Herman Trading (@RHerman) header
Herman Trading (@RHerman) profile picture

NQ, ES & Gold futures | Probability over opinion | ICT + backtests | TradingView indicators | https://xitter.twitterapi.xyz/t.co/pruz2NQ6Tu | https://xitter.twitterapi.xyz/t.co/7xIEUoPhSw

Portsmouth, United Kingdom
Joined December 2017
Photo by Herman Trading (@RHerman)Photo by Herman Trading (@RHerman)Photo by Herman Trading (@RHerman)Photo by Herman Trading (@RHerman)Photo by Herman Trading (@RHerman)Photo by Herman Trading (@RHerman)Photo by Herman Trading (@RHerman)Photo by Herman Trading (@RHerman)Photo by Herman Trading (@RHerman)Photo by Herman Trading (@RHerman)
London session. 62% probability for the short side. I took shorts only. +2R on the day. This is the full model. 1. Intelligent Balance Probability Map at 2 AM NY: 62% short, 38% long 2. Bias set: shorts and shorts only 3. Wait for a sweep reversal with confirmation 4. Short #1: too early, too aggressive. -1R 5. Short #2: small but valid confirmed sweep reversal. Entry 6. TP toward the more probable side. Level reached: +3R Basic ICT idea, done with numbers: trade toward the more probable side, and only with confirmation. Full walkthrough in the video. After the first short stopped out, would you have taken the second one?
3
33
8,660
19 green days at +$200: +$3,800. 1 red day at -$4,000. Net: -$200. 95% green days. Losing month. One day without a stop can erase a month of discipline. Do you have a hard daily loss limit?
6
11
878
𝟭𝟱𝗺, 𝟭𝗛 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝟰𝗛 𝗰𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗹𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝟭-𝗺𝗶𝗻𝘂𝘁𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗿𝘁. 𝗡𝗼 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝘀𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗰𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗳𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗲𝘀. HTF Fractal Bars [Herman]: → 3 independent higher timeframes, 15m, 1H and 4H by default → each one customisable, on or off → HTF candles drawn as clean OHLC bars, green bullish, red bearish → C1, C2, C3 structure → HTF highs, lows and opens in context No predictions. No probabilities. No black box. Just raw higher-timeframe structure next to price. Inspired by Ben's work on OHLC and OLHC candle structure (@Bentrades_ttfm). Free and open source. Link below. Which higher timeframe do you read first: 15m, 1H or 4H?
4
10
1
79
6,816
Default 15m, 1H and 4H, drawn next to NQ on the 1 minute chart.
1
3
645
Yesterday's high stayed untouched on 85.4% of 82 NQ days. Three checks, all known at 08:00 New York time: 1. The 08:00 overnight filter is on (overnight session 18:00-07:59 ET) 2. The Daily Open (18:00 ET) is right next to the previous close 3. The 08:00 open is inside the previous week's range The question: does New York stay below the previous day's high after 08:00? 2022-2026: 85.4% of 82 days Expected from the distance alone: 75.3% 2015-2021: 80.6% of 108 days It shows up about 1.4 days a month. A frequency, not a trade signal. No entries, stops or costs modelled. Do you take yesterday's high off the target list on days like this? Source: Herman Trading Backtesting Centre, NQ Daily Study (nq-daily-study), 2015-2026
2
3
896
Expected from the distance alone: 75.3%. 2015-2021: 80.6% of 108 days.
1
213
Hey @grok Scalping or swing trading: which one makes more traders profitable?
5
2
9
7,035
𝟭𝟭.𝟭𝗸 𝗚𝗶𝘁𝗛𝘂𝗯 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘀 𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗴𝘆 𝗰𝗼𝗱𝗲. 𝗟𝗼𝗻𝗱𝗼𝗻 𝗕𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗸𝗼𝘂𝘁, 𝗗𝘂𝗮𝗹 𝗧𝗵𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁, 𝗛𝗲𝗶𝗸𝗶𝗻-𝗔𝘀𝗵𝗶, 𝗽𝗮𝗶𝗿 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲. je-suis-tm/quant-trading: Python, around since 2018, and it ships strategy code with backtests instead of theory: → London Breakout → Dual Thrust → Bollinger Bands and RSI pattern recognition → MACD, Parabolic SAR, Awesome Oscillator, Heikin-Ashi → Pair trading, Monte Carlo, portfolio optimisation → Options straddle and a VIX calculator Apache-2.0 licence, 1.9k forks. It had 10.7k stars when I first shared it in September. I haven't tested these on futures yet. Which one should I backtest on NQ first? github.com/je-suis-tm/quant-…
1
7
1,491
The win rate you need to break even. It drops fast as your R:R grows. 1:1 → 50% 1:1.5 → 40% 1:2 → 33.3% 1:3 → 25% 1:4 → 20% 1:5 → 16.7% Before costs. Fees and slippage push every line up a little. Which line of the chart do you trade?
1
7
1,016
17 of 17 days in 2023. One 08:00 NQ check saw the overnight high taken every time. The check, at 08:00 New York time: 1. The 08:00 overnight filter is on (overnight session 18:00-07:59 ET) 2. The Asia range is wide, more than 1.3x its median of the previous 24 sessions Then: does New York trade above the overnight high after 08:00? 2022-2026: 93.0% of 86 days, against 81.0% expected from the distance alone. Every year from 2015 to 2026 came in above its expected rate. The weakest was 2020: 76.5% of 17 days, against 74.8% expected. One year at 17 of 17 proves little on its own. 12 of 12 years above the expected rate says more. Do you run an overnight check before the 08:00 New York start? Source: Herman Trading Backtesting Centre, NQ Daily Study (nq-daily-study), 2015-2026
4
1
7
1,143
2022-2026: 93.0% of 86 days, against 81.0% expected.
1
248
Strategy A wins 70% of trades. Avg win 0.3R, avg loss 1R. Strategy B wins 35%. Avg win 3R, avg loss 1R. A feels amazing and loses 0.09R per trade. B feels awful and makes 0.40R per trade. Stop chasing win rate. Chase expectancy. Which one would you actually stick with?
6
11
4,240
𝟲 𝗳𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘀. 𝟴,𝟰𝟭𝟲 𝗯𝗼𝗼𝘀𝘁𝘀 𝗯𝗲𝘁𝘄𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺. Boosts on TradingView today, 28 Oct 2026: Sweep Reversal Map+: 3,527 Minicharts Pro+: 1,983 HTF Liquidity Map: 1,909 HTF Fractal Bars: 388 Tech Leadership Map+: 319 Premium & Discount Map: 290 All built around the things I care about most: structure, liquidity, context and bias. All six are on my TradingView profile. Link below. Which one is on your chart right now?
1
9
1,576
Most boosted: Sweep Reversal Map+, at 3,527.
1
1
300
A wide Asia range makes NQ LESS likely to take the overnight high. 62.9% vs 68.6% on an average day. The question: does New York trade above the overnight high (18:00-07:59 ET) after 08:00? NQ, 2022-2026: → Average day: 68.6% of 643 days → Wide Asia range only: 62.9% of 194 days → 08:00 overnight filter only: 87.9% of 290 days → Both together: 93.0% of 86 days Wide Asia means more than 1.3x its median of the previous 24 sessions. On its own, the wide Asia range lowers the odds. Next to the 08:00 overnight filter, it adds to them: distance alone predicts 81.0% for those 86 days. A filter can change sign once you combine it. Test it alone and together. Do you read a wide Asia session as a reason to fade or to follow? Source: Herman Trading Backtesting Centre, NQ Daily Study (nq-daily-study), 2015-2026
6
1
9
1,231
Both together: 93.0% of 86 days.
1
264
Hey @grok I have $500. Prop firm challenge or my own account?
11
1
16
11,547