Vic Slayback (@TheVicious_One) header
Vic Slayback (@TheVicious_One) profile picture

Vicious takes & AI creations Can a brother get a follow?

World
Joined September 2016
Photo by Vic Slayback (@TheVicious_One)Photo by Vic Slayback (@TheVicious_One)Photo by Vic Slayback (@TheVicious_One)Photo by Vic Slayback (@TheVicious_One)Photo by Vic Slayback (@TheVicious_One)Photo by Vic Slayback (@TheVicious_One)Photo by Vic Slayback (@TheVicious_One)Photo by Vic Slayback (@TheVicious_One)Photo by Vic Slayback (@TheVicious_One)Photo by Vic Slayback (@TheVicious_One)
this is who you're arguing with, FYI
2
452
You can say what you want about Russell Brand, but he's no hypocrite
Idk why Russell Brand didn’t just simply say he didn’t do it
57
the goal of Obamacare was always to make healthcare so expensive that only the government could provide it
30
"We should have finished the job!" Define the job. No no no it's not a trick question. Seriously. What is "the job?"
18
Iran has been technologically capable of building a nuke for 40yrs and they never did it. They weren't going to either. But NOW they probably will. So the good news is we "beat" Iran in the war. The bad news is we'll probably have to do it all over again in 15yrs.
It's common to hear defenders of the Iran war praise Trump for acting to make sure Iran does not obtain a nuclear weapon. If you believe that is a good goal, as I do, there is still a problem: The US has already made sure Iran will not obtain a nuclear weapon for quite a while. The goal was probably achieved in June 2025, but if it needed a booster, it was certainly achieved in a day or two in February-March of this year. The rest of the war, including wiping out Iran's leadership, was not necessary to keep Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. Now, after a serious beating from the US, would Iran go back and restart its efforts to get a nuclear weapon? The answer is most likely yes. There is no forever solution to this problem. If Iran gets close to a nuclear weapon some years in the future, the US might have to take out its facilities again, which is entirely within US capabilities.
3
105
Every Democrat in office needs to be forced to disavow this
Scott Galloway calls Elon Musk a “traitor to the West” and invokes the Rosenbergs, who were EXECUTED after WWII. GALLOWAY: “We took the Rosenbergs and put them up against a wall and executed them for being traitors.” “And I realize this is an incendiary statement, but I’ll make it and I believe it. I think Elon Musk is a traitor to the West.” “If this had happened in any other age where we were not obsessed with innovators and money, a much different reaction would be playing out to Elon Musk.” These people are absolutely unhinged. CONTEXT: Scott Galloway is not some random but a bestselling author with a top podcast who regularly appears on cable news. His net worth is over $100 million, and he’s openly suggesting Musk deserves death. This is what the Democratic Party has become, and people voted for it.
1
53
I'm of two minds, if I'm honest. I really don't care either. It's very far away and we have very serious problems much closer to home. So on the one hand I could say we have no business being in the region militarily, and our presence there has done nothing but stir up trouble and drain us militarily and financially, and we should leave. On the other hand I recognize the strategic value of the Strait of Hormuz. Someone will control it. If the United States wants to admit that it operates as a worldwide Empire and commit to taking and holding that territory... Well, that would be a whole different ball of wax. Nobody's pitching that, though. It's just some amorphous horseshit that sounds a whole lot like WMD 2.0 and another quagmire.
I care about America because I am an American. I care about Europe (to a lesser extent because they are my cousins.) I even care about Japan because I think they are a culturally compatible nation who make a great ally. I don't care about the Middle East. That includes Israel and Iran. I don't care about conflicts or turmoil there. I don't care if they're at war. I don't care if the Mulahs are fighting the Zulas or the Umbas or any other name you can think up. I don't care about defending Israel or supporting Iran. The entire region is Mars to me. I simply don't care.
45
If Charlie was still alive, they'd be blaming him. UNFOLLOW
The person most responsible, in my opinion, for everything that just happened is Tucker Carlson, and not just because of his propaganda show and elevating all these New Right weirdos into everything. Because of his relationships: Don Jr., JD Vance, and so many others. He's the node at the center of pulling down the President.
31
Iran had an elected parliamentary government and the United States overthrew it, installed an exiled King as a puppet. 1953, Eisenhower. 1979 they shut down the US Embassy, the head of the defacto occupation force. Sold to Americans as a "hostage crisis," it was really a populist revolution. Into the power vacuum came the Mullahs. So the effect of US meddling was to turn a parliamentary government into a religious extremist movement. Please for the love of all that is holy, unfollow this faggot
People crack me up when they say Trump started the war with Iran. That war started in 1979. 7 presidents later, only 1 man is fixing it!
44
Unfollow these accounts that are going after Vance. Obviously Israel-first propaganda spewers. Clean your feed up. Unfollow, unfollow, unfollow.
JD Vance was the single biggest mistake in political history.
23
Unfollow these monday morning armchair quarterbacks.
JD Vance is not to be trusted. Vance is not the future of the Republican Party.
21
The establishment is attacking Vance because he's the last man standing
18
Tucker didn't pull this idea out of his ass. He obviously has sources and one of them may even be the President. How many times has Trump tweeted about ending a civilization? At the UN a few weeks ago he wondered aloud whether he should annihilate Iran, and said he didn't care whether it affected the elections. Tucker wasn't your problem. Your President was.
Four days ago Tucker Carlson warned in a long post that Trump was preparing to drop nuclear bombs on Iran. His post laid out all the "details" of the plan. The post got almost 100 million views and 400k likes and was shared everywhere across social media and MSM. Carlson warned that November 7th (two days from now) was the day that Trump would be deciding to drop the bombs. He said that there was a good chance that Trump would start WWIII, which Tucker said would be "short and final" because it would be a nuclear holocaust. This is the first video that Carlson has put out since the midterms. It's almost two hours long. At no time during this video does Tucker mention the upcoming "nuclear holocaust" that he said may be coming in two days. Think about that. In this video Tucker did celebrate the end of Trump and Trumpism a bunch of times, but there was no mention of the possible upcoming nuclear holocaust that he just warned the world about in excruciating detail. I've never seen anything like this. I'm just blown away. Tucker and many others who supported Trump in 2024 have been doing this sort of incomprehensible sabotage since early 2025, way before the Iran War started. A month into Trump's second term there were big name podcasters already declaring his presidency a failure. I know a lot of them have always hated Trump but were forced to support him in 2024 because it would have killed their brands to support Kamala. She was just that bad. I also realize that it is way more profitable to attack the person in the White House than to support them. The more outlandish the attack, the more clicks. That being said, I still don't understand this psychotic, life-consuming obsession with undermining and destroying this administration. They would never do this to a Democrat president.
35
Obviously, you go further Right.
Watters: How do Republicans, I can't even believe I'm saying this, win back young men? Pool: I'm not sure they do
64
if we were a serious country there'd be a party of well behaved Patriots forming outside this gentlemen's house
If you're such a low IQ moron that you opposed President Trump taking military action against the Islamist-terrorist regime in Iran when he was told (by them to his envoy) that they were 10-days away from having 11-nuclear warheads and had already enriched weapons grade uranium for more bombs, I don't ever want you to open your big mouth, show your contorted face, or write your asinine comments here or anywhere ever again!  This would be the same Islamo-Nazi regime that has killed and maimed thousands of Americans over the last 47-years and has slaughtered hundreds of thousands of innocent young people and tried to assassinate our president and other top American officials.  Your propaganda undermines the president, our military, and no doubt gave talking points to the Democrats during this election.  Protecting our country is America first, fools.  Just shut the hell up and crawl back under your rock.   Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
It has been reported that Iran is “days or weeks” away from a nuclear bomb since the 1990s. thebulletin.org/2025/06/a-simp…
27
today's JRE guest vs. Mike Myers as his own father in So I Married an Axe Murderer
26