BC Benji retweeted
Leftists care more for the world than their family/friends because it's easier, not because they're altruistic
Caring for your immediate circle is a tangible daily task that requires effort
Caring for "the world" is an abstract virtue signal that needs zero actual output
BC Benji retweeted
The Right must use the discourse to illustrate the nature of the Leftist process. How do I mean? Well,
The Left doesn't experience feelings. Not the way you and I do. And they don't use words the way you and I do either. Let me explain.
A good example is to compare human children to dogs.
A Leftist has been trained to know that doing to a dog what the abortionist does to a fetus is evil, and so they'll pantomime outrage over the very thought of it. They know that violence against a dog is considered evil and wrong and so will feign anger and sadness and outrage over it.
But they don't have these feelings. They have the expression of them, but there's nothing actually there.
How do we know this? Well, again, imagine doing to a pre-born child those terrible things and it will fill you with rage.
But the Leftist? Nothing. They feel nothing, but importantly they won't DISPLAY any of those feelings either. Because they haven't been trained to express them.
They're both intelligent living things capable of feeling pain. Yet the Leftist only shows sympathy for one.
And this crops up elsewhere. It's why Leftists positively gush concern and compassion for illegal immigrant rapists but are remarkably silent about their victims.. especially when those victims are White women.
They've been conditioned for one and not the other. They've been trained in how to respond for one and not the other.
Whereas you instinctively recoil at the notion of animal cruelty as well as fetal cruelty because you are capable of such a thing, because you have actual empathy, they don't. They have a trained simulacrum of it.
Which tells you that they don't experience the feelings that informs you as well. If they did then there would be crossover. They wouldn't be able to help themselves.
But they don't. So you know. A lot of what the Right does is project its own humanity onto the Left.
It's why the Leftist will giggle and gush over the thought of X'ng you and all your kids while you find the notion of even THINKING about doing that to them horrific and why it causes a disconnect in you.
Because you, having projected your humanity onto them, can't understand. You try to use arguments like "Well what if the such and such was reversed" because such an argument would work on you.
But it never works on them, does it? That's because your projection, when the rubber its the road, is just a projection. It's not real. They don't have that innate quality you're putting on them.
And this being divorced from human emotion also means they're divorced from human meaning.
This is ENORMOUSLY difficult for a lot of people who aren't evil to wrap their heads around.
People like to phrase it as "one tv screen, two stories", but it's not even that, that's just cope on your part. More projection on your part.
Let's say, for example, you're arguing about teenage girls getting double mastectomies. Now you, well aware that this is evil and horrific think that this happenning *at all* should give the Leftist pause.
It won't. First they'll deny it happens, then when presented incontrovertible evidence that it does they'll say it doesn't that much, and when they ask them how many times is an acceptable number they'll find some other thing to argue about.
But the point was never that they ALSO viewed Double mastectomies on thirteen year old girls as evil, it was always to just wear you down, tire you out, lie until you gave up.
Because to YOU what you're arguing is the rightness or wrongness of an action... while what they're doing is trying to psychologically destroy you and using the argument as an inroads to do so.
It's why they'll show up to events intended for debate and share the poem they wrote about murdering us.
Stop projecting your humanity onto these people.
There’s really only two paths you can go down, though neither is a suitable reason to continue to engage in dialogue with these people.
The first is a warning. After the assassination of Jose Calvo Sotelo in July 1936, the head of Spain’s largest Right-wing party in parliament got up and read one Leftist newspaper after another celebrating the murder and demanding that more on the Right be killed in a similar manner.
He then warned “A day will come when the violence you have leashed will be turned against you.”
For some of these people, that’s all you can really tell them. But for others, the appropriate response is one of mocking their own martyrs and saints for the explicit purpose of desecrating their Progressive religion.
This is what the Right did with George Floyd, with the transgender movement in general, and increasingly with illegals, Palestine, and Third Worldist causes that the Left has more recently latched on to.
None of this brings back debate or discourse between the two camps of course. If anything, it confirms that discourse between the Left and Right is all but dead. But the “death of discourse” that Dave has been talking about for years now doesn’t have to end in the Right just handing Leftists a perpetual advantage in the culture wars.
It just means we need to stop pretending we’re engaged in a friendly debate with these people any longer. The struggle has now moved on to something else which has not yet been fully defined. We’re in some sort of bizarre twilight that exists between consensus and collapse.
BC Benji retweeted
So, basically, 500 million Europeans expect 300 million Americans to protect them from 120 million Russians who can’t even defeat 40 million Ukrainians while those 500 million Europeans don’t even realize they are being conquered by 2 billion Muslims who claim they are being persecuted by 8 million Israelis. Is that about right?
1







