Absolute gammon. Red-faced, fat, bald, smelly, alcoholic, racist, xenophobic, senile, dinosaur. 'Proper Chels' with two stars, grew up in Cobham. /s
SW6 1HS
Joined August 2022
- Tweets46.2K
- Following764
- Followers541
- Likes181K
principles of conservatism, and the conservatives sat on the right of the assembly.
"the rule of law"
Your view of the right is too narrow, and possibly too modern and Anglo-American. There were, and are, many conservative regimes that pay little respect to the rule of
2/
1
276
I upset a couple of Nazis* last night. Ho hum...
* Tbf, one wasn't an actual Nazi, just an ill-informed, ignorant snowflake.
2
4
271
Fascinating replies. It would appear a large part of it is about the food. Different sports cultures, and different sports.
xitter.twitterapi.xyz/MeanJoeGOAT/status/210…
Do you usually wander around all the sections at stadiums here in the US? I never really do that since most concessions/areas all look pretty similar but maybe I am missing out?
1
2
399
Really don't see much point in posts like this.
If EC is somehow still available, and the club does something about it, then it's time to talk. If we never hear anything more about it, then that's that.
Why don't people just wait until the club makes a decision? Or doesn't.
Been a CFC fan for 40 years, my dad since 1957. Chelsea Supporters Trust member.
I’m open to staying at SB if it can be done. But I’m also not against Earls Court - if it’s possible.
First, it ensures Chelsea can compete for the biggest and best players and trophies long term financially.
Second, IMO we should be embarrassed we have a smaller stadium than SPURS. People wreck the liquidator song like fans of a tiny club, then are happy they have a bigger stadium.
Third, we’re a giant club, with incredible history - we deserve a stadium which reflects this and still retains the magic of being Chelsea.
Fourth, many clubs have moved stadium and kept their soul, and their history intact.
Finally, Earls Court is in the same area of London, same commute, same pubs etc.
There’s some who are so dead against us getting a bigger stadium they tell you EC impossible.
It’s very difficult, yes, but not impossible.
Billionaires & successful businessmen make sure they know these things. If it were totally impossible they’d 100% know already and have ruled it out.
The soul of Chelsea isn’t us being a tiny club, a small group of fans seem to prefer us acting like a small club whilst still winning like a big club. Well that’s not how football works now.
Big clubs have big stadiums, we have big commercial deals, we need to make big revenue. We need these to compete for trophies.
I believe we can do this and still keep our soul though. Through involving the CPO and Chelsea Supporters trust.
Which is what we need to do.
2
8
763
Still happy with my decision in 2011. I didn't vote against moving from Stamford Bridge, I voted against moving at some time in the future to God knows where. If they'd had a location withing a reasonable distance I would have considered it, and perhaps voted differently.
Chelsea Pitch Owners reject club's attempt to leave Stamford Bridge | Chelsea | The Guardian share.google/p7GTTA1OXGaoyHn…
3
7
825
Nope. As I've already pointed out, these came either before there was a British Empire, or so early in its existence that they were not affected by its material or philosophical existence.
It appears you don't know much about British history.
You are reviewing issues that, without the material conditions provided by looting and pillaging, could never have been realized.
That explains itself amd well the original thesis about the low levels of British civility, present in the current day.
2
3
517
Your friend blocked me. So I'll open this here.
I disagree, I've given many world significant cultural achievements that were either before the age of empire, or in its very earliest stages (and not infuenced by it).
And the Vikings were not the 'civilisers' in this instance.
You're confirming the hypothesis that without looting and pillaging "Britain" couldn't have created any cultural infrastructure (such as the burning of Philosophy Christian books)
Let's add the fact that that people were civilized by primitive vikings.
That says a lot.
1
339
🏴 King of the Yerdas ⭐️⭐️ retweeted
Changing your name in Tel Aviv or Buenos Aires in 1949 doesn't retroactively remove you from a Westerbork transport list written in 1943, or hide you from emigration records. The ITS was on top of all of this.
You're making the claim that every single Dutch Jew who was sent to Sobibor (with the exception of the 18 who survived):
1. never contacted a single surviving relative
2. never filed a restitution claim on their own looted Lippmann-Rosenthal accounts, property, or insurance policies (their heirs did)
3. never appeared in the ITS/Arolsen tracing files, the DP registries, HIAS/JDC emigration records, or the Central Location Index
4. were never found by the Dutch Red Cross, which ran individual tracing on every single one of them
5. left estates that went unclaimed in Dutch probate