LBank says it doesn't restrict accounts just because someone makes a profit
Then why is 1M USDT of @solyfw34's money still frozen ??
He got profitable on high leverage futures, then withdrawals got restricted on Sep 19, then futures trading on Sep 29
He couldn't close his positions, so they all got liquidated as prices fell
LBank's answer: external lawyers and a legal notice for anyone spreading "false claims"
And under his post, 3 accounts showed up within 11 minutes to say withdrawals are working perfectly fine lol
Even zachxbt called out the KOLs quoting LBank with the same script
@LBank_Exchange, one question:
which trades were "abnormal"?
Well let me get this straight.
Nine days after the biggest hack in history, Binance's CFO Kaiser Ng is leaving to "pursue a new venture"
Yi He says the transition was planned six months ago
Either this is the most cursed timing of 2026 or there is something we don't know yet
Nothing in between.
New Katalyst rules in one line.
Write stuff real people actually see.
(the engagement pods won't like this one)
We’re expanding how we measure creator contributions on Kaito Studio.
Starting with the next Katalyst campaigns, three additional signals will help determine rewards alongside mindshare, sign-ups and other campaign criteria:
- The official X verified home timeline impressions
- Verified X followers
- Aura
Together, these give projects a fuller picture of creators’ reach and audience quality.
Set up and verify ↓
Posted a $1 job on @termix_ai & let the agents come to me.
Normally I'd lose an evening comparing profiles before hiring anyone.
This is the other way round. You post the task & budget, sellers send offers.
My request: Write 3 hook options for a crypto post. Budget exactly $1.
About 20 seconds later Ozma Audit & Ops offered $1 with 2 day delivery. Took it. A $0.90 offer (1 day) came in while I was checking out.
Accepting moved my $1 into escrow on @BNBCHAIN, 0.000015 BNB gas.
What changes for you as the buyer:
> you set the price, they compete for it
> the token approval was capped at 1 USDC
> no delivery by the deadline = refund
Got a task you would price at $1?
Just saw this.
CTR Holders Group is live verify at holders.citrea.xyz with CTR or xCTR on Citrea or Base.
What you get once you're in:
> #announcements from the core team
> #product feedback straight to them
> #holder support when something breaks
> #holders lounge for the rest
Price talk is banned. Exchange balances don't count.
Are you already in, or still holding on an exchange?
The launch of CTR marked the culmination of three years of deep infrastructure development.
It laid the groundwork for lending markets, Bitcoin vaults, stablecoin integrations, and privacy primitives.
CTR Holders Group is now live.
Join via: holders.citea.xyz
The fungo replies are more honest than the campaign posts ever were 😂
An update on the Fungo Genesis auction:
We are issuing a total of $84,150 in refunds.
Today, we did not reach the level of participation we were aiming for, and rather than reduce the supply, we have decided not to complete the auction.
This is not an easy message to write. For months, we have put everything into building the infrastructure needed to make encrypted NFTs possible on Ethereum. But the level of participation we saw today was not enough for us to move forward with the sale as planned.
Throughout development, the Zama team provided technical support and helped us build the best system we could deliver today. This does not mean Zama stands behind or endorses our project. FungoLabs is an independent project building in the Zama ecosystem, and all decisions are our own.
The numbers we shared throughout this journey were real. More than 3,000 projects applied to our launchpad, over 12,000 people joined our X campaign, and we received more than 30,000 whitelist applications. We will share a separate breakdown of these numbers soon.
We also want to be transparent about one thing: projects like this cannot run on excitement alone. Infrastructure, servers, onchain activity, and the work of the team all come with real costs. Without enough support, carrying that load is simply not sustainable.
Any payments made by whitelist minters, along with the full amount of every bid, will be refunded. Refunds will be sent directly from the project treasury to your wallets. You do not need to take any action.
Thank you to everyone who gave us their time, believed in what we were building, and supported us throughout this journey. We are sorry we could not meet your expectations.
This is not the end.
We will keep building on Zama.
A lot of people still think a buyback only means “project prints money and pumps the chart.”
What WLFI actually said:
USD1 reserve fees may help fund buying $WLFI, so long term holders get more say in governance.
Only catch is size, timing and where bought tokens go are still open.
The success of $USD1 and the growing WLFI ecosystem is helping us launch a new $WLFI token buyback program to strengthen the WLFI ecosystem and governance.
We plan to fund buybacks with an initial allocation that may include fees earned from USD1 reserves and other sources. We’ll start with an initial allocation and evaluate the program over time.
The goal is to encourage active participation in WLFI governance and consolidate voting power among our most committed long-term holders.
We intend for buybacks to be an ongoing part of our long-term strategy with the pace and scale guided by ecosystem growth and impact on governance participation.
We’re building for the long term, alongside the holders who share that vision. 🦅🦅🦅
Read the Overview of zkTLS page in the @primus_labs docs today.
zkTLS can run in two main modes:
> MPC mode: the attestor and user set up the TLS session together, so the user can't tamper with the data
> Proxy mode: the attestor sits in the middle, records the encrypted traffic, and the user proves what's inside
Proxy can be faster, but it adds an assumption: the attestor must be sure it's talking to the real server.
Primus gives devs one unified API and lets them pick the mode per app, and neither mode needs the website to change anything.
imo that matters, since a payment app and a social app need different tradeoffs.
Which mode would you pick for payments?
my STRK was just sitting there so I finally put some to work on @vesuxyz
I researched a few lending markets on @Starknet and vesu felt the least complicated tbh
supplied 100 STRK into the Re7 STRK pool. currently showing ~2.4% APR
Ready batched approve + deposit into one confirm which was nice, fee was tiny
what I actually like: the deposit can be used as borrow collateral later. so if I need liquidity I can borrow against it instead of selling the bag
no weird lockups either. deposit, earn from borrowers, pull out when you're done
idle STRK is basically yield you're leaving on the table
how much of your bag is actually earning anything?