Some inconvenient facts for Canadian back-seat drivers in US healthcare policy:
1. In 2025, Canada had 5,462 cases of measles - 20x the per capita rate in the USA.
2. As a result, Canada lost measles elimination status a year ago.
3. In 2026, Canada has had 1,126 measles cases - about twice the per capita rate as USA.
#GetYourOwnHouseInOrder
gavi.org/vaccineswork/canada…
health-infobase.canada.ca/me…
The incompetent lunatic RFK should be impeached.
-2,289 measles cases in 2025
-5,200 measles cases in 2026
-11 measles deaths since last year
-North Korea, Bhutan and Sri Lanka don't have flying cars. But they are measles-free.
cnn.com/2026/11/10/health/cd…
Ahem...
bbc.com/news/articles/cgjw0x…
Fun facts about Neil.
He’s an infectious disease expert.
In London. England.
Where they have a higher per capita rate of measles than in the US.
And a lower rate of MMR vaccination.
Neil could put his time and considerable expertise to work increasing vaccination rates and bringing the measles epidemic in his neighborhood under control.
And then lecture RFK, Jr. and us Yanks on how he did it.
But there is more $$$ for Neil in engagement farming on Twitter.
And it is more fun for Neil to be a back-seat driver in US politics and healthcare policy.
Good work, Neil!
independent.co.uk/news/healt…
ukhsa-dashboard.data.gov.uk/…
Canadian hospitals also “overwhelmed.”
I was on @MooreintheAM talking about the surge in ER patient volumes in the GTA this fall.
“In effect, the VSD is among the most secretive services in the entire government, comparable to Fort Knox, the Federal Reserve, and the National Security Agency and Central Intelligence Agency. It’s the real Puzzle Palace. “
I want to make sure that you saw this.
It came out the day of the election so it might have gotten buried. It is extremely important.
VSD Is the Vault with the Secrets brownstone.org/articles/vsd-…
“Hospitals are overwhelmed”
Hospitals Are So Crowded Patients Spend 24 Hours in the E.R. Hallways
Wait times for hospital beds are getting longer, clogging up emergency rooms, and doctors say it is only getting worse
wsj.com/health/healthcare/ho…
Doctor suggests an indecent proposal with colorful language. Fortunately, the USA still has a First Amendment.
Now that we have more doctors elected to government, can we work on legislation that holds healthcare providers accountable for knowingly spreading false medical claims that put people at risk?
I’m talking about using your credentials to sell bullshit you KNOW is bullshit and leading people down a rabbit hole of harm while cashing the checks.
Wouldn’t that be fucking fantastic.
Bill Maher and Coleman Hughes finish each other's sentences for 3 minutes straight as they lay out how teachers' unions wrecked public education.
The MS NOW host thought she could sit this one out quietly. Then Maher turned and lobbed a grenade right at her.
MAHER: "The reason why they don't know that socialism didn't work... is because NOBODY taught them in school."
HUGHES: "A lot of kids go to underperforming public schools, which is our euphemism for government-funded daycare centers with occasional school-like activities."
MAHER: "I knew they weren't learning anything, but like you said, it's like a daycare center and not a good one."
HUGHES: "And I think people on the left want to blame funding because that's the easy issue. But the truth is, this school was well funded. You know, it's 50,000 per pupil at this school. The problem isn't the funding. It's that you can't fire anyone bad."
MAHER: "Yes.... The problem is the union, the teachers union, is too powerful. We've seen it in results in states where the union is less powerful, the schools do better."
HUGHES: "I call it the chalkboard mafia."
MAHER: "The problem, the unions protect bad schools and bad teachers, and the party protects the union. It's almost impossible in a lot of these cities to fire a teacher. I mean literally like you could sell drugs to a kid and it's got to be two offenses before we get—"
HUGHES: "It wasn't that long ago that the unions lobbied for a law in New York State to ban even collecting data that you would use to assess which teachers are better than others. You can't even get the data. So obviously the teachers union serves the teachers, they don't serve the students, and if you're a Democrat or any American that's serious about public school reform, you have to challenge the teachers union, period."
MAHER: "And I think in this school, where they were learning nothing with no supervision and absentee principals and teachers, I think spending 50,000 dollars per year per student, it's not money. That's what you always hear from the left. 'Oh, it's underfunded.' It's not the funding. The funding isn't the issue."
HUGHES: "No, it hasn't been for a very long time."
MAHER: "I think this is the kind of thing I will NEVER hear on MS NOW."
ALI VITALI: "I think you hear a lot of perspectives on MS NOW."
MAHER: "I don't ever hear that one."
CONTEXT: Maher and Hughes aren't making this up. On the latest Nation's Report Card, high school seniors posted the lowest reading and math scores ever recorded on the test.
And getting rid of bad teachers is nearly impossible. Federal survey data shows the average school district dismissed just 0.2 tenured teachers for poor performance in a year. That's roughly 1 in 500.
Meanwhile, students do better long-term in states where unions have less power.
A 2019 study in the American Economic Journal found that boys who went to school in states that forced districts to bargain with teachers' unions went on to earn about $2,100 LESS per year as adults compared to boys in states without those laws.
If a business failed this badly, someone would get fired. As Hughes put it: "The teachers union serves the teachers; they don't serve the students."
“Half of what you will learn in medical school is wrong” is an aphorism every medical student is told in medical school.
The year is 1956. Your mother is expecting you, and her doctor smokes through the appointment. More doctors smoke Camels than any other brand, the adverts say, and he tells her a few a day will settle her nerves and keep the baby small for an easy birth.
The year is 1960. Your first proper shoes come from a shop with an X-ray machine in the corner. You slide your feet into the slot and watch your own toe bones wriggle, green and glowing, while the assistant checks the fit. You go back every time your feet grow.
The year is 1961. Your mother is expecting your sister and the sickness is bad. The chemist has a new tablet, advertised as completely safe in pregnancy. Your sister arrives the next year alongside 10,000 other babies whose mothers took it, and some of them arrive without arms.
The year is 1964. Three sore throats, so the tonsils come out, as they do for over a million children a year on both sides of the Atlantic. Twenty beds, and the promise of ice cream. Nobody asks what the tonsils were for. They were the immune system, and the operation never did much for the throats.
The year is 1972. You are sixteen and every car on earth runs on leaded petrol. The lead comes out of the exhaust and settles on the playground, the vegetable patch and the blood of every child walking to school. The men who put it in the petrol knew what it did to a brain in the 1920s. The ban arrives in your forties.
The year is 1981. Your mother's hands have gone stiff. The doctor has a new arthritis tablet with the biggest launch the drug industry has ever mounted. Two years later it is pulled on both sides of the Atlantic, with dozens of pensioners dead whose kidneys could not clear it. She gets off lightly: the sun burns her on it, and she spends a summer behind the curtains.
The year is 1991. Your father is diabetic, and the dietitian hands him a sheet. More than half his calories are to come from carbohydrate: bread, potatoes, pasta, cereal. His sugar goes up on it, so his insulin goes up with it, and his waist follows. He does as he is told for twenty years.
The year is 1998. Your back has gone. The doctor has a new opioid, and the rep carries a letter from a medical journal saying addiction on it is under 1%. The letter is five sentences long. The company pleads guilty twice, and by the second time more than half a million Americans are dead.
The year is 2002. Your knees hurt, and the doctor has a new pill that is kinder on the stomach. You take it for two years, the same two years the maker is sitting on its own heart data. It is withdrawn with as many as 140,000 heart attacks laid at its door. Your heart was fine. The man next door's was not.
The year is 2008. Your wife has a prolapse after three children, and the surgeon fits a strip of plastic mesh. Once the tissue grows through it, it cannot come out. Australia apologises to its women in 2018, America bans it in 2019, Britain apologises in 2020. Your wife gets hers by press release.
The year is 2026. You are seventy, and the new doctor has a screen and a number for everything. The meat on your plate is a hazard. The oil in the bottle is good for your heart. The injection is for life. He is the age the first doctor was when he lit a Camel in front of your mother, and every bit as sure.
Not one of them was a rogue. Every one was the standard of care, taught to the next doctor, printed on the leaflet, and handed to a family with no way to check it.
You have spent seventy years as the experiment. The results come out after you are gone, under somebody else's name, and the chair you are sitting in is where they recruit for the next one.
Physician services is the only thing that the US government pays below market prices for. Doing our part to help balance the budget.
“Build back better” - where have we heard that before?
sciencepolitics.org/2026/10/…
Science is under a withering attack by the Trump administration. Here, my co authors and I offer key proposals to build science back better.
3
13
1,841
If you choose the "right" endpoint, you can get the clinical trial result that you want.
If "Heart block requiring permanent pacemaker" were added to the "combined primary outcome," then the alleged "benefit" of early TAVR would be wiped out.
An alternative way to frame the same results: there is no significant risk in deferring TAVR in this clinical scenario - total mortality was slightly higher in the early intervention group.
When I have "moderate aortic stenosis," it will be watchful waiting for me.
Presented at #TCT2026:
In patients with moderate aortic stenosis and high-risk features, the percentage who died or had a heart-failure event within 2 years was lower with transcatheter aortic-valve replacement than with surveillance (16.7% vs. 23.9%). Full PROGRESS trial results: nej.md/4eUv9kA
@crfheart
"Trust the science"
That a Nobel mooted institute director in a hard science field could be framed by a seeming cabal of Woke women causing not only the destruction of a leading cancer expert's life but also of the institute itself for the pettiest of motives at MIT is more horrifying than the Jason Arday episode at Cambridge.
Lysenkoism is alive and well and its new name is Wokism. The immense prestige of the Ivy League, Oxbridge and les grand ecoles attract not only the tall trees, but growing in its shadow, also the malignant creepers of envy, deceit and greed.
All those who exclaim "trust the science!" must never forget the scientists are fallible humans who work in institutions from whom ambition and folly have not been banished. The hunger for power is the Satan in the search for truth and it will lead us astray should we not consciously at whiles renew our glance at the light.
nypost.com/2026/10/18/us-new…
How is it possible that the strange, neurodivergent dipsy-doodle that we all saw in this film, peddling only a magical black box that no one was allowed to see inside, could have executed such a complex, multidimensional business fraud over so many years with only a single co-conspirator?
There must be more to this story…
Same with hundreds of "internet .com" companies in the 1990s that had no revenue and no profits selling shares on public exchanges for absurd prices. Almost all went bankrupted after the 2000 bust.
Did anyone go to prison?
Imagine how foolish and gullible you would have to be to invest millions of dollars in a 21-year old college dropout claiming to have a magic little black box that can accurately run thousands of complex biochemical medical tests on a drop of blood at cost of pennies each?
Suppose instead she had been selling magic beans? Or oil lamps you could rub to gain three wishes? Or shares in the Brooklyn Bridge?
If wealthy private investors had been dumb enough to invest in these, would people still believe that it is Elizabeth Holmes who belongs in prison? Or rather her investors for being criminally stupid? Or Theranos’s board of trustees for being a pack of dunces who enabled the scam?
Saw this yesterday I found it to be a very clever and entertaining film, well-worth seeing. Interesting insights into truth, deception, image, media, and film. It has no answers but forces the viewer to ask interesting questions. What do words mean? Can I trust anyone? How much am I lying to myself?
The film has also put me squarely in the #FreeElizabethHolmes camp. She is a scammer and a pathological liar. But the world is full of them. “Fake it ‘til you make it” culture abounds in entrepreneurship. How many biotech startups promise their investors that they will cure cancer or a rare disease? Almost all fall far short, and a few still manage to make a buck. All she did was deceive a few wealthy old men and reporters who were beguiled by her persona and failed to perform due diligence. Perhaps her real crime was making them look foolish. The law almost always treats such cases as private matters to be adjudicated in civil courts. How many other entrepreneurs are sent to prison for overpromising and underdelivering?
In 2008, bankers and rating agencies defrauded the US public out of trillions of dollars in the systemic fraud in mortgage-backed securities. No one went to prison. They were all given bailouts and amnesty. Why lock up a small-time huckster who only fooled a few rich private investors?
It serves no purpose to keep her in a minimum-security camp any longer. She is no threat to anyone. She has done over 3 years already. Let her serve the rest of the sentence at home with her kids. Wear an ankle monitor, do a few thousand hours of community service, and take advantage of her new round of celebrity to make money and pay the restitution she owes. Seems like the right thing to do.
“You Can See Everything” is on track to become one of the highest-grossing documentaries of all time. Here are four takeaways from its surprise success:
1) Restraint bolstered demand: A24 initially released the film in 855 theaters, expanding its footprint as word of mouth grew.
2) Secrecy dialed up anticipation: Nobody knew the Nathan Fielder doc existed until its surprise world premiere at the Telluride Film Festival in early September (nothing short of a miracle in Hollywood).
3) Word-of-mouth elevated ticket sales in the movie’s second weekend: 90% of initial ticket buyers said they would “definitely recommend” the film, while 80% said it was “even better than expected.”
4) Younger audiences are all in on A24: Roughly 70% of opening weekend ticket buyers were under 35; this year’s lineup of “The Drama,” “Backrooms” and “Primetime” also scored big among Gen Zers.
wp.me/pc8uak-1lI2b7
Magic shots
Twenty-one studies meta-analysis. Vaccination against herpes zoster was associated with a reduced risk of any dementia (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.69–0.83) & Alzheimer’s disease (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.44–0.64). Influenza vaccination was linked to a reduction in dementia risk (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77–0.99), as was pneumococcal vaccination (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.47–0.87) for Alzheimer’s disease. Tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis (Tdap) vaccination was also associated with a significant reduction for any dementia (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.54–0.83). Adult vaccination staves off dementia. Run..do not walk..to get vaccinated.
academic.oup.com/ageing/arti…





























