Resisting oblivion by recording how people remain human in a world collapsing into noise. Clarity is rebellion. Memory is the weapon.
Joined September 2022
- Tweets96.7K
- Following226
- Followers60.2K
- Likes77.6K
So Clintonโs affair didnโt make the zipper a symbol of national shame.
Epstein did not bring shame upon the American people.
But Jensen Huang has an affair and the leather jacket itself needs to repent?
The New York Times really has no bottom.
Only new ways to dig lower.
#่ง็น ้ปไปๅไปค็ฎๅคนๅ
็ฑๅฅฝ่
่็พใไธไธชไบฟไธๅฏ่ฑช่ฃ
ๆฎๆๅ้่
ๅทฒ่ถณๅคไปคไบบๆผ็ซ๏ผ้ปไปๅ็ซ็ถๅ็่ธ็ฎๆๆไปฌๅผไปฅไธบๅฒ็ๆ ๅฟๆง่ฃ
ๆๅๆไบไป็ๆ็ใไธไธช็ทไบบ็่ไฝ่ฟๅคฑไธๅบ็ทๆฑกๆไปฌ็็ฌฌไบๅฑ็ฎ่คใๅฆไปๆไปฌไธญๅนด็ฎๅคนๅ
็ฑๅฅฝ่
่ฟ่ฆ่ขซ่ฟซๅๆ๏ผ่บซไธ่ฟๅฑ็็ฒๆฏๅฆๅ่่ฎฉไปๆไบ็็ฉ๏ผๆ่ดต็็ฎๅคนๅ
้พ้ๅฆไปๆไบไธญๅนด็ทไบบ่ฝๅ
ฅ็พไบบ่ฎกๅๅฅ็ๆ ๅฟ๏ผcn.nytimes.com/opinion/20261โฆ
Jensen Huang was not blameless.
But the cost was enormous.
Nvidia occupied more than half of his life. He spent 33 years building it, shaping it, defending it, and turning it into one of the most important technology companies in the world.
And in the end, under a political climate already waiting for a reason to turn on him, he was forced to let go of the company that had become inseparable from his own life.
That is what makes this so difficult to watch.
Not because he did nothing wrong.
But because some mistakes destroy far more than the mistake itself.
He lost the company he spent most of his adult life building.
And Nvidia lost the man who made it Nvidia.
For years, developed countries told China:
โCut emissions.โ
โBuild clean energy.โ
โDo more.โ
China did.
Now China is asking them to honor their own climate commitments.
You demanded the homework.
China handed it in.
Now itโs your turn.
The irony is brutal.
When the U.S. tried to strangle Huawei, China mobilized its market, industry, supply chains and technological ecosystem to keep it alive.
Huawei survived.
It rebuilt.
It returned to the top of Chinaโs smartphone market.
Meanwhile, America watches its own technological champions with permanent suspicion, turning them into political targets the moment they become inconvenient.
China fought to save Huawei.
Washington end up destroying Nvidiaโs stability all by itself.
One side protects its own national champions under attack.
The other keeps looking for enemies inside its own house.
Excellent.
Chinese people also think Japan lives under the shadow of permanent U.S. military occupation, stripped of strategic autonomy and national dignity.
So by your logic, China should be free to โinterveneโ and liberate Japan from American military domination.
Whether Japanese people agree is irrelevant.
Apparently all that matters is that outsiders decide they know what is best for you.
ๅฝๆใฎไธญๅฝใฏ้ทใๅ
ๆฆ็ถๆ
ใซใใใพใใใใใใคใใฎ่ป้ฅใๆญฆ่ฃ
ๅขๅใๆฎบใๅใฃใฆใใใฎใงใใใใใซๆฅๆฌ่ปใไปๅ
ฅใใใฎใฏๅฐๆฟๅญฆไธใ้ฟใใใใชใใใจใงใใใใใใฏใ่ฟๅนดใฎไธญๆฑใใขใใชใซใซ็ฑณ่ปใไปๅ
ฅใใใฎใจไผผใๆงๅณใงใใใ ใใใจใใฃใฆใ็ฑณ่ปใๅ็ดใซไพต็ฅ่ปใจใฟใชใใใจใใงใใพใใ๏ผ
Beijingโs response to the G7 statement on Taiwan was very cold:
Taiwan is Chinaโs own business.
Mind your own.
You have enough domestic crises, economic stagnation, political dysfunction, wars and social problems to deal with. Yet somehow the G7 still finds time every day to lecture China about its own territory.
This is not the Eight-Nation Alliance era.
It is the 21st century.
A Cold War-era political club huddling together for relevance does not get to dictate Chinaโs internal affairs.
Handle your own mess first.
The U.S. is busy trying to stop China from accessing American AI models and technology.
Meanwhile, Chinese AI is going abroad to help Mexico protect jaguars, improve monitoring efficiency, and reduce poaching.
One side treats technology as a wall.
The other treats it as infrastructure.
Beijingโs message is basically:
Stop writing cheap spy thrillers in which every Chinese woman is an intelligence asset sent to seduce some American tech genius.
China has the talent, the technology, the market, the industrial ecosystem, and China is still open to cooperation.
You can keep inventing increasingly hysterical excuses for technological containment.
The more energy you spend trying to trip up your competitor, the more obvious it becomes that you have stopped moving forward yourself.
The real story is not that China won 5 of the 7 large LNG carrier orders placed worldwide in October.
The real story is this:
China secured just 3 large LNG carrier orders in all of 2025.
In the first 10 months of 2026, it secured 32.
More than a tenfold increase in less than a year, in the highest-value shipbuilding segment long dominated by South Korea.
That is not a monthly upset.
That is an industry turnaround.
Taipei seems to believe that the more combustible the Taiwan Strait becomes, the more likely Washington will be forced to enter the fire.
Beijingโs calculation is moving in the opposite direction: the longer Taiwan is allowed to function as an anti-China strategic outpost, the greater the eventual cost of resolving the question.
Anti-China narratives frame the overseas assets of Chinaโs elite as a โscandal for China.โ
Ordinary Chinese people read it and think:
โGreat. Hand the list to the tax authorities.โ
๐๐ฐ๐ณ๐ณ๐ช๐ฏ๐ฆ retweeted
Some people say I never say anything negative about China. That is because the Western Presstitutes blast lies about China into my ears and eyes 24/7/365 for decades on end. Why would I waste my breath?
Well, here is something for you to mull over. Guandongโs contribution to the state does seem obscenely high and obviously needs to be addressed.
I defend China on this platform every day. I write long threads about Huawei, about Western hypocrisy, about historical memory. I believe in this country's civilizational vision.
But I'm also angry.
Guangdong contributes more tax revenue to the central government than any other province โ over 800 billion yuan net annually.
Per capita transfer payment?
Dead last in the country.
2,070 yuan per person vs. more than 70,000 in Tibet.
And what does Guangzhou get back?
Two years ago, I walked through Tianhe North โ once one of Guangzhou's most prestigious neighborhoods.
Ground-floor shops were shuttered.
Doors boarded up.
Sewage on the pavement.
Silence where there used to be life.
A friend just sent me a closure notice for my favorite store there.
Gone.
Twenty years ago, Guangzhou's per capita income ranked among the highest in China, shoulder to shoulder with Beijing and Shanghai.
Today, it is being overtaken by cities that once trailed far behind it.
Here's the bitter part:
The same country that can unveil a 100% domestically produced PC under technological blockade is allowing the capital of its most productive province to lose vitality from the ground up.
China's trade surplus has already beaten last year's total by more than a trillion yuan, a full month early.
Ports are booming.
But the bakery downstairs is gone.
The noodle place is gone.
The supermarket is gone.
This isn't "China is collapsing."
It is something much more specific:
Guangdong has spent decades feeding national growth while too little of that prosperity has been retained for the people and cities that generated it.
A rich state should mean strong people.
When one of the country's greatest economic engines keeps sending wealth outward while its own neighborhoods lose businesses, wages lose relative ground, and local prosperity fades, something in the distribution mechanism is broken.
A civilization that can build a 100% domestic computer in seven years under total blockade should also be capable of ensuring that the places which built its prosperity are allowed to share in it.
The numbers say we're winning.
The streets say we're forgetting something.
I trust the streets.
Guangdong has continuously channeled its prosperity to the rest of the country,
so why is it that, in the end, even the streets of Guangzhou itself have begun to lose their vibrancy?
The obscenity is not that Guangdong helps poorer regions.
It is that Guangdong can be drained for decades, then told to look away while its own poorest regions are left waiting.
A region that has long been the countryโs largest net contributor should not be bled to the point where it lacks the fiscal capacity to properly support its own most impoverished areas in eastern, western, and northern Guangdong.
Localities generate the wealth. The central government and interregional system decide where it goes.
Local officials build promotion records on short-term performance metrics, then move onโleaving the long-term costs to the people who actually live there.
Eventually, the idea of a โnationwide integrated strategyโ becomes an extraordinarily convenient way to evade accountability:
the players can move to another table.
The people on the board cannot.
Redistribution should reduce inequality.
It should not reproduce it inside the very region doing the redistributing.
I defend China on this platform every day. I write long threads about Huawei, about Western hypocrisy, about historical memory. I believe in this country's civilizational vision.
But I'm also angry.
Guangdong contributes more tax revenue to the central government than any other province โ over 800 billion yuan net annually.
Per capita transfer payment?
Dead last in the country.
2,070 yuan per person vs. more than 70,000 in Tibet.
And what does Guangzhou get back?
Two years ago, I walked through Tianhe North โ once one of Guangzhou's most prestigious neighborhoods.
Ground-floor shops were shuttered.
Doors boarded up.
Sewage on the pavement.
Silence where there used to be life.
A friend just sent me a closure notice for my favorite store there.
Gone.
Twenty years ago, Guangzhou's per capita income ranked among the highest in China, shoulder to shoulder with Beijing and Shanghai.
Today, it is being overtaken by cities that once trailed far behind it.
Here's the bitter part:
The same country that can unveil a 100% domestically produced PC under technological blockade is allowing the capital of its most productive province to lose vitality from the ground up.
China's trade surplus has already beaten last year's total by more than a trillion yuan, a full month early.
Ports are booming.
But the bakery downstairs is gone.
The noodle place is gone.
The supermarket is gone.
This isn't "China is collapsing."
It is something much more specific:
Guangdong has spent decades feeding national growth while too little of that prosperity has been retained for the people and cities that generated it.
A rich state should mean strong people.
When one of the country's greatest economic engines keeps sending wealth outward while its own neighborhoods lose businesses, wages lose relative ground, and local prosperity fades, something in the distribution mechanism is broken.
A civilization that can build a 100% domestic computer in seven years under total blockade should also be capable of ensuring that the places which built its prosperity are allowed to share in it.
The numbers say we're winning.
The streets say we're forgetting something.
I trust the streets.
Guangdong has continuously channeled its prosperity to the rest of the country,
so why is it that, in the end, even the streets of Guangzhou itself have begun to lose their vibrancy?
27
1,449
He thought being indispensable to American technology would protect him from American politics.
He spent decades proving how vital he was to the American tech industry, only to discover that loyalty, contribution, and technical brilliance could not shield a Chinese-American tech leader from the machinery of American politics.
โThe U.S. cannot let China dominate the AI race.โ
Meanwhile, Washington is busy politically torching the man who built one of Americaโs most important AI companies.
Apple without Steve Jobs is no longer Apple.
Is Nvidia without Jensen Huang still Nvidia?
You cannot simultaneously scream about losing the AI race and then destabilize the very company sitting at the center of your lead.
At some point, โnational securityโ starts looking less like protection and more like self-sabotage.
So Japan was the country that got invaded?
Japan was the country that had 23 million of its people killed?
Japanese women were subjected to industrialized mass rape?
Japanese civilians were used for live human experimentation?
You do not get to reverse perpetrator and victim, call Chinese historical memory โfabricated,โ and then pretend you are politely correcting โmistakes.โ
The only thing the descendants of Japanese fascists learned after the war was how to play the victimโ
while screaming at the actual victims:
โThis isnโt true.โ
