🇨🇦 Policy Hawk (@CDNPolicyHawk) header
🇨🇦 Policy Hawk (@CDNPolicyHawk) profile picture

Independent Canadian security analyst & writer. Substack: https://xitter.twitterapi.xyz/t.co/TWJ4RvfFGZ Also published by: @VanguardMag | https://xitter.twitterapi.xyz/t.co/4nHz6brCyR | https://xitter.twitterapi.xyz/t.co/IixSnKpARp | @navalassn | @DominionReview

Joined December 2022
Photo by 🇨🇦 Policy Hawk (@CDNPolicyHawk)Photo by 🇨🇦 Policy Hawk (@CDNPolicyHawk)Photo by 🇨🇦 Policy Hawk (@CDNPolicyHawk)Photo by 🇨🇦 Policy Hawk (@CDNPolicyHawk)Photo by 🇨🇦 Policy Hawk (@CDNPolicyHawk)Photo by 🇨🇦 Policy Hawk (@CDNPolicyHawk)Photo by 🇨🇦 Policy Hawk (@CDNPolicyHawk)Photo by 🇨🇦 Policy Hawk (@CDNPolicyHawk)Photo by 🇨🇦 Policy Hawk (@CDNPolicyHawk)Photo by 🇨🇦 Policy Hawk (@CDNPolicyHawk)
This is legitimately great. But limiting the demonstration to something that is indistinguishable from an e-transfer is a really funny comms fumble.
Canadians will now start being able to send and receive money in seconds. Any hour, any day, all year round. As announced in Budget 2026, Canada's Real-Time Rail starts rolling out today. Over the next year, financial institutions and payment providers across the country will come on board, reaching more than 9 in 10 Canadians. Faster, safer payments for families and businesses, on national infrastructure owned and operated here at home. That strengthens our economic sovereignty.
11
7
100
3,237
There's an enormous scale difference between what Stellantis was doing there and what Roshel does. Presumably Roshel has some plans to grow... but it's hard to believe they'll be using that facility's full capacity any time soon.
It's been officially confirmed that Stellantis has sold the Brampton assembly plant to Roshel. We will have something up soon ourselves.
14
10
1
123
3,525
Ashleigh deserves a lot of credit for continuing to press for this information. And DND deserves significant criticism for refusing to release it. I wish I was confident that this information will be available on an on-going basis, as it should be, but I suspect it won't be.
6
11
75
2,010
🇨🇦 Policy Hawk retweeted
New article from me. The Cyclone is a failure. It’s also a priceless lesson in work Canada will have to do again. Civilian designs are sometimes the best starting point for things the CAF needs. If all we get from the Cyclone is “never do that again,” how does that help us? 1/2
10
9
1
68
5,152
🇨🇦 Policy Hawk retweeted
"Another aspect to consider is that Canada can simply no longer afford to purchase the bulk of its equipment from other nations....[w]hen Canada’s defence budget was around 1% of GDP and only 13% of that miserly budget was devoted to major equipment purchases, it did not matter if nearly all of that money was spent in other countries. However, with Canada committed to spending 3.5% of its GDP on defence by 2035, with reasonable estimates putting major equipment expenditures as high as 30% of that total, the arithmetic changes. At those levels, major equipment purchases would account for 1.05% of GDP, roughly eight times the 2014 share of 0.13%. The economic headwinds created if most of that spending were to leave the country every year, with nothing of direct economic value returning, are simply unsustainable. Canada must largely rely on its own industries for major equipment purchases to achieve and sustain its military spending commitments."
Replying to @CDNPolicyHawk
The Beleaguered Cyclone, the Baby, and the Bathwater Find it here: open.substack.com/pub/policy… If you know someone who’s followed the Cyclone program, send it their way. I’d like to hear what they think Canada should take from it. 2/2
3
9
1
85
3,268
🇨🇦 Policy Hawk retweeted
This is a good article. But I think the more important question is not simply what aircraft should replace the Cyclone. It is which functions must remain aboard a crewed aircraft, which can be distributed across uncrewed systems, and which requirements disappear altogether when the force is designed differently? That is particularly consequential as Canada shifts from an expeditionary force optimized for coalition operations abroad toward one that must also provide persistent defence of its own vast territory.
Replying to @CDNPolicyHawk
The Beleaguered Cyclone, the Baby, and the Bathwater Find it here: open.substack.com/pub/policy… If you know someone who’s followed the Cyclone program, send it their way. I’d like to hear what they think Canada should take from it. 2/2
6
5
39
2,125
Curious to see what reaction this one gets. My sense is that there are a lot of people who believe buying exclusively off the shelf equipment would solve a lot of the CAF's procurement problems... and this piece pushes back pretty hard on that as a viable option.
New article from me. The Cyclone is a failure. It’s also a priceless lesson in work Canada will have to do again. Civilian designs are sometimes the best starting point for things the CAF needs. If all we get from the Cyclone is “never do that again,” how does that help us? 1/2
3
5
41
2,151
New article from me. The Cyclone is a failure. It’s also a priceless lesson in work Canada will have to do again. Civilian designs are sometimes the best starting point for things the CAF needs. If all we get from the Cyclone is “never do that again,” how does that help us? 1/2
10
9
1
68
5,152
The Beleaguered Cyclone, the Baby, and the Bathwater Find it here: open.substack.com/pub/policy… If you know someone who’s followed the Cyclone program, send it their way. I’d like to hear what they think Canada should take from it. 2/2
7
1
18
5,913
Reporters' aversion to just calling a good thing good has funny results sometimes. In this case, the gov't is taking an annoying mandatory bureaucratic process and making it automatic. And the negative included is that people still need food banks. 🤦 cbc.ca/news/business/rrsp-fo…
1
14
642
Thanks to the new tax break for artists, I am now a defence poet. Please enjoy my debut piece, The Lament of the TAPV. Love it? Support more poetry. Hate it? Sponsor my return to prose. Leave a tip and your verdict here: donate.stripe.com/bJe7sE8Iuf…
5
11
2
78
1,316
I guess my security analysis writing is now art... this will save me dozens of cents in taxes.
In Budget 2026, we’re backing the Canadian artists who tell our stories. That means if you’re a Canadian artist, you won’t pay tax on up to $45,000 of income derived from your creative work.
5
1
58
1,653
Given how much emphasis Premier Smith put on this incident not stretching Alberta's health care capacity (in response to significant reporting to the contrary), this is an interesting development.
Earlier today I approved a Request for Federal Assistance from the Government of Alberta and Acute Care Alberta for nursing support related to the ongoing treatment of 22 Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) members who were injured in the tragic fire at CFB Wainwright on October 17th.  The Canadian Armed Forces is mobilizing resources to respond to this request.  Working in partnership with the medical teams at the University of Alberta Hospital in Edmonton and Foothills Medical Centre in Calgary these additional resources will ensure that the injured soldiers continue to receive excellent care during their ongoing recovery.
3
39
1,198
Not a surprise. Still a disappointment. This is really basic information that should be public and updated at least daily after an event of this type.
OK guys, I guess we aren't getting an update on the CFB Wainwright members in a critical condition Three follow-up emails to the Department of National Defence on this have gone unanswered. We asked Premier Danielle Smith's office, who directed us to Acute Care Alberta. Acute Care Alberta directed us back to DND. The Prime Minister's Office directed us back to DND. ICYMI: we asked for this update, along with updated patient numbers, on Sunday evening -- citing conflicting information in recent stories we'd seen. DND published a statement three days later, but it didn't include this information.
2
2
31
1,083
The CAF released an update on personnel injured at Wainwright today, but it's skimpy on details. 25 remain hospitalized. That's down from 27 on October 22. Four soldiers were moved to hospitals closer to their homes. Nothing on condition or... well... anything else.
Update on personnel injured in Canadian Forces Base Wainwright incident: canada.ca/en/department-nati…
3
7
29
1,353
This is such a weird post. It's somewhat reflective. But it also shows Vance thinking in terms of a party leader, not a national leader.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
5
2
40
1,000
Looks like all the States that Canada trades most with will have Democratic governors. The top one with a Republican is Indiana, which is #9. Not an unambiguously positive development, but an interesting one.
2
7
76
1,342
For the first time in a couple years... good job America. More to do. But, good job.
3
3
75
965
Counterpoint: This matters to Canada far more than anything else they would be covering tonight.
Someone needs to remind CBC they’re the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation David Cochrane, live from Toronto, solemnly dissecting Kentucky-6 and Virginia-1 margins, the precise “magic number” of three House seats, and the Senate path through North Carolina, Ohio, and Maine like he’s calling a CNN Decision Desk. Full audition energy for a US Democrat comms job The Boomer bait is strong with this one: endless US midterm wall-to-wall coverage while actual Canadian politics gets the B-reel. At some point the red maple leaf on the set starts looking like a prop
12
58
3,313
70,173
Jamil would rather the contract go to SpaceX, I suppose.
Telesat got a $2.3B government contract. Its CEO is a personal friend of the Prime Minister. He's not on the PM's conflict screen. Last week, the Ethics Commissioner asked me to send him the details. Here they are.
1
5
84
1,433