Married Vet, Math background. I provide 1-1 coaching/based therapy yielding you joy & confidence. Eyes On The Prize | Prov. 28:1 Make Therapy Great Again
Joined June 2024
- Tweets28.8K
- Following615
- Followers7.5K
- Likes177K
The idea of “rape by deception” floating around has a precise causal chain of fake felt heuristic reasoning, Id Slavery, and hunter gatherer utility as the only value system.
While it’s worth dismissing for your understanding of yourself and the world, it’s worthwhile to investigate how women come to such a goofy little conclusion, so you’re armed with the ability to reprogram them.
They’re very susceptible to social influence, and while shame doesn’t work, nor does direct logic, entering their little schemas and deconstructing them while providing an alternative of discipline and self-actualization does. They’re only stubborn if you’re trying to make them feel stupid, if you’re trying to give them instructions for how to access their soul and step onto the path to actualization. This is how we win
——
✅Marchese Maxxing
✅Eyes On The Prize
1-1 coaching/based therapy where I help you navigate and change your complex thoughts, feeling, and behaviors to yield you purpose, confidence, results and peace ➡️ link in bio MarcheseMethods dot com
Support: (support button at the top of my profile)
CashApp: MarcheseMethodsCash
BTC: bc1qj34czh332u9qvwxedcvl7dvhhayzf8mwe8hr6a
DM For Discord/email unlimited text help, daily voice chat spaces, and a community of like-minded individuals $5 per month: marchesemethods at proton dot me
Follow me on X, Substack, Europa, Youtube, Rumble @ MarcheseMethods
26
This probably goes so hard if you’re retarded but also will blow a gasket in your little foidnugget head when you realize this means “The Patriarchy” either doesn’t exist is a product of your mismanagement
14
269
Jessica Pin Groypette dropping harder “Women Don’t Have Magic Psychology Intuition Powers” red pills than I ever could, with a bonus of providing evidence to suggest that either most of what women call rape isn’t real, where if women can stop the force of rape 81% of the time it’s not actually physically imposing, since there’s no shot they can actually do that if a man is really using force
Women don’t have magic psychology intuition powers and are always completely off on anything that isn’t surface level because they cannot for the life of them resort to constructing rational causal chain analysis.
They *feel* like they have these powers, because they build upon their false axioms of *their own feelings* both as the model and barometer. This is like the x plugged into the f(x), and the f(x)s are usually false teleologies and heuristic axioms of pseudo logic.
These f(x)s include:
- Projection: "If I were to do what he is doing it'd be because my feeling a, therefore he's feeling a"
- Pathology: "That makes me feel unsafe, which means I am in fact unsafe"
- Low IQ Insentient Hunter Gatherer Morality: "What feels good is good, what feels bad is bad" which also comes with a secondary appraisal of the faster it feels good the gooder it is.
These are r*tarded per the following:
1. This does not apply a global causality to anything because it relies on how *she* chooses to respond and feel with no regard for differences in this like in maturity, or different teleologies.
Something like a man yelling or getting angry falls under this category, where she "gets scared" because she presumes the only possible reason you would yell or get angry is le ✨out of control✨, because it betrays kindergarten cooperation and play nice ethics, with a sprinkle of blaspheming the Holy Trinity of the mother, the daughter, and the holy vagina. How dare you speak to her as if you're not beneath her, and how dare you insert the slightest bit of discomfort. It's in your best interest to cooperate and play nice, because her mammal brain makes her feel that way.
2. Women eternally conflate ego pathology safety with emotional safety. Ego pathology safety usually just winds up being them reading any negative feeling or discomfort as le "unsafe", even if they're necessary for growth. Children feel unsafe on their first day of school because it's slightly out of their comfort zone. Under eternal female juvenilism, they essentially never go to their first day of school. Born of femtarded worship, hunter gatherer teleology, and of eternal rationalized self-sabotage pathology. Most prominently with a dork like this, what "causes her to be guarded" is likely something that deconstructs her currently constructed self-sabotage self-protection mechanisms. E.g., women who are low self esteem and use sex and control over the supply of it as value will sperg out at the sight of attractive muscular chads because he strips her of that power due to her helplessness to want to have sex with him. It tears away their lies they've told themselves to force confrontation with who they actually are, which is someone they deem as low value, but mostly due to false frames like hunter gatherer utility and id indulgence over super ego alignment. She hates herself for not being her ideal self, and exercising discipline.
3. Feelsie goodsie morality overlooks firstly long term feelsies, but also is fundamental insentience that cuts off access to rationalism. A dork subsumed by this cannot operate outside their own feelings and means to peak pleasure, comfort, and survival. Consequently, they cannot infer a causal chain and wind up resorting to projection as above.
It's all evident in her use of “I feel like” instead of I think, suspect, surmise, posit, especially for such a smarty pants always dealing with hypotheses and spreadsheets.
Always such a delight when the spreadsheet geniuses who demand a source for everything you say resorts to feelsies and vibes for what they say, which further tells you they do not live in the actual world. They LARP empiricism or whatever but once again rely on their feelings and where they're assigned. It feels smart to be le empiricist and OWN you on that, but it also feels good to not be and pretend to have some magic celestial pseudo smartypants psychology vibes powers, hence they're not contradictory.
Plansgenders and the Captive Copesphere are having a mental health crisis, and I will not offer them any help
2
13
428
Undermentioned note on the porn thing: men are just as spergy about it as women.
We know women are just coping that they can’t control male sexuality, and with porn satisfying men sexually women then think themselves obsolete — funnily enough tacitly implying they think themselves the sex object with only one thing to offer.
But there’s a faction of men, mostly MtM Tough Guys, who get extremely neurotic about porn because of castration anxiety. Namely, they feel porn as training them to be sexually needy, which then empowers their relationship to the caricature of women in their little moidnugget brains, which is then emasculation. Which of course they fear above all else as unattractive and thereby sentencing them to a life of no peepee pets, which is their actual emasculation and problem in relation to women. A need for sex as approval precipitating any consumption of porn.
Bonus: low IQ determinism about the brain to feel smart is exacerbating the issue too
It didn’t occur to me, but was a “no duh” considering the causal chain I applied here, she is trying to “reclaim” her sexuality as felt heuristic appraises it as “taken” from her from that surgery by quite literally being sexual and sexually liberated. Exercising this “distribution” of sex to reverse engineer the feeling of actually owning sex, by having sex when she chooses.
Further, on some level she sabotages her chance at relationship because in a relationship women are no longer “in control” the same way they are in a casual sex relationship, because there’s something they’re asking for and dependent upon. So she gets sexual in this uncommitted way to emulate ownership of sex and thereby ownership over her genitalia, a “taking back” of it from that surgery
Impotent Girlfriendguyism where they pretend they’re being STOIC and COLD HARD TRUTHERS when they’re actually being cowards and projecting their low self esteem is about as destructive as feminism and women as a class.
Whether you call it commitment or whatever, you have something women want that they cannot provide for themselves. By definition that’s the nature of any “deal” including relationships, however abstract and difficult to articulate.
You only presume otherwise if you can’t bring yourself to think your very existence and identity as valuable, and accordingly protect yourself by LARPING stoicism and emotional detachment so you don’t have to face what you think to be the reality that is you have nothing to offer women. Judging yourself this way, as always, is a consequence of Id Slavery
Predictably omitting there was likely a moment where she was an insufferable bitch. On some level it is indeed “cruel”, but this is an average male experience which she has presumably given to quite a few guys.
This is why dating as a concept needs to go
She has a lot of hot guys that beg her for commitment. Because, you know, she’s just so hot. Hot girls get hot guys, so she has to be hot. They’re also young and tall, which means she’s hot enough to filter for height, because she’s so hot. She’s hot, and gets hot guys, so that means she’s like, Cool and Tough, and every failure in dating is Not Her Fault. How could it be? She’s hot, and that’s all that matters. Even if she messed it up, she’s hot, so those mistakes would be neutralized.
Since she’s so hot every failed relationship or pre-relationship failed because she chose to end it. She can choose to end it because she’s hot, so nobody would choose to end it with her. It’s not that she can’t get her needs met, it’s that all these men can’t meet her needs, because they’re not hot enough for her, because she’s really really hot. But also those guys are still really hot, they wouldn’t even be on the table if they weren’t hot, because she’s so hot she can choose from a pool of hot men.
She’s so hot so she knows her way around men, but when they lie and she believes it it’s because they are evil, not because she doesn’t understand men. She has to understand men, because hot girls understand men, because men are constantly pining for them. Hot girls get guys’ attention, which is then exposure to men, which develops those skills, which she has really well developed because she’s one of the Really Hot girls.
Since she’s so hot she’s good, she doesn’t need to change any of her behaviors to develop herself and her self esteem. Why would she? She’s hot and can thus get sex whenever she wants, so there’s no improvement needed, because all you ever need to do in life is get sex. Also metabolizing calories is icky, hot girls don’t have to do that.
Even in her age, she’s still really hot. Evidenced by the hot guys she attracts, which means she’s especially hot. Most women stop being hot at her age, but not her, she has special hotness. The only trouble she has is picking from her pool of hot options, because she’s so hot.
She knows us moids are helpless to women's desire because she has a lot of sex, and moids are helpless to women's desire because they're beneath women in inter psychic power and needy unlike celestial powerful women btw.
She has a lot of sex so she knows a thing or two about sex. She has a lot of sex because she's really hot btw guys, and hot girls are like, cool and valuable. Men she knows you're not predators, so give her your emotional vulnerability, especially because she'll have sex with you, because she likes to have a lot of sex, a Very Serious High Order Intellectual thing to like. Not many people like to have sex, and if they do it's about being an animal, unlike her, who likes sex because it's some magical celestial experience for her. She'll provide that for you too btw, so you can rest assured you can give your sexuality to her safely.
If you think you can argue anything she says, you can't, because she has had so much sex with so many men that she knows what she's talking about. How could she not? Experience means she knows what sex feels like, and knowing what something feels like is a Very Accurate way to arrive at truth. All that knowing what sex feels like gave her insight into the Very Complicated Celestial Intricacies of sex, a Very Complicated subject of much intellectual intrigue, with serious mathematical depth, logical depth, and structure that we need a ton of rational analysis of, which is comprised of examining how we feel when we have sex, a very rational thing. Sex is not something we share in common with the lowest level and most simple life forms, not some preprogrammed simple reward mechanism for successful reproduction. It's the most complicated thing in existence, because like, there's a bunch of different feelings it can provoke in us, and feelings are very high order and complicated too.
Good thing we have such an intellectual on the frontlines having a lot of sex for all of us so we can know what sex feels like, using her gift that is she's hawt enough to be able to have a lot of sex with a lot of men. She will continue to have a lot of sex, which she can because she's still that hawt btw, purely for our sake and not because she has a pathological Id Slavery issue and uses sex as a way to confer value upon herself amidst feeling valueless for never Superego aligning.
A woman who has a lot of sex is speaking (she can because she's hawt btw), listen and learn.
95% of women's tweets:
1. IM HAWT BTW AND I CAN GET LAID WITH HAWT GUYS BTW BECAUSE IM SO HAWT
2. Women are aykshually Tougher Than Men
3. Muh Pussy
4. You said something I don't like so I declare you sexually unworthy and valueless
Men come on Twitter to talk about politics, current affairs, culture, philosophy, psychoanalysis, and share their personal projects and network with those doing the same.
Women come on Twitter to talk about sex, incels, porn, r*pe, how mean it is to have to metabolize calories, and about men.
Even to the extent that men talk about women, it’s analytical and removed from just vaguely inserting into the collective unconscious some kind of cope about one’s own experience, unlike women.
Sentient female frens excluded from this tweet, and classical cope theorist men who are in fact seething are excluded as well
For Veteran’s Day I present my article providing a comprehensive argument for why you shouldn’t join the military if you’re thinking about it, from my perspective during my brief time in.
In the Marchesian spirit I address these lesser acknowledged abstract psychological reasons people join, and why and how you won’t get what you think you’ll get emotionally/spiritually out of joining.
Further, browse this guy’s instagram, he does these funny skits that highlight what time in (or at least in the army) entails. It comes as a surprise to many outside the whole ecosystem, and neutralizes the mythologies that it’s all a bunch of Serious Guys that are REELY COMPETENT AND ELITE at all times.
Funnily enough, these face filters are no joke incredibly accurate. Everyone in the army has met every one of these characters exactly, and has had these exact interactions. It’s almost scary.
Lastly, in the replies is my article on the myth of American military dominance. If you get mad at even arguing that as retards often do you’re going to the prisons too.
This is you posting moyish quips
Article in the replies
The moyim have gone insane. This is the moid version of “you make me do too much labor”, and is just as pornographic.
At this point I’m just inclined to say hypergamy isn’t real. Fake, gay, made up, and anyone for whom this goes hard and makes them cream their pants belong in prison and is part of the problem. This existing means you are emotionally attached to Muh hypergameee as servicing some kind of cope need.
Enough hypergamy sperging. This goes hard for you because your mental point of origin is perpetually appraising yourself as beneath per Id Slavery. You are neurotic, and can only ever think of Les “Chads” as a linearized response to how you feel, and as an excuse for your inaction and non-results.
As if this is somehow indicative of misery. Aren’t you all so BASTE and emancipated from the confines of female approval? Women have THAT much power over your internal world?
As if this is a good deal for them. Getting pumped and dumped isn’t exactly satisfying for them. You think it is because you have moid solipsistic projection
Thank you to Marchesians for always reading, engaging, and having a sapient understanding. You guys make it worth it, fans, friends, and clients alike.
Considering you agree, it's worthwhile to further arm you with an understanding against the cope that this provoked, especially since it's not even cope from women or "her side" but our "own side". They're so insufferable we can't even really publicly engage and disagree, knowing they'll take it to the cope hills and run with it to morph disagreement into whatever self-serving low IQ emotional pacification they need to insulate themselves against growing up.
Cope Report:
1. Every day, every fucking day, I am horrified to see how bad things really are. Most of all it has nothing to do with women, politics, et cetera. Rather, the horrifying exposure is to what Scorched Earth Policy calls "The Small Minded Reductionist Reply Guy" [SMRRG]. Their existence is a stain on reality. An offense to life, God, Truth. They make you seriously question why Old Testament Punishments had to be done away with, a class of people that aren't even just the usual suspect Id Slaves, but rather seething and deeply detached from reality. They aren't just lazy and indulgent with a set of copes, their low IQ makes them completely unaware of themselves and their thoughts.
In their cognitive laziness they think they're smart, they think low IQ reductive quippy lines and categorizing things with labels is unironic high IQ reasoning. Le "simplification", le "bwrevitee enhanthces cwaritee". It feels good and feels like reasoning to categorize, so it is, and categorization is the final answer because all that matters is soothing their little brains. Specific causal chains hurt, and they get mad at their existence because they don't understand how problems are specific. They think the category is the cause, and don't understand that there's a cause before the category. They're mad that you and your explanation's existence hurts their precious nice and neat little organization, terrified that they could have had it wrong this whole time and that they'd subsequently have an onus to update their understanding, a herculean effort for them metabolically. Further, having it wrong is horrifying because in their eternal low IQ they think it then follows they're stupid, another example of a constant need to categorize like babies playing with they toy that is fitting the square in the square hole, the triangle in the triangle, circle in circle.
2. The first expression of this is retards unironically seething that I said "femcel", which is the very first thing I addressed. Like boomers who just got on the internet yesterday, they saw the title and latched on to getting some fake OWN that PROVES HOW STUPID I AM for using the suffix -cel "incorrectly", because "erm it means celibate and women can't really be involuntarily celibate 😏😏😏😏😏".
This services what it always does for the SMRRG, which is concluding "therefore I can dismiss the entire article, which means it's stupid and incorrect, so I don't have to feel stupid for it hurting my brain to read and for not being able to string more than 100 words together at once 😏😏😏😏😏😏".
Yet, the very first thing I said was addressing this, that the femcel is a woman who can't get emotions or commitment from men, their version of not getting laid. Famously this is one of their biggest frustrations, copes about how they don't aykshually want emotions that much they JUST WANNA FUCK aside. The conclusion of the relationship between a man and a woman is emotions and attention for sex, regardless of what kinds of pathologies take place in between. The SMRRG seethes when I point this out, because it makes them look especially stupid considering it's the first paragraph. Naturally they resort to their feminine little condescending aloofness quip of "I ain't reedin allat", which retards on our "pro white" side don't even realize is Ebonic, reducing them to LARPING as black. They think this is like the automatic win, as if it isn't obviously being cognitively fat and lazy. "I ain't reedin allat" yeah, we know.
3. The second expression is the emergence of Barnes & Noble Psychoastrology. Women's Barnes & Noble Psychology is vibes, projection, and reducing everything to "you don't get laid". Moyim are now the exact same thing, except it's an expression of that aforementioned toddler-tier categorization. The DSM-V is the big Smarty Pants book, the categorizer that explains the scary nebula of the abstract human experience and existence of another human. Hence, "Sagittarius so X" is to women as "Narcissistic Personality Disorder so X" is to men.
Following they get mad at something like my writing here or any of my writings per the SMRRG operative mentality above. They don't read the post, they get mad that it exists, and proposes an explanation that they could have never conceived of. They needed to be the One True Guru, constantly dancing in unfalsifiability and plausible deniability. A bonus layer emerges when they go "ERM YEW DONT UNDERSTAND FROID AYKSHUALLY", which they support by revealing they didn't read the post because I already addressed their support. E.g. "Castration Anxiety isn't aykshually about castration". No shit, I've already said that 6M times.
Amusingly it becomes then "Youwre nawt a reel fewrapithst", an oxymoron, because they're saying I'm unqualified and armchair psychoanalyzing, which they know I am because I don't agree with what would be their equally unqualified armchair psychoanalysis. Just like women, it's "I feel like it's X, an inarguable truth, so you are wrong if you reject what I feel like it is". Especially prevalent in these "diagnoses", which essentially reduce to "she did something Meen ™ so she doesn't have compashun ©, so she's Narcissistic ™ © ® ℗. Which always functions to tacitly allude to feminine ethics, where the follow up is "and that's bad because that she means she doesn't freeking think of how other people feel". Which really reduces to them mad she doesn't think of how *they* feel, ironically precisely the narcissistic trait. This is how women operate, you are women. They need to play this game to say "she's bad", so they can compare themselves and conclude "therefore IM in the category of good"
"This is not complicated" and "It's aykshually Just X" or "Everyone knows X is already Y" ensue, see replies to the article for Scorched Earth Policy's address for this. Overall, a special bonus of retards not paying attention also ensues in this episode, where they think we should "have compassion for someone mentally ill", who might've even gotten that had she not fucking doxxed a poor guy. She has gone on to smugly post contradiction after contradiction, all amounting to different ways to say "I'm hawt and tougher than you all and cooler than you all and I get laid". I'm not going to have sympathy for someone who's not even mentally ill, but rather just a misbehaved person. The emotional pathology may be present, but this is all her choosing to cope with it at the expense of other people and declare herself above everyone else unmeritably. I don't really care to diagnose that, I care how she got there and to disseminate that to everyone so they are empowered in interactions with her or anyone like her.
The police will do nothing, the only accountability for women is social. Not even shame, but embarrassing them by excavating exactly what's going on in their little heads, making them realize we all see everything in her internal world, leaving no room for cope or interpsychic manipulation.
Don't fall for stuff like this. This isn't a heckarino compassionate post, a heckarino Not Being Biased post where she's Genuinely Intellectually Curious and Wants To Hear About Men's Experience.
This post is "I'm a Tough Guy". Just like when men say "HUEH I HAVEN'T CRIED". She's telling us all what a Very Tough Guy she is because she Had To Emotionally Survive which makes her A Victim which then grants her special Hood Credit.
Asking to hear if men cry, and saying she has "Had Men Cry" (which is also this really weird narcissistic language construction), functions to play Penis Envy games of both:
1. Men cry and I don't (therefore I'm tougher than them 😏😏😏😏)
2. Gathering more evidence pursuant to that
Way too many men instantly melt the second a woman Trojan Horses affection in for them despite all being 5000 IQ Heckin Red Pilled Analysts on women.
Many a dorkoid say that women "give" men sex because they're talking about the interpsychic abstract transactional space. They register women as "giving" them sex because it's how they feel approved of and emotionally safe. They feel it as insulation against castration.
But even then, women still get more out of sex really than men. The emotional transaction there is intimacy for them, a closeness, a knowing she exists to you. She gets social intimacy needs met out of sex, feeling desired, much more than you. Again, you should start to feel that as empowering, and reject girlfriendguy premises that you need women in any way or capacity in a way that they don't need you.
Reminder that sex is not something women exclusively “give” and men “take”.
She “gives” you sex with her and in exchange you “give” her sex with you. Increasingly as we get insight into their collective unconscious we find that they may not be as visual as men are with sex but they’re more fiendish for it and its pleasures.
Quite literally all they talk about is cock. Not even sex overall, very specific intricacies of cock. They are obsessed and you should take that as empowering
Public reminder to foyim that even under gynocratic hypergamy harems by definition a very small minority of you will be in Chad’s harem, and in fact that you’re not in his harem now is enough to conclude you never will be, so you’re stuck an unironic femcel
The “don’t bother maaan women just won’t get it” girlfriendguyism not only presumes anything and everything is about getting pussy and “getting” something like an OWN from women, but easily fails once you take that to the natural conclusion that is “don’t bother teaching toddlers they can’t eat candy for dinner they just won’t get it brooo”.
Both are irrational and emotional, yet we very clearly treat it as an implicit necessity to teach one but not the other. Because like, reasons and who cares it’s not a prerequisite to getting precious peepee pets.
Imagine how destructive it would be if we all weren’t taught as toddlers we can’t just indulge ourselves whenever we want
3
29
828
