This man is a grifter. He raises money to fund his lifestyle. It’s insane anyone sends him cash.
Powerful men use the law to intimidate women they’ve abused into silence.
But it’s time to flip the fear. Help us to fund cases that turn the tables on these men, empower women to speak out – and get justice:
goodlaw.social/plpq
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Jolyon Maugham, the director of the GLP, has a history of harassing women that campaign for sex based rights.
This includes Sarah Phillimore who has had to take legal action against him. crowdjustice.com/case/protectio…
And recently he made derogatory remarks about the appearance and age of Barbara Rich. x.com/barbararich_la…
8
216
We should question why Brand’s criminal behaviour was accepted (and covered up) until he broke ranks with the left.
It’s not that he was prosecuted that is shocking- it’s what the intervening 20 years tells us about British criminal “justice” that’s more illuminating.
"The Left must reflect on its relationship with Russell Brand
The comedian’s sexual depravity and misogyny were part of his public persona for decades
The Guardian and New Statesman lionised Brand as a political seer"
Telegraph
archive.today/LQV01
82
“I think a big part of the problem is that much of the public still haven’t twigged that the LGB has nothing to do with the QTIA+.”
Correct.
I can’t think of a single parent I know - even v.religious ones - who have not accepted their child coming out as gay.
That is not to say homophobia does not exist. But where it does, we already have laws to deal with it. If a parent was telling their child they were going to ‘burn in hell’ for being gay … we already have laws to deal with that.
But this bill is not about ‘protecting’ the LGB - it’s about criminalising anyone who questions the TQIA+ i.e. gender identities.
And you have to ask yourself what kind of people would be trying to push through a law that makes it easier for children and vulnerable young people experiencing mental distress to become estranged from the people who love them most.
I think a big part of the problem is that much of the public still haven’t twigged that the LGB has nothing to do with the QTIA+.
Once you understand that, the danger of this bill is immediately apparent. While you’re still in ‘be kind’ mode - not so much.
This story has Martin Bryant overtones.
Sometimes mass-shooters are deranged psychiatric basket cases without political motivation.
The killing of the family before taking to the streets is a hallmark of these cases.
'No evidence' Polish killer was far-Right, prosecutors admit as it is revealed he executed parents and sister with two shots to the head each as they slept… and even killed their two cats trib.al/m1mkNm5
1
9
320
There is an entire army of accounts with anime pfps only pedophiles would choose, and “she/her” in their bio arguing that girls should have to compete against boys in sport because “trans”.
Their arguments all being debunked rubbish, scaremongering and infuriating rhetorical illogic circa 2015.
A former worthy publication turned work mess. Good riddance.
Today, after 31 years, we are saddened to announce that Salon is ceasing publication. It has been an extraordinary privilege. salon.com/2026/11/05/goodbye…
98
If you needed more evidence that the @Greens have devolved into an Islamic-communist hellscape.
He only cared to congratulate one US candidate- who isn’t a Green. 🤔
@stonewalluk (who have me blocked) are a sham of an organisation and should disband.
A lot of us were very willing to have a debate without heat, @stonewalluk, and the reason that never happened wasn't because gender critical feminists didn't want one.
While we were trying to get you to listen to our concerns, your former CEO was telling a BBC boss that gay people not wanting to include the opposite sex in their dating pool was 'sexual racism'. While we were pointing out the homophobia inherent in gender ideology, Stonewall ambassador Alex Drummond (a bearded, heterosexual man who'd had no surgery and taken no cross-sex hormones but liked wearing skirts), was going into schools to talk to students about his 'lesbian' identity. @BluskyeAllison, who actually is a lesbian, was subject to unlawful discrimination at her place of work for tweeting: ‘Stonewall recently hired Morgan Page, a male bodied person who ran workshops with the sole aim of coaching heterosexual men who identify as lesbians on how they can coerce young lesbians into having sex with them. Page called [it] “overcoming the cotton ceiling”.’
When the UK Supreme Court upheld women's right to single sex spaces, you issued a statement expressing your unhappiness about the ruling. In her report on your unhappy influence at the University of Essex, you were found by barrister @akuareindorf to have misrepresented the law as it related to women's rights: '[Stonewall have] stated the law as Stonewall would prefer it to be, rather than the law as it is’.
In 2018, you publicly advised schools to shred a research pack saying there were risks to puberty blockers, in spite of the fact that you aren't a medical charity and that there was already credible evidence that puberty blockers are neither irreversible nor harm-free. Meanwhile you produced your own educational packs, recommending a children's book, for ages 5-9, in which the parent 'is neither a man, nor a woman – they’re non-binary.' In July 2022, Stonewall sent out a tweet that read ‘Research suggests that children as young as two recognise their trans identity'.
@thetimes has reported how you've sought to control the language used by NHS trusts and government on their social-media accounts. Organisations would get points from you for replacing commonly understood words with ideologically approved terms, eg, 'birthing parent' instead of 'mother'. thetimes.com/uk/society/arti…
In short, you took a maximalist position on gender identity ideology, which you attempted to enforce by diktat. You refused to acknowledge that you'd hitched your wagon to a cause that, unlike civil rights, gay rights or women's rights, sought to strip rights from others. You sought to curtail everyone's right to freedom of speech and belief by controlling what it was permissible to think and say, through the management and political class. You have argued against women's and girl's rights to their own spaces, their sports and to assemble without men. Your former CEO tried to shame gay women/men into dating the opposite sex if the latter claimed to be female/male.
Your mantra was 'no debate' because, like all totalitarians, you preferred slogans, bullying and infiltration of powerful institutions to talking to opponents. You appear to have had no concern for the lowly people your ideology was harming: gender confused kids, female rape victims, female prisoners, regular people hounded and investigated at their places of work for refusing to accept the new mandates on sex and gender issued from on high.
Your 'activism' has been a disaster for those trans-identified people who really do just want to get on with their lives in peace. You have besmirched the name of an organisation many of us were once proud to donate to, the charity that was partly responsible for securing the legal right of gay people to marry, which a lot of us thought would never happen in our lifetimes. The milquetoast words quoted below do not erase a decade of gender activism that has been disastrous not only for individuals but for society as a whole.
There was once a debate to be had, but until you acknowledge the direct harm you've caused, it is no more possible to debate you than to persuade a person in the throes of a drug-induced psychosis that they are not, in fact, the reincarnated Christ.
6
141
