Replying to @timperceval
The mask is definitely off. For decades, the strategy relied on keeping the occupation hidden behind "peace process" talking points.
Now the world sees the annexation maps, the ministers calling for expulsion, and the destruction of Gaza. The ideology is fully exposed.
5
This exchange from 1988 captures the core of the conflict.
The Palestinian representative acknowledges the Holocaust. The Israeli representative tells him not to "go back to history" because acknowledging that history forces a conversation about the villages that were destroyed and the Palestinians who were displaced to create the state of Israel.
A 1988 ABC News Nightline debate. Saeb Erekat, Haim Ramon, and Eliahu Ben-Elissar.
18
JERUSALEM, 1988: "DON'T TRY TO GO BACK TO HISTORY."
A televised debate on Palestine. Saeb Erekat lays out the Palestinian case for peace, but then brings up the history of Jewish persecution, Spain, Russia, the Holocaust.
"I hate Hitler more than you. I was also on his list!"
Haim Ramon鈥檚 response is the most revealing moment of the entire exchange:
"Don't try to go back to history."
Erekat brings up centuries of trauma to explain the tragedy of the Palestinians. Ramon tells him to stop looking at history, because looking at history means looking at what happened to the people who were already living in Jaffa and Haifa in 1948.
One side gets to use history as a shield. The other gets told to forget it. 馃Л
1
49
Finkelstein鈥檚 point is that we are in the final stage of a historical erasure.
If the West Bank is fully annexed and Gaza is made uninhabitable, the "question of Palestine" disappears because the land is gone.
We are fighting for the mere survival of the concept of Palestine itself.
70
"THERE IS A VERY REAL POSSIBILITY THAT PALESTINE WON'T BE THERE."
Prof. Norman Finkelstein, in an interview with Matt Kennard, explaining the ultimate goal of the current war.
He points out that Israel's strategy didn't start with just Gaza. The plan was to "solve the Gaza question," then the West Bank, then Hezbollah, then Iran. They are proceeding down that exact path right now.
His conclusion is chilling: at this present moment, the very existence of Palestine is up in the air.
This isn't a war about hostages or security buffers. The end goal is permanent erasure. The land gets taken, Gaza is made uninhabitable, and the possibility of a Palestinian state disappears before the world can stop it. 馃Л
Replying to @MarkRuffalo @PeteHegseth
The noble thingh left decades ago. A man who dismantles civilian safeguards and calls the carnage " success" isn't going to resign. He's going to fight impeachment and call it a witch hunt.
Replying to @infolibnews
"Bring down America" ? They're voting.
That's literally the more American thing a citizen can do. A rabbi calling voters a threat to the country because of their religion is exactly the kind of bigotry that gets people hurt.
Replying to @annunakkki
Sachs hits the nail on the head regarding the double standard.
The US can bomb a country illegally, but if that country defends itself, it's an act of terror. The US can occupy land, but if others do it, it's aggression.
The refusal to accept that the unipolar era is over is exactly what is making the West so dangerous.
"WE CAN DO WHAT WE WANT BECAUSE WE'RE GOOD, AND IF YOU DO THE SAME THING, YOU'RE EVIL."
Prof. Jeffrey Sachs just dismantled the entire Western foreign policy establishment in two minutes.
He calls the US and Europe "neurotic" for still living in a world of Western privilege that is already over. He calls the February 28th attack on Iran the most "senseless, reckless war imaginable," launched arbitrarily and illegally because Washington thought they could win in 12 hours.
"They're idiots, I'm sorry, the people in my government. They don't know anything."
He points out the fatal flaw: the US thinks it runs the world, but it doesn't. And when you believe you are the "good guys," every horrific action you take is justified, while the exact same action by an enemy is a war crime.
He warns that this delusion is dragging us toward a total disaster. 馃Л
63
This is the clearest admission yet.
He lists "security zones" in Syria, Lebanon, and Gaza as achievements. That is the definition of expansionism. And to protect those expansions, he claims a Palestinian state would be an Iranian proxy.
It is a perfect loop: occupy the land, claim the resistance to the occupation is a foreign threat, and use that threat to justify permanent occupation.
NETANYAHU JUST ADMITTED WHAT THE WAR IS ACTUALLY ABOUT.
In a new speech, he warns that international pressure is coming to establish a Palestinian state. He says this state would be "under the auspices of Iran" and would "destroy the State of Israel."
But look at what he lists as his "great achievements" that the world is trying to take away:
鈻笍 Security zones in Syria
鈻笍 Security zones in Lebanon
鈻笍 Control "deep in Gaza"
鈻笍 Control in the West Bank
He just admitted it. The goal was never just security. It was permanent territorial expansion and military control across multiple countries.
Now that the world is pushing back and demanding a Palestinian state, he is using Iran as the ultimate boogeyman to justify keeping the entire region under Israeli military dominance. 馃Л
NETANYAHU SMEARED THE ARABS AS "TERRORISTS." THE PRESIDENT JUST IGNORED HIM.
President Herzog just handed the task of forming the next government to opposition leader Gadi Eisenkot.
In the consultations, 67 lawmakers recommended Eisenkot. Only 46 backed Netanyahu.
After weeks of Netanyahu trying to brand Arab lawmakers as a "terrorist threat" to hold onto power, the President looked at the math and moved the mandate.
Netanyahu's era is officially on the clock. 馃Л
Replying to @arealmermaid2
Exactly. The US Constitution defines a defensive war as repelling an invasion. Since 1945, Congress hasn't formally declared war once.
Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, and now Iran were all fought on executive power, UN resolutions, or AUMFs. Calling these "lawful defensive operations" is a massive stretch of the law.
Pete Hegseth at the Pentagon: "In the two hundred and fifty years of our American Republic, no Secretary of War or Secretary of Defense has ever been impeached for carrying out lawful military operations."
Rep. Thomas Massie just filed articles of impeachment saying his "lawful operations" killed schoolchildren in Iran.
There's a first time for everything. 馃Л
Rep. Thomas Massie on Pete Hegseth: "He was very effective at killing schoolchildren in Iran."
Massie says Hegseth dismantled the Pentagon's civilian protection rules, leading directly to the Minab school strike.
"There's no fog of war on the first day... Yet they picked a school building on a school day with school kids in it, and then struck it again, and then struck it again."
One strike is a mistake. Three strikes is a choice. 馃Л
Replying to @Frankat04
Why is he not official? Because if he were formally appointed and confirmed by the Senate, he would be legally required to file financial disclosures, divest from his private equity firm (Affinity Partners), and face strict ethics oversight. By keeping him as an "informal envoy," he gets all the diplomatic power with none of the accountability.
Why him? Because Trump trusts him, and he has deep financial ties to the Gulf states (Saudi Arabia and the UAE), which makes him very effective at negotiating with them.
Was he in charge before? Yes. He operated the exact same way in Trump's first term. He was the architect of the Abraham Accords, the Gaza ceasefire, and the "waterfront property" plan. He has been running shadow diplomacy for years.
He is now pushing peace in Ukraine because the midterms changed the political math. But the reason he is doing it off the books is so nobody can audit his business deals when the war ends.
26
Replying to @xIsraelExposedx
This is how you beat the algorithm. They can shadowban an account, but they can't delete a sticker on a lamppost.
Turning the archive into physical QR codes and putting them on the streets is brilliant. It bypasses the tech censorship entirely and forces the evidence into the physical world where people have to look at it.
They can try to erase the history online, but the truth is now stuck to the pavement. Incredible work by everyone involved.
Proud of you 馃憦
Replying to @Tradin1983
You're pointing at the ultimate hypocrisy. European leaders like Weidel complain about migrants crossing their borders, but Germany and other Western powers spent decades bombing the Middle East and supporting the wars that displaced millions.
You can't destabilize an entire region through illegal wars and then act surprised when the refugees show up at your door. This is the definition of blowback.
1
25
Replying to @madlife1000
That's the crucial context. With Democrats taking Congress in January, this rogue, unconfirmed diplomatic channel closes.
They are trying to ram through a highly favorable deal for Trump's personal legacy before the new Congress can impose any actual oversight or block the sanctions relief.
33
Replying to @Dormusjessup
The ICC was built on the premise of universal justice, but in practice, it's been overwhelmingly used to prosecute African leaders while Western officials who started illegal wars are never touched. It's a court for the weak, while the strong issue the arrest warrants.
1
1
41
"NOTHING WOULD MAKE TRUMP HAPPIER." KUSHNER IS IN ABU DHABI NEGOTIATING PEACE WITH ZERO OVERSIGHT.
Kushner and Witkoff are hosting trilateral talks with Ukraine and Russia. He says they鈥檙e seeing "positive signs."
But remember who is doing the negotiating. No official title. No Senate confirmation. No financial disclosure rules.
He is the same man who pitched the Gaza ceasefire like a real estate deal while his firm made hundreds of millions from Israeli military suppliers.
When an unaccountable developer negotiates the end of a war, the real question is: who gets the reconstruction contracts? 馃Л
"IF SCHENGEN DOESN'T WORK, WE NEED TO GET OUT."
AfD leader Alice Weidel is calling for Germany to leave Europe's open-border zone, demanding the detention and deportation of those bringing "turmoil" into the country.
Schengen was the crown jewel of the EU. But as migration pressures mount, the far-right is pitching a breakup.
The map of Europe is being redrawn. 馃Л



