Alec Stapp (@AlecStapp) header
Alec Stapp (@AlecStapp) profile picture

Co-founder @IFP, an innovation policy think tank

Washington, DC 🇺🇸
Joined June 2009
Photo by Alec Stapp (@AlecStapp)Photo by Alec Stapp (@AlecStapp)Photo by Alec Stapp (@AlecStapp)Photo by Alec Stapp (@AlecStapp)Photo by Alec Stapp (@AlecStapp)Photo by Alec Stapp (@AlecStapp)Photo by Alec Stapp (@AlecStapp)Photo by Alec Stapp (@AlecStapp)Photo by Alec Stapp (@AlecStapp)Photo by Alec Stapp (@AlecStapp)
First hurdle cleared! Thank you to everyone has been working tirelessly on BAAJA. Onward.
Happy permitting reform day to all who celebrate. First major vote on BAAJA will be at 5:30 PM today — let's get it done.
13
68
3
746
20,121
Alec Stapp retweeted
*NVIDIA PREPARING TO OUST CEO JENSEN HUANG: WSJ
90
188
195
1,976
420,886
Alec Stapp retweeted
Stunning report. At this point it seems like Howard Lutnick and Jeff Kessler are just outright defying the President's orders on export controls. The President apparently ordered Secretary Lutnick to crack down on China's access to controlled AI chips in Southeast Asia--and reportedly has ordered this three separate times--and they're just...not doing it. Why is Lutnick refusing to act? Why is he allowing China to continue to get AI chips via Southeast Asia? At this point, Lutnick isn't just protecting Nvidia, he's straight up protecting Chinese companies--reportedly against the wishes of the President and the entire rest of the Cabinet. Is Lutnick personally benefitting from China getting access to AI chips? This is a total breakdown inside the administration on a major national security issue. There has to be accountability for this. Congress obviously will investigate, but how is it that the President's own appointees are just refusing to execute the President's orders? I've never seen anything like this.
SCOOP: President Trump authorized a crackdown on companies suspected of diverting Nvidia's advanced AI chips to China on Thursday, but one administration official repeatedly stood in the way: Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. axios.com/2026/11/11/trump-l…
117
677
55
2,701
272,465
Why is the Congressional Progressive Caucus opposing a bill endorsed by AFL-CIO, IBEW, LIUNA, and the Teamsters?
25
36
4
345
9,301
BAAJA’s opponents are just throwing stuff at the wall now NEPA affects everything the gov does (~200k actions per year, only 0-5 for detention facilities) Opposing BAAJA because of this tiny effect is like opposing repealing Trump’s tariffs because that would make metal for detention centers cheaper The far greater affect of NEPA reform is faster gov action, more vital infrastructure, and disproportionate benefits for clean energy
Replying to @USProgressives
As a result, the public would lose key tools used to protect the environment and hold the administration accountable against ICE detention centers, Trump vanity projects, and more.
3
51
2
284
7,826
Alec Stapp retweeted
Today on Volts: more permitting bill! The "manager's amendment" of the bill was released, with 77 pages of changes meant to address the objections of enviros, tribes, & utilities. @DanielPalken rejoins me to walk through the changes & catch us up on the legislative state of play. volts.wtf/p/the-federal-perm…
5
13
3
61
8,550
Remember, many NHPA slowdowns are not about demolishing protected buildings but whether you can see a dim smudge of a wind turbine on the horizon from the window of that protected building.
Replying to @mattyglesias
Because clean energy projects are physically large, this creates a huge attack surface for NIMBYs who want to cite viewshed impacts to block things. This doesn’t work as well against fossil fuel projects but it does sometimes work.
13
84
7,028
Alec Stapp retweeted
I feel like I am going crazy. The Q will not be getting four Republican senators next year — it will be getting 10 R senators, because Trump will veto any permitting measure that can get all 56 Ds. (And of course, any bill that can get 56 Ds won’t get 10 Rs.)
David is right here--there is no path to passing a "better" permitting bill next Congress, let alone one that Trump would sign.
14
36
6
337
13,742
Alec Stapp retweeted
Rep. Peters' analysis that the bipartisan permitting bill, BAAJA, writes Tribal consultation into law in a way it isn't now seems right to me. To break down how I'm seeing it: - The relevant section, Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), is currently only two sentences; neither sentence mentions Tribes nor requires Tribal involvement in the process. - The Tribal consultation process exists today via Section 101(d) of NHPA & the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP)'s regulations -- which can be rewritten. - In fact, the ACHP has already voted to rewrite them in a way that strips Tribal involvement and consultation out compared to the current regs. - BAAJA, as amended by the manager's amendment, puts much of the current Tribal consultation process that is present in the regs into statute: - Under BAAJA, Tribes would be provided agency's findings on every project (other than ones that don't affect historic properties), and consultation begins early, at least at the start of env review. - Agencies "shall" (not may) seek input from Tribes about sites of religious and cultural importance. - Tribes can object to an agency's findings, the agency must respond in writing. - Tribal historic preservation offices (THPOs) keep control of their programs, with no option for a federal takeover even of noncompliant THPOs (this was a change from the original bill). - Sensitive information about sacred sites is exempt from FOIA. The ACHP's draft rule goes the other way: it makes early Tribal consultation optional, has a Tribe's lack of input cause waiver of their right to consultation, and deletes the regulations' statements about government-to-government consultation, Tribal sovereignty, and ancestral lands, among other things. That regulation (or other regulatory rollbacks of Tribal consultation rights currently in regulation) would be impossible under BAAJA.
Replying to @SiegelScribe
Dems supportive of BAAJA make the same point. "We need to remember that Trump was just starting to take away the whole process anyway. Now we've got enshrined in it mandatory consultation, not just on sites but on landscapes," Rep. Scott Peters (D-Calif.) told me of NHPA changes
5
17
2
52
5,662
It actually sucks that Al Gore (who has been out of policymaking for 25 years now) would come out of his cave to just shit on the work of Sheldon Whitehouse, the man who has been *the* climate hawk of the Senate for the past 20 years.
11
39
3
624
28,400
Alec Stapp retweeted
This datacenter critique made sense before amendment; Zephyr may not have had a chance to read the new text BAAJA's new datacenter safeguards make them subsidize consumers: Getting this was a red line for @PubEnterprise, @Groundwork, & @rooseveltinst endorsement We got it! – at Queens, NY
The voters: stop data centers being forced down our throats and corruption, the people need power over their lives. BAJAA: federal regulators can override local rejections of the power lines needed by big tech and states are stripped of power to protect local water.
3
6
1
68
4,658
Alec Stapp retweeted
i like my permitting — reformed my chip exports — controlled my auditors — embedded my waymos — authorized to operate in dc
7
15
376
8,855
Alec Stapp retweeted
really powerful to see @SenKevinCramer — a senior member of the Senate Banking Committee and a cosponsor of the Chip Security Act — calling for jensen huang to step down.
9
15
2
122
13,921
The AI race with China is all about who has the best and most chips. There are four main ways China gets access to chips: 1.) Buying them directly from US companies like Nvidia. 2.) Illegally smuggling them from other countries into China. 3.) Accessing them remotely through the cloud from data centers located in places like Southeast Asia. 4.) Building their own domestic chips in China. The Chinese military has used advanced chips to further its capabilities while undermining our national security, and the Chinese government has used these chips to strengthen its totalitarian surveillance project. Congress has a generational opportunity in this year’s NDAA to pass bipartisan bills that would address all four of the pathways through which China acquires chips. While we need a full assessment of the damage done to our national security by recent revelations, we can begin today by setting a better course. No excuses. No apologies. Let’s get this done.
79
102
18
413
52,732
1. Reasonable people can oppose BAAJA; many people I respect do. Calling it a "utility giveaway" is not supportable, imho. Utilities opposed it until yesterday am, when they threw in largely for optics/relationship preservation.
The permitting bill is a data center accelerator and an oil and gas and utility giveaway. It’s a boon to the big tech barons that the country just rejected. Listen to Al here on why it’s especially bad w a Trump
3
12
2
87
7,520
NHPA impacts clean energy WAY more than it does dirty energy, creating a predictable process with a beginning, middle, and end that respects tribal consultation rights is a good idea. People block clean energy projects for years because they *don’t like how they look*!
Here is the Sen. Schiff amendment to strike NHPA section from BAAJA. Broad group of Dems with tribal interests signed on, including those who voted to proceed on the bill last night. It's unlikely this will succeed. Negotiators have consistently said they won't remove sections
3
20
1
100
5,185
Alec Stapp retweeted
Heatmap describing perfectly why we at CPE published Down to the Wire - an federal policy framework for macrogrid development - and then immediately supported BAAJA a couple weeks later.
This is the best argument for why Dems should take the deal now on BAAJA rather punting for another two years (at minimum):
1
7
30
2,525
Got this text unprompted from a friend who's a liberal influencer. Anti-BAAJA groups are offering tens of thousands of dollars to moderately-sized accounts to spread anti-BAAJA talking points. I've almost never seen anything like this.
Anti-BAAJA groups are shopping for Native American influencers who will parrot their talking points for $10K
19
128
24
862
77,643
Attention: dissertation-writing PhD students in economics + related fields. If you are interested in how changes to microeconomic policies -- e.g. housing, energy+transportation infrastructure, high-skilled immigration, R&D -- affect economic growth, please consider applying!
Open call for Applications, PhD Student Workshop on Microeconomic Policies & Economic Growth. Workshop to be held in Washington, DC on March 31, 2027. Submit papers by 11:59pm EDT on December 16, 2026. More information: nber.org/calls-papers-and-pr…
1
26
85
8,513
What does @RepNikkiB, the new chair of the 114-member New Dem caucus, think about BAAJA and permitting reform? See her episode with us on Right of Way: greentape.pub/p/right-of-way…
News: Nikki Budzinski officially elected as New Dem chair, per a source in the room during the caucus leadership elections
6
1
35
3,024