Wikidata is a free and open knowledge base that can be read and edited by humans and machines. It acts as central storage for the structured data of Wikimedia projects like @Wikipedia.
Keep learning about this powerhouses behind Wikimedia projects ➡️ w.wiki/4TCt
Oct 29, 2024 · 2:07 PM UTC
What's this? Just checked out your article about Trump - seems more than a little biased, especially since nearly all of the claims Trump has made about political attacks on him, including impechement, lawfare, current absolute lies in the media as well as lies from before his Presidency FAIL completely to be noted, and YET HAVE PROVEN TO BE FALSE. LIES ARE NOT FACTS, or did you miss that class in grammar school? xitter.twitterapi.xyz/elonmusk/status/185131…
I have donated in the past but will never do that again, sad to see something that could have been good, turn to 💩 President Trump said "everything woke turns to $hit" 💩
@Wikipedia doesn’t respect actual knowledge - it’s just another cog in the radical left’s machine. IE all the people in seats of privilege, power, wealth and or authority continually beating the core citizen into dust. 🖕Wiki deez nuts.
In presenting information about a war, a key element is establishing who initiated the conflict. However, the English Wikipedia entry titled "September 2024 Israeli attacks against Lebanon" lacks crucial context, omitting Hezbollah's aggressive actions against Israel and Israel's defensive response.
This omission creates an incomplete narrative that risks misleading readers about the nature and progression of the events.
The Wikipedia entry exemplifies how selective facts can produce a misleading portrayal of a complex situation. On October 8, 2023, a day after the devastating attack on Israel, Hezbollah, a recognized terror organization that Wikipedia refers to as a "militant group", began launching rockets into Israeli cities and villages from Lebanon, escalating to drone and anti-tank missile strikes.
This assault led Israel to evacuate over 96,000 residents within a two-kilometer range of the Israel-Lebanon border to protect civilian lives. Yet, the opening paragraph of the Wikipedia entry fails to mention Hezbollah's sustained assault.
The entry also omits that the IDF disclosed Hezbollah’s initial plans to invade Israel, which could have resulted in mass casualties reminiscent of the October 7 events.
Additionally, the article fails to note that Israel’s airstrikes were specifically focused on Hezbollah’s military assets, targeting sites like missile stockpiles intended for attacks on civilians.
Notably, in an incident such as the Majdal Shams massacre, where a rocket struck a football field, killing 12 children, the context of Hezbollah’s missile threat remains unaddressed.
Instead, the entry lists Lebanese casualties without distinguishing between combatants and civilians, even implying that Israel’s actions constitute a "war of annihilation" against Lebanon.
By omitting this essential context, the article presents a skewed perspective that could lead readers to dangerously incomplete conclusions about the conflict. Such one-sided narratives must be addressed by @Wikimedia to prevent @Wikipedia from becoming a tool of propaganda through what might be called #wikiwashing.
1
14
Replying to @Wikimedia
This isn't knowledge sharing, this is pure propaganda. Shame on you!
xitter.twitterapi.xyz/WikiBias2024/status/18…
12














































