The Moderate Case

Everyone’s sharing this clip now as if it’s something Nick just said… This clip is like half a year old.

Democrat elect Adam Hamawy, a Muslim who was born in Egypt, doesn’t think Iran is an enemy of America. I’m shocked!

This is a lie. Nobody will actually go read up on what happened, so let me explain. This is about a letter from 12 senators that does NOT call for ending U.S. military cooperation with Israel. It asks Congress to remove 3 provisions from the defense bill that would: 1. Mandate expanded joint weapons development, production, and sharing of sensitive military technologies, including AI, cyber, and quantum systems. 2. Require expanded intelligence sharing while restricting the president’s ability to reduce or suspend it. The senators are simply arguing that the president should decide whether to expand military and intelligence cooperation with Israel, rather than having Congress require it by law in a bill. They’re not calling for an end to existing cooperation and there’s a massive difference between saying “we shouldn’t be required to expand military ties with Israel” and saying “we should end those ties altogether.” That’s literally all this comes down to.

I’d argue that 90–95% of political influencers, commentators, and pundits online are fundamentally unserious and unprincipled. They’re more interested in being applauded for telling their audiences what they want to hear than risking that applause by telling them what they need to hear. The goal should ALWAYS be honest discourse that helps get America back on track and improves people’s lives, not simply winning approval from people who already agree with you.

Democrats may have just SAVED Pete Hegseth from impeachment in The House of Representatives. The House buried all 8 articles by only 7 votes, 211–204. 11 Democrats didn’t vote, including Nancy Pelosi. They needed just 8. Many Democrats are now melting down over their own party helping kill the effort.

Democrats freaking out over the failure to impeach Hegseth in the House are being so performative… You’d need a 2/3 vote in the Senate to actually remove him from office, and that wouldn’t happen, even if those 11 Democrats had voted. It’s all a spectacle. Totally unserious complaints.

Pete Hegseth is facing impeachment, and his defense today was basically: President Trump ordered it. But once you see what Truman, Clinton and Obama did without congressional authorization, this becomes WAY more complicated than it sounds. Watch this:

This is what I had to say before the war in Iran kicked off. Take a look at the foreign policy experts in the comments.

Disgraceful. What a spit in the face.

JD Vance never said that “Republicans” in general showed up and voted Democrat. He said that many people who voted Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. Trump voters in 2024 aren't the same as "Republicans" or the 54 million who voted GOP in the 2022 midterm. This chart is comparing the wrong groups. Raw totals can't show crossover anyway. If 3 million Trump voters flip blue and 3 million other people show up and vote red, the red bar doesn't move. You need voter-level data for that. Good for us, the data exists. CNN's Voter Poll and NORC both put it at about 7% of 2024 Trump voters backing Democrats nationally. In Texas, Ohio, Iowa, Kansas and South Carolina it was around 1 in 10. That switch can very easily decide close races in what were red states in 2022 and 2024. The extra Dem votes didn't come out of nowhere. About 18M more people voted than in 2022 (~125M vs ~107M). Independents went Democrat by double digits, people who didn’t vote in 2024 went heavily Democrat, and some of Trump voters flipped, so when you add this up, you get the blue bar (that is mathematically skewed on the graph to make it look worse than it is). Where Vance is wrong is "the main problem is not turnout." The GOP's share of the electorate dropped from 36% in 2022 to about 32-33% this year, so turnout hurt them. Crossover and a turnout drop both happened. Also, the count isn't finished. It's around 64M D to 49M R right now, so the 2026 bars in this chart are projections and aren’t very accurate.

Jensen Huang, Nvidia’s CEO, just admitted he was sleeping with a woman U.S. intelligence identified as a Chinese spy. The FBI is now involved and roughly $190 BILLION was wiped from Nvidia’s value overnight. President Trump reportedly knew about the intelligence operation a year ago, was briefed, and did nothing. This story is absolutely insane. Here’s everything we know:

Trump is openly saying he approved of JD’s tweet and that he was right about the war in Iran and voter’s responses. Now let’s see the “never Vance” crowd attack Trump the way they’ve attacked JD. They won’t.

Susie Wiles left Ballard Partners to run the Trump campaign and then the White House. The same year, Ballard’s lobbying revenue jumped from $19 million to over $88 million. Her daughter’s firm, Continental Strategy, went from under $2 million to $27 million. You’d be dumb to think this is all a coincidence. It’s the classic revolving-door cash-in… the people who used to work with you (and whose family still does) are now the ones controlling access. Clients who want to block food, chemical, chronic disease reforms, or anything else on the MAHA agenda suddenly have a much easier path in. Call it what it is. Corruption.

Trump says he’s open to working with Democrats to let some longtime undocumented immigrants stay legally, acknowledging his deportation policy may have been “too tough.” The President says Democrats have already called about a deal, and he now calls the deport-everyone crowd “pretty far right.”

Well, this is quite the reversal. The same president who made mass deportations a defining promise of his presidency is now entertaining a compromise with Democrats over illegal immigration.

You are, and will remain, irrelevant in any meaningful sense. Your entire claim to fame comes from embarrassing yourself on Jubilee and then getting thoroughly dismantled, intellectually and physically, on a podcast. More than half your following came after that episode aired. You’re a loudmouth whose relevance depends on controversy and the attention of clickbait-driven networks like Jubilee. You’ve mistaken being a spectacle for being someone of substance. People tune in to watch you embarrass yourself, not because they respect what you have to say. Know your place.

The anti-Israel morons apparently don’t realize that AIPAC is only one of several pro-Israel lobbying groups. Take Jon Ossoff here. Most of the pro-Israel donations to him are from J Street, a liberal organization that frequently disagrees with AIPAC. Ossoff hasn’t taken anything from AIPAC. This just goes to show how misleading and inaccurate these graphics are. Any political contribution associated with Israel gets labeled “AIPAC money,” regardless of where it actually came from. People are so eager to push a narrative that they can’t even be bothered to look into the facts themselves.

LOL. And so it begins. Laura Loomer, whose mouth is practically a vending machine for propaganda, is now going after DeSantis for not being sufficiently pro-Israel. As I predicted, watch how a select group of pundits treats anyone who doesn’t fall in line with their preferred vision for the GOP in 2028. There will be a sustained effort to undermine Vance and DeSantis while manufacturing support for Rubio. These people are clearly misreading where American politics is headed. My prediction is that both parties will increasingly reassess America’s relationship with Israel. Unconditional support is becoming a political liability, and I suspect that reality will become harder to ignore. Frankly, greater independence in the relationship could benefit both countries. Yet some pundits seem determined to treat any Republican who questions the status quo as politically unacceptable. There’s a difference between supporting Israel and demanding that American politicians agree with every aspect of its government’s policies. That distinction is going to matter enormously in the debate over the GOP’s future.

Watch the 2028 GOP primary discourse closely. I expect a handful of self-described “conservative” pundits on this app to spend the next two years trying to undermine JD Vance and Ron DeSantis while pushing Marco Rubio. From what I understand and have been told, Rubio has little personal interest in mounting a presidential campaign, much less entering a divisive primary against other members of Trump’s political coalition. Of course, things can change. But for now, my prediction is that we’ll see a sustained effort to manufacture momentum for a Rubio presidential candidacy, despite indications that Rubio himself has little interest in running.

For 2 years, far too much of the right’s messaging has been reduced to “owning the libs” and celebrating how angry Democrats supposedly are going to be. Meanwhile, many average Americans were struggling to afford basic necessities, wondering when all the promises of economic relief would actually translate into their everyday lives. But retards like this kept (and keep) recycling the same dumb culture-war talking points, as though “upsetting liberals” is some kind of political achievement. Completely out of touch.