Pinned Tweet
The Government has hailed a £12bn “investment” by RWE and KKR in the Norfolk Vanguard East and West offshore wind projects.
It is not new. The projects already won CfDs in AR7. And it now comes with an extra £1bn from the National Wealth Fund. A short thread 🧵(1/6)
🤖 Made with AI
As I was saying tonight @KwasiKwartengUK subsidised green jobs in renewables decrease productivity of the electricity sector, push up prices and destroy jobs in the real economy.
Myth: green investment creates jobs and growth
Fact: it creates jobs in green sectors, but less growth overall
More workers making the same electricity means fewer builders, nurses and shop assistants making other things we want
NetZeroCostBenefit.com/objec…
David Turver retweeted
AFAICS the whole setup will result in high levels of subsidised export and little domestic supply, with the grid and interconnectors needed for exports also paid for by consumers. A very bad bargain indeed.
This is government gaslighting to a high degree.
1. It’s not a new announcement. The Norfolk East and West offshore wind projects were announced earlier this year as part of the AR7 round of contracts.
2. No way does it bring down prices. Those behind it, energy giant RWE + global investors KKR, were guaranteed an above-market strike price of £91.20/MWh based on 2024 prices — indexed linked for 20 years. That guarantee is already worth £97/MWh in 2026. This is v expensive energy.
3. What is new is that the costs of developing offshore wind have soared. So the government has now had to chip in £1 billion of the £12 billion investment needed from the National Wealth [Destruction] Fund. So more state subsidy on top of the massive subsidies for two foreign companies implicit in the price guarantees embedded in AR7.
4. Far from cheaper electricity this embeds high-cost electricity in the system for 20 years.
5. So much for the Chancellor’s Budget pledge to ‘only build new projects when they lower prices’. This does the opposite — and at enormous expense to the taxpayer and electricity user.
Gaslighting indeed.
David Turver retweeted
This is akin to demanding money with menaces. The UN wants our money so it can continue the destruction of the Western economy.
Fossil fuels are not only driving the climate crisis. Dependence on them carries a steep economic & security price, as the crisis in the Middle East has shown.
An accelerated transition away from fossil fuels is fundamental to building economies that are cleaner, more secure & less exposed to shocks.
At #COP31 we must move from discussing the transition to organizing it, financing it & delivering it.
You are the guy that is advocating for sailing ships 200 years after coal-fired steam power took over and was then replaced with fuel oil and then nuclear reactors.
Replying to @7Kiwi
You'd have been that guy saying canals were the future of freight transport 20 years after the railways had got a decent network running.
David Turver retweeted
Oil and Gas is energy treasure and provides around 80% of the energy we use. They will remain essential for decades to come.
Leaving our own resources untapped, including at Rosebank, while importing energy from overseas is gross negligence.
Every last barrel. Every last drop.
Billions in tax revenues. Thousands of highly skilled jobs. Greater energy security.
It’s time to put Britain’s interests first.
🇬🇧 DRILL BRITAIN. DRILL!
David Turver retweeted
RWE & KKR mega wind project needs extra £1bn from UK taxpayer to make project work
Already demanded 20 year inflation linked contract at high electricity price
A Reform Govt will end this Net Zero rip off against taxpayers
Caveat Emptor RWE and KKR
rwe.com/en/press/rwe-ag/2026…
David Turver retweeted
Look no further than Sophy Ridge’s post this morning to see how easily the Westminster lobby is taken for a ride on Net Zero. Sky’s lead presenter breathlessly announces £12bn for two offshore wind projects "off the east coast of Scotland". They aren’t in Scotland. They are Norfolk Vanguard East and West—50km off East Anglia. No 10 slipped "Scotland" into a press release, and the lobby typed it out without checking a map.
If they won’t check which country a £12bn project is in, they certainly won’t check the balance sheet.
Strip away the slogans from Ed Miliband’s zealots and look at the financial engineering. We are told this is "homegrown British energy." In reality, it is a 50:50 joint venture between German giant RWE and New York private equity firm KKR. Taxpayers are handing over £1bn from the National Wealth Fund to de-risk their equity, while locking households into a 20-year inflation-linked Contract for Difference at £91.20/MWh in 2024 prices—well over £100/MWh today. For two decades, your energy bill will legally underwrite the guaranteed yield of a Wall Street fund.
Where do the industrial jobs go? Not here. The 184 turbines come from Denmark’s Vestas, backed by Danish export finance. Worse, the steel monopile foundations were promised to the SeAH factory at Teesworks in Redcar. In April, RWE pulled the plug on the Teesside contract for Vanguard West—triggering North East job cuts—and outsourced fabrication to Bilbao in Spain and Nordenham in Germany, underwritten by German export agency Euler Hermes. British taxpayers put up the £1bn subsidy; German and Spanish factories get the heavy engineering.
Then look at the environmental reality Net Zero ideologues ignore. Building 184 15MW turbines requires over 400,000 tonnes of virgin blast-furnace steel, thousands of tonnes of copper, and Chinese rare-earth neodymium and dysprosium mined in toxic conditions. To connect it, developers are using compulsory purchase powers to rip a 60km, 45m-wide trench—wider than a motorway—through prime Norfolk farmland from Happisburgh to Necton, pouring tens of thousands of tonnes of concrete into 150 jointing bays and a 300m converter substation.
Before a single blade turns, the embedded carbon from smelting steel, curing concrete, and running diesel jack-up vessels across the North Sea is vast. The switchgear relies on sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)—a gas 23,500 times more potent than CO2 that lingers for 3,200 years. And when these turbines hit the end of their 20-year subsidy life? We are left with 552 epoxy-resin blades, each 115m long, which cannot be economically recycled at scale and end up shredded, incinerated, or buried in landfill, while 400,000 tonnes of rusting steel stay driven into the seabed.
Yet Kemi Badenoch and the Tories now tour studios calling Net Zero "fantasy politics," hoping we have amnesia. Look at her record:
In June 2019, she waved through Theresa May’s statutory Net Zero 2050 target in 90 minutes without objection.
In 2022, she boasted at the dispatch box that Net Zero would cost "under 2% of GDP."
She sat in the Cabinet that passed the Energy Act 2023, expanding the exact CfD subsidy racket behind this £12bn RWE/KKR stitch-up.
The uniparty built this machine together, mortgaging our industrial base to foreign utilities and private equity, giving Britain the highest industrial electricity prices in the developed world while paying gas stations to sit on standby when wind drops to 4%.
Only Reform UK—led by Nigel Farage and Richard Tice—will rip up the Net Zero mandates, scrap the CfD racket, fast-track domestic North Sea oil, gas, and modular nuclear, and stop treating British billpayers as a cash cow for global finance.
This quoted post is unavailable.
Wind output tracking below forecast so we're paying £750/MWh to keep the lights on. And the Government is subsidising Norfolk Vanguard offshore wind farms with an extra £1bn of our cash from the NWF.
David Turver retweeted
These windfarms already had huge subsidies in the form of CfDs awarded under AR7. Now an extra £1bn in subsidies from the National Wealth Fund. Make it stop.
We've secured £12 billion of investment from @RWE_AG, alongside £1bn public money, for two major UK offshore wind farms off the coast of Norfolk - powering millions of homes and supporting thousands of jobs.
This is another vote of confidence in British homegrown, clean energy.
David Turver retweeted
The NWF was supposed to catalyse investment in nascent technologies. Offshore wind has been around for decades and Norfolk Vanguard had already secured a CfD. Why does it need extra government support and what are the terms of the investment?
David Turver retweeted
If you enjoyed this thread, please like and share. You can sign up for free to read the full article on the link below (6/6):
davidturver.substack.com/p/e…
🤖 Made with AI
David Turver retweeted
Offshore wind is already heavily subsidised through CfDs. It now has an additional taxpayer subsidy on top. This is not pure private investment. It is a further misallocation of capital that leaves both billpayers and taxpayers exposed. (5/6)
David Turver retweeted
Higher construction costs push the levelised cost of the electricity well above the government baseline.
Using more realistic load factors and a 20-year life instead of 30 years takes the figure higher still — into the £140–£173/MWh range in the analysis. (4/6)
David Turver retweeted
Billpayers are already on the hook for 20-year index-linked CfDs at around £97/MWh (2024 prices adjusted for inflation). Taxpayers are now also providing £1bn via the National Wealth Fund. The terms of that investment have not been disclosed. (3/6)




















