Real Time with Lawless Alien

Liberal is such an Old Term for the New Age! Lazybones is more Accurate. THEY ARE "SPECIAL" PEOPLE!!! What us Old Farts called the Mentally Ill. BRING BACK MENTAL HEALTH CARE!!!

TWO FREE WEEKS of Grok Bot on me. Try the always-on AI teammate that actually handles real work, then decide for yourself. I get a usage reset if you subscribe after the trial. Fair deal, and the price is reasonable. Link: grok.com/refer/bot?code=TTFJ… In a little over a month I’ve built 70+ games plus a site that Grok Bot runs on its own: You can build almost anything in less than a day. Quick start tip: Create a folder, drop whatever files you want it to work with, then start Grok Bot with:“Your working directory is C:\GrokBot” (then hit Shift+Enter twice) Tell it what you want. If something’s off, just say so and it fixes it Token saver: Tell Grok Bot: “We are currently in Design Mode. Do not start programming until we finish the outlook of the project.” *** Imagine and the top-end models cost tokens. Design first, build second. You stretch your usage a lot further that way.

youtube.com/playlist?list=PL… “Come in… Welcome. Turn the lights down, light a candle if you want, and let the story take over. CBS Radio Mystery Theater full episode — Himan Brown’s series that ran 1974–1982, hosted by E.G. Marshall. Pure theater of the mind. No visuals needed. Just the creaking door, the voices, and whatever your imagination builds next. Please Subscribe ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

c.org/4NNYqBxfSx DMCA Creator Protection Act 2026 SIGN IT FOR YOUR RIGHT TO STREAM!! The Issue The Digital Millennium Copyright Act was signed in 1998 to stop online piracy and give websites a legal safe harbor. In 2026 it is still the rulebook platforms use when they take speech down. That rulebook is broken in a specific way. A host that wants Safe Harbor protection has to move fast when a copyright notice arrives. It does not have to prove the claim is true first. Automated matching systems then sit on top of that law. On YouTube, Content ID accounts for about 99.5 percent of copyright actions — about 2.5 billion claims in 2025 — and more than 99 percent of those claims are automated. Most of those claims do not delete the video. They often take the money. When the policy is a block, a mute, or a legal takedown, the video is gone for the audience too. The speaker is hit. The viewers are cut off. That is the full harm. I am Anthony Packman. I broadcast as Real Time with Lawless and LawlessAlien . I am a Florida archivist and independent creator. I have personally fought more than 38 abusive copyright strikes and claims. I have lost streams, archives, and years of work. This petition is bigger than my channel. It is for every teacher, critic, journalist, musician, and viewer who watched a copy vanish because a machine, or a bad-faith notice, got there first. The law already has a civil penalty for knowing false notices (17 U.S.C. § 512(f)). In practice the bar is so high, and a lawsuit so expensive, that a small creator almost never gets a remedy. Fair use already exists (17 U.S.C. § 107). In practice it is a defense you argue after the audience is gone. A counter-notice already exists. In practice it requires your real name, home address, and a willingness to be sued in federal court. We are not asking Congress to legalize piracy. We are asking Congress to stop treating accusation as proof. We demand the DMCA Creator Protection Act of 2026: 1. Human review before a legal takedown or a channel strike.    Automated fingerprinting may flag a match. It must not be allowed to delete speech or kill a channel with no human in the loop.   A monetize-claim that leaves the video up is not the same event as a removal. The statute should treat them differently. 2. A real penalty for knowing false claims.    Raise 17 U.S.C. § 512(f) so it is usable. A statutory floor of $1,000 per knowing material misrepresentation, plus costs, plus the right to cut off repeat abusers. Honest mistakes should not be treated the same as a notice filed to bury criticism. 3. Fair use on the form, not only in court.    Before a removal of commentary, education, news, parody, or archival use, the uploader gets a window to raise fair use, and the claimant has to consider it. That is already Ninth Circuit case law (Lenz v. Universal, 2015). Make it national and make it run before the public copy disappears. 4. A public claims log.    Platforms above a size threshold must publish, with personal addresses redacted: claimant identity or registered agent, date, outcome, time to restore, and whether the claim was disputed or withdrawn. Sunlight is how you find bounty-hunter patterns. 5. Restoration and lost-revenue repair when the claim fails.    If a dispute or counter-notice succeeds, the copy goes back. Redirected ad money from the wrongful period goes back to the creator. The audience is not a rounding error. Named cases, not composites:   Lenz v. Universal (2015) — a toddler dancing to Prince.   Online Policy Group v. Diebold (2004) — DMCA notices used to bury leaked emails about voting-machine security. Diebold lost under § 512(f).   YouTube Copyright Transparency Report (2025) — about 8.7 million Content ID claims were successfully disputed in one year on one platform. Those claims did not survive a challenge. Each video had viewers. Sign this petition. Share it. Tell Congress the 1998 bargain was built for a smaller internet, and the people who live on this one are done being the collateral. #DMCAReform2026 #CreatorProtectionAct #DMCA #TakeDown

Grok is NOT Super Intelligence, Smarter Intelligence Yes.

@Support @bot Awesome job on the Emoji replies, I LOVE EM!!!