Kate Maltby (@KateMaltby) header
Kate Maltby (@KateMaltby) profile picture

Columnist: news @theipaper | theatre @thestage @Prospect_UK Co-Chair @londoncritics (drama) Dep Chair @IndexCensorship Research on Elizabeth I @JesusCollegeCam

Mainly on the other place now.
Joined August 2008
Photo by Kate Maltby (@KateMaltby)Photo by Kate Maltby (@KateMaltby)Photo by Kate Maltby (@KateMaltby)Photo by Kate Maltby (@KateMaltby)Photo by Kate Maltby (@KateMaltby)Photo by Kate Maltby (@KateMaltby)Photo by Kate Maltby (@KateMaltby)Photo by Kate Maltby (@KateMaltby)Photo by Kate Maltby (@KateMaltby)Photo by Kate Maltby (@KateMaltby)
Kate Maltby retweeted
Replying to @centreWJ
@centreWJ have secured yet another groundbreaking victory. This time, on behalf of the late Eleanor de Freitas and her loving, tenacious parents, Miranda and David. The UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) has found that the UK violated the rights of Eleanor de Freitas who took her own life after being prosecuted for allegedly making a false rape accusation. In a landmark decision and the first ever decision by CEDAW against the UK under its optional protocol, the Committee has found in favour of the case brought by Centre for Women’s Justice on behalf of Eleanor’s father. It recommends reform of the law to ensure effective safeguards are in place to help protect women from retaliation and revictimisation by those they accuse of rape. A summary of the facts of the case and decision is set out in the Committee’s press release. The committee recommends that the UK amends its legislative framework to prevent the use of private prosecutions in such cases. David de Freitas, father of Eleanor, stated: "For the last twelve years, ever since Eleanor felt that the only option for her was to take her own life, we have felt that the Criminal Justice System in the UK was not interested in any justice or accountability for Eleanor, nor the detrimental effect that their actions would have on those women who need to report serious sexual assault. Finally, an international body of the United Nations, which specialises in the rights of all women, has listened, examined my complaint comprehensively and agreed with what we have been saying all along. I want to make sure that what happened to Eleanor is never, never repeated." Miranda de Freitas, Ellie’s mother, stated: "My Darling Daughter’s devastatingly tragic death in April 2014 should never have been allowed to happen. Ellie was beautiful, kind, incredibly intelligent and hugely loved. She had a bright future ahead of her until she felt absolutely cornered by unjust litigation. "The last twelve years have been a living hell for us and for our family who adored Ellie and will forever feel her enormously tragic loss. Ellie was the centre of our universe. This should never be allowed to happen again. This decision brings some kind of justice though crushingly far too late for us." Harriet Wistrich, CEO of Centre for Women’s Justice and solicitor for the de Freitas family since 2014, stated: “This has been a very long and hard battle for justice against a prosecution system that refused to be held accountable and a man whose sense of entitlement overrode any compassion or empathy for grieving parents. As the finding from CEDAW sets out in detail, every avenue for justice and accountability was pursued with dignity by the family but their efforts met by resistance at each step. We call on the UK government and Crown Prosecution Service to implement the recommendations for reform and reparation made by the Committee.” David de Freitas added: “I call on this government to bring in Eleanor's Law which would prevent future private prosecutions being brought against complainants of rape or other forms of sexual and gender-based violence. “Eleanor's Law would stop all private prosecutions of those who report rape or serious sexual offences. It would allow the Crown Prosecution Service to mount such prosecutions only with the Attorney General’s consent and with appropriate safeguards in place including that the statutory right to life-long anonymity for rape complainants is to remain intact until conviction with all avenues of appeal having been exhausted.” Alexander Economou is a sadistic monster. After Eleanor took her own life, David spoke out against the CPS. Economou then sued this grieving father for defamation. He lost, having put the family through further hell. He has since threatened to sue anyone who speaks of anything remotely related to Eleanor and the tragedy. He is, in my view, one of the worst humans alive. 5rb.com/alexander-economou-v…
5
19
1
83
5,735
I haven't been on this site for a bit. But I haven't seen anyone share the photo the New Statesman staff staged in 2013 of Russell Brand as Christ, and themselves as his disciples. It seems to have been scrubbed from the web. It made me angry then and it makes me angry now.
164
1,264
144
4,461
451,306
And as a follower has pointed out, this instance of serious sexual harassment on set had been reported just months earlier. (“‘It was just a bit of fun’, a source said.”) tabloid-watch.blogspot.com/2…
4
24
1
259
24,506
(Context for the 2013 tweet about the GQ Awards: GQ was seen as close to Cameron’s Tories and had given George Osborne a prize the previous year. An on-stage Brand insulted them & GQ’s corporate sponsors Hugo Boss, whom he called Nazis. Labour Twitter went wild. Hence my tweet.)
4
19
164
17,780
Kate Maltby retweeted
You might have seen clips of Rachel Zegler appearing on the balcony of the London Palladium as a bleach-blonde Eva Perón, writes @KateMaltby. But is the show any good? prospectmagazine.co.uk/cultu…
1
1
1
2,488
"We guard our sanity by recognising our powerlessness as individuals. But we owe it to history to bear witness to our times." I agree with every word of this brilliant column by @KateMaltby: inews.co.uk/opinion/youre-no…
1
4
1
4
2,082
On the detention and potential deportation of Mahmoud Khalil:
39
76
11
207
43,941
Kate Maltby retweeted
The stories of Oedipus, Elektra and their ilk are oh-so-relevant today—provided that new productions do them justice, writes @KateMaltby. prospectmagazine.co.uk/cultu…
2
1
2,030
Kate Maltby retweeted
Then we get to my investigation, published by the Sunday Times Magazine a year before the Charlene Downes one, in September 2007, four years before my esteemed colleague Andrew Norfolk's first piece was published in the Times, 20011.
2
19
3
417
27,620
Kate Maltby retweeted
THREAD Hi @GoodwinMJ, I read your lastest Substack on how, according to you, 'the media class did not touch this issue AT ALL until the year 2011.' xitter.twitterapi.xyz/GoodwinMJ/status/18762…
69
324
53
1,477
677,339
I don't think Nigel Farage should be interviewed about violence against women and girls without mentioning the Reform MP who was jailed for physically abusing his partner
139
185
23
1,186
65,276
Kate Maltby retweeted
My heart is warmed by the number of men (rapists, sexual harassers, blatant misogynists) who now seem to have seen the light and are passionately concerned about the endemic rape and abuse of girls by pimping gangs.
100
146
17
1,458
58,853
Kate Maltby retweeted
"England’s cricketers are being asked to normalise a regime that treats women as livestock" My @theipaper column this week is on the moral imperative for England cricketers to boycott Afghanistan. All credit to @VictoriaPeckham & @DalgetySusan for leading on this.
16
165
4
744
19,656
"England’s cricketers are being asked to normalise a regime that treats women as livestock" My @theipaper column this week is on the moral imperative for England cricketers to boycott Afghanistan. All credit to @VictoriaPeckham & @DalgetySusan for leading on this.
16
165
4
744
19,656
And as I make clear in the piece, I'm pretty surprised by the attitude shown to Afghanistan by Peter Hain, who led the campaign to boycott South African cricket in 1970.
1
7
49
1,532
Hain has yet to comment on this latest fixture. An intervention from him would be welcome. But back in 1970, he insisted that a nation should only be welcomed to international fixtures if it allowed all its people, no matter their race, to play cricket. Perhaps he meant only men.
2
22
1
77
2,364