Nocturnal Intellect (@NocIntellect) header
Nocturnal Intellect (@NocIntellect) profile picture
Joined January 2018
Photo by Nocturnal Intellect (@NocIntellect)Photo by Nocturnal Intellect (@NocIntellect)Photo by Nocturnal Intellect (@NocIntellect)Photo by Nocturnal Intellect (@NocIntellect)Photo by Nocturnal Intellect (@NocIntellect)Photo by Nocturnal Intellect (@NocIntellect)Photo by Nocturnal Intellect (@NocIntellect)Photo by Nocturnal Intellect (@NocIntellect)Photo by Nocturnal Intellect (@NocIntellect)Photo by Nocturnal Intellect (@NocIntellect)
Nocturnal Intellect retweeted
ARE WE HAVING FUN YET? The new Press Secretary and the Headlines.
118
461
27
1,773
43,035
Nocturnal Intellect retweeted
Do you believe the 2026 Midterm elections in America were rigged? (Share for a larger sample size)
92%YES
8%NO
39,855 votes • Final results
726
6,669
203
6,855
204,181
Nocturnal Intellect retweeted
Speaking as a computer scientist... Note also that the numbers you referenced aren't all just 64-35, they're all 64.6 + or - 0.2, and 35.4 + or - 0.2. That's even more unlikely. This is what happens when you don't pay attention in math class. Likely some corrupt programmer put in a random factor that he thought would alter the numbers, without making it look like it altered the numbers. Like (brain-dead example) "If this ballot was for the opponent, and the random number generator is greater than 0.6, then change it.". But he didn't bother to do the math, or he would have realized that if you use whatever that random element is, over enough cases, then the result converges on 64.6 and 35.4. At least if I was going to vet the program that did this, then that's what I'd most expect to find. This is a typical undergrad mistake. Just because your algorithm has a randomizing element, that doesn't mean that the result isn't going to converge, over a large enough number of trials. Also note that this kind of manipulation almost always leaves a footprint in the data. Statisticians who specialize in analyzing voting results know what properties honest results should have. Unless the corrupt programmer really knew what he was doing, they'll spot the strange results, and the nature of the strangeness will give them a strong clue as to what the programmer did.
HOLY CR*P 🚨 How is this even possible?? All of California’s major candidate election results are the EXACT SAME percentages for Democrats and Republicans Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R) Lieutenant Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R) Secretary of State 64% (D) vs 35% (R) Controller 64% (D) vs 35% (R) Treasurer 64% (D) vs 35% (R) Attorney General 64% (D) vs 35% (R) Supreme Court Justice: Joshua Groban 72% (D) vs 28% (R) Supreme Court Justice: Kelli M. Evans 72% (D) vs 28% (R) These don’t look like real election results, they look like a computer algorithm Our elections are fake
760
9,228
545
23,879
663,832
Nocturnal Intellect retweeted
This man is a Computer Scientist and he looked at my post regarding California’s identical election results for top government positions 🚨 He CONFIRMS from a computer scientist programming perspective how the results ARE FROM AN ALGORITHM, NOT REAL VOTE TOTALS 👇 IT’S RIGGED
Speaking as a computer scientist... Note also that the numbers you referenced aren't all just 64-35, they're all 64.6 + or - 0.2, and 35.4 + or - 0.2. That's even more unlikely. This is what happens when you don't pay attention in math class. Likely some corrupt programmer put in a random factor that he thought would alter the numbers, without making it look like it altered the numbers. Like (brain-dead example) "If this ballot was for the opponent, and the random number generator is greater than 0.6, then change it.". But he didn't bother to do the math, or he would have realized that if you use whatever that random element is, over enough cases, then the result converges on 64.6 and 35.4. At least if I was going to vet the program that did this, then that's what I'd most expect to find. This is a typical undergrad mistake. Just because your algorithm has a randomizing element, that doesn't mean that the result isn't going to converge, over a large enough number of trials. Also note that this kind of manipulation almost always leaves a footprint in the data. Statisticians who specialize in analyzing voting results know what properties honest results should have. Unless the corrupt programmer really knew what he was doing, they'll spot the strange results, and the nature of the strangeness will give them a strong clue as to what the programmer did.
237
4,893
133
12,679
138,563
Nocturnal Intellect retweeted
Here is the full list of ‘New valid voter registrations’ done nationwide between 2022-2024 WITHOUT ID 🚨 The total number of new voter registrations WITHOUT ID in 43 states is 24,662,998 California: 4,308,269
Texas: 2,900,357
North Carolina: 1,410,905
Florida: 1,337,303
Ohio: 1,198,459
Illinois: 981,482
Pennsylvania: 842,187
Georgia: 757,440
New York: 680,259
Tennessee: 634,912
Michigan: 604,606
South Carolina: 594,568
Alabama: 572,632
Virginia: 563,781
Maryland: 524,189
Colorado: 498,308
Washington: 473,192
Minnesota: 471,657
Massachusetts: 465,616
Missouri: 460,197
New Jersey: 425,782
Oklahoma: 388,669
Connecticut: 386,014
Indiana: 357,741
Mississippi: 344,991
Louisiana: 263,705
Arkansas: 246,974
Oregon: 240,611
Kentucky: 220,093
Kansas: 218,739
Idaho: 181,741
Nebraska: 164,491
Nevada: 145,494
New Mexico: 118,141
Iowa: 116,644
Maine: 106,978
Vermont: 81,993
Montana: 78,669
Delaware: 71,902
Hawaii: 64,468
West Virginia: 53,343
Rhode Island: 53,040
Alaska: 52,456 States: 43
 Total new valid registrations without ID: 24,662,998 This is extremely suspicious since Democrats somehow materialized 20 million new voters…. It’s almost like they stacked the voter rolls with tens of millions of new voter registrations without ID or proof of citizenship and then used electronic voting machine algorithms to rig the results…..
626
5,078
443
8,884
304,877
Nocturnal Intellect retweeted
WOAH 🚨 College campuses in Michigan were plastered everywhere with these ‘Vote for Abdul El-Sayed’ flyers But this wasn’t organic, it was paid for by the Michigan Action Fund. If you look into their funding, THEIR LARGEST DONOR IS GEORGE SOROS Foreign billionaire George Soros paid to have our college campuses plastered with flyers that tell people to vote for Abdul El-Sayed The guy who ran on getting money out of politics is financially backed by Democrat’s largest donor So yet again, it’s George Soros paying for the propaganda signs and flyers in America
264
3,371
127
6,266
107,537
Nocturnal Intellect retweeted
HOLY CR*P 🚨 How is this even possible?? All of California’s major candidate election results are the EXACT SAME percentages for Democrats and Republicans Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R) Lieutenant Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R) Secretary of State 64% (D) vs 35% (R) Controller 64% (D) vs 35% (R) Treasurer 64% (D) vs 35% (R) Attorney General 64% (D) vs 35% (R) Supreme Court Justice: Joshua Groban 72% (D) vs 28% (R) Supreme Court Justice: Kelli M. Evans 72% (D) vs 28% (R) These don’t look like real election results, they look like a computer algorithm Our elections are fake
3,098
18,654
1,652
46,005
2,000,349
Nocturnal Intellect retweeted
I’ve used multiple artificial intelligences to go through each state’s election results to see if there is another Democrat state that has identical results like California. They don’t, not even close This makes California’s results even less likely. It’s undeniable algorithmic fraud
HOLY CR*P 🚨 How is this even possible?? All of California’s major candidate election results are the EXACT SAME percentages for Democrats and Republicans Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R) Lieutenant Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R) Secretary of State 64% (D) vs 35% (R) Controller 64% (D) vs 35% (R) Treasurer 64% (D) vs 35% (R) Attorney General 64% (D) vs 35% (R) Supreme Court Justice: Joshua Groban 72% (D) vs 28% (R) Supreme Court Justice: Kelli M. Evans 72% (D) vs 28% (R) These don’t look like real election results, they look like a computer algorithm Our elections are fake
146
1,901
56
5,039
57,409
Nocturnal Intellect retweeted
MIDTERM ELECTION FRAUD INDICATORS! In the latest installment, a consistent mathematical pattern appears across 59 Senate and gubernatorial races. Some are calling it the 85/15 algorithm. It is quite OBVIOUS that algorithmic election manipulation rather than ordinary electoral swings has occured. Here's how the algorithm works: (or you can continue to believe in Communist miracles) - 85% of Trump's 2024 vote share carries over to Republican candidates in 2026. - 15% of Trump's 2024 vote share effectively shifts toward Democratic candidates. - The pattern appears in both Republican and Democratic strongholds. For example, if Trump received 60% of the vote in a state in 2024, the formula predicts that the Republican candidate would receive approximately 51% in 2026. This is on top of 20 million votes that magically appeared out of thin air...... again..... and 100 percentile sweeps with a 1 in TRILLIONS odds of occurring. So, what is being asked of you currently, by Democrats, their multi-billion dollar globalist deepstate propaganda machine and every Conservative grifter and globalist neocon power player, is to accept is this: Their proposal to you is that the party that opened the borders and flooded the country with 10s of millions of illegal aliens, has fought ICE, fought deportations, fought Voter ID, fought purging corrupted voter rolls and every other attempt to secure elections, literally with threats of legal action and the help of SENATE RINOS.... WON a 1 in TRILLIONS miracle. Well I call bullshit. And not only that but they are going to try and overthrow the democratically elected President of the United States and attempt to destroy him and his family to cover it all up. Just like last time. They failed that time too. Welcome to "color revolutions 101" Weve already done this in history. It ended in blood.
3
14
3
15
1,939
Nocturnal Intellect retweeted
🚨REAL TIME GA Election Fraud🚨 November 7th Case 1,633 - 1,641 - Multiple Counties – Deleted votes Just found 9 more deleted votes. If the insertions were not bad enough, they had to delete votes as well. The following examples "at one time" had vote credit. Not anymore.....🤬 @FBIDirectorKash @FBI @FBI_Response @FBIAtlanta @CivilRights @secmullinsdhs @stephenM @dow_ig @ODNIgov @DOJFraudDiv @AGToddBlanche @WHFraudTF @DHSgov @HSI_HQ @GaSecofState @realGeorgia_SEB @Georgia_AG @GovKemp @GaRepublicans @GASenatePress @GaHouseHub
9
295
16
439
5,188
What if it was a trap? What if they've been trapped? You're quick to defend the results without thinking about that. Let's just start with the over 20 million illegal voters added to the roles between 2022 and 2024 alone. Trump hasn't done everything he's done these last two years globally, and written all the executive orders that he's written about the elections dating back to 2018, just to meagerly walk away from this one. Don't forget. Trump created space force. There's a faction of our government that has never had control of it. Purposely. As a Canadian you're barking up the wrong tree.
For everyone sharing that graph, claiming 2026 midterms were stolen by fraud… Appreciate what a double-edge sword that argument is. Bottom line, it’s probably not fraud. 2026 midterm numbers are very commensurate with 2018 midterm numbers. But even if it is the result of fraud: Republicans had the trifecta of power for nearly 2 years. They ran on combatting election fraud. If they did not do what they needed to do to make sure they were not the victims of the fraud they ran on combatting, they must also assume responsibility for that failure.
2
144
Nocturnal Intellect retweeted
Maricopa County mail-in ballot envelopes have a clear windows in the envelopes so you can clearly see if the voter is a Republican or Democrat so compromised election workers or mail carriers can "accidentally" lose your ballot. This is just another form of election fraud that you would never think is effective but actually is. Every vote counts, and this is just another way to get rid of a lot of them.
617
5,882
292
13,933
444,798
Nocturnal Intellect retweeted
Election fraud: Kansas Republicans cast more votes for Treasurer, and Insurance Commissioner, than their US Senate and Governor seats. Really? I don't think so. The pattern continues like Texas, North Carolina and Ohio, North and South Carolina, Georgia (see previous tweets). @FSociety_1942 found this unholy pattern, help him out at his give-send-go link at the top of his X page. @realDonaldTrump @AGToddBlanche Kansas:
150
2,072
73
4,748
122,101
Nocturnal Intellect retweeted
🚨🚨🚨 BREAKING: THE NEW YORK CITY ELECTIONS WERE RIGGED! 🚨🚨🚨 SHOCKING AUDIT BLOWS THE LID OFF THE 2025 NYC MAYORAL RACE! 😱🗳️ Marly Hornik of RealAmerica.vote just dropped a BOMBSHELL audit proving the system FAILED to qualify voters under the law! ❌ 23% of ballots came from voters with UNVERIFIABLE identities, INVALID Social Security numbers, or addresses OUTSIDE New York City! 💥 7% of voters DON’T EVEN EXIST in records! 6% had FAKE Social Security numbers! 10% NEVER lived in NYC during the election period! These illegal ballots EXCEED Mamdani’s margin of victory! The Boards of Elections have NO IDEA who actually won! 🔥🗽 THIS IS NOT NORMAL. THIS IS FRAUD. THE NEW YORK CITY ELECTIONS WERE RIGGED! 🇺🇸 SHARE THIS EVERYWHERE before they memory-hole it! Demand a full investigation NOW! 👇 #ElectionIntegrity #NYCRigged #AuditTheVote #Mamdani #StopTheSteal FOLLOW ME, THE NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING.
192
2,900
93
4,895
74,750
Nocturnal Intellect retweeted
Election fraud: North Carolina Republicans cast more votes for Court of Appeals races than their US Senate and US Congressional seat. Really? I don't think so. The pattern continues like Texas (see previous tweet). @FSociety_1942 found this unholy pattern, pls help him out at his give-send-go link at the top of his X page. @realDonaldTrump @AGToddBlanche
123
1,588
79
3,466
151,197
Nocturnal Intellect retweeted
Texas and Oregon statistics show massive voter fraud. 2,900,357 new voters were registered without verification of U.S. citizenship in Texas from 2022 to 2024. 56.5% were considered "valid registrations" even without any verification of U.S. citizenship. Proof of U.S. citizenship is allegedly not required when registering to vote in Texas. This information can be found on page 193 in the Official Election Administration and Voting Comprehensive Report. On top of this, since 2020, Oregon's population saw an increase of 36,530, which are ALL immigrants from around the world. BUT, somehow, new registered voters in Oregon saw a gain of 263,459 voters. Which is a 700% gain. What is going on here? Look at the graph for international immigration that says +56,700. Then look at the birth to death statistics at -19,500, with a 36,530 population gain. The 36,530 is all, 100% immigrants. So how does it go from 2020 with 36,000 new immigrants with a total of 263,459 new voters registrations within the same period, while also taking into consideration all the other graphs including death to birth ratios? Just wait until more states get exposed. None of the numbers, votes, or new registrations, make any sense. I believe they went to big on cheating which made it extremely obvious and exposed their rigged system.
845
7,403
546
15,411
379,414
Nocturnal Intellect retweeted
Here's ANOTHER election where the Democrat in NC won more votes in early voting than the Republican got in total votes. Just like Talarico in TX. Thus is not a coincidence. It was the plan. Massive voter fraud. Crickets from Republicans.
42
374
16
683
5,448
lol. Um, you're not getting away with any of it. The is the full stop our nation has been waiting for. You've been caught. Big time. Not by Trump. Not his staff. Not the internet sleuths. We're not going to take it. The buck stops here. 2026.
The President of the United States has a loose grip on the law and an even looser grip on reality.    As I’ve said many times, the only election Donald Trump recognizes as valid is one where he wins.    There is no widespread voter fraud. The federal government has no right to interfere in California’s elections.
54
Nocturnal Intellect retweeted
🚨 BREAKING: OVER 2,000 UNCOUNTED BALLOTS DISCOVERED IN IOWA! 🚨 🗳️ ANOTHER STATE. MORE ELECTION QUESTIONS! As concerns continue to mount about election procedures across the country, we’re now seeing reports out of JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA! 🚨 HERE’S WHAT WE KNOW: 📍 Johnson County, Iowa 🗳️ 2,017 absentee ballots were identified that had NOT been included in the preliminary election results! ⚖️ Iowa Secretary of State Paul Pate is involved as officials move forward with an audit to determine exactly what happened. 📊 According to the report: 🔴 2,017 absentee ballots were missed in the preliminary count. 🔴 A full audit is planned. 🔴 Officials say the ballots are NOT expected to change election outcomes. 🇺🇸 BUT HERE’S MY QUESTION! How do more than 2,000 ballots get left out of an election’s preliminary results in the first place?! We’ve been discussing election discrepancies in TEXAS, MICHIGAN, GEORGIA, AND NOW IOWA! I’m not saying this automatically proves fraud, but election officials absolutely need to explain how these mistakes happen and what safeguards prevent them! 🔥 HOW MANY MORE STATES ARE WE GOING TO HEAR ABOUT?! 👇 WHAT DO YOU THINK? Are these isolated administrative mistakes, or do they point to bigger problems with election procedures nationwide? #BreakingNews #IowaElection #ElectionIntegrity #Election2026 #JohnsonCounty #ElectionTransparency #Voting #Politics #TheLegislativeLounge
141
2,504
109
3,922
107,089