Truth, Liberty, Freedom, Rights, Memes, Humor, Peace matters more than ever in the world now. CBDCs are evil. Bitcoin is money. Blockchain & Crypto enthusiast.
Satoshi Heights
Joined June 2009
- Tweets194K
- Following550
- Followers63.4K
- Likes68K
Pinned Tweet
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has admitted to an affair with a Chinese businesswoman US intelligence believes was a spy, apologized to his wife of 41 years and their children for the hurt caused, and faces an independent board investigation—while the company insists no secrets or national security were compromised.
In a company-wide memo released Sunday, Huang stated: “I was unfaithful to my wife. My actions hurt her and our children. There is no excuse for what I did. I am deeply sorry.” He expressed hope the family would heal and asked for their privacy, while affirming his commitment to Nvidia and full cooperation with the probe.
The woman is Alice Huang (also known as Huang Le), an executive at Singapore-based Megaspeed, a major Nvidia customer. She is not related to Jensen Huang. US intelligence assessments, reported by the New York Times and others, concluded she was recruited by China’s Ministry of State Security to gather information on American AI chips and potentially influence Huang to advocate for fewer restrictions on advanced Nvidia processors reaching China. Surveillance reportedly identified communications involving him. China has called the claims “groundless speculation.”
Huang has been married to Lori Huang (née Mills) since 1985; they met as engineering lab partners at Oregon State University. Their two adult children, Madison and Spencer Huang, both work at Nvidia (in roles including marketing and product). No public statements from the family beyond Huang’s apology have been reported.
Nvidia’s board launched an independent investigation (overseen by independent directors and outside counsel), stating it has “no reason to believe” company secrets or US national security were compromised and expressing confidence in Huang’s leadership. He remains CEO without interruption. The episode arrives amid intense US-China competition over AI chips, congressional interest in a briefing, and Nvidia’s dominant market position.
Markets were closed when the admission broke (Sunday). Traders and commentators have flagged potential volatility in NVDA shares on the open due to governance and national-security optics, though the company has emphasized operations will not slow. Any concrete market reaction remains to be seen.
Ladies and gentleman… it’s time
BREAKING: Jim Cramer says he doesn't understand why Berkshire Hathaway took such a big "ill-advised position in Alphabet $GOOGL."
Ladies and gentlemen, it’s time.
Everyone knows why Republicans lost the midterms.
The top 4 reasons being..
1) End the damn endless wars
2) Reduce the cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Stop being Israel First
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
TRUTH IS TYRANNY IN AN EMPIRE OF LIES
COMMUNIST TYRANNY IS REARING ITS UGLY HEAD AGAIN IN FREE AMERICA
Democrats just swept the House and Senate. Within hours, the quiet part got louder: some of their loudest voices want to arrest Elon Musk, seize his factories and nationalize SpaceX.
This is not abstract policy. It is the explicit desire to seize the private company that cut the cost of reaching orbit by an order of magnitude, returned human spaceflight to American soil, and built Starlink—the system that now connects remote American communities, disaster zones, and free-speech-dependent users worldwide. SpaceX employs roughly 15,000–22,000 people directly (with rapid growth and thousands of open engineering and manufacturing roles), has created life-changing wealth for thousands of its own employees through equity, and supports a far larger web of suppliers and local economies. Tesla and related companies add well over 100,000 more direct jobs. That is the American Dream in practice: high-skill, high-pay work built by engineers who actually ship, not by committee.
Nationalizing it would replace that with the usual results of state ownership—slower iteration, political patronage, higher costs, and the quiet death of the culture that made reusable rockets routine. The same people who spent years calling Musk a threat for buying a social-media platform and reducing institutional censorship now treat successful private enterprise itself as the crime. Investigations into DOGE, contracts, and donations are already being telegraphed as the opening move; the nationalization talk from figures like Robert Reich (“lay the groundwork… Nationalize it. It should be a public corporation”) is the logical endpoint they no longer bother to hide.
Punishing the companies that deliver launch dominance, electric vehicles at scale, and open discourse does not expand opportunity. It shrinks it. It tells every engineer and founder that the reward for creating jobs and capability America actually needs is political seizure. Free speech and technological leadership are not side issues here; they are the same fight. The message after this midterm is clear to anyone watching the targets: success and independent platforms are now fair game for the new majority.
1
770
Elon Musks new fashion line
Nonetheless, look at how generic and banal day-to-day corpo fashion and cars have become for over 2 decades!!
Time for a total reset in fashion.
To quote my son, Saxon, “Why does everything today look like 2015??
The future should look like the future!”
We will make it so.
5
930
Humanity might go extinct again unless we are an interplanetary species. Elon Musk and SpaceX are putting us in that path.
First reusable rockets
First reusable boosters
Space refueling rockets
Payload costs have to be cut down 10,000x to be able to make the journey to Mars sustainable for human settlements
We are at an inflection point for SpaceX with ARR ranging between $500 billion to $1 Trillion
Revenue drivers for SpaceX being launch, connectivity and Super-intelligence
SpaceX will be the largest company in our Solar System with a truly mind boggling TAM
Launching super intelligence satellites into deep space with a mass driver on the Moon can achieve >>petawatt/year capability, which would far exceed the best case value of Earth’s economy
1
1
633
@VivekGRamaswamy is right 💯
America’s problem isn’t an IQ gap. It’s a culture that chose mediocrity.
We spent decades celebrating the prom queen over the math olympiad champ, the jock over the valedictorian, and “chilling” over grinding. Immigrant parents saw the signal and limited the cartoons and the shows that taught coasting. Their kids filled the engineering ranks. Too many American kids got the message that ordinary is fine—and ordinary loses to China.
No bill fixes that. You can’t legislate parents who treat homework like a second job or kids who stop scorning the ones who do. Quotas and H-1B tweaks paper over the gap; they don’t create the habits built in childhood.
We did this before. Sputnik wasn’t a new federal program—it was a cultural decision that technical mastery mattered more than comfort. That muscle still exists. It lives in the families who choose competitions over the mall and books over reruns.
Normalcy doesn’t win global talent races. Excellence does. Culture change is the only thing that works. The rest is noise. 🇺🇸
The reason top tech companies often hire foreign-born & first-generation engineers over “native” Americans isn’t because of an innate American IQ deficit (a lazy & wrong explanation). A key part of it comes down to the c-word: culture. Tough questions demand tough answers & if we’re really serious about fixing the problem, we have to confront the TRUTH:
Our American culture has venerated mediocrity over excellence for way too long (at least since the 90s and likely longer). That doesn’t start in college, it starts YOUNG.
A culture that celebrates the prom queen over the math olympiad champ, or the jock over the valedictorian, will not produce the best engineers.
A culture that venerates Cory from “Boy Meets World,” or Zach & Slater over Screech in “Saved by the Bell,” or ‘Stefan’ over Steve Urkel in “Family Matters,” will not produce the best engineers.
(Fact: I know *multiple* sets of immigrant parents in the 90s who actively limited how much their kids could watch those TV shows precisely because they promoted mediocrity…and their kids went on to become wildly successful STEM graduates).
More movies like Whiplash, fewer reruns of “Friends.” More math tutoring, fewer sleepovers. More weekend science competitions, fewer Saturday morning cartoons. More books, less TV. More creating, less “chillin.” More extracurriculars, less “hanging out at the mall.”
Most normal American parents look skeptically at “those kinds of parents.” More normal American kids view such “those kinds of kids” with scorn. If you grow up aspiring to normalcy, normalcy is what you will achieve.
Now close your eyes & visualize which families you knew in the 90s (or even now) who raise their kids according to one model versus the other. Be brutally honest.
“Normalcy” doesn’t cut it in a hyper-competitive global market for technical talent. And if we pretend like it does, we’ll have our asses handed to us by China.
This can be our Sputnik moment. We’ve awaken from slumber before & we can do it again. Trump’s election hopefully marks the beginning of a new golden era in America, but only if our culture fully wakes up. A culture that once again prioritizes achievement over normalcy; excellence over mediocrity; nerdiness over conformity; hard work over laziness.
That’s the work we have cut out for us, rather than wallowing in victimhood & just wishing (or legislating) alternative hiring practices into existence. I’m confident we can do it. 🇺🇸 🇺🇸
What happens if DSA sweeps the 2028 presidency elections and comes into power…
“They didn’t just take the government. They took the locks.”
Once the Democratic Socialists of America hold real power, the experiment stops being theoretical. Private property is reframed as “collective ownership.” Your house, business, and savings become public resources to be redistributed—first by decree, then by force. Food, clothing, shelter, and travel are rationed through a central system that decides what you “need.” Wealth is capped. Movement is tracked. Social media is scrubbed of “misinformation” that challenges the new order. Cash disappears into a mandatory CBDC so every transaction is approved, denied, or flagged in real time.
The DSA banners on the buildings and the “Now Under Public Administration” signs on storefronts were the opening act. What follows is the part every previous attempt at this model has delivered: empty shelves, political commissars in everyday life, and a surveillance state that treats dissent as a supply-chain problem. The gates that once protected individual rights are the first things dismantled—because those rights were the obstacle.
A republic only survives if the people still recognize what is being taken. By the time the ration cards and the digital wallet alerts become normal, the choice is already gone.
My biggest concern is that if there is a clean sweep by Democrats of the House, Senate and Presidency in 2028, they will:
1. Make DC and Puerto Rico states to gain a strong majority in the Senate.
2. Open the borders and legalize everyone living in America illegally to cement a permanent majority.
3. Increase the size of the Supreme Court to gain an immediate majority.
This would result in America becoming a permanent one-party state and the end of democracy in any meaningful sense of the word.
All that is needed to ensure this doesn’t happen is 51 Republican senators in 2029. That is why you should vote for Republican senators this election. Other reasons are irrelevant compared to this one.
The age of the single dominant machine is over
WARFARE HAS CHANGED FOREVER
For a century, warfare rewarded the exquisite: the tank that could shrug off shells, the fighter jet that owned the sky, the submarine that vanished into the deep and dictated the terms of the ocean. That model is collapsing under a simple arithmetic of cost and numbers.
A few thousand dollars of plastic, batteries, and software can now erase tens of millions of dollars of steel and human skill. The Ukraine war made this concrete: cheap FPV drones and loitering munitions destroyed or disabled thousands of tanks and armored vehicles. Russia’s armored losses ran into the thousands of main battle tanks and other vehicles, largely to systems that cost a fraction of a single round of tank ammunition. Tanks still matter for seizing and holding ground when everything else is suppressed—they are not dead. But the old idea of a massed armored fist rolling forward under its own protection is finished. Without electronic warfare, drone escorts, active protection, and careful combined arms, a tank is just a high-value target with a big signature.
Fighter jets face the same logic in the air. A single modern jet is a marvel of speed, sensors, and payload. A swarm does not need to dogfight it on equal terms. It can saturate radars, force the expenditure of expensive missiles, jam or decoy, and present so many tracks that the pilot’s decision loop breaks. High-end air forces are already shifting toward manned-unmanned teaming—loyal wingmen and collaborative combat aircraft—precisely because the pure manned platform is too expensive and too scarce to absorb attrition the way a swarm can. Jets remain essential for air superiority, long-range strike, and battle management. Alone against coordinated numbers, they become very expensive interceptors that can be exhausted.
Under the sea the same pattern is arriving. Coordinated small underwater drones and torpedo-style AUVs can approach from multiple angles, exploit the difficulties of underwater sensing and communication, and overwhelm a traditional submarine’s defenses. Surface naval drones have already forced major fleets out of ports and damaged or sunk high-value ships. Extra-large unmanned undersea vehicles and mothership concepts are moving from prototypes to funded programs. A nuclear submarine remains one of the most potent weapons on Earth, but it is no longer the uncontested apex predator of the deep when dozens of cheaper, quieter, disposable systems can be thrown at it.
This is not the end of tanks, jets, or submarines. It is the end of the era in which a handful of exquisite platforms could dominate by quality alone. Warfare is shifting toward intelligent mass: networks of sensors and effectors that can be lost, replaced, and re-coordinated faster than the adversary can kill them. The side that can generate, adapt, and sustain that mass—while protecting its remaining high-end systems—wins the exchange. The side that keeps buying fewer, more perfect machines while the other side buys thousands of good-enough ones loses the economics of the fight.
The swarm does not need to be smarter than the tank crew, the fighter pilot, or the submarine captain. It only needs to be cheaper, more numerous, and more willing to die. That is the permanent change.
⚠️ THE BATTLEFIELD EQUATION IS CHANGING.
A main battle tank represents decades of engineering, armor and firepower.
Now imagine it facing not one machine — but a coordinated swarm of small autonomous robotic systems. 🤖⚔️
This speculative footage raises a serious question about the future of warfare:
What happens when speed, autonomy and numbers begin challenging armor, size and raw firepower?
The next arms race may not be about building the biggest machine.
It may be about building the smartest network of machines.
Would autonomous swarms eventually make traditional armored warfare obsolete — or simply transform it?
👇 I want to hear your prediction.
#MilitaryTechnology #Robotics #NLP #AI #IoT #5G #Tech #Technology #innovation #Bigdata #4IR #Cybersecurity #ArtificialIntelligence #FutureWarfare
Cc: @jblefevre60 @Nicochan33 @pierrepinna @RosyCoaching @kalydeoo @Ym78200 @enilev @FrRonconii @CurieuxExplorer @Khulood_Almani @mvollmer1 @JoannMoretti @margaretsiegien @Shi4Tech @anand_narang @Eli_Krumova @HaroldSinnott @bimedotcom @EvanKirstel @Hana_ElSayyed @sallyeaves @SpirosMargaris @ipfconline1 @LaurentAlaus @Analytics_699 @Jeffkagan @AndresVilarino @efipm @FMFrancoise @MHcommunicate @Corix_JC @JolaBurnett @JeromeMONANGE @mary_gambara @drsharwood @smoothsale @sulefati7 @debashis_dutta @dinisguarda @devbhatt72 @terence_mills @BetaMoroney @mdrechsler @MarshaCollier @avrohomg @NevilleGaunt @PamMktgNut @arlenenewbigg
681