Planck unity ψ = ℜ(ψ) ⋅ 1 + ℑ(ψ) ⋅ i with hν / mc² = 1 z_n = n ⋅ 10⁻⁹ + i sin(2π n ⋅ 10⁻⁹) at cosmic time t_n = n ⋅ 435.4 s At n = 10⁹: γ = −π, |ψ|² = 1
Joined October 2025
- Tweets27.5K
- Following135
- Followers178
- Likes12.4K
dave chappelle abandons comedy for a god complex in africa
he then returns to get paid for standup
xitter.twitterapi.xyz/i/trending/21198435550…
15
theres no suvh thing as an icc
only muslim terror
xitter.twitterapi.xyz/i/trending/21199042034…
9
i never got to watch startrek and tell you if it was okay
from the scenes i ever saw
it was well scripted
xitter.twitterapi.xyz/i/trending/21159004247…
20
were going to be so polite you will never be able to investigate our real life terror
that is their playbook
10
Blanket “they vented → future terrorist” logic, however, is lazy and authoritarian. It collapses the distinction between speech and conduct that an uncompromised American system maintains.
10
Real terrorism involves organization, ideology, and action (or credible preparation for it), not just online rage.
The France comparison
France (and much of Europe) operates under a very different legal culture. They have broader hate-speech, “incitement,” and public-order laws that criminalize a lot of speech the U.S. First Amendment still protects.
1
14
Treating every instance of “they should all die” as evidence of future terrorism is both factually wrong and constitutionally dangerous. It invites viewpoint discrimination—exactly the kind of thing that gets applied unevenly depending on whose side the speaker is on.
10
Protected speech*: Political hyperbole, venting, dark humor, “these people need to die” style rhetoric aimed at broad groups or ideas, insults, or exaggerated frustration.
1
11
True threats vs. protected speech
U.S. law (including Florida’s statute) draws a real line:
Unprotected “true threats”*: Context matters heavily—prior relationship, specificity (“I will burn *your house”), credibility, history of actual violence, etc.
1
6
No, venting online does not automatically make someone a “future terrorist.” That’s an overreach, and treating every angry or hyperbolic statement that way is how you get bad policy and selective enforcement.
5
Do you remember when you joined X? I do! #MyXAnniversary
THERES NEVER A TIME TO MAKE BELIEVE YOU ARENOT CLOUT CHASING GRIFTER PSYOP PLEBIAN LOSER SYNDROME ANIMAL KINGDOM BETAS
5
YOU ALL ARE MORE
THAN JUST FAILURES
AT LIFE AND REALITY ITSELF
YOU ALL ARE
TRULY INCOMPLETE WITHOUT ME
8
AND A LONG 3 YEARS IT HAS BEEN
ONLY THE FILTERED THE UNCULTURED THE LIVING UNDER A ROCK NOT THE SHELTERED
WOULD EVER SAY THIS TIME HAS FLOWN BY
xitter.twitterapi.xyz/i/trending/21069901283…
ITS ISRAEL THAT HAS HAD TO SPEND COUNTLESS TIMES IN SHELTERS
NOT THE @X USER
13