🇺🇸 Video Producer | Politics | Media | American 🇺🇸
Joined June 2023
- Tweets50.6K
- Following859
- Followers386K
- Likes83.7K
Brian Williams told various versions of his courage under fire story, including this one in 2013:
"Two of our four helicopters were hit by ground fire, including the one I was in. RPG and AK47."
Stunning. Brave. Total lie.
He then went on to host an MSNBC show for years.
Hillary claims she lives rent free in Trump's head because she "got more votes" in 2016.
"He can't live with that."
Yeah, Trump had to console himself with being elected president, and she hasn't stopped ranting about her 2016 loss for ten years straight.
The projection levels here are otherworldly.
Remember when CBS mornings interviewed the white York College students dragged off their porch and beaten by a mob of black people?
I don't either, because it never happened.
A CBS Mornings Exclusive: The University of Mississippi freshmen who captured the viral video of two white students making monkey gestures and sounds outside their apartment door speak out for the first time. The students and one of their mothers tell @Jerickaduncan how they feel now that one of the students involved has voluntarily withdrawn from the school.
Local Wisconsin media is targeting the car business owned by the grandfather of one of the Ole Miss 'monkey noises' girls.
"Her grandfather Greg still owns the company, which we've reported on before."
They even called up a 2025 story about the business just to make sure they hammer the idea that this is a family of racists.
Woke never died, it was just biding its time.
Mayor Pete and Psaki go after Hegseth, Miller and Jordan.
Thune isn't even enough of a worry to make the list.
Mark Kelly threatened going after people down the chain of command back in November 2025:
Kelly: “People should be able to tell the difference between something that is unlawful and something that is lawful."
Welker: "It puts a lot of burden on the troops to make a decision in real time."
Kelly: "It puts a tremendous amount of burden on officers in the military, but that is their responsibility. A reasonable person can tell something that is legal and something that is illegal."
Ansari is echoing what Kelly told us Democrats want to do a year ago.
Democrat Rep. Yassamin Ansari threatens members of the US military well below Secretary of War Pete Hegseth who followed lawful orders:
"I also think that people down the chain at the Pentagon who carried out these orders need to be investigated....
So that is why it's important for everyone, you know, who works for these individuals who are making these decisions, takes very seriously, you know, what the Constitution says and what types of orders they're being given. This is all very, very serious, and there is going to be a world beyond this administration."
The way to really reinvigorate a party after crushing losses in the Senate is to take the Senate leadership in power during the crushing losses and rush them back into power as quickly as possible with less than two years to go before the next election
Said no one ever
Scott Galloway calls Trump an “obese man with no one in his life who loves him” and says “let biology take care of him.”
Galloway once again talking about the deaths of his political opponents. He craves the audience response.
Staying right on brand.
Jennifer Welch says her advertisers were "harassed" into dropping the show.
"Sadly, some of the advertisers have caved. But we still have other advertisers, and we're still standing."
Little companies are apparently stepping in to try to save them.
They read a message from a brewery in Wisconsin that called Charlie Kirk "an awful human being" and wanted to help sponsor the show.
Welch called that "so sweet," then did a shout out for the company for free.
At last count, around 30 sponsors have dropped the podcast.
It's not because they were harassed. It's because these women are toxic.
But hey if you're a little company, just drop these hateful hags a message bashing Charlie. Maybe that'll get you a free ad read.
Jamie Raskin wants America to know that Democrats would never, ever consider going after their political opponents for revenge.
"We don't engage in retribution and revenge. We uphold and defend the rule of law."
Just about spit my drink out.
Ok, Chuck.
.@SenSchumer (D-NY) demands impeachment of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth: "The Senate needs to put Pete Hegseth on trial so we can remove him for his catastrophic failure in Iran."
Galloway went up to the edge of the rhetorical cliff of directly calling for Elon's execution. He tried to leave himself a whisker of slither room to deny that's what he was doing.
When every objective and rational person knows that's exactly what he was doing.
In fact, he liked doing it so much, he doubled down.
If he wants to issue a mea culpa, it needs to be very thorough, very sincere and very public.
Admissions, retractions, apologies. No blame-shifting, etc.
Honestly, no matter what it looks like, it's a very tall order to ask people to believe he's had a sudden moral epiphany about his remarks. Probably impossible for most.
Especially the man he obsesses over. Why would he?
Galloway has a body of deranged Elon commentary. The "execution" rhetoric was just the latest iteration.
He has also said Elon will "potentially go down as the agent of the greatest manslaughter in the history of mankind."
(That video is attached in the thread)
So you can see why this runs much deeper than a single comment.
Jennifer Welch just demonstrated what the opposite of a sincere apology looks like. Because she actually has zero remorse for what she did. She issued an ersatz apology to try to stop the advertiser bleed. That's all she cares about.
If Galloway tries to emulate that approach amidst the reports of his own advertiser exodus -- he's better off saying nothing.
UPDATE: Scott Galloway reached out to me earlier today and asked me to call him. I'm glad I did.
I've read @profgalloway's books, listened to his podcasts, and appreciated his willingness to confront campus antisemitism and debate people he vigorously disagrees with, including @BenShapiro with comity (and more than a little comedy).
That's why his recent comments about Elon Musk surprised and troubled me.
My central criticism was that Scott called Musk a "traitor to the West" while invoking Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, who were executed for espionage.
I think it was a careless statement, but I don't think Scott is calling for Musk's execution. Too many people on this platform are making that accusation, but it's an oversimplification. He told me he explicitly opposes capital punishment. I still believe the analogy was overblown.
We also discussed what actually happened with Starlink and Starshield in Ukraine. What was restricted, when, by whom, and under whose authority? I agree with him that we need to know what actually happened for transparency's sake. Sunlight is the best disinfectant.
Scott acknowledged that if Musk was legitimately enforcing a commercial agreement, not meddling in wartime policies as a private citizen, the accusation of treachery would be unwarranted. I hope that if that occurs, he will retract it publicly.
We agree that serious accusations require serious evidence.
I raised Scott's role as a UC Regent because I believe those entrusted with governing the best university on the planet deserve particular scrutiny. I never called for his removal, nor do I want him removed.
Scott explained why that framing troubled him. I listened, and I understand his concerns better.
Despite disagreeing with my criticism, Scott offered to defend my academic freedom and my right to criticize him.
As a professor, I teach students to revise their conclusions when confronted with new evidence. Today I was reminded that professors must also reconsider their own approach, too.
I stand by the substance of my criticism. But my tone should have been more collegial.
Our conversation strengthened my respect for Scott's generosity and commitment to the University of California, a system that transformed both our lives. As a two-time native son of the UC system, I think Scott will play a vital role on that august board.
Lastly, and most remarkably, two podcast hosts managed to have a contentious discussion and find common ground without recording another podcast about it.
A first in (unrecorded) history.
Let's be very honest here: If a Democrat used the same language prior to the election the Rapid Response account would've said they're calling for an amnesty.
And they would've been right.
Clean this up, walk it back, Trump can change his mind and/or it's very possible (probable) this "deal" or whatever never happens regardless. Ok, fine.
But don't try to gaslight us on the language we all heard.
Wrong. The word “amnesty” was never even said in this entire exchange.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Trump said: “let the people that are here, and in some cases here for 10 and 15 years, work a deal for them.” Under standard definitions, this describes amnesty.
merriam-webster.com/dictionary/amn…
law.cornell.edu/wex/amnesty
This is how far the Democrat lawfare agenda has already escalated:
Ayanna Pressley wants Republicans held accountable for "crimes against humanity."
"Starving, hungry children. Denying people essential health care. The list is long."
This was after listing other punishable offenses such as "Black women pushed out of the workforce," tariffs and the unemployment rate.
In other words: It doesn't matter what the grievances are, Democrats want them contorted into prosecutable crimes.
Affordability, everyone!
Scott Galloway likes the idea of an 80% top income tax rate.
"I'm going to sound like a socialist here and I'm not."
"If you get into that top tax bracket, 80%, you're not any less happy because you're making so much bank that your happiness has already peaked."
The fact that this guy insists on continuing the charade of being some kind of serious, moderate voice of reason on the left might be the most hysterical thing about this.
Hs ever-growing body of deranged, toxic and misguided commentary says otherwise.
Yet, he continues.
Hey @andersoncooper since you won't ask the esteemed Prof Galloway about his Elon execution rhetoric, perhaps you at least can ask him why he's bragging about taking a dump in his Tesla next time he's on your show.
Your handful of viewers might find it to be helpful context when listening to his Very Serious™️ perspective on Elon Musk and other topics.
Scott Galloway says he owned a Tesla, but sold it because of Elon.
"Not before taking a giant dump in the passenger seat. True story."
He's gone from suggesting Elon be executed to telling stories of taking dumps in a car he owned because it was made by Elon's company.
This is a broken, deranged and utterly toxic individual.
Lizzy Warren says if you've been "cheating" Americans, get ready for "serious investigations."
She's asked who specifically she's talking about.
"Anyone who's been cheating. That's what investigations are all about."
Translation: We have no idea if any crimes have been committed by our list of targets, but we'll be digging hard to try to find some. (And if we can't find any, we'll just invent some.)
Scott Galloway says he owned a Tesla, but sold it because of Elon.
"Not before taking a giant dump in the passenger seat. True story."
He's gone from suggesting Elon be executed to telling stories of taking dumps in a car he owned because it was made by Elon's company.
This is a broken, deranged and utterly toxic individual.
I’m told at least seven advertisers have dropped @karaswisher @profgalloway @PivotPod @ProfGMarkets On with Kara Swisher and Raging Moderates, for their incessant calls for the execution of Elon Musk — and their joking about the assassination attempt on President Trump.
I don’t believe in censorship, but advertisers need to decide if they support political violence and this kind of rhetoric
It’s extremely dangerous and disgraceful
I don’t know why a tech company would pay Scott and Karen $10m a year each to endorse violence.
Why pay for Prof G’s private jet and $4,000 hotel suites that he brags about constantly?!?
Disagree with Elon and Trump as much as you want — I certainly do — but endorsing political violence is unacceptable.
TX congressman Gene Wu says the new Democrat majority in Texas wants Elon Musk investigated and prosecuted:
"The word is PROSECUTE."
"Every single sacred rule we have, he has found some way to break it or bend it. And we're tired of it."
"Everywhere that Elon Musk goes in Texas, whether it's SpaceX, whether it's X AI, whatever it is, there is controversy and illegality that follows it everywhere."
What illegality? Of course Wu doesn't say.
That's because the 'crime' Elon committed is funding Republican campaigns in Texas. That's what they believe deserves punishment.