Theocratic fascist, bestselling children’s author, world renowned DEI consultant
Joined June 2013
- Tweets72.9K
- Following609
- Followers4.1M
- Likes28
Matt Walsh retweeted
Charlie Kirk pled the Fifth before the January 6 committee. He probably didn't technically commit any crimes, but he lied in order to try to overturn a free and fair democratic election.
George Floyd never did anything that bad.
Also, while Floyd's death led to riots, Kirk's death was used by authoritarians to push for more restrictions on speech, in addition to propping up an administration that cares nothing for the rule of law.
It's true that Kirk was killed for his political views, while Floyd wasn't.
Regardless, the two deaths and their role in political debates aren't as different as this argues.
George Floyd was a drug addled violent criminal hobo who died of a drug overdose and then was venerated as a literal saint while leftists burned down entire city blocks in revenge. Charlie Kirk was a political commentator who never committed any crimes and was gunned down on camera while speaking peacefully in front of an audience, and nobody responded by rioting or committing any acts of violence or reprisals anywhere at all. So, no, joking about George Floyd is not the same as joking about Charlie Kirk. The two men, and the circumstances around their deaths, and the subsequent reactions, have no resemblance at all. There is no comparison except that they both died, and that's it. Anyone trying to draw this moral equivalency is lying or stupid or both. And any conservative claiming that we have to tolerate the Charlie jokes because we criticized George Floyd is a submissive cucked shill and should be disregarded on this issue and every other.
Matt Walsh retweeted
"Iran was 10 days away from a nuclear weapon" is the Boomer conservative version of "We're only 10 years away from global extinction because of climate change."
If you're such a low IQ moron that you opposed President Trump taking military action against the Islamist-terrorist regime in Iran when he was told (by them to his envoy) that they were 10-days away from having 11-nuclear warheads and had already enriched weapons grade uranium for more bombs, I don't ever want you to open your big mouth, show your contorted face, or write your asinine comments here or anywhere ever again! This would be the same Islamo-Nazi regime that has killed and maimed thousands of Americans over the last 47-years and has slaughtered hundreds of thousands of innocent young people and tried to assassinate our president and other top American officials. Your propaganda undermines the president, our military, and no doubt gave talking points to the Democrats during this election. Protecting our country is America first, fools. Just shut the hell up and crawl back under your rock.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
It has been reported that Iran is “days or weeks” away from a nuclear bomb since the 1990s.
thebulletin.org/2025/06/a-simp…
Matt Walsh retweeted
Election Night 2026 with The Daily Wire xitter.twitterapi.xyz/i/broadcasts/2WXKJXkZO…
Matt Walsh retweeted
Something we are all guilty of due to being exposed to news that doesn't concern us is a glibness. Trying to fit a tragedy into our worldview. This is my sin too. "Go woke, go die," is an intrusive thought I might be tempted to post. Even where, as here, it's not factually accurate. And if the facts had aligned, what is wrong with me? People are grieving, funerals are being planned, a gigantic hole is in human hearts, but ignore that loosh farminto a banger post. God have mercy.
I’m not at all shy about blaming DEI where appropriate, and it often is appropriate. But I see no DEI angle on this jet crash. The female pilot was not flying the plane. The captain was a 55 year old man. Trying to blame the girl for the crash is absurd and baseless. Yes she seemed frantic and terrified in the radio call but I would be to, and so would you. And even if she’d been cool as a cucumber, there isn’t the slightest reason to think it would have made any difference at all.
I’ll fully admit that I wouldn’t get in a plane if the copilot was a 20 year old girl. But that doesn’t change the fact that there is no evidence that she was personally at fault. And for the record, becoming a pilot at 20 is pretty impressive. She had her shit together a lot more than I did at that age. I’ll say that at least. I don’t think airlines or private charter companies should be making any specific effort at all to be “inclusive” of women or whatever, but it’s still admirable for a kid to have a goal like that and pursue it. I don’t see any reason to mock her, as some have done.
Some of the comments about that audio recording have been callous to an unhuman degree. None of you would have the stoicism in that situation that you demand from this girl. And again, there’s no reason to think stoicism would have magically kept the plane from falling out of the sky. Besides, she actually did seem pretty calm in that recording until the last few seconds, relative to the circumstance she was in. I don’t want my pilot to panic but I also don’t want them to be completely indifferent to the prospect of a fatal crash, as some commenters here apparently expect.
Matt Walsh retweeted
Here’s the thing about spotting the horrendous, soulless AI-generated writing infecting every corner of the internet now: it’s not just about the words — it’s about the patterns.
And once you start noticing them, you can’t unsee them.
The unnecessary em dashes. The polished transitions. The examples given in groups of three.
The weird metaphors that kind of make sense but kind of don’t — like a parachute opening inside a submarine.
The load-bearing use of the term “load-bearing.”
The random one sentence paragraphs.
The way a bunch of bland gibberish is quietly reframed as a profound insight.
The on-going and un-necessary hyphenation of every-day words that really don’t need it.
The cliches.
Read that again.
Cliches.
Louder for people in the back.
Tons of cliches.
That’s not a typo.
Sit with that for a moment.
And the biggest red flag? Asking yourself a question and answering it.
Because honestly? No sentient human writes like this.
And truthfully? If you can’t identify these red flags, you might not actually be sentient yourself.
Because really? If this formatting doesn’t immediately strike you as awkward and artificial, it means you don’t read books.
Ever.
Seriously.
But here’s where it gets interesting:
It doesn’t.
The point has been made but I’ll keep going. That’s what AI writing is all about.
Let’s delve into real problem. It isn’t the technology. It’s the people using it because they’re too retarded to generate an original thought of their own.
That’s not thoughtfulness. It’s intellectual laziness wearing digital makeup.
It doesn’t make the internet more fun. It makes me want to throw my phone in the river and forsake all of humanity and live as a hermit in the woods for the rest of my life.
Seriously this shit fills me with despair. I’m not kidding.
And the distinction matters.
Especially when you’re saying the distinction matters without actually drawing a distinction.
But here’s what nobody tells you.
When you ask a machine to manufacture your personality, you’re not just automating your writing. You’re quietly announcing that you’re a boring, insipid dork with nothing interesting to say.
Let that sink in.
The uncomfortable truth?
AI didn’t turn these people into tedious midwits.
It quietly revealed what they already were.
And perhaps — just perhaps — that’s quietly the most important takeaway of all.
But what do you think? Let's unpack this together in the comments. 👇
Matt Walsh retweeted
Governments Are Telling Citizens To Prepare For The Worst... Here's What You Need To Know
Matt Walsh retweeted
AI writing is obvious to any decently intelligent and observant reader because it's the uncanny valley of writing. A perfectly constructed simulation of something a human "might" write but constructed in a way that makes it obvious that it's a simulation by a machine.
Why exactly is it so obvious when someone is trying to pass off AI writing as their own? There are clear red flags like “quietly” and “load bearing” but there’s also something less tangible in the rhythm and construction that screams AI but is hard to precisely describe. I can tell when something is AI slop but I can’t always tell how I can tell.
Matt Walsh retweeted
.@MattWalshBlog goes through a very good process about assessing anything you see online. This process is worth applying to anything alarming you read online.
Governments Are Telling Citizens To Prepare For The Worst... Here's What You Need To Know | Ep. 1864
m.youtube.com/watch?v=1f7k43…
Matt Walsh retweeted
A Planned Parenthood doctor tries to lecture Matt Walsh on child gender identity and insists even babies understand gender.
Then he asked her about Santa Claus, and it was over.
MICHELLE FORCIER: “There’s research and data that show that babies and infants understand differences in gender. Some children figure out their gender really early...”
WALSH: “Have you ever met a 4-year-old who believes in Santa Claus?”
FORCIER: “Mhm.”
WALSH: “So, this is someone who believes that a fat man is traveling through the sky on a flying reindeer at lightning speed coming down his chimney with presents.”
FORCIER: “Yeah.”
WALSH: “Would you say that this is someone who maybe has a tenuous grasp on reality?”
FORCIER: “They have an appropriate 4-year-old handle on the reality that’s very real for them.”
WALSH: “Agreed. Agreed. But Santa Claus is real for them, but Santa Claus is not actually real.”
FORCIER: “Yeah, well, and but Santa Claus does deliver their Christmas presents.”
WALSH: “Well, yeah, but he’s not real, though.”
FORCIER: “To that child, they are.”
WALSH: “When I see a child who, you know, believes in Santa Claus, and then let’s say this is a boy and he says, ‘I’m a girl.’ This is someone who can’t distinguish between fantasy and reality, so how could you take that as a reality?”
FORCIER: “I would say that as a pediatrician and as a parent, I would say how wonderful my 4-year-old and their imagination is.”
Most 4-year-olds can’t even tie their shoes. We don’t let them cross the street alone, pick their bedtime, or choose what’s for dinner. But she thinks they’re mature enough to decide they’re “in the wrong body.”
The most terrifying part about this lady is that she’s also an Assistant Dean of Admissions at Brown University.
She’s not just affirming fantasy as reality in her own practice. She’s helping hand-pick the next generation of doctors — ones who think just like her.
Matt Walsh retweeted
It’s one of the worst things to happen to Christianity, culturally speaking, in modern times. And despite reports to the contrary, it really hasn’t gotten any better. Most “faith based” entertainment is bland and flavorless and, worst of all, a display of artistic cowardice. It refuses to take any chances or do anything that might be even remotely upsetting to the audience or even vaguely ambiguous about the message it’s trying to send. The result is an endless catalogue of “Christian” films and shows that are lifeless, pointless, and boring to an almost infuriating degree. What makes this so tragic is that it wasn’t always this way. Christian artists in all mediums for centuries created brilliant, beautiful, inspiring, timeless, sometimes difficult and complicated works of art. But the modern day Dostoevsky or Flannery O Connor or even Michelangelo, if such a person exists, would never get a film made by a Christian studio because their stories would be too upsetting to the middle aged Christian female audience that all of these companies exclusively cater to.
Matt Walsh retweeted
I understand why the genre might not be someone’s cup of tea. I don’t particularly gravitate to it myself, usually. But it’s okay for Christians to tell and enjoy stories that are tense, suspenseful, even scary. There’s nothing inherently sinful about any of those feelings. And the categorical insistence on avoiding those feelings is precisely why almost all “faith based” entertainment is terrible. I would argue that bland, bad, boring “Christian entertainment” — which is almost all of it, truly — is a far greater cultural problem for Christians than any horror movie ever could be. Christians used to be the great storytellers of western civilization. That was back when they told difficult, complicated, sometimes bleak and violent stories. Not anymore. Now the stories are all very nice and pleasant, but they also suck and nobody with any taste can stand to watch them.
Matt Walsh retweeted
Great new mini doc about the Russian Revolution from @MattWalshBlog. The whole hour is well worth your time.
You know it's good because it includes a section on Always With Honor (below) and another on Serge Obelensky's One Man In His Time.
Matt Walsh retweeted
6-year-old after shooting his teacher: “Fuck you, nigga. Shut the fuck up, ho. I stole dat gun from my mama. I don’t care if I go to jail.”
This person cannot be rehabilitated and is guaranteed to kill in the future. This mother and absent father deserve the death penalty.
Matt Walsh retweeted
Absolutely disgusting. The generation that broke America, undid every single moral creed of the republic, and is leaving the most debt in human history to their progeny, thinks their children and grandchildren should pay even more to subsidize this generational implosion.
Matt Walsh retweeted
Was it like having her skull crushed with a chunk of asphalt?
Christa Pike felt extreme pain during botched execution, death penalty expert explains. tmz.com/2026/10/02/christa-p…
Matt Walsh retweeted
New York no longer has a justice system. It has a partisan machinery of destruction it deploys against perceived enemies. Going after Trump broke whatever pretense of fairness existed. Now this.
'Deeply disturbed' Hochul rages at how 'brave' Cornell 7 accuser was 'failed at every turn' trib.al/PGAZJr1
