Wikidata is a free and open knowledge base that can be read and edited by humans and machines. It acts as central storage for the structured data of Wikimedia projects like @Wikipedia. Keep learning about this powerhouses behind Wikimedia projects ➡️ w.wiki/4TCt

Oct 29, 2024 · 2:07 PM UTC

147
38
5
98
10,215
RelevantRecentLikes
What's this? Just checked out your article about Trump - seems more than a little biased, especially since nearly all of the claims Trump has made about political attacks on him, including impechement, lawfare, current absolute lies in the media as well as lies from before his Presidency FAIL completely to be noted, and YET HAVE PROVEN TO BE FALSE. LIES ARE NOT FACTS, or did you miss that class in grammar school? xitter.twitterapi.xyz/elonmusk/status/185131…
2
3
53
500
You've been begging for ppl to donate. Well THIS👇is why we don't. U r biased & don't deserve to have trust OR money
6
34
251
I have donated in the past but will never do that again, sad to see something that could have been good, turn to 💩 President Trump said "everything woke turns to $hit" 💩
1
41
352
Can't wait to read the update when Trump is President #47!!!!!!
2
1
27
343
@Wikipedia doesn’t respect actual knowledge - it’s just another cog in the radical left’s machine. IE all the people in seats of privilege, power, wealth and or authority continually beating the core citizen into dust. 🖕Wiki deez nuts.
1
19
226
Propaganda outlet which helps to instigate violence
1
25
234
Absolutely hope your page gets what you're begging for donations to stop.
25
320
I have never used Wikipedia for info because it’s pure garbage, but I can’t believe others do. It’s literally a cesspool of mal-information.
1
20
226
Will never use or give money to you again
23
270
No more wikipedia for me!
1
16
196
Stop asking for money, you leftist cunts.
1
12
136
Wiki When you went political you can
18
144
Bias is imbedded in your site. Here’s hoping your site goes broke.
13
141
Wikipedia has turned into nothing but bogus propaganda.
1
1
8
97
YOU WILL SINK LIKE THE REST OF THEM. YOU ARE PLAYING WITH FIRE.
8
112
You beg for donations while insulting over half of the US. Interesting way to run a campaign.
1
6
75
You are a piece of shit joke that has lost all credibility
8
71
You fuckers are incel beta cuck liars
4
74
What a disgrace you are. By sharing lies, you've lost all credibility .
5
83
Wikipedia is propaganda now
4
19
Wikipedia is dead.
3
41
“Everything woke turns to shit” -Donald J Trump. Once again, he was right.
2
15
A WOKE WIKIPEDIA IS SOMETHING I'LL NEVER USE AGAIN!!!
2
43
In presenting information about a war, a key element is establishing who initiated the conflict. However, the English Wikipedia entry titled "September 2024 Israeli attacks against Lebanon" lacks crucial context, omitting Hezbollah's aggressive actions against Israel and Israel's defensive response. This omission creates an incomplete narrative that risks misleading readers about the nature and progression of the events. The Wikipedia entry exemplifies how selective facts can produce a misleading portrayal of a complex situation. On October 8, 2023, a day after the devastating attack on Israel, Hezbollah, a recognized terror organization that Wikipedia refers to as a "militant group", began launching rockets into Israeli cities and villages from Lebanon, escalating to drone and anti-tank missile strikes. This assault led Israel to evacuate over 96,000 residents within a two-kilometer range of the Israel-Lebanon border to protect civilian lives. Yet, the opening paragraph of the Wikipedia entry fails to mention Hezbollah's sustained assault. The entry also omits that the IDF disclosed Hezbollah’s initial plans to invade Israel, which could have resulted in mass casualties reminiscent of the October 7 events. Additionally, the article fails to note that Israel’s airstrikes were specifically focused on Hezbollah’s military assets, targeting sites like missile stockpiles intended for attacks on civilians. Notably, in an incident such as the Majdal Shams massacre, where a rocket struck a football field, killing 12 children, the context of Hezbollah’s missile threat remains unaddressed. Instead, the entry lists Lebanese casualties without distinguishing between combatants and civilians, even implying that Israel’s actions constitute a "war of annihilation" against Lebanon. By omitting this essential context, the article presents a skewed perspective that could lead readers to dangerously incomplete conclusions about the conflict. Such one-sided narratives must be addressed by @Wikimedia to prevent @Wikipedia from becoming a tool of propaganda through what might be called #wikiwashing.
1
14
Can I get my donation(s) back? I don’t want to support an organization that I have come to find out is very biased.
2
17
The fact that you keep asking users for money to stay free but insist on openly framing the Republican party candidate as fascist and closing those pages to comments makes you biased, and hypocrites
1
21
Not a dime and I blocked the page.
3
So glad I get ZERO information from @Wikipedia.
32
Boycott Wikipedia they are liars.
2
1
28