Cardinal Ratzinger in 2004 speaking officially as Pope St. John Paul II’s chief doctrinal officer. This remains the only position on capital punishment consistent with scripture, the Fathers and Doctors of the Church, and papal teaching up to Benedict XVI. ewtn.com/catholicism/library…

Oct 1, 2025 · 2:52 PM UTC

61
451
45
1,968
91,469
RelevantRecentLikes
Great. And he also explicitly said, in the passage I quoted, that Catholics were free to disagree with him. That's the relevant point.
2
63
1,028
Please, give it up. You can't just say, "I'm stopping with this Pope."
2
2
1,209
Please, give it up. You can't just say "I'm ignoring all the earlier popes."
1
1
48
1,080
1/17 🧵 There’s controversy swirling around the Pope’s recent comments: can someone be “pro-life” if they oppose abortion but support the death penalty? Or if they are harsh toward immigrants? Many are outraged. Let’s slow down and look at what this really means.
1
2
659
The Church teaches, in light of the Gospel, that the death penalty is inadmissible. Cope.
2
164
And, also, the natural light of reason.
2
381
One would think Pope Leo was running for political office with that answer instead of leading the Catholic Church. Pathetic.
1
22
437
I know pro-life Catholic servicemen who used these words to comfort them as they were called into a war that St. John Paul II declared was not morally justified. Catholic military chaplains were doing overtime to assure the soldiers they could follow orders.
15
1,348
Donum Veritatis 23 and Lumen Gentium 25 require religious submission of will and intellect to non-definitive papal teaching. In 2018 the Pope approved CCC 2267. It teaches “the death penalty is inadmissible” and directs the Church to work for abolition. This is ordinary papal magisterium and it binds. Ratzinger’s 2004 note allowed legitimate diversity on applying the death penalty before the 2018 judgment. Later development narrows that space. Donum Veritatis 30 to 31 rejects public dissent and instructs private, respectful handling of difficulties. Evangelium Vitae 62 teaches the condemnation of abortion in definitive terms. Treating pro–death-penalty as a protected viewpoint against CCC 2267 conflicts with the current magisterium.
3
13
1,055
As the kids would say, that one was a “Banger”
8
852
His comments were always clear and objective, never confusing or misleading. Wish Leo XIV would study Leo XIII, and Ratzinger/Benedict XVI
5
282
Yes but don't forget-Pope Benedict called for the abolition of capital punishment as well. I would respect your opinion if you said: JPII was right AND capital punishment Has to go.
4
5
1,198
What else is “morally inadmissible” but not “inherently sinful”? 🤔
3
4
1,461
Paragraphs 5&6 are also very pointed about politicians who publicly espoused abortion and euthanasia, and how they are to be counseled and communion withheld if they persist in public support of those policies.
4
772
Yes, I don't see how the Holy Father can "generally" comment that 1 million per year (USA only) abortion of innocents has the same moral weight as the execution of a very few criminals (as the Church has previously accepted capital punishment).
3
523
When Benedict was pope I was enthusiastic in promoting others to catholism. Since then,....not so much...
2
407
Abortion is the premeditated murder of an innocent child, and yet no one is calling for the death penalty for women who have an abortion (though this would have been a capital offense in the days of Aquinas). Why the inconsistency if not for changed conditions?
1
298
There are many reasons why today’s left-politicized clergy ignores this teaching and none of them are good.
2
234
thank you for this
1
49
Clear thinking in an age of mental midgets. You are doing great work Mr. Feser; keep it up. I notice almost all the objections are about choosing sides and don't offer any intellectual counter argument at all.
1
25
A perfect statement.
1
30
Wow, I was unaware; thanks for posting this!
1
89
This is very helpful, thankyou 🙏🏼
1
50
It seems there exists an ‘increasing awareness’ that the state can no longer reasonably claim recourse to the death penalty yet the same Catechism of the Catholic Church provides for in #2265 that a “Legitimate defense can be not only a right but a grave duty for one who is responsible for the lives of others. The defense of the common good requires that an unjust aggressor be rendered unable to cause harm. For this reason, those who legitimately hold authority also have the right to use arms to repel aggressors against the civil community entrusted to their responsibility.” The assumptions here are rooted in a supposed technocratic progress that is capable of stopping violent deadly offenders before killing again….
1
375
Nothing he said goes against anything Pope Francis has done. It is shameful for Catholics to put one Pope against another.
2
1
317
"But muh seamless garment theory"
1
154