The world is changing, and in many places, gendered norms and expectations are being left at the door…
But not in all of them.
Dating remains one of the final bastions of such norms, not only in who *still* pays the bill, but in who initiates the date too.
As we know, it is usually the man who asks a woman out, and it’s something men across the world do every day, with varying results…
But amid the renaissance of women’s empowerment, why is it still so rare for women to take that initiative?
How often are men approached and asked out?
How many times has a woman, without being asked, slipped a man that piece of paper with her number on it?
Well, let’s ask the guys –
Men, how often do you get cold approached?
The word 'boys' doesn't feature a single time in this whole article.
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cmwy…
So often, the online conversation of ‘gender equality’, becomes infatuated on relatively fringe issues that directly impact very few people.
Meanwhile, universal issues, such as education, which impact quite literally everybody, are swept under the rug and widely ignored.
Here are the facts -
Boys and young men are behind at every stage of education, at every age, and in every Western country.
They are behind in every racial and socioeconomic group, and have been for around 45 years.
And its not just the degree that they’re missing on (which frankly I don’t care about), it’s the fact that high education is correlated with countless positive health outcomes, that men and boys deserve to benefit from.
So why do so few speak so little about what is happening to boys in school?
And what are the impacts down the line when we refuse to help them?
What do you think?
~
Speaking with El Podcast youtube.com/watch?v=6DEFMf_o…
Associates Degrees nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/…
Scholarships saveservices.org/2019/05/pr-…
Population in private households by educational attainment level ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databr…
B roll by Oli’s Danilvich, and Pavel Danilyuk from Pexels
When it comes to violent crime, it’s “not all men”, and we should become increasingly comfortable asserting that, until it becomes a widely accepted and mundane thing to say.
It’s not all men.
Not even most men, or anywhere close.
In fact, fewer than one in 400 American men are arrested for a serious violent crime in any given year.
And yet, this tiny speck of ‘men’ is all we ever seem to talk about.
So whilst I don’t deny that far too many women have horrific experiences at the hands of men, such things are largely down to a small minority of repeat offenders.
No good comes from blaming ‘men’ for the actions of such a minority, as it turns allies into enemies, and puts the blame where it doesn’t belong.
So yes, whilst the most violent people in society are (almost) entirely men, only a small percentage of men as a class are part of that group.
The vast majority of men are kind, wonderful people, just like the vast majority of women.
I often hear: “women are injured more” when it comes to intimate partner violence.
And it’s true, they are.
But it’s not so simple.
In US ER data (ages 15–39), 2.63x more women than men were injured by a partner.
But for people 'hospitalised' by IPV, that shrinks to just 1.27x, with injured men twice as likely to be admitted than women (6.7% vs 3.4%).
Why?
Well, because abusive women are more likely to use knives or sharp objects.
28% of men injured by a partner had cut or stab wounds from knives or sharp objects, vs 4.8% of women.
Meanwhile, 88% of women’s injuries came from being struck (vs 58% of men’s), which rarely leads to hospitalisation.
So whilst, yes, the large majority of injuries are against women, when it comes to injuries serious enough to cause hospitalisation, things are not so different.
And this isn't some small limited sample of people.
This is data from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission’s National Electronic Injury Surveillance System All Injury Program (NEISS-AIP) in America.
...an enormous, 20+ year database capturing MILLIONS of IPV emergency room visits.
Source: Gentzis & Dutton, Violence & Victims, Injury severity from intimate partner violence: Data from U.S. Hospitals, (in press).
The UK Government have dedicated £15 million to combat misogyny.
Meanwhile –
Boss kweens on TikTok talk about setting their child on fire, or 'throwing him into the streets' if he's a boy, calling it 'women's empowerment' and raking in hundreds of thousands of likes.
Nice.
Despite boys being behind girls in school, at more or less every stage, the only ‘boys education’ we seem to advocate for, are the lessons for them to not become sexual predators.
And I get it.
My issue is not that these lessons aren’t needed, they are, in fact, in many ways, they don’t go far enough.
They don’t go far enough, because they fail to see the other side of the problem, and tend to wholesale ignore the unseen perpetrators of abuse, violence, and coercion… who are girls.
Yes. I said it.
Demands to ‘educate your sons’ have offered useful, if not hard-to-hear lessons to our boys.
And now it’s time to teach them to our girls too.
So, educate your sons…
Educate your daughters…
And most of all, educate yourselves…
What do you think?
~
My new Ask Me (Us) Anything with @lisabritton is out now! youtube.com/watch?v=bAYEaT8W…
Youth Endowment Fund Data youthendowmentfund.org.uk/re…
The new Lancet 'manosphere' article claims 'the perceived female advantage these narratives assert is not borne out of evidence'.
So if female advantage is a myth, can they explain how women in education are ahead in every EU country?
You won't win men back by gaslighting then.
I wonder if @LaylaMoran or @SarahChampionMP would pass this, considering they were arrested for assaulting their husbands?
Both women went on to lead successful careers as senior politicians, with Sarah Champion even serving as Shadow Minister for Preventing Abuse (!!)
If you were to set foot in the women’s clothing section of any good fashion store, you would be greeted with a plethora of colours, textures, designs, patterns, shapes, fits, jewellery and more…
Behold! The shimmering majesty of satin. Look in awe at the cascading train of that sparkly sequined dress, or stand in disbelief at the endless racks of shoes in every style you can dream of, or wander through fields of trinkets in every shape, colour and design imaginable.
And once you’re done (assuming you find your way back out), take a quick look at the men’s section too.
Don’t worry, it won’t take long…
T-shirts: they come in black, white, grey and navy blue.
Trousers: also black, white, grey and navy blue.
Jeans.
And that’s about it.
Men and women often treat each other in fundamentally different ways, usually based on a highly gendered set of assumptions about the other.
We rightly hear about the frustrations women feel at how they are treated and perceived by men...
But now I’d like to ask the opposite...
Apparently the mere discussion of 'male victimhood' is now emblematic of 'the manosphere'.
Vilifying conversation of male victimisation is something we should embrace as part of everyday conversation, rather than further stigmatise with these chidlish, fear mongering policies.
Treat 'manosphere' similar to tobacco addiction, health leader warns amid explosion of misogynistic content
lbc.co.uk/article/manosphere…
I’ve tried so many things to highlight the absurdity of how society neglects men and boys.
Infographics, filmmaking, personal testimony, podcasts, reels, written word, campaigns, protests, petitions, animations, poetry...
Each of these have had different levels of success, and largely feel underwhelming.
No matter what I create, it can never truly showcase what is going on.
And then, something is sent to my inbox, an official Government document no less, that captures the whacky landscape of men and boys issues better than anything I could ever hope to create.
This particular document was titled:
‘Supporting male victims of crimes considered violence against women and girls’.
Errr… male victims of violence against women and girls?!
It’s hauntingly perfect.
So let’s take a look at the damage such “gendering” of issues creates, who it harms, and how…
~
My new Ask Me (Us) Anything with @lisabritton is out now! youtube.com/watch?v=bAYEaT8W…
Bilateral abuse researchgate.net/publication…
Injuries from bilateral abuse pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1739…
What started with me quietly creating content, hiding in my bedroom from a tyrannical man-hating house mate, is now me talking on national radio, on the biggest podcasts in the world, or sat on the main stage of Europe’s largest festival of the future, speaking in front of a sell out crowd.
What was originally an audience of one, became ten, then a hundred, a thousand, and is now one hundred thousand.
It’s been a rather wild ride, not one I ever expected, and nor is it one I could have done without you.
So thank you.
2
13
474
Despite being behind at every stage of education, in almost every area, and in every country in the west (with a few exceptions), the world is yet to fully wake up to what is happening to boys in school.
Instead –
We blame boys for not applying themselves, expecting them to sit still and read quietly for hours every day, within an educational system that is simply not designed for them.
And so these frustrated, bored and bemused boys disengage, misbehave, fall behind, and drop out; to the point that, by the time it comes to university, they are outnumbered by girls 3:2.
The systemic failure of boys is beyond doubt, and yet people don’t want to hear it…
Until, that is, they have a son of their own, and they see the tragic tale of boys’ educational underachievement play out in real time.
And this leaves us with a bizarre contradiction.
If you ask Americans: are they more worried about their sons or daughters, every group, men, women, liberals and conservatives, says “our sons”.
But ask them if they are more worried about girls or boys, then you’ll see liberals flip, with more concern for “girls”.
Yup they are worried for their sons, but less so for ‘boys’…
1
12
540
In America, men have worse health outcomes across every ethnic, racial and socioeconomic group; they are more likely to die at every age; and they lead in 13 of the top 15 causes of death.
Meanwhile, the National Institutes of Health spends about 2.5 times more on women’s health research than it does on men’s, and this has been true for nearly forty years.
Yet, despite this… there are now eight federal, tax-funded Offices of Women’s Health, and zero for men.
And so, statistically speaking, the formation of the first Office of Men’s Health seems like a no-brainer, and an urgently needed step to help stem the deluge of early male deaths.
But sadly, many still find it a controversial ask, and remain dedicated to undermining any political move to open such an office.
Instead, such people insist the opposite is true: that women’s health is where attention, and all the funding, should go.
So let’s look at the stats and ask what is so unpopular about men living long, healthy, happy lives…
What do you think?
~
My new Ask Me (Us) Anything with @LisaBritton is out now! youtube.com/watch?v=bAYEaT8W…
Men lead in 13 of the top 15 causes of death sciencedirect.com/science/ar…
NIH Gendered Funding jameslnuzzo.substack.com/p/n…
Men and boys have higher mortality at every age washingtonpost.com/wellness/…
Men have worse health in every group
congress.gov/bill/119th-cong…
Also shoutout to @JamesLNuzzo for his amazing work in this area too jameslnuzzo.substack.com/p/n…
1
24
1,020
And who are the remaining 3/4?
25 women and girls.
That’s how many were killed 𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙮 𝙙𝙖𝙮 in conflict zones in 2025.
#Peace must mean safety for women and girls.
🔗 More on the @UN Secretary-General's report on #WomenPeaceSecurity: unwomen.org/en/news-stories/…
#ForAllWomenAndGirls
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
According to the same UN report, women and girls accounted for one in four of over 37,000 civilian deaths in 2025. Men and boys were the remaining three-quarters. The report notes men are still likelier to be killed.
unwomen.org/en/articles/fa…
If, when, and who you marry could be the most important decision you ever make.
Yet, some people do it on a whim.
Some marry too soon.
Some marry the wrong person.
Some think marriage will fix things.
So, who better for men to get advice from, than married men themselves?
1
18
1,048
Yup.
Generations of sneering "we don't need men" and "the future is female", evaporates in the most terrifying way imaginable, as the young men whose soul we've chipped away at for decades, are needed as meat shields.
(no hard feelings against Wes, IMO he's done a lot for men)



























































