I support Elon Musk.
Democrats need to stop talking about nationalizing his companies. He earned it and he gets to keep them. This is America. – at San Antonio, TX
This is Truth. – at China Grove, TX
Fundamentally, I think we're living through a civilizational shift, and most people still don't see it.
For decades, one model ran the West. It didn't run through elections. It ran through institutions.
Antonio Gramsci understood this a century ago, from a prison cell: you don't take power by storming the palace, you take it by capturing the culture. The universities, the press, the schools, the courts, the foundations, the bureaucracy. Win the institutions and you never need to win the argument, because you decide which arguments are allowed. In the 60s, the German student leader Rudi Dutschke turned it into a slogan: the long march through the institutions.
It worked everywhere, even in America, the one country supposedly built to resist exactly this.
Here's the part nobody says out loud. An entire class of billionaires got rich inside that system, and now they have every incentive to keep it running. When your wealth, your status, and your moral standing all depend on the institutions staying captured, you don't reform them. You fund them.
Elon has a line he keeps coming back to: he cares about the reality of goodness, not the perception of it.
That sentence is a scalpel, because the old model runs on the opposite principle: perception of goodness, purchased at scale.
Look at who owns or bankrolls the narrative.
Laurene Powell Jobs bought The Atlantic. Marc Benioff bought Time. Pierre Omidyar poured hundreds of millions into The Intercept and a network of media and "democracy" nonprofits. George Soros's fund became the largest shareholder of Audacy, a company with over 200 radio stations, while Open Society has spent billions funding NGOs, activist groups, and journalism programs around the world.
None of these people need the money, and media is a terrible business. So why buy it?
Because you're not buying a business. You're buying an aura, the right to be called good by the people who decide who is good. It's an indulgence in the medieval sense: pay the church, get absolved.
And the people they claim to care about? The guy in the Ohio town that got hollowed out isn't a priority. He's a talking point.
Once you see this, the only honest question left is: what actually works?
The answer is brutally simple. Pure value creation.
Build something that didn't exist. Make it cheaper, faster, better. Let millions of people choose it freely. Reinvest. Repeat. That's the only machine in human history that has ever pulled billions of people out of poverty. Not galas, grants, or op-eds. Production.
That's what Elon does: reusable rockets, electric cars at scale, internet from space, brain-computer interfaces. Each one is a gift to humanity with a price tag attached, and the price tag is what makes it last.
Of course it doesn't look like philanthropy. In the old model, philanthropy is a ritual. You take money and visibly hand it to someone, and the visible handing is the point. Creation is invisible. Nobody throws a gala for a 10x drop in launch costs.
And the old model doesn't even perform the ritual honestly. It isn't redistributing wealth to the poor. It's funding NGOs. Some are bullshit NGOs that exist to produce reports, conferences, and salaries. Others are worse: NGOs acting as an unelected shadow government, lobbying, litigating, shaping speech rules, deciding which voters are "misinformed." They answer to their donors, never to citizens. That's not philanthropy. It's a parallel state no democracy ever voted for.
This world is dying.
It's collapsing under its own weight: too expensive, too slow, too disconnected from the people it claims to serve. And it's collapsing under its own lies, because a system that runs on perception can't survive the moment everyone sees reality in real time, unfiltered, on their phone.
That moment is now.
I have never been more optimistic.
The institutions were captured. The builders aren't marching back through them. They're making them irrelevant.
2
6
419
Please read before you vote. – at China Grove, TX
‼️ TEXANS ARE RISING UP AGAINST THE ISLAMIZATION!
THIS WAR IS PLAYING OUT AT THE BALLOT BOX THIS NOVEMBER!
Barry Wernick is running for Dallas County Commissioner to stop it.
Democrat Dhimmi Andy Sommerman used taxpayer money to turn mosques into official vote centers - then bragged about the power he delivered.
He opened three, then four, mosque polling places. 1,689 people voted inside them for the first time. Then he said it out loud:
“Almost every one of these new voters voted Democrat. We know that.”
“Those mosques and those new voters were the difference in making sure Tina Clinton was elected.”
Mosque voters could declare: “We chose that candidate. We decided that election.”
He called the result POWER.
❌One site was the Islamic Center of Irving - now facing a civil lawsuit alleging a woman was strangled and raped inside its school, begged for police, and was allegedly told officials would “handle it” instead of calling 911. She was questioned about her citizenship and offered money.
❌Another was the Islamic Association of North Texas, which hosted “FROM MARXISM TO ISLAM: THE REVOLUTIONARY ROAD TO ALLAH” - where speakers said Islam and Western civilization cannot coexist.
This is the machine: Islamic institutions supply organized voters. Democrat politicians supply the ballot boxes. Sommerman already told you the payoff - mosques, Democratic wins, and political power.
Thank you, Barry Wernick, for being bold, for taking this Islamic political fight on directly, and for standing up when so many won’t.
You are a hero.
Their election is war. Their organized vote is jihad.
Show up or watch them seize it one office at a time. 🚨🔥
Iran turns citizens into informants as chilling crackdown spreads beyond its borders
foxnews.com/world/iran-turns… – at San Antonio, TX
1
9
407
SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Option: What If Starship Makes Orbital Data Centers Economically Viable? seekingalpha.com/article/495…
Great article. – at San Antonio, TX
2
10
375
youtu.be/K3UQ8UvkriI?is=b9so…. Miracle. – at China Grove, TX
2
11
723
Trump’s Good Friday address from Resolute Desk on faith, Christianity in America
Amen.
foxnews.com/video/6392543820… – at San Antonio, TX
Trump administration expands anti-cartel fight to Ecuador
foxnews.com/video/6391883372… – at San Antonio, TX
7
56
2,272
xitter-newx.xyz-mikolabs.workers.dev/NatlGunRights/status/1… – at San Antonio, TX
2nd Circuit upholds Connecticut’s gun and magazine bans, groups say courts openly defying Supreme Court
HARTFORD, Conn. — The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on Thursday upheld Connecticut’s bans on commonly owned rifles and standard-capacity magazines, a decision gun rights advocates say directly conflicts with Supreme Court precedent.
The ruling came in National Association for Gun Rights v. Lamont and Grant v. Rovella, two consolidated challenges to Connecticut’s restrictions on so-called assault weapons and magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds.
The National Association for Gun Rights (NAGR) argued that AR-15 style rifles and standard magazines are among the most popular firearms and accessories in the nation, owned by millions of law-abiding citizens for self-defense, hunting, and sport shooting. The Second Circuit rejected those arguments, concluding the state’s bans are consistent with what it called a tradition of regulating “unusually dangerous” weapons.
“This opinion is a brazen act of defiance against the Supreme Court,” said Hannah Hill, Vice President of the National Foundation for Gun Rights. “Oral arguments before the female-dominated panel felt like going before the legal version of The View — utterly hostile to both principle, common sense, and the Bill of Rights. This ruling absolutely follows that theme.”
The Supreme Court held in District of Columbia v. Heller in 2008 that firearms “in common use” by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes cannot be banned. Gun rights advocates say lower courts have defied that precedent, upholding sweeping prohibitions with little regard for Supreme Court rulings.
“The reality is that appellate courts across the country are in open revolt against the High Court’s rulings,” said Dudley Brown, President of the National Association for Gun Rights. “That’s why we are continuing to press these cases in the lower courts, building strong records and keeping the pressure on until the Supreme Court finally decides to step in. When the dominoes start falling, the justices will have no choice but to decide the issue.”
The National Association for Gun Rights said it will return the case to the district court to begin the full merits process while monitoring other challenges moving through appellate courts nationwide.
“The Second Amendment doesn’t mean whatever a hostile appeals court wants it to mean,” Hill said. “For over two centuries — and reaffirmed time and again by the Supreme Court — the rule has been crystal clear: arms in common use by law-abiding Americans cannot be banned. Yet courts like the Second Circuit treat the Constitution as optional. We will not stop until the plain text of the Second Amendment is enforced nationwide, and the right of the people is finally respected.”
For more information, contact Taylor Rhodes at media@gunrights.org.
2
32
2,735
xitter-newx.xyz-mikolabs.workers.dev/RickyDoggin/status/195… – at San Antonio, TX
3
23
548





