Investigative video creator
USA
Joined June 2009
- Tweets37.3K
- Following931
- Followers114K
- Likes92.7K
Pinned Tweet
Jacob Blake didn't die. I've had many conversations with him myself. Please help me finish this documentary.
Matt Orfalea retweeted
Wow
Former FBI Special Agent Charged with Federal Civil Rights Violation and Making False Statements justice.gov/usao-edny/pr/for…
Matt Orfalea retweeted
🤯
More infuriating revelations in the MeToo hoax at MIT:
Not content having just destroyed his career at MIT and the Whitehead Institute, conspirators Kristin Knouse and Izabella Pena gleefully celebrated each time David Sabatini was dropped from a professional organization or website. (Howard Hughes Medical Institute & Pew are mentioned here—Sabatini was removed from their sites and lost all fellowship funding.)
Knouse and others also lobbied hard to get Sabatini fired from his corporate biotech positions. As Sabatini said, almost overnight his collective income went down to zero.
Matt Orfalea retweeted
🤯
“We should all threaten to kill ourselves if he doesn’t lose tenure.”
“No, the world needs us.”
—MeToo hoaxers Kristin Knouse, Isabella Pena, and Tina Lopez considered how best to manipulate MIT into revoking David Sabatini’s tenure. (It was easy for them, as MIT rolled over without a second thought. The tenure revocation was basically rigged.)
Can anyone ID this camera guy? I'd love to see what he shot and possibly use in my Kenosha 2020 doc.
Fascinating. A guy lost his MIT job due to false accusations that have now, years later, been ruled defamation. The woman who lied still has her job at MIT...I mean she'll need it to pay the guy the $6 million she now owes him, but still blatant hypocrisy from MIT.
So, @MIT , what about Kristin Knouse? Any consequences for her, or does accountability suddenly become optional when it’s politically inconvenient? Or is your commitment to justice strictly selective?
Matt Orfalea retweeted
Hard for me to see someone who was a colleague at MIT relishing in my destruction. Particularly since they barely knew me and never bothered--as perhaps scientists should--to check if there was another version of events.
🚨 BOMBSHELL COURT EVIDENCE EXPOSES EXPLOSIVE PRIVATE MESSAGES REVEALING COORDINATION BETWEEN KRISTIN KNOUSE AND MIT PROFESSOR SANGEETA BHATIA IN THE DAVID M. SABATINI ORDEAL.
🔱 NEW REVELATION — Court evidence exposes how Knouse and Bhatia privately celebrated Sabatini’s removal, discussed the potential destruction of his professional career, and anticipated the revocation of his @MIT tenure.
An 80-message exchange between Kristin Knouse and MIT Professor Sangeeta Bhatia, dated August 20–21, 2021, reveals their private reactions immediately following Whitehead Institute and HHMI's severance of ties with Professor @DMSabatini.
The communications contain statements that deserve serious public examination.
🔴 1. “YOU DID IT” — “AND HE’S OUT.”
On August 20, 2021, Bhatia congratulated Knouse:
🔴 “YOU DID IT. You crossed the finish line. It's out in the open. And you're not out in the open. And you're on the faculty. And he's out.”
Knouse responded:
🔴 “You connecting me to Nancy [Hopkins]was the turning point. I will never forget that walk in Lexington.”
🔴 2. “THIS WAS THE OUTCOME I DREAMED OF.”
The following morning, as news coverage spread, Knouse discussed the possibility of Sabatini losing his MIT tenure:
🔴 “Hard to imagine MIT will be left with any choice other than to revoke tenure.”
Bhatia responded:
🔴 “You're right about tenure”
She subsequently wrote:
🔴 “This was the outcome I dreamed of but NEVER certain I would get it.”
Knouse also described her assessment of Whitehead's handling of the matter:
🔴 “And as skeptical as I was of Whitehead's end game, in the end I think the overall process was perfectly executed.”
Bhatia expressed her approval of Whitehead Institute Director Ruth Lehmann:
🔴 “I'm proud of Ruth [Lehmann]”
These exchanges occurred months before MIT's April 2022 tenure-revocation recommendation.
🔴 3. THE PROFESSIONAL CONSEQUENCES — BEYOND WHITEHEAD.
The participants also discussed Sabatini's corporate affiliations and prospects for future employment.
Knouse wrote:
🔴 “I know of one company already speaking with lawyers to remove him on grounds of morality clause.”
She subsequently stated:
🔴 “Hard to imagine how he can be gainfully employed anywhere after the past 24 hours ...”
These were not merely discussions about an institutional investigation. They extended to the potential consequences for Sabatini's career, tenure, corporate affiliations, and future livelihood.
🔴 4. THE DIVERSITY SURVEY AND PROTECTION FROM PUBLIC IDENTIFICATION.
In another particularly consequential exchange, Bhatia wrote:
🔴 “Also the dei survey and subsequent investigation really protects you, which I love. There is not even a scent of whistleblower in all the press.”
This statement takes on particular significance alongside the previously disclosed communications in which Knouse and Nora Kory discussed using Whitehead's diversity survey to conceal an investigation already under consideration (📑 see the original court evidence in the first comment below).
🔴 5. “WE DRANK CHAMPAGNE” — CELEBRATING AS THE NEWS SPREAD.
Perhaps the most striking exchange appears on KK011419.
On August 21, 2021, Knouse declared:
🔴 “I KNOW! Young people took down a relatively young king. Progress, progress, progress.”
Knouse also wrote:
🔴 “Two other women who came forward and I drank champagne while watching the Tweets and articles roll in last night. It felt like campaign headquarters after an election victory. Really special.”
Bhatia responded:
🔴 “That's awesome.”
These exchanges reinforce the serious concerns about coordination and conflicts of interest raised by our previous disclosures. Their significance must be assessed alongside the full documentary record and the subsequent jury verdict.
The scientific community deserves full accountability for any misconduct established by the evidence, including the roles of individuals who participated in or improperly influenced the institutional processes that subjected Professor Sabatini to a devastating ordeal and profoundly damaged his career.
📑 REVIEW THE ORIGINAL COURT EVIDENCE BELOW.
🔱 ScienceGuardians™ Legal and Investigative Team
MORE COURT EVIDENCE. MORE REVELATIONS. STAY TUNED. ⚠️
@SciGuardians 🔱
Matt Orfalea retweeted
"In hindsight, it was quite aggressive, / #hetoo."
That’s MIT based biologist Dr. Kristin Knouse being asked about text messages she exchanged with Dr. David Sabatini, a world renowned former MIT biomedical scientist.
Sabatini was once considered a potential Nobel Prize candidate for his breakthroughs in understanding cancer and aging.
The deposition is part of the evidence I reviewed in a defamation and work interference lawsuit Sabatini brought against Knouse.
Sabatini watched his career, his lab, and his reputation collapse under the weight of campus protests and social media attacks after Knouse accused him of coercing her into a sexual relationship that lasted more than a year, according to court documents.
🚩Sabatini gave me his first television interview since a Boston jury delivered a stunning $6 million defamation/interference verdict in his favor.🚩
The interview airs on #Boston25 News during our 6pm newscast.
I will post the full report after it airs.
#25Investigates
Matt Orfalea retweeted
NEW: A court filing indicates the arrested FBI official who said she was running a "SHADOW GOVERNMENT" shaped the fake media narrative around the Hunter Biden laptop.
It specifically cites an Oct. 15, 2020, email from NBC. Later that evening, NBC's Ken Dilanian would report the bogus "SCOOP" that the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation.
Floris lawyers:
“What is going on at the DC US Attorney’s Office? In the middle of the night, the government filed an unsigned and unsworn complaint attempting to fix the issues with their original charge against Ms. Floris and adding a new charge just as meritless as the first one.
“In our combined decades of DOJ service, we have never seen or even heard of something like this being filed. That’s because the public lodging of criminal charges must be authorized by the grand jury, a judge, or the defendant herself. Here, the government has taken that power for itself in a desperate attempt to delay our client’s right to challenge the charges in court and litigate this case in the media, rather than the courtroom. We have asked to address this outrageous government conduct against a decorated public servant at today’s court hearing.”
Diagnose me. You don't need a fancy degree.
Am I autistic? Why/why not?
There's no limit to the stupidity of the lying media nor to the autistic brilliance of @0rf
xitter.twitterapi.xyz/0rf/status/20917390832…
Of course
A man attending the Theranos trial told me and other reporters covering the case that his name was “Hanson,” and that he fixed up old cars for a living. He said he was a “concerned citizen,” and that the judge had it out for Elizabeth Holmes.
I had questions, so I looked into him and found he was a San Diego hotelier who collected antique cars.
His son was Billy Evans, Holmes’ romantic partner and the father of her children.
npr.org/2021/09/14/103683586…
1
11
3,232