuels must help foot the bill for the damage they have caused. “Polluters must pay.”
Image from United Nations (@UN)

Nov 11, 2026 · 7:27 PM UTC

26
231
11
963
14,834
RelevantRecentLikes
Elementary school photosynthesis education debunks climate crisis. Greta Thunberg would've know this if she didn't famously skip school for attention
Image from Kevin (@KevinFladnander)
2
27
because the warming trend we are currently experiencing, and the carbon in the atmosphere from burning carbon, benefits plants, so plants are flourishing. It's a lie that this is a bad thing. It's a lie that has been designed to steal money from you and from me.
12
188
Because if they don't keep screaming about fossil fuels and climate change, people will stop giving them billions in taxpayer money every year.
3
65
Easy. Because fossil fuels produce CO2, which produces accelerated growth in tree canopy, and food crops.
5
198
Same reason we can't do nuclear. The mission is hurting people, climate is just the justification.
1
105
The only time "fossil fuels" were killing the planet was when we were putting tetraethyl lead in the stuff!
1
2
112
Even if it is, get the money from fucking China. It's bullshit that we have to pay $10 for a package of bacon for this while China is the main problem. Why do no politicians ever say anything about their pollution levels? It's suck a fucking joke.
24
dailysceptic.org/2026/11/10/…
Shock Evidence Suggests Humans Are Not Responsible for Most of the Increase in Atmospheric CO2 –...

Shock Evidence Suggests Humans Are Not Responsible for Most of the Increase in Atmospheric CO2 –...

Scientists have uncovered shock new evidence based on carbon isotopes that suggests the recent rise in atmospheric CO2 has little or nothing to do with fossil fuels, says Chris Morrison.

dailysceptic.org
2
Deforestation is "bad" and, I guess, growing the forests back is bad too.
1
147
Plants need CO2 for photosynthesis to thrive. Photosynthesis is their primary source of energy. The more CO2 the better plants thrive. We need more CO2 in the atmosphere, not less? Bill Gates and the climatards don’t understand science. They just want control thru CO2 regulation.
1
1
77
We're coming out of an ice age, and entering a warmer phase
1
44
Who would have thought CO2, the essential requirement for plants to thrive together with sun light, would green the planet. So bad. We need to stop CO2 emissions to make the planet less green
1
24
The greening of the planet would seem to be an inconvenient truth.
18
Plants love CO2.
43
What the hell are fossil fuels??? They aren't oil derived from dinosaur bones, that's f*cking rediculous.
1
89
CO2 is plant food, in case they don't teach that in meteorology schook
37
I believe it's called photosynthesis 😃🤣🤣🤣
16
Seems plants like CO2. Who could have known?
42
A fertilized cornfield counts as “green” just like a rainforest. Crops grown under more CO2 lose protein, zinc and iron. None of it stops heat waves, floods or sea-level rise. Leafier isn’t healthier. You are funded by fossil fuel money.
2
1,482
Yeah.. Logic does not compute with Lefties...
6
thanks for posting Chris as usual no coherent replies refuting
9
Real science?
24
Thank you
21
Like are you a parody account? No way you have a meteorological degree.
4
1
2,327
Yo so are you going to address other impacts of human caused climate change or are you going to pretend that one handpicked metric is the end all be all like a retard
22
Load more replies