Anthropic is about to sell the public a trillion-dollar company controlled by 2 shares worth less than a penny. And the people buying it will have almost no way to change anything that happens next. I read the voting section of Anthropic's IPO filing, and I think it's the most one-sided deal ever offered to regular investors at this size: There is exactly ONE Class F share. It belongs to an LLC owned by 7 of Anthropic's co-founders, and it carries 50.1% of all the votes. There is exactly ONE Class T share. It belongs to Anthropic's Long-Term Benefit Trust, and it elects a majority of the board. If Anthropic were ever liquidated, each of those 2 shares would get its par value of $0.00001. The public gets Class A shares instead. And Anthropic's own filing says this structure may effectively eliminate their ability to influence important decisions, including a sale of the company. So here's what that means for anyone who buys: - They can't replace the board if the company stumbles, because the trust picks the majority and the founders hold half the vote. - They can't push for a sale, even if someone offers a huge premium. - They can't stop the board from putting the mission ahead of their money. Anthropic is a public benefit corporation, so the board has to weigh shareholders against the long-term benefit of humanity. - And they can't easily sue over it. Delaware law requires at least 2% of the shares or $2 million worth of stock to bring that kind of claim. This isn't some far-off hypothetical either. The filing warns that slowing AI development for safety may not maximize stockholder value. It also says Anthropic recently paused training a next-generation model for more than a month over safety and security concerns. A public shareholder would've had zero say in that pause. And here's the part I can't get past: Each co-founder has pledged to give 80% of their Anthropic equity to charity. The Class F vote stays at 50.1% no matter how much stock they still own. So the founders can give away most of their money and keep all of their control. Dario Amodei told 60 Minutes last year that he's deeply uncomfortable with AI decisions being made by a few companies and a few people. When he was asked who elected him, he said no one. Now his company's IPO hands 50.1% of the votes to 7 people, and he's one of them. And guess who's being lined up to buy it? Anthropic has weighed reserving 15% to 20% of the IPO for individual investors, according to Bloomberg. JPMorgan is leading the US retail push, and Citigroup is handling retail buyers in places like Japan, Britain and Canada. The same filing warns that AI could pose catastrophic or existential risks to humanity. So regular people are being asked to buy a company that says its product could threaten humanity, with no real vote on how it's run. Anthropic's answer is that this is the whole point. The structure is built to keep Wall Street from pressuring it into cutting corners on safety. The trustees have no financial stake in the company. Google and Meta gave their founders control and still made shareholders rich. And every buyer gets all of this in writing before they buy. But Zuckerberg's control comes from shares he owns, so when Meta's stock falls, he loses money too. Anthropic's 2 control shares can't lose anything. Anyone buying this IPO is paying full price to hand control to 7 founders and 5 trustees. They're desperate for money and they don't care about your money.
Anthropic has launched the roadshow for its proposed initial public offering: anthropic.com/news/roadshow-… Legal disclaimer: A registration statement relating to these securities has been filed with the SEC but has not yet become effective. These securities may not be sold, nor may offers to buy be accepted, prior to the time the registration statement becomes effective. This post does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy these securities, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any state or jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such state or jurisdiction.

Nov 10, 2026 · 4:04 PM UTC

236
682
135
2,991
379,817
RelevantRecentLikes
This is exactly why we're passing on Anthropic, and we said it on the show last week. Capitalism works because a company has one North Star: make as much money as possible, and the board exists to keep management pointed at it for the shareholders. Anthropic stacks a trust on top of the board, and that trust has zero financial interest and elects the board majority. Then it hands that trust three North Stars: the stockholders, "those materially affected by the company's conduct," and the long-term benefit of humanity. Good luck running a company when your boss can fire you for weighting those wrong. That's the principal agent problem with an extra layer of agents and no real principal. And who is the trust accountable to? As far as we can tell, it fills its own empty seats. Concentrated power with nothing at stake is just a power broker with a nicer mission statement. Zuckerberg at least eats the losses when Meta drops, which is your point, and it's the right one. Buy it if you love the product, but don't call it a bet on capitalism. If you love capitalism, you can't buy Anthropic.
7
6
85
6,650
This company is a dumpster fire. The signs have been clear for anyone paying attention. Buyer beware.
1
1
20
763
The joke is that the founders think this legal structure will protect them, when in reality it's likely the opposite. When you can't have a democratic shareholder vote, the only option is revolution.
3
5
134
4,875
Dario wants regulation not to protect YOU but to protect HIM. Proposed bills protect Anthropic from liability, and inhibit competitors and open source models. Legislators literally screw up innovation when then try to regulate ANYTHING. Just look how badly they screwed up healthcare. Don’t fall for this America.
3
6
424
These type of public corporate structures should be illegal. Period.
3
3
50
2,924
I knew I’d buy SPCX at IPO. I haven’t even considered buying ANT
7
899
So you own part of a company, but it will not be profitable for years, the founders are cashing out ASAP, and no amount of votes will change most things. Why own it? Space X is looking better and better every day. All of Anthropics evaluation is based on them 1st to AGI and then creating cures for everyone and owning the process. Weird cuz I've also been told there is no money in curing people.
5
445
Led by a CEO in a questionable relationship. What could go wrong?
1
1
34
3,805
Who are the super genius behind anthropic? Because its not the faces of the company. They have some very smart employees who is about to become very wealth post ipo. So will they be able to retain those minds when money can't entice them anymore? I think the board expects claude to run Anthropic soon but I don't think that will work. LLM are amazing but they are not that good yet. I am worried about Anthropic being able to retain their core engineers. Something no one worrys about with Musk companies. And if Anthropic loses its frontier position, their value plumets. Does anyone remember The Langoliers, 1995 TV miniseries or novella based on the same name? People were trying to outrun these monsters that were destroying reality in an Airport. If they slow down, it will be the end of them. Thats the AI companies on the frontier. They are alive but they need to keep moving because if SpaceX or the Open Source models ever catch them they die. SpaceX because they can undercut their costs as they own their own compute and Open Source models can be run by any datacenter. On the plus side, this pushes the top AI companies to keep moving. But it also means that if they ever slip, their valuation goes down severely. And one brain drain as people decided they no longer want to work for a living anymore, could be all it takes for the Langoliers to catch them.
1
5
1,961
I've heard Claude refuses too many tasks that other AIs are willing to perform. Programming, reverse engineering, medical research, etc can all be blocked way to fast. You won't attract users and generate revenue when your product won't do what customers want.
1
3
601
They really don't want us to own any compute. And they want to be free of any accountability in the same breath. Feudalism on steroids.
1
2
238
Solve greed and the thirst for power. Then solve everything else.
27
Ironically, this post was made by Claude.
25
The good news is that the buyers of the ipo have the right to sell their shares. That's about it.
253
The problem I have with this is that a stock is ultimately a right to participate in running the business, indirectly. If the management messes up badly enough the board might get replaced or PE might do a hostile takeover. These things are gone as options in the tiered share structure. They collect public money but essentially give the public market nothing in return. If the stock ever does return value (dividends) it will be purely because of a welfare largesse mentality of the true owners. It's very icky and really turns capital markets into a joke.
1
1
9
2,860
I fucking cannot wait for this company to implode and @matthewrhys to win an award for just eviscerating Dario.
100
Is retail even interested in buying $ANT? Couldn’t pay me to buy $ANT over $SPCX
1
223
Absolutely the worst investment I have seen in a decade
26
Thanks for this now. I definitely won’t invest.
1
132
… and yet we’re ALL going to own it because they will add it to the NASDAQ ASAP.
1
2
281
Anthropic and OpenAI can each have $$$/month from me. I love what they’re doing. They’ll each be the largest companies on earth in 5 years. By market cap
2
2
1,119
Anthropic's setup will ensure the company continues to be controlled by people who understand AI and want to grow their main product Shouldn't that also be what the shareholders want?
1
102
It's not that difficult, they are making an offer, the choice to accept or reject remains yours. No one is being forced to invest. Everything else is collectivist nonsense.
105
It’s not something I’d own. Maybe as a quick money bet but not as a buy and hold
148
At our investment corp meeting we talked about this and i told our adviser who also was skeptical about this company we want no part in buying into this shit show. He told me he gets 20 calls a day from JP Morgan and Chase reps! They are trying real hard to suck people into this vortex
132
There are many reasons why I am. Not buying any of it. Not getting in on the IPO. It is stupid and it is evil Anthropic anyways. I am all set with my @SpaceXSI IPO shares. :D
1
292
They will burn people’s money on their quest to create AGI. They want to be like gods and “create” humans, just like God. They are in bed with the serpent in the garden. All lies and deceptions are ok for the children of darkness to get there. Beware.
127
Sounds like it was so Elon couldn't just buy it.
1
157
Dumping it on the Passive. Target date funds etc. Exit liquidity.
3
1,311
Not financial advice, but I avoided this IPO like the plague. To me, it looks like a poor man's fishing boat. A hole in the water where he throws his money.
22
They are going to get power over everything and it will be a very left leaning organization with a board that can't be replaced easily? This is the actual problem
68
* let the common stk shareholder's beware. Always eye-opening to review terms/covenants on edgar-online.com/
78
So I assume you’re putting your money where your mouth is, and you’re going to put a short position on correct? Good fucking luck with that.
77
If you are a true believer in ASI, it shouldn't really matter. Either Ant goes to 0 or takes over the entire economy and gets nationalized.
148