Leaflit 🍃 Angel's Sword

OUR GAME JUST DROPPED!

Tbh developing games with AI is so liberating. No shareholders, no investors, no corporate bureaucracy, no deadlines or timelines, no marketing team, no team drama… -Pure design- I can make any mechanics I want, say fuck all the normal conventions and the rules. No “oh that mechanic would take too many engineering hours”. No “oh that character isn’t unique enough” no “oh we need to think about monetization to pay for the overhead and investors” It’s only design vision and it feels sooooo good. It’s like a reset back to the old days of making games just for the hell of it.

Reached an Alpha build of a game I've been working on. I really liked games like this that are a mix of Moba and Fighting Games. We ran a full online server playtest and the players got really addicted and played for over 5 hours straight. Angel's Sword Rumble Alpha Test Footage:

It's finally here! The long awaited FULL ED02 is done! Pixel Memories by @nubiahistoria and @mitakarin I wanna thank @aidenguoai and @PocketScreenAI from @Atelier452 for his amazing work. This project means a lot to me since it's been my dream since I was a kid to have something of my own to share with my friends, and after years of hard work, I finally have the Angel Sword TTRPG and what it looks to be a potential sneak peek of what an anime of it would look like. Thanks to them and you guys my dreams are no longer dreams and are becoming a reality! Also I have a special surprise on stream today! ^^

Ate 2.5 whole raw garlic bulbs for my birthday meal (did it today cause tomorrow is Monday) Here’s to hoping I don’t get food poisoning again! Ehehehe

You can just do things now. You’re not sitting around doing nothing are you? Show me what you’re making with AI.

This would be the best collab ever...

Lmao true.

Imagine your politics being disgust based, so much so you go full on identity politics. You’re woke as fuck Quango. Lol These are the same people that will tell Scott Presler to get out for “being a faggot” when he’s the only reason Trump even won in 24. Same people that will say to send Thomas Sowell back to Africa. You and the hardcore leftists are two sides of the same ugly ass intersectionality coin. The horseshoe is fucking real.

Yep.

Omg so many mushrooms. Guys this is one of my favorite vtubers Holymoly.

Uh oh...

This is my favorite ramen place in the whole world. I’ve been to the Asahikawa honten and tbh the American ones taste pretty much the same. Give it a try I recommend the shio toroniku.

omg

Oh… so that’s why…

Heh

Amazing

I’m an antisocial nerd, so I’m bad at communicating. I asked AI to help clean up my flow of consciousness to be more easily understandable for everyone. This is the last thing I’ll say on the Ember situation… sorry it is long, you don’t have to read it: The old internet was built for this. Social circles, MMOs, avatars, and handles let people be themselves or be something else entirely. You could be a different gender, a different species, a completely invented person, and the space treated that as normal rather than a problem to solve. For a lot of nerds, that was the point. The character was the version of you that existed there. You didn’t owe anyone a tour of the body sitting at the keyboard just because they decided they liked talking to you. Ember said “I’m a woman” and “I’m not a man.” In my rule set, that was still the character. The whole point of kayfabe is that the persona speaks as the persona. If the character is a woman, the character says she’s a woman. That doesn’t automatically turn into a claim that the person behind the account is biologically female, any more than a male VTuber playing a catgirl is claiming to be a cat. I don’t have a problem with Ember keeping the female character. Online, the persona is the person you’re dealing with. The avatar, the voice, the consistent presentation—that’s the identity that exists in the space. Other creators invited that character into chats and talked to the character. I don’t think that created a debt for Ember to exit the character and hand over real-world information just because people wanted to be friends. No one has shown proof of coercion or Ember pushing for sexual stuff beyond basic banter. It was ordinary chatting under the assumption created by the kayfabe. From the older internet rule I use, you aren’t owed someone’s offline body just because they presented their persona to you. Treating the later discovery as proof they should have confessed earlier feels entitled to me. They invited the avatar. The avatar showed up. The rest was optional. This only looks like a clear case of deception if you already start from the position that the physical person must override the character once the conversation is personal, or that anything the character says about being a woman is a literal claim about the operator’s body. I don’t start from that position. It’s a different standard for what an online identity is allowed to be, not a shared rule that one side is simply failing. The online person shared with you about their real self if they wanted. I understand why they’re upset though. From their culture , they entered those chats under a working assumption that the presented sex matched the real one, shared things they say they wouldn’t have shared otherwise, and later treated the mismatch as a broken premise. That feels like a violation if you believe the physicality stays relevant in private online relationships. I get that reaction. I just don’t share the rule that makes the offline details something other people were entitled to in the first place. This is why I don’t understand it myself outside of emulation.