Stuart Syvret (@StuartSyvret) profile picture

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret. Whistle-blower; July 2007 exposed decades of child-abuse cover-up on Brit tax-haven Jersey island. International anti-mafia activist.

A safe location in the USA
Joined July 2009
Photo by Stuart Syvret (@StuartSyvret)Photo by Stuart Syvret (@StuartSyvret)Photo by Stuart Syvret (@StuartSyvret)Photo by Stuart Syvret (@StuartSyvret)Photo by Stuart Syvret (@StuartSyvret)Photo by Stuart Syvret (@StuartSyvret)Photo by Stuart Syvret (@StuartSyvret)Photo by Stuart Syvret (@StuartSyvret)Photo by Stuart Syvret (@StuartSyvret)Photo by Stuart Syvret (@StuartSyvret)
Considered in-the-round. “THE DARK ZONE How the British Mafia Blew its Cover The author of this document was struck by the reaction of an early reviewer from overseas who, after commenting on the uniqueness of the situation, confessed to laughing uncontrollably….. 1/10
29
433
30
332
Should these statements seem hyperbole, each & every one is evidenced on Brit Monarch off-shore tax-haven Jersey island. How did so much crime & decadence happen? British chaps in London. Imagine the film Casino, if the Chicago Mob had failed to reign-in the Santoro brothers.
"Super-injunctions" are a tool of: Mafia; Child-molesters; Rapists; Nazis; Murderers.
1
3
10
431
I'm asked by a certain Jersey island account, 'What does all this mean, where does it go?' Not complicated. It means that the Jersey island gangsters take the fall. Or - the Monarchy does. Hey, frankly I'd prefer the latter. Making history. Serving the greater good.
3
61
"Super-injunctions" are a tool of: Mafia; Child-molesters; Rapists; Nazis; Murderers.
Replying to @StuartSyvret
I'll write in greater detail on Substack. For the moment, know this. On Brit Monarch Jersey island, super-injuctions were used to conceal: Rape; Serial-murder; Child-abuse; Child-murder; Police corruption; Judicial corruption.
1
5
1
11
851
Heishi making full use of his human after a tiring day.💤🐈
23
383
I said earlier that I would write more on this subject of "super-injuctions" later today. However, thinking about it, the issue of super-injuctions, the attendant corruption, and the use of such devices to conceal serious crime, is too important for a few tweets.
Replying to @I_amMukhtar
Technically speaking, super-injuctions are already ultra vires. I was/am subject to a super-injunction on Jersey island. It was issued by & on behalf of gangster Freemasons ...
1
5
8
323
I'll write in greater detail on Substack. For the moment, know this. On Brit Monarch Jersey island, super-injuctions were used to conceal: Rape; Serial-murder; Child-abuse; Child-murder; Police corruption; Judicial corruption.
2
4
1
7
583
Few people know this, but the British Crown Dependacies, such as Jersey island, remain pure Monarchies. Thus the Brit Monarch is not a powerless symbolic head-of-state, but an all-powerful supreme Monarch. We're going to see about that.
... but also those who had covered-up those criminals. Such as Jersey island "judges". Interestingly, as an unreformed Monarchy, the Brit Monarch is responsible for all the forgoing criminality.
3
6
234
Breakfast was served to the Heish!🐈♥️🍗
1
2
23
343
Orange Bud, Heishi, & Dumpling on the Resolute Windowsill.♥️
2
1
29
378
Yep ... here comes the Heish.🐈♥️
1
22
362
The sun is shining and it's morning ... do we know what that means ... ?
5
16
381
One thing we can be pretty sure about, MAGAts are not even remotely smart.🤣🤣🤣
This quoted post is unavailable.
1
10
439
For American readers, 'nonce' is Brit prison slang for a child-molester. It's an acronym drawn from the words, 'not on normal courtyard exercise', because child-molesters - the lowest scum - obviously attract "prison justice". See Ian Watkins, & Ian Huntley for reference.
2
16
1
35
529
There's plenty of bad news in the world. So relax and enjoy wild kitty Heishe and his tail shadow dance.❤️
Here comes the tail and the Heish; wild kitty Heishi does his morning shadow dance.🐈♥️
1
2
17
412
Indeed one of the all-time great press corrections! "The correction read: "This article was amended on Oct 31, 2014. An earlier version said: 'A lot of what he says is ghost-written sub-Chomskyian woo.' This has been corrected.""🤣🤣
If only the allegations were KNOWN years ago when he was used to boost @Labour support🧐 🚨BRAND’S RECKONING SHOULD BE UNDOING OF OWEN JONES🚨 By @suzanne_moore @owenjonesjourno claims to have met Brand twice. Didn't he not watch him on panels making RAPE jokes while women near him edge away? Didn't he see him invade personal space of women near him? In 2014, Russell Brand described Owen Jones, the Left-wing activist, as: "This generation's Orwell." It was a quote that Jones used on the cover of his book, The Establishment: And How They Get Away With It. These guys bigged each other up. Oh dear. Yet Jones wasn't the only one in Brand's thrall back then. In 2014, George Monbiot, the environmental campaigner, called Brand a hero, saying that because of his "emotional honesty", he was "the best thing that had happened to the Left in years". Meanwhile, Alastair Campbell was clearly enamoured by Ed Miliband rushing around to see Brand (whose shtick was that he didn't vote) during the 2015 general election campaign. "What Russell Brand says and does matters more than what The Sun, The Mail, The Telegraph, The Star and The Express are going to say on election day," said Campbell at the time. Brand did eventually encourage people to vote, but only after applications had closed. Revolutionary, right? I don't know whether these guys read any of his books, went to any of his shows, or actually took Brand seriously. And by seriously, I mean at his word. Did they not find his behaviour around women the least bit problematic at the time? I had to take him seriously when he threatened me with lawyers for calling his book "ghost-written". Not very radical, threatening journalists with lawyers, is it? Though it did result in a treasured correction under my previous column for The Guardian (who, incidentally, invited him into their news conferences). The correction read: "This article was amended on Oct 31, 2014. An earlier version said: 'A lot of what he says is ghost-written sub-Chomskyian woo.' This has been corrected." Now, everyone else is beginning to see how litigious he was. In 2015, he was granted a High Court injunction to shut up one complaining woman with a lifelong gagging order. Now that he is a convicted rapist, both Jones and Monbiot have apologised. Monbiot is at least straightforward. "When the revelations emerged, I was horrified," he said. "But I should have been more alert before, and have recognised the predatory nature of his treatment of other people." Well, yes. There were clues. Brand wrote in Booky Wook 2: "What kind of man was I? Treating women in this way? If this is what I'm telling you, can you imagine what's being left out?" He wrote about spitting in the face of a prostitute and kicking his dog down the stairs repeatedly when he was a child. He harassed the 78-year-old Andrew Sachs by leaving voice messages telling him that he had slept with his granddaughter. Wasn't any of this behaviour a tiny sign that this man should not be held up as a tribune of the Left? As for Jones, he couched his Brand apology in his usual, vomit-inducing sanctimony. "At the time I saw him as a crude means to reach disillusioned younger people with Left-wing politics – the sort of people who wouldn't be reached by conventional Left-wing journalists and politicians. As a result, I was willing to overlook, or just not look into, his history of problematic behaviour/statements, including sexism. I convinced myself that he was on some sort of journey and that was a good thing. That was an obvious misjudgement." Crude, yes. But "overlook" is the key word here. Who was he prepared to overlook? Women, obviously. These Left-wing men show us what they believe time and time again – women are disposable. Men such as these care desperately about trans women (other men) and "sex workers" (who they like to decriminalise), but forget the rest. Jones claims to have only met Brand twice. Did he not see Brand invade the personal space of any women who came near him? Did he not watch him on panel shows making rape jokes while any woman near him edges away? I went to see Brand in the early days when he was trying out material. It is true, as has been said, that he groomed his audience. The front row was full of girls whom he picked out because he wanted to have sex with them. The show went on for hours, and he boasted that he could go all night. It was feeding his ego, and he wanted to push everything into darker places. He riffed on paedophilia, bestiality and choking until it became boring and I decided to leave. This was not seduction – it was bullying. It was grinding down his audience into submission. Jones is keen to stress that Brand has now been taken up by mad Right-wing conspiracy theorists. This is true, but Brand only became considered a "political" figure because of the endorsement of much of the respectable Left – the part that turns a blind eye to misogyny in the name of the greater good. The circle-jerks of the Left protected a man who openly harassed women for their "cause". Apologies are really not enough, nor is this pretend concern about victims. It would be better to say nothing than to try to justify the unjustifiable. I welcome the discussion about how we conduct rape trials, what to do about our low conviction rate and what consent means. I am glad to see justice being done, but God, I wish we had moved on. In 1964, Stokely Carmichael, the Civil Rights and Black Power leader, was asked about the position of women in the revolution. "The only position for women [in the movement] is prone," he said. What's changed? uk.news.yahoo.com/russell-br…
3
169