“Theosophical” = Theology + Philosophy. Christ Above All.
Joined November 2023
- Tweets10.5K
- Following408
- Followers739
- Likes17.4K
Pinned Tweet
"Stone Choir has some great episodes. Racism and Jew hatred amounts to only 3% of what they do."
"Planned Parenthood has some great healthcare for women. Abortion is only 3% of what they do."
Jihadists *dont know* it’s a lie. The apostles, however would have know whether Jesus really rose or not.
1
59
Catholics, how are you justified in being less confident than what Holy Scripture says you should be?
Matt Walsh and Michael Knowles are asked if they know where they’ll go when they die.
Their answer? “No”
Why? Because their faith is not resting in the finished, imputed work of Jesus.
It’s in their own merit.
But Hebrews 10 tells us this:
“Therefore, brothers, since we have confidence to enter the holy places by the blood of Jesus, by the new and living way that he opened for us through the curtain, that is, through his flesh, let us draw near with a true heart in FULL ASSURANCE OF FAITH, with our hearts sprinkled clean from an evil conscience and our bodies washed with pure water.”
Hebrews 10:19-20, 22 ESV
When Jesus said “it is finished”, he meant it.
If our faith is in him, we have no reason to not know where we will end up.
Ironically it is moral degeneracy like this that convinces me of objective morality, and therefore God.
What is wrong with you atheists?
61
A couple of ladders to help illustrate a sermon is a problem? Remember when Jesus used a denarius to illustrate a point?
These joyless school marms always gotta chime in.
If gimmicks like this make for better, more impactful preaching, does that mean pastors who are, say, crippled and unable to climb ladders or do not drive luxury cars are less effective, and their congregants are not really being fed? Asking for a friend.
2
5
315
Why do atheists say such dumb stuff like this? Does this guy not realize how much of philosophy is driven by intuition?
Nobody is saying intuition is indefeasible. But to just act like you can dismiss it out of hand is to cut off your nose to spite your face.
62
“Secondary sources aren't infallible, so you have no reason to trust secondary sources as authoritative.”
Then we have no reason to convert to Catholicism or whatever tradition you are.
Because if scripture is the final authority in all matters of faith and practice, then you should have no problem providing a justification for your canon using that final authority. Secondary sources aren't infallible, so you have no reason to trust secondary sources as authoritative.
1
62
Lila’s point is that you are consenting to the risk involved.
So in the same way when you drive really fast and recklessly and you get in an accident, you were the one who rolled the dice and now you have to take responsibility.
This isn’t difficult.
This is erroneous. Consenting to sex is no more consenting to pregnancy than consenting to driving is consenting to an accident.
It is more accurate to say that consent sex (driving) entails taking responsibility for any consequences resulting from driving whether intended or unintended.
Stop bastardizing the concept of consent just because you're too intellectually lazy to make a good argument.
56
This is basically what an atheist would say. I’ll give the answer that the three Hebrew boys gave Nebuchadnezzar, “we have no need to answer you in this matter”.
No Protestant minister can prove that God has ever appointed or sent him. Those who follow such men cannot explain why they do so other than that these men say what they want to hear.
47
