The Climate Crisis is fuelling disease outbreaks.
The Climate Crisis is driving higher rates of heart and lung disease.
The Climate Crisis is driving higher rates of cancer and asthma.
The Climate Crisis is making healthy diets less affordable.
I call on leaders ahead of #COP31 to put people's health at the centre of negotiations. @WHO recommendations are here: bit.ly/4A8LPgm
Nov 8, 2026 · 12:08 PM UTC
Sitch the wind turbines off and you get lower global temperature and less droughts
Switch the wind turbines off and you get less co2 level in higher athmosphere
Switch the wind turbines off and you get less tornados, floods and hail
Switch the wind turbines off and you get less birds and bats killed
Build less wind turbines and you destroy less nature
6
83
Without getting into the mass psychological manipulation that is the goal behind the claim that the rise in cancer, heart disease, and epidemics is due to the “climate crisis,” here is my response:
xitter-newx.xyz-mikolabs.workers.dev/ChGefaell/status/21195…
According to BloombergNEF data, global investment in the energy transition (public and private) has totaled around $16 trillion since 2004, all of it financed by taxpayers and consumers.
What effect has had this on flattening the curves of CO₂ and temperature? Not a single part per million of CO₂, not even one-hundredth of a Celsius degree. Quite the opposite: the steepness of the curves has increased.
The only thing these burdens have achieved is to slow economic growth, increase energy costs, and cause millions of jobs and industries to move to... China.
Isn't any politician, “environmentalist,” UN or WHO official going to be held accountable to anyone?
What else do you want us citizens to do? Pay even more taxes and fees on top of the 50%–60% we already pay? Pay even higher prices for energy and goods? Or perhaps burn ourselves alive in the town square as an expiatory offering to Pachamama?
You’re insane.
Climate change makes all food more available, especially healthier food. Https://xitter-newx.xyz-mikolabs.workers.dev/aaronshem/stat…
C3 plants, which we would want to switch to for health reasons anyway, benefit even more than grains from warming and CO2. Once basic caloric food security is established, people are able to switch to producing and consuming more nutritious foods. We can aggregate nutrients by feeding ruminants, which also boosts bioavailability. We also can shift to more fermented foods, which, again, we should be doing anyway. More red meat, fish, vegetables, fruits, nuts, etc., less grains.
The main factors in nutrition content are what we choose to grow/eat, breeding, and availability in soil.
Ultimately, once productivity is high enough, bad nutrition is entirely about people making bad choices.
It’s funny how when you point out how beneficial climate change and CO2 are and how much they boost productivity, the Oompa-Loompa’s become worried about carbs for the first time in their lives.
As productivity increases, people are able to switch to producing/consuming more nutritious crops. Suggesting a small change in nutrient to carbohydrate ratio as a reason to keep people poor is reprehensible.
1
29
