https://xitter-newx.xyz-mikolabs.workers.dev/t.co/RjlP6s2QoD
New York, USA
Joined June 2017
- Tweets16.2K
- Following135
- Followers7.8M
- Likes42.1K
Pinned Tweet
Today marks one year.
To my friend Charlie Kirk.
Join us LIVE:
youtube.com/live/S07n8TnRT0Q
I’m afraid to say this is accurate.
The Macrons have indeed filed a NEW set of claims against me. 88 in total, and this time, they want justice over my Brigitte-Doll.
Those of you who are fans of the show know that Brigitte-Doll has never pursued the limelight. For her to be called “grotesque” by the French couple is hurtful, to say to the least. The bleach incident referenced in the filing was a traumatizing incident, which occurred during a polar vortex in Tennessee.
Brigitte-Doll will be making no further statements at this time.
🚨 French President Emmanuel Macron and First Lady Brigitte Macron have filed a NEW defamation lawsuit against far-right podcaster Candace Owens in Tennessee.
The massive 409-page complaint accuses Owens of spreading “outlandish, defamatory, and far-fetched fictions” about Brigitte Macron for financial gain, including selling merchandise and soliciting donations tied to her claims. politico.eu/article/the-macr…
Thank you all for the 2.5 million views on the handover episode with Baron.
Today will be his first day filling in for me!
Hope you guys enjoy.
@baroncoleman
youtube.com/live/3Cp9TwQM7cM…
I’m not even being funny but I think he should consider checking into a rehab clinic. He can’t even successfully recall what I’ve said or done anymore, yet he forces a conversation about it anyway, every episode.
This is a man who needs a team of therapists, not a podcast. He’s trying to intellectualize an unhealthy obsession with a former work colleague, and he is unfortunately surrounded by people on his payroll who will never tell him it’s making him sick.
It also appears to be taking a physical toll on him now too.
I’ve honest to God never seen anything like this in the corporate world.
I’m afraid to announce that the debate/discussion between me and @leahfiles will not be happening. My take is that we are dealing with someone who is mentally unwell and is incapable of remembering what she said or did 5 minutes ago.
Officially, Renn claims that her schedule is completely booked with podcast media for the midterms, followed by travel to see her clients— leaving her unavailable until the 16th earliest. Since she will inevitably misrepresent what was said, please find it below.
I want off her DARVO crazy train so I am done here. Anyone who does not realize this woman is a fraud, who made up her background in intelligence, is using AI tools to create fake “deep dives”, and is additionally plagiarizing the work of other independent media sources— deserves to be scammed.
Between the fake tears, the 3am crash-outs, and the verifiable lies, this is clearly a distraction op and I’m no longer taking the bait. Best of luck to her on her midterm podcasting tour though.
Erika Kirk is being protested at Middle Schools because she is forcing “school assembly” events via the administration.
I cannot stress enough how creepy this is.
It was never Charlie’s vision to force politics on middle schoolers via principals and administrations.
It was his vision to have students willfully create clubs, invite speakers and win people over with ideas.
If the Left was doing this, every person on the right would be calling this out.
Leave underaged kids alone.
And what’s even more embarrassing is TPUSA execs trying to spin and highlight these protests as though they are owning the left.
Bro. These kids are 11-13 years old. Their parents are writing to local newspapers saying they don’t want you in front of their children and they are concerned about safety.
Everything about this looks and feels predatory.
Just put an end to it.
🙌🙌
Also what exactly does Macron’s lawyer mean when he says they would consider “other ways” to hold me personally accountable despite the ruling.
Your client is the sitting President of a foreign country that is currently on fire. He should maybe reflect and consider ways to be personally responsible to his countrymen.
nytimes.com/2026/10/27/busin…
I am in the absolute best mood over this Macron dismissal. Feels like a year and a half of my family having to deal with psychotic lies regarding pending bankruptcies, secret accounts and plans to flee the country, has finally come to end.
For those of you wondering what happens now with the case, here is a synopsis:
You will note the Macrons additionally named two other business entities in their lawsuit: Candace Owens LLC and GeorgeTom Inc. They admitted in our hearing that they were unsure if one or both of these entities housed the podcast and that they would need limited discovery to determine how those businesses run and who runs them.
As it turns out, one of the above mentioned entities has absolutely nothing to do with the podcast in any way, shape, or form, so it will be a legal exercise in futility for the couple.
In effect, that leaves just one entity.
In addition to my personal dismissal, the court also decided in favor of our argument that France’s defamation law should apply.
Let me explain to you why that decision deeply impacts matters and was a major point of legal contention; France’s defamation law has a statute of limitation of just 3 months. This means defamation claims time out very quickly.
We argued the Macron couple was intentionally forum shopping because being held to France’s 3 months would have naturally expired their claims. We included a briefing from a French legal expert explaining French defamation law.
The Macrons did not submit a briefing to counter our arguments, but during oral arguments they suggested that France has a unique statutory law that could, in theory, extend claims up to one year IF the defamation claim pertains to an individual’s sexual orientation or gender.
Before ruling on the dismissal pertaining to the remaining entities, the judge is allowing for the Macron couple to submit a supplemental brief, arguing why they believe this case could meet that threshold
In his response (see below), the Judge has duly noted our legal expert’s notation that in parallel cases filed by the Presidential couple against other journalists in France, the couple sued under France’s 3 month defamation rule—not the one year statutory.
I believe it is worth again noting that the couple is NOT and has never sued anyone for matters pertaining to sex, sexual orientation, or gender (despite intentional media misrepresentations), but rather for defamation related to claims regarding MK Ultra and theft.
You are free to read their initial filing against me yourself.
So what happens now is the remaining entities and the Macrons submit additional briefings regarding French law and statutes. The judge will then rule on the lingering dismissals.
🚨BREAKING NEWS:
I was just personally dismissed from the Macron lawsuit filed against me in Delaware.
This case represents one of the grossest, legal overreaches by a foreign government leader in human history—a sitting President’s attempt to personally bankrupt a single podcaster from outside the nation in which he governs.
And to formally reiterate since many reporters willfully lied about this most important detail: I was NEVER being sued for stating that Brigitte Macron was born a male. I was instead being sued for discussing MK Ultra and for allegedly accusing the “First Lady” of theft from her sister.
I am tremendously grateful to the Delaware courts and to the presiding Judge for looking at this case objectively, despite false media depictions and government pressures.
🚨BREAKING NEWS:
I was just personally dismissed from the Macron lawsuit filed against me in Delaware.
This case represents one of the grossest, legal overreaches by a foreign government leader in human history—a sitting President’s attempt to personally bankrupt a single podcaster from outside the nation in which he governs.
And to formally reiterate since many reporters willfully lied about this most important detail: I was NEVER being sued for stating that Brigitte Macron was born a male. I was instead being sued for discussing MK Ultra and for allegedly accusing the “First Lady” of theft from her sister.
I am tremendously grateful to the Delaware courts and to the presiding Judge for looking at this case objectively, despite false media depictions and government pressures.
I’m going to deport her as soon as I get home. I told nanny #5 several times she has to chill with the español.
Now look what she’s done. 😩
youtu.be/BXkFQjO6k7Q?is=ss3t…
This was actually a fantastic answer. Don’t care what your opinion is regarding James Fishback. The majority of America feels this way about the Charlie Kirk assassination despite the DOD’s best attempts to Operation -Mockingbird the public.
For the record, I never authored even one opinion piece for the Daily Wire.
You guys ghostwrote all of them and then slapped my name on it as the author for clicks.
Good luck finding the intern (or AI system?) you’re upset with.
@CommunityNotes
Or… and hear me out because this theory is even crazier…
OR the person who makes my thumbnails and graphics speaks multiple languages and simply made a mistake.
And since he doesn’t work for a narcissist and he rarely, if ever, makes mistakes he knows it’s no biggie.
I typo all the time X. We have a small team. Get over yourselves and thank you for the never ending free-marketing.
(Watch the vid— it’s a good one!)
Sorry for the late reply. Please note my husband protected me and our children from running afoul of immigration law by filing his paperwork appropriately. He was able to make time to do so by resisting the urge to *repeatedly* and spinelessly attack women via social media who have done nothing to him.
Handle your affairs at home before you concern yourself with the households of others. 🙏🇬🇭
I never let go of the Egyptian planes. Always knew they were a piece of the Charlie Kirk assasination. They completely overreacted when I mentioned them and Erika made such an awkward joke about them at AmFest when she should have been naturally concerned about them. Plus Joe Kent was blocked from looking into them.
Never once doubted they were/are a major piece of the puzzle.
280 community notes from just ONE person. Just incredible. Every day people wake up and just fictionalize narratives about me. I work for Russia, I work for the Vatican, I work for Israel, I’m funded by Qatar, I’m getting a divorce, I’m a lesbian, I was in love with Charlie, I secretly hated Charlie, I have a mansion that houses my illegal 8 nannies, my husband is Mi6, I’m reading ads for the Mossad, I’m hiding money in secret LLCs for fear of bankruptcy. I plan to flee to Russia.
I’m Time’s Most Vile Person of the year.
Like what actually is there left to make up about my life. Where do we go from here? I want you guys to think carefully about this while I’m on maternity leave because I think I’ve made it clear that I AM NOT LETTING THE DEEP STATE, PUBLIC ASSASINATION OF CHARLES JAMES KIRK GO. He was an innocent young man who didn’t deserve the betrayal and death sentence he received.
Thank you for your attention to this matter!
Community Notes on Laura Loomer posts about @RealCandaceO.
Every one labeled misleading.
Here they are.
I have not deleted a single post. Again, your pithy research is wrong.
If it needs reminding, I made one public and TRUE statement on X that I was not prohibited from speaking about any topic on Shawn Ryan’s show— including Peter Thiel, who we discussed. My episode aired the week before you went on his show. I made no further public comment nor would I have ever addressed you publicly had you not decided to publicly drag me, question a simply ad read, and refer to me as a shill because you could not comprehend the *private* feedback I gave you on the substack you shared with me.
You should be calling NO ONE a shill. Your entire background is manufactured (contract work for the NSA and CIA, finance and accounting and now a tech expert but never heard of a liability clause or the petrodollar? K.)
It is obvious that you are producing AI-generated substacks based on publicly available information. Nothing you present is new or breaking and for those of us who have spent an entire year working on just ONE story, watching you pop in as a chaos agent to sow unnecessary drama is an annoying deviation.
I’m responding to you because you are now annoying me.
You are not a victim of some deep state attack because you managed to google “who owns flock” and had a bad interview with someone who saw through your bullshit.
As a bonus, here is the full context of our correspondence which you read aloud at 3am in the morning in a random x space. This is the correspondence that led to your determination that I was a shill. I apologize for not writing you a 2am dissertation on why your article made no sense.
Will state again you are FREE to publish the entire conversation because I have nothing to hide.
Candace, what is your end goal? To destroy an independent researcher and save face because Glacier is a sponsor/advertiser of yours and your audience made note of it? Because they made note of how quickly you involved yourself in something that wasn’t yours to be involved in, then turns out that same person co owns the company that pays you? That’s a conflict of interest and they are asking you about it. Instead of addressing it, you attack me and my credibility.
That article had been up days before your ad read but you do all this AFTER your ad read.
Then you write a post lying about me, which you have since deleted. Now you are in comments? What did my comment have to do with you? It didn’t. So why comment?
I wish you the best.
This is positively insane and there is no way that this should be legal.
Everyone is freaking out over this clip but tbh, it’s just classic female projection.
Alex Cooper is not really speaking to Sophia, she is speaking to (and intentionally disrespecting) her current husband bc she knows he will see this clip and she wants him to know she’s unhappy in their marriage.
Sophia Bush is looking for reassurance that her two failed marriages (which each lasted less than a year) are not her fault.
It’s meaningless banter between two insecure women looking to validate their own life choices.
No disrespect to either of them. Just stating the obvious. Wrote a lot about this topic in my last book.
