You have been cordially invited 📜
Coming to BBC iPlayer and BBC One in October
#TheCelebrityTraitors #TheTraitors #ClaudiaWinkleman
The fingerless gloves are ON as Claudia Winkleman returns to The Traitors castle with an all-star cast who are ready to play the ultimate game of deceit and betrayal.
Aug 21, 2025 · 12:30 PM UTC
Yesterday, a demonstration was held in front of the Japanese Prime Minister's Office, but was it not reported in the media?
youtube.com/live/luMY4cKgOws…
255
Ahh the BBC FULL OF SHIT AS USUAL.
Public Statement on the BBC’s “Black Anglo-Saxons” Depiction
The BBC’s recent drama portraying Black Anglo-Saxons represents a clear departure from historical accuracy and raises serious concerns about the misrepresentation of England’s cultural heritage.
The Anglo-Saxon period, spanning roughly the 5th to 11th centuries, is one of the most well-documented eras of early English history.
Extensive archaeological, linguistic, and genetic evidence confirms that Anglo-Saxons were primarily of northern European origin.
There is no credible scholarly basis for depicting Anglo-Saxon nobility as Black.
By presenting fictionalised portrayals as fact, the BBC risks misleading audiences, particularly those unfamiliar with the actual historical record.
Rather than enriching public understanding, this approach distorts and trivialises a defining period of English history.
The decision undermines trust in the BBC as a public broadcaster tasked with upholding standards of accuracy and integrity.
This is not an argument against diversity in media.
Britain has a rich and complex Black history which deserves serious exploration on its own terms.
Programmes such as David Olusoga’s Black and British: A Forgotten History demonstrate how this can be done responsibly, rooted in evidence and scholarship.
Inventing “Black Anglo-Saxons,” however, erases both authentic Anglo-Saxon identity and authentic Black British history by replacing them with a manufactured narrative.
Historical drama inevitably involves some artistic licence, but rewriting cultural identity for ideological purposes crosses a line.
The BBC owes the public an honest account of the past, not a politically convenient fiction.
5
541
You need to address this...xitter.twitterapi.xyz/EasternVoices/status/1…
🚨
@BBC caught changing the translation of a statement about the terrorist who murdered Jews at the Synagogue in Manchester to “He was resisting Israeli forces” instead of “doing Jihad against the Jews”
They deliberately feeding you false information in favour of Terrorists!
130
@grok do people residing outside of the uk have to pay for bbc international
2
5
505
I am delighted to say that this week I joined The National as a Political Reporter.
In my first week I have written about:
• Russian interference in UK politics
• A movement to “decolonise” Scotland
• The rising threat of the far-right
• .. & the NAZA premiere.
Today I made the front page with a story about a new UN report into Israel’s information war.
Francesca Albanese’s analysis should send a sobering shockwave through the Western media landscape, including the BBC.
According to her report, Western media outlets are part of a sophisticated and interconnected system “intrinsic to genocide”.
Special criticism was levelled at the BBC, who Albanese used as her first and primary example to illustrate how Western media amplified Israeli narratives while silencing Palestinian voices.
Des Freedman told me that the media created “the ideological ground on which the tanks and the bombers went in”.
The Centre for Media Monitoring told me, specifically in reference to the BBC, that these findings “raise serious questions about impartiality and whether audiences are receiving a complete picture of events.”
Albanese, the UN Special Rapporteur, ultimately calls for the International Criminal Court to investigate and prosecute “direct and public incitement to commit genocide by government officials and media figures”.
Link to read below ⬇️
3
















































