
I perform @nixos_org witchcraft at @mercury
Joined January 2010
- Tweets19.8K
- Following2.1K
- Followers6.3K
- Likes13.5K
It really feels like half of AWS has genuinely lost the plot and are stuck in their own LLM delusions. I hope Kiro writes the perf reviews too?
On the other hand S3 and EC2 teams keep releasing absolute banger after banger.
This isn’t the first time AWS just releases absolute hallucinated trash. Their MCP was full of arbitrary code execution like fetching random shit from pypi unpinned and unprompted.
The aws emulator is not as delusional but it’s pretty close.
I can slop myself. Stop launching slop.
1
21
1,298
Is internet just really that bad in the US?
My dorm room internet at Utrecht University campus had sub 1ms ping to google.com
How are y’all doing 8-40ms ping in the same state between professional networking companies? That’s decades of latency
Replying to @AdamRackis @andrelandgraf
It's basically:
Random ass pop: 8-200ms
Close to us-east-1: 8-40ms
Inside us-east-1: 0.X-5ms
Same AZ: 0.X-1ms
12
44
6,670
Opus 5.5: this is weeks of work
Me: okay do it
Opus 5.5 5 minutes later: it is done
Why are LLMs so bad at the concept of time?
Arian van Putten retweeted
Announcing a major milestone achieved by my team @GoogleDeepMind: we have proven key security properties of the machine code underlying the Signal messaging protocol. This is the first time the actual production code of a widely deployed protocol has been formally verified – by any method, with or without AI – and at this depth.
More than a research breakthrough, it’s a prime example of how frontier AI can be a force multiplier to counter the speed and scale of modern cyber threats.
Formal verification offers a higher standard of security; however, it’s extremely complex and time consuming, which is why in many cases it’s considered to be impractical. Similar efforts could take teams decades of combined effort. We did it in a month’s time.
Using AlphaProof Code, Google DeepMind's new agentic framework for formal verification that runs on LLMs including Gemini Carbon, we verified the Signal protocol down to the actual code running on devices. This milestone lays the groundwork for a future in which vital systems, from medical device firmware to power grid software, ship with mathematical proof that their protections work.
Reaching that future will take continued research from our community. In that spirit, we're open-sourcing our formal specifications and verification artifacts so others can build on this work.
On a personal note, this moment is of deep significance to me. I started my own research journey more than two decades ago as an intern working on checking the consistency of complex software systems. Seeing this grand challenge made practical with modern AI is extraordinary.
I'm extremely proud of my team members: Swarat Chaudhuri, Andrew Ferraiuolo, Anton Kovsharov, Tej Chajed, Sam Schlesinger, Karn Seth, Jonathan Katz, and Charles Sutton for taking on this grand challenge and delivering, and grateful to the Signal team for their partnership.
deepmind.google/blog/formal-…
This is easily fixable. We should require root CAs and intermediate CAs to publish hardware attestations into CT from their HSM that prove the key is non-exportable. Roots who can’t comply are remove from the root programme. The end
Audit this audit that. Shut up!! Give me cryptographic assurances! This tech is like 30 years old my god.
This is going to be my first truly post-LLM Chaos Communication Congress and I have extremely mixed feelings about it. I see a high probability that the event is gonna go poorly in terms of social cohesion and am preparing for it to be an extremely toxic gathering 🙃
1
16
1,166
I love that modern wifi 6 routers from fritzbox still look like dsl modems from the 90s. Massive respect for brand that don’t change their branding for decades . It’s extremely goated.
Arian van Putten retweeted
All of the people who hated on verification and type theory, and who called our research useless for years, should probably admit they were wrong now and maybe apologize for being mean while also being wrong













