Nana 🚀 retweeted
Our message to Nvidia's board:
Do not fire Jensen Huang.
There is no clear replacement for Jensen Huang. We are confident that his departure would ultimately be a net negative for Nvidia, its shareholders, and the AI Revolution.
First, take a look at the data. History also suggests that removing a successful CEO will come with a significant cost.
A study of 187 forced CEO departures from S&P 1500 companies found that removing outperforming CEOs resulted in negative long-term stock returns. This case would be no different, in our view.
Jensen Huang is the definition of an outperforming CEO. Nvidia's board must not make a decision in the heat of the moment.
The board should take the time to conduct a thorough investigation and consult with shareholders, with a strong emphasis on the latter.
Quite literally, Nvidia's board should convene a special shareholder meeting and hold an advisory vote on this decision. This is the most consequential CEO controversy in world history. Shareholders deserve a say.
In addition, Nvidia's stock, $NVDA, is now down -35% in 26 trading days, nearly half of which is a result of the recent scandal.
We believe Jensen Huang's potential removal as CEO is now ~80% priced in.
Why take an action with massive downside potential when the market has already priced in much of that risk?
The downside of retaining Huang may be limited, while the potential upside is tremendous.
Lastly, history shows that retaining Jensen Huang could still lead to a favorable outcome. In 2019, Amazon retained Jeff Bezos as CEO after his extramarital affair became public, and the company's stock subsequently surged +108% by 2021.
Personal misconduct should not be ignored, but it must also be distinguished from corporate wrongdoing and weighed against the consequences of removing an executive who is instrumental to the company's success.
We believe Jensen Huang is an irreplaceable part of Nvidia and the AI Revolution more broadly.
Once the dust settles, firing Jensen Huang would prove to be a costly mistake.
It is time to pause and consult your shareholders.
Nana 🚀 retweeted
Elon Musk backs calls for Nvidia's board to wait for the investigation's findings before ousting Jensen Huang.
Investor Gavin Baker also suggested a $NVDA shareholder vote.
Nana 🚀 retweeted
I’ve been driving since Monday to arrive in Starbase tonight with a vehicle full of cameras. Launch is Friday, Starship catch is Saturday.
History will be made, and I will be present to document it. Sending nothing but positive vibes to the talented team at SpaceX. You got this.
Super Heavy moved to the launch pad at Starbase. Booster 22 is the first Super Heavy V3 booster planned to return to the launch site for catch and was used for final catch testing upon arrival, including a suspended squeeze test at catch height
Nana 🚀 retweeted
Mike Myers says that ‘SHREK 5’ is the best film in the franchise.
“They’ve really outdone themselves.”
(Source: Deadline)
Nana 🚀 retweeted
Daniel Radcliffe when asked if he will be watching the new HBO Harry Potter Original Series:
“I don’t know if I will, honestly. I’ve watched [and] been in a lot of ‘Harry Potter’ already. Also, I don’t watch any TV. I haven’t seen ‘Breaking Bad’; I haven’t seen ‘Mad Men’; I haven’t seen some of the real classics. So, you know. Eight hours is a lot of anything to watch.”
(Source: @Variety)
Nana 🚀 retweeted
Arnold Vosloo confirms his return to The Mummy franchise:
"I just signed my deal. We are doing another Mummy. Brendan and them are shooting now in London. And the character Imhotep is back, that I play. I’ll be going there in November.
The first time I’ve admitted … I’m back in the next Mummy. Imhotep is back. Somebody wakes me up … they read from the Book of the Dead … and there we are."
(Source: Danger Close Podcast | @BDisgusting)
Nana 🚀 retweeted
Arnold Vosloo confirms he will return as Imhotep in 'The Mummy: Book of the Dead'
In theaters October 15, 2027
(via @JackCarrUSA)
Nana 🚀 retweeted
🇺🇸HISTORIC WIN IN MISSISSIPPI
Scott Colom: 49.2%
Cindy Hyde-Smith: 48.7%
Scott Colom’s twin brother Andrew Colom said that “Mississippi decided that Colom was the person to make change."
The Democrats have not held a senate seat there since 1982!
Writer: Bri
Nana 🚀 retweeted
Postponed due to technical difficulties, today’s TELx Council meeting will now take place tomorrow, Thursday, November 12th at 20:00 UTC.
We apologize for the inconvenience and look forward to seeing you then.
Meeting Reminder: TELx Council
Today 3pm EST/7pm UTC
Agenda:
1. Opening & Council Overview
2. Recap of Last Meeting
3. TELxIP - TELx on Telcoin Network
4. TELIP - Merkl Integration Costs
5. TELx Web Unification Walkthrough
6. Analytics/Data Review
7. Q&A
Join the discussion here on X at @TelcoinTAO
or YouTube at youtube.com/@TelcoinTAO
Next Meetings:
TAN Council: Nov. 12th - 5pm EST/9pm UTC
Platform & Treasury: Nov. 19th - 4pm EST/8pm UTC
Replying to @AllOurRecipes @TelcoinTAO
Genesis is the moment a new blockchain creates its very first block and starts running.
Nana 🚀 retweeted
We’re probably living in the galactic boondocks — and even if aliens have already built a “galactic internet,” we almost certainly can’t join it.
Japanese astrophysicist Koji Tsumura from Tohoku University decided to test one of the boldest ideas out there: what if other civilizations in the Milky Way don’t just exist, but have already been searching for each other and built a shared communication network? How realistic is it for our civilization to connect to that network?
The answer is pretty grim: almost impossible.
Why almost no one can hear us
There are billions of Sun-like stars in the Galaxy, and millions of them should have planets in the habitable zone. The classic Drake equation suggests there ought to be a lot of intelligent civilizations. But then we run into the famous Fermi paradox: “So where is everybody?”
Tsumura started from the most optimistic scenario — civilizations exist, they’re active, and they’ve already built a galaxy-wide network. Even then, everything depends on location. The galactic habitable zone isn’t the entire Galaxy; it’s a relatively narrow band where three things line up:
- enough heavy elements to form planets,
- stars that live long enough,
- and not too many nearby supernovae sterilizing everything around them.
Modeling showed that the most densely populated part of the Galaxy is probably about 3,000 light-years closer to the center than the Solar System. We’re sitting roughly 26,000 light-years from the center — on the rather distant periphery. Out in these “suburbs,” the chances of plugging into a shared network are essentially zero. Either there are simply too few civilizations for a network to exist at all.
Can we at least detect anyone?
Detecting even one extraterrestrial civilization is theoretically possible, but only if it:
- exists at the same time as we do,
- is deliberately beaming a signal toward the Sun,
- and is doing so in a way we can actually notice.
According to Tsumura’s calculations, the fact that we still haven’t heard anyone means there’s a 35–38% chance that there really is nobody within about 6,000 light-years of us. But there’s a 61–65% chance that civilizations do exist — we just can’t detect them for some reason.
In other words: our cosmic loneliness is not yet proof that the Milky Way is empty. We might simply be sitting in a quiet neighborhood where signals either don’t reach us or arrive too weakly to notice.
The study is available on arXiv (arxiv org/abs/2610.20475).
Nana 🚀 retweeted
Replying to @morganlinton
Thanks for your feedback. I don’t believe separate apps are needed. So I think our strategy and OpenAI’s is correct. We should just work on easy accessibility of Teammates on iOS and orchestrating them from anywhere. We’re already on it.
Nana 🚀 retweeted
Right now I see a very interesting gap between personal ai assistants that I think will close, but is there now.
The gap is those that have a dedicated app for their assistant vs. those that have their assistant as a sidebar widget/panel in their main app.
When I use Grok Bot, Muse, or Duet, the experience is just a lot more streamlined that using Dot or Teammates in Perplexity.
And while, yes, you can update your settings in ChatGPT to make it so that Dot becomes the first thing to load when you open the app, it's just not the same as having a dedicated app.
Grok Bot has been in the lead imo for some time now for anything related to agentic coding, but I got access to Duet and I honestly think the two are pretty much tied at this point, Duet is really good.
Muse in many ways has its own lane. My Dad uses Muse, it's what I think really is the first broad-based personal agent that can do a lot of things pretty well.
I think both ChatGPT Dot and Perplexity Teammates are still finding their path in many ways. While Perplexity was late to the party, they are catching up quickly, and I do think they likely have a unique edge on the finance-side that could make them more useful than the other assistants in this area.
If I was to rank my own usage of personal ai assistants today, I think it would be:
1. Grok Bot
2. Duet
3. Muse
4. Dots
5. Teammates
But I could see this being different a month from now.
Still tinkering a lot and I'm the newest with Teammates as I just started using it this weekend so have a lot more experimenting to do.
I think one of the things I like about having no sponsors or paid partnerships or anything like that is that I can just use stuff for the sake of using it, and share my actual experience.
As usual, I will continue to do this. Now, it's 5:09am, back to work!
Nana 🚀 retweeted
Replying to @fishfolkfriend @Starlink
They are smart, they will figure it out. The potential for this product is huge and life saving for remote ppl and emergencies.




































