Will Coleshill

🇬🇧 "Because they IMPORTED 5-10 million migrants." Tory member asks @WillColeshill why she wouldn't be a member of the Conservative Party, to which he explains they DESTROYED Britain.

🇬🇧 "There's NOT enough people in this country, we need MORE people." Indian Tory demands MORE immigration into Britain at the 2026 Conservative Party Conference

Six years ago I became a journalist to report the truth that lockdowns were a criminal act by government. Restore Britain has now committed to criminally prosecuting those responsible. "Where crimes have been committed, an apology, a resignation or an admission that mistakes were made cannot remove criminal responsibility. Prosecution must follow..." Here is the truth of how it can be done: The imposition of lockdowns was unlawful and constituted the criminal offence of Misconduct in Public Office, carrying a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. The offence is defined by the Crown Prosecution Service as: "wilful abuse or neglect of the power or responsibilities of the public office held" The abolition of the most fundamental rights of Englishmen manifestly reaches this criminal category. The choice of police, judges and the courts, to fail to enforce this law was not merely an act of discretion, it was a dereliction of the duty of public office. That choice not to prosecute does not need to be continued by any future government. Indeed, it is the obligation of any future government to ensure that justice is done, and seen to be so. As a nation, we must prosecute. Utilising the principle of joint-enterprise, there is a cast-iron case to prosecute every single perpetrator. This includes: • Cabinet Members • Government Ministers • Civil Servants • Police Officers • Judges, District Judges & Magistrates Yet the public was subject to years of indoctrination, abuse and propaganda. The criminal offences we talk about were political crimes waged with ample (and still extant) political cover. How do you get this past a jury when they have utterly biased the population via propaganda? You don't. You try them by Act of Parliament. An Act of Attainder naming the defendants, starting at the top, and working down. Parliament serves as their judge, jury and executioner. They can be permitted to state their case before Parliament and receive their verdict from Parliament. It exists within the power of Parliament to change the sentence for this crime or to try for a higher common-law offence, citing historical precedent, citing higher principles of law via constitutional documents or by voiding the Human Rights Act (1998) as illegitimate. In my personal opinion, imprisonment is too lenient. I believe in the death penalty. Many should be lawfully sentenced to hang. Alternatively, and perhaps more easily, compared to an Act of Attainder they may be impeached by Parliament. Under Article 9 of the Bill of Rights, Parliamentary procedures, including the conduct of impeachments, is exempt from scrutiny of any outside court. Further, given that Section 6(3) of the Human Rights Act 1998 provides that the duty on public authorities to act compatibly with Convention rights does not apply to: “either House of Parliament or a person exercising functions in connection with proceedings in Parliament.” Notably, the maximum sentence of an impeachment is not limited by any statue and includes death. In which case Parliament may impeach and hang any public office-holder with impunity. Indeed, despite the mainstream common consensus, the death penalty is legally extant and valid in Britain. Regardless, it is entirely, manifestly and explicitly possible to lock up every prominent individual, who perpetrated this crime, for the rest of their lives, at the very least. I state this because the scale of the crime perpetrated is so vast that it is necessary as a deterrent to prosecute the perpetrators of the crime to the maximum extent. Should they evade justice, then this can and will happen again and cause untold suffering. Mass prosecutions are compassion. It can be done. It must be done. It will be done.

🇬🇧 Ex-Green who defected to the Tories argues Conservatives should face ZERO consequences for violating human rights with LOCKDOWNS and forced vaccinations.

🇬🇧 "We messed up." @WillColeshill to Tory: You flooded Britain with MILLIONS of migrants. How are you a right-wing party?

I am absolutely delighted to announce Molly Kingsley (@lensiseethrough) as Restore Britain's Spokesperson for Accountability in Public Office, alongside our new policy paper on pandemic era accountability - ‘A Roadmap For Restoring Public trust’. Throughout the pandemic, Molly was a tireless campaigner against school closures and the damage inflicted on children - she has spent years challenging government overreach, exposing failures of accountability and demanding greater transparency from those in power. It is an honour to have her on the team, helping to deliver the aims stated in our new policy paper. Our plan sets out independent investigations into lockdowns, vaccines deployment, unethical decision-making, care home treatment, censorship, conflicts of interest and procurement scandals. We will protect whistleblowers, seek prosecutions, and introduce strict safeguards against future abuses of emergency powers. Molly will help lead Restore Britain's fight to restore integrity, transparency and accountability to public office. What we have outlined today as a party is a historic step forward in reversing just some of the damage inflicted on the British people by continued lockdowns and widespread vaccination coercion. The British state exercised extraordinary powers over our lives. It is only fair that those responsible must face extraordinary scrutiny. Read our paper in full here... assets.nationbuilder.com/res…

🇬🇧 "Do you want REMIGRATION?" "No." @WillColeshill interviews Tories at the Conservative Party conference who claim they want to stop mass migration — while refusing to reverse the damage it’s already done to the country.