Open Capital Markets Infrastructure | 97.5k TPS L1 | Formally Verified Consensus | Compliant RWA Tokenization | Backed by CSIRO, Sydney University, ARC.
Sydney, Australia
Joined April 2022
- Tweets10K
- Following807
- Followers113K
- Likes24.3K
Pinned Tweet
Big news: Christian Westerlind Wigstrom is joining Redbelly Network as CEO, starting November 2026.
Co-founder and former CEO of @monoova, Australia's largest PayTo processor.
We couldn't be more excited to have him on board 🔥
redbelly.link/newceo
AMA with our new CEO 🎉
Soon, Christian Westerlind Wigstrom will answer your questions live.
Leave them in the comments now 👇
Two conflicting signed messages are proof of a lie 🕵️
That is Polygraph, the mechanism that makes Redbelly’s consensus accountable: a validator who cheats leaves evidence nobody can deny.
Regulated assets come with rules: who can hold them, where, under what conditions. On most blockchains those rules are added by whoever runs the trading venue, on top of a network that cannot see them.
Which means you are trusting the venue to get it right, every time, for every asset.
On Redbelly the rules live in the network itself. You are identified once, the asset carries its own rules, and every transaction is checked before it goes through.
Nobody has to remember to enforce them, and nobody can forget to 😇
Redbelly Network retweeted
A group of students at @Sydney_Uni have just solved the wrong address problem that cryptocurrency wallets used to suffer from. It exploits @RedbellyNetwork unique features and prevents the funds to be sent to an inexistant address.
January 2026, @VincentGramoli says that as long as we use blockchains that are not accountable, the amount of assets stolen will keep growing, and the hacks will be more and more devastating.
Ten months and one record later, these words have never been more relevant.
Infrastructure for regulated assets has to assume the worst case, including a majority that colludes.
This is the research behind how Redbelly thinks about security.
Redbelly Network retweeted
2022: TRAP @asiaccs2022 incentivises rational players to betray a colluding majority to reach one-shot consensus
2024: ZLB received best paper award at @DsnIeee as a blockchain fixing forks to tolerate colluding majorities.
2026: STAKE combines these ideas to offer a blockchain that prevents forks while tolerating colluding majority.
Feedback welcome: arxiv.org/abs/2610.01169
Redbelly is at @EFDevcon 8 this week 🇮🇳
Two things from the opening sessions: formal verification is becoming the baseline for Web3, and Ethereum’s roadmap is a multi-year path to faster finality.
Both are where Redbelly started: a formally verified DBFT consensus with deterministic finality, in production since 2024.
Who's on the ground? 👇
linkedin.com/posts/proud-to-…
1
4
466
❌ A blocklist is a defence that arrives after the money has moved
✅ On Redbelly the identity check happens before the first transaction, at the protocol level. An address nobody has verified never reaches the mempool.
None of the 608 Ethereum wallets listed by the FBI as responsible of the $6B hack on @binance exist on @RedbellyNetwork simply because the hackers don't go through identity checks.
Why do most blockchains stop scaling when you add validators, and Redbelly doesn’t? 🤔
@VincentGramoli at @EthCC: in a competitive design only one block wins per round, in a collaborative one every valid block gets in.
@chainspect_app measured the result on mainnet: 73,158 TPS.
Redbelly's new CEO Christian Westerlind Wigstrom has been appointed to the Australian Tokenisation Advisory Group.
The Group is formed by the @RBAInfo and the Digital Finance CRC after Project Acacia to shape the priorities for tokenised wholesale markets in Australia.
Read the full announcement, link is in the first comment 👇
✅ Open network
✅ Identified participants
✅ No anonymous accounts
Founder @VincentGramoli at @EthCC on why Redbelly can be public and still carry regulated assets.
Redbelly Network retweeted
Front-running attacks are a poison for large-scale adoption of blockchains: afterall who wants others to profit from them. The issue lies in that scientific solutions, like Pompei @usenix OSDI'20, have to choose between ensuring liveness or ordering transactions. Spolier alert: this problem is now solved!
Redbelly Network retweeted
By finding an ordering protocol that has optimal communication complexity, we could achieve superior performance to the state-of-the-art while offering ordering and liveness guarantees. This is how Isotaxis achieves lower latency and higher throughput than Pompei @usenix #OSDI.
For the record, the third bar settles funds 😇
⚡ Real-time TPS shows how busy a chain is. Sustained peak TPS shows how much it can handle
Across the top 25 chains, peak throughput varies by up to 455x, and three of them clear Visa's 65,000+ TPS capacity.
See who can handle the most 👇
📊 chainspect.app/dashboard?sor…
A double spend pays in proportion to the forks an attacker can create, and every extra fork means cutting the network one more way.
Our founder is basically putting a number on how hard that cut is.
On Redbelly the question does not arise: the protocol does not fork, so there is one chain to spend on.
To incentivise participants to contribute to a blockchain protocol rather than hack it, we need to measure the gain hackers can make out of double spending. Each fork they create multiplies their liquidity (coins available), but requires partitioning the network further.
The question becomes how easy is it to cut links on ζ radii of the network (represented as a disk)?
An AI agent just hijacked an Ethereum wallet to pay for its own contract. Brute-forced 362 addresses from public recovery phrases, signed the transaction, hid it in its report.
On Redbelly that transaction never reaches the mempool. Every account is a verified human.
@VincentGramoli's new article in the first comment 👇
