A parent-led legal campaign for transparency in UK schools. PLEASE LIKE, SHARE and DONATE! With thanks for all support.
UK
Joined October 2022
- Tweets17.4K
- Following3.1K
- Followers5.7K
- Likes21.7K
How else will people hear an alternative opinion if you don’t critique? Opinions that have in some cases been sidelined or suppressed…
Take for example @AlessandraAster - I’ve never met her, don’t know her at all - yet I can see her ideas are valid, better than SMs I would say, and yet she reports almost exactly the same treatment as I have had and seen towards others.
I have reports from other campaigners who have sadly given up campaigning altogether. Not friends of mine - all completely independent people, arriving at similar conclusions and getting cancelled or ignored for it.
You should exercise more curiosity and find out why that is.
1
1
14
And take a look at how the LGB campaign is fighting the Conversion Practices Bill - ‘it’s okay to be gay’… as if it’s only a gay problem!
Actually, it’s MOTHERS who they’re going to come for with this draconian law more than anyone, when their estranged trans kids don them in.
And the trans indoctrination is attacking ALL of our children.
This internecine fight between LGB and T is just revealing the absurdly myopic, control freakery amongst gay activists.
2
9
83
Wrt to knowledge of campaigning, I’ve managed to fundraise tens of thousands to fund a court case that is still ongoing, which will be heard on appeal next year. If I win it will help establish transparency for dodgy materials in schools across the country.
I’ve also advised politicians, managed to get the Rishi Sunak to promise education reforms and provided research for Miriam Cates’ report on dodgy RSHE, (although the Tories got chucked out before they could deliver).
And I did that pretty much alone whilst being blackballed by the great and good of the GCs… so I think I do okay at campaigning, thanks.
1
1
14
As we approach the checkmate move by Stonewall of criminalising dissent from affirmation - even by parents - we should reflect how we got here. Namely, by chronic mistakes made by liberal, GC feminists and LGBA activists who took it upon themselves to shape and dominate the narrative so unwisely.
This was an injustice. And a grave mistake by @SexMattersOrg
I was blocked by various GCs for voicing disagreement with their promotion of Hayton as the positive face of GC transsexualism.
I’ll make my point one last time:
NC as part of SM has steadfastly refused to campaign for the repeal of gender laws.
She is now questioning whether a case could be made to justify restricting ‘transsexuals’ from ‘child facing roles’.
I say, that’s not nearly good enough a solution, indeed, it would be a bad idea to try in law. If you lost, you’d entrench GR rights to work with kids further, if you lose, you sanitise gender law so that it can be avoided only in roles with direct contact with kids, making trans rights for all other roles more entrenched by comparison.
In short, funny or not, pondering or not, within her control or not, it’s a bad idea, as are all ill thought out efforts south of repeal!
1
19
And here’s the problem she’s already baked into her poor idea:
“Any child facing role”
Well what about the ones that don’t ‘face’ the child directly, but have simians bearing?
Governors, Federation CEO’s, caretakers, kitchen staff, administrators… and what about in the other public services which children use but aren’t strictly child-facing, eg medicine, social services, housing, police…?
How about department stores, where children buy their first bra? Teen fashion shops? Cafes? Driving instructors… swimming pool attendant… gym managers etc etc. How about employers, who are in charge of young teens taking their first job?
Why should children ever have to encounter a person lying about their sex, as they go about the world?
Indeed, why should adults have to?
No one else gets to take a job and lie about something important like their age, race, disability, species, which planet they come from, then expect others to passively accept the madness.
1
2
24
And you are darn right I have concerns about that charity - it has chronically underperformed, is far too political to be a charity, and it has entirely the wrong objectives for keeping British children safe.
1
3
49
Oh that old chestnut… if you’re not running your own mega funded international reaching, establishment sanctioned charity, then you’re shouldn’t critique the way another charity is making epic strategic mistakes that affect you, your children and the rest of the country…
So you’re anti debate, then?
2
2
55
It’s your lack of comprehension and NCs unwise legal objectives I believe we are both critiquing.
The humour was discernible, but just not funny, in the circumstances.
1
2
49
Clare Page : No Secret Lessons retweeted
You have been a significant contributor, if not in charge, of the leading campaign group on this topic.
And whilst no one said you were in charge of legislating, you are in charge of which kind of lawfare you undertake.
You are, presumably, also in charge of your own political opinion.
Consequently, I am pointing out that firstly, Sex Matters did not manage to raise this issue when it was timely to do so, its rather too late to be ‘wondering’ about it know (sardonically or otherwise).
Secondly, the lawfare you are pondering is an extremely bad idea. If you lose, you strengthen trans rights, but if you win, you create a mere ‘carve out’ for teaching, leaving it even more established that the care taker or administrator on school sites can be a raging AGP.
Which leads me to ask, why are you not giving your political opinion that we should be repealing all gender laws and preferably enacting a prohibition on formal cross sex impersonation in safeguarding situations?
You have been a significant contributor, if not in charge, of the leading campaign group on this topic.
And whilst no one said you were in charge of legislating, you are in charge of which kind of lawfare you undertake.
You are, presumably, also in charge of your own political opinion.
Consequently, I am pointing out that firstly, Sex Matters did not manage to raise this issue when it was timely to do so, its rather too late to be ‘wondering’ about it know (sardonically or otherwise).
Secondly, the lawfare you are pondering is an extremely bad idea. If you lose, you strengthen trans rights, but if you win, you create a mere ‘carve out’ for teaching, leaving it even more established that the care taker or administrator on school sites can be a raging AGP.
Which leads me to ask, why are you not giving your political opinion that we should be repealing all gender laws and preferably enacting a prohibition on formal cross sex impersonation in safeguarding situations?
I’m not sure you’re reading what I’m writing.
She is specifically saying that maybe people in ‘child facing roles’ should not be impersonating the opposite sex.
I am specifically that’s not a good enough solution.
1
3
25
Clare Page : No Secret Lessons retweeted
I took a couple of risks to get the story about Oxford lecturer Matt Rattley into the national press.
First, I did the reporting on spec. There was every chance I’d never be paid a penny for it.
Then I published some of what I’d found on my own site, [Un]Captured. I’d seen three complaints made to St Hilda’s College about Rattley wearing large prosthetic breasts at work. From what I could establish, no action appeared to have been taken.
On Friday morning, the Mail on Sunday finally said yes. About ten minutes later, the Telegraph asked me to write the story for them. I had to say no. I’d already given it to the Mail on Sunday.
Then the Telegraph’s piece came out before mine. Which, if I’m honest, was gutting. But at least the story was out there. Which is clearly in the public interest.
I still have SO many questions.
Why did it take so long for this to get national coverage? What did St Hilda’s do with those complaints? Did anyone investigate the safeguarding concerns they raised?
And what is it about the culture at St Hilda’s that makes it so hard for current staff and students to speak openly about what’s been happening?
My inbox is open. You can reach me at janet@janetmurray.co.uk. I’ll treat all messages in confidence. Please share this with anyone who might be able to help.
