John Bulkeley (@bulkeley_john) header
John Bulkeley (@bulkeley_john) profile picture

Naval history and politics. Nothing complicated here, just straight, simple, facts with some opinions. Take what you wish, leave the rest.

Anywhere but New York City
Joined February 2021
John Bulkeley retweeted
Sayed is simply answering the call. Who knew we were on the cusp of a religious war as well as a civil war in this country.
“We extending the time for the infidels in America, so when time is come we will destroy them completely with no mercy” This isn’t in Iran, this isn’t in Lebanon, this isn’t in Gaza and it’s not even in Turkey.. This is in California.
1
7
John Bulkeley retweeted
Replying to @MarioNawfal
And when did Europe have ours? Certainly not with Iran, even though they considered Iran an enemy for 47 years now. Let Europe deal with Ukraine. And let’s see them do that and fund NATO at the same time. Time for Europe to grow up.
1
18
John Bulkeley retweeted
Replying to @awacs62
And if Fincantieri is building them, they will be on time and on budget. Also, since San Marco, San Giorgio, and San Giusto are such good ships, they will probably find another country wanting to buy them. Perhaps Brazil or some other South American country?
1
2
51
True.
I find it mildly amusing that a number of people are surprised that an ocean liner, built to navy standards for damage control and designed to resist sinking, did in fact resist sinking. William Francis Gibbs must be smiling from the afterlife as the old girl definitely used every ounce of experience lavished upon her by Gibbs & Cox to fight the inevitable.
2
91
John Bulkeley retweeted
Replying to @RantyAmyCurtis
They want healthcare to be just a lousy as it is in Canada, with huge wait times to see a doctor, bad treatment, and a country that encourages euthanasia at the drop of a hat just to save money on those pesky sick people. There is a very real civil war coming, because if these lunatics control Congress and the White House in 2028, they will enact laws that will literally tear this country apart. Stacking the Supreme Court, elimination of the Electoral College, making DC and Puerto Rico states, and their wet dream of all wet dreams, gutting the 2nd Amendment and disarming the American public. And this isn't paranoia speaking. People like Kamala Harris and tons of other Democrats are now openly saying it. There will be war if this happens and, as in 1861, it will be Democrats who start this war.
1
1
46
John Bulkeley retweeted
Replying to @LauraLoomer
xitter.twitterapi.xyz/buttonslives/status/17… And there is a lesson to be learned from that to this day. Christopher Hitchens pointed it out years ago and it all boils down to the fact that the Muslims hate us because we are, to them, infidels. Some of them may try to camouflage that fact by occasionally trying to cooperate with us, but to them Islam is everything and we are expendable. And this is proving out in spades with Abdul El Sayed right now.
Christopher Hitchens: “Islamic fundamentalism is not created by American democracy. It’s a lie to say so. It’s a masochistic lie. And it excuses those who are the real criminals, and it blames us for the attacks made upon us.” This is why you have to study history.
3
7
409
John Bulkeley retweeted
Replying to @MarioNawfal
"A stupid war that we have no business fighting." Seriously? Tell that to the American embassy hostages that were taken in 1979 in Tehran. Tell that to the families of the Marines killed in the Beirut barracks bombing in 1983. Tell that to the families of the American troops killed by Iranian roadside and suicide bombs in places like Iraq and Afghanistan. Or how about the many Iranian assassination plots to kill American officials here in the US? And we haven't even talked about Iran's support for homicidal terrorist groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis which is designed to destabilize the entire Middle East. We have been at war with Iran for 47 YEARS, and if you are too stupid to grasp that Iran, which has consistently chanted "Death to America" for all that time, isn't serious about that by now, then you are a suicidal fool.
1
1
5
118
John Bulkeley retweeted
Did you see this?! A newly elected Democrat SHOCKED even CNN when he refused to answer a basic question about Iran 😱🚨 “Adam Hamawy: Go f*** yourself!” — @dbongino
35
262
9
890
40,909
John Bulkeley retweeted
Replying to @ForcesNews
xitter.twitterapi.xyz/bulkeley_john/status/2… Is this an admission that the current structure of NATO doesn't work? Because these are all NATO members, so why are they creating an alliance within an alliance? Why not work to make all of NATO more efficient if that's the ultimate goal.
Replying to @nexta_tv
Seems like they are building an alliance within an alliance, which is a waste of time. Why not strengthen the existing alliance by putting in new ROEs and making NATO more efficient and effective. Seems easier than creating a new alliance apart from NATO.
1
1
39
John Bulkeley retweeted
Replying to @clashreport
The IRGC could not have hoped for a better Iranian representative in Congress. When Americans, especially young Americans, get all their news and propaganda from Tik Tok, don't be surprised at what you get elected to Congress. This degenerate is Ilhan Omar in male drag.
1
66
xitter.twitterapi.xyz/TitanicNewYork/status/… Terribly sad end to a magnificent ship. What disappeared yesterday wasn't just a phenomenal ocean liner, but a big piece of America's maritime history. And it is a crying shame that nobody thought it was worth preserving that.
I carried your name proudly on my bow. I brought your friends and forebears to new lives in America. I'm the fastest ocean liner that ever lived. I'm the true Icon of the Seas. I am the SS United States, your namesake. Yet you scuttled me. #SSUnitedStates🇺🇸
76
John Bulkeley retweeted
Replying to @brentdsadler
It doesn’t have to be expensive or complicated. China is already experimenting with these and they work. Don’t overthink the need for putting a lot of firepower at sea. An economical answer is already here.
Replying to @brentdsadler
We are rapidly approaching the high-tech era of disposable unmanned weapons, on the land, sea, and in the air. Drones and missiles will be the future, and an astronomically expensive Trump battleship may not be needed when a large missile arsenal ship based on a commercial tanker or containership hull can throw off just as much firepower at the enemy. The arsenal ship concept involves transforming commercial merchant hulls—such as double-hull tankers, oilers, or container ships—into floating missile-armed platforms to address modern naval "missile deficits" and saturation threats. Proposals and operational shifts utilize inexpensive commercial merchant or oiler hulls (costing roughly $25–$50 million per hull) rather than building expensive, dedicated new-construction combatants. Systems like the Mark 70 Payload Delivery System—housed inside standard 40-foot ISO shipping containers—allow container ships or auxiliary tankers to carry SM-6, Tomahawk, or ballistic missile interceptors. Instead of relying on a vulnerable, standalone super-warship with its own massive sensor suite, these converted ships act as remote "missile trucks". They receive targeting data from offboard network sensors (such as F-35s, Aegis cruisers, or E-2 Hawkeyes) and can be fired upon remote command. The U.S. Navy has explored using auxiliary platforms—such as adapting tanker/cargo hulls like the USNS Montford Point or commercial container frames—for heavy missile carriage and at-sea reloading concepts. In 1996, the Navy partnered with DARPA to conceptualize a massive, dedicated floating magazine. Early design studies, including the Total Ship Systems Engineering project, explicitly used a modified T-AO 201 (Henry J. Kaiser-class) replenishment oiler double-hull. It measured roughly 785 feet long to maximize interior room. It was engineered to carry 512 Mark 41 Vertical Launch System (VLS) cells packed with Tomahawk cruise missiles and SM-2 interceptors midship. Following a "sensors on one platform, shooters on another" philosophy, the ship lacked complex radar or combat centers. Instead, it relied entirely on Cooperative Engagement Capability (CEC) data links to fire on command from an accompanying Aegis cruiser. Capped at a sailaway price of $450–$550 million and automated for a crew of fewer than 50 personnel, Congress canceled its funding in 1997 due to political friction over shifting the role of traditional surface combatants. Think about that. We could have had an arsenal ship for less money than what a final LCS cost the US Navy. But the future is in these ships. relatively cheap, small crews, and with more firepower than a battleship.
1
1
2
71
John Bulkeley retweeted
Replying to @clashreport
Why? Europe did absolutely nothing to create this new “security architecture” for the Middle East, so why should they derive any benefits from it? If they expect the US to do all of the heavy lifting in creating this new Middle East and then expect to come in at the end like hungry jackals to pick at the scraps, then dream on. You’re on your own, you deadbeats.
1
96
John Bulkeley retweeted
Replying to @JasonJournoDC
xitter.twitterapi.xyz/clashreport/status/212… America, be scared. Be very, very, scared of these Democrats you foolishly elected. It only gets worse from here on out. But cheer up. This scumbag will only be in office for SIX YEARS. Enjoy.
Abdul El-Sayed: You don't have to go back that far in history to remember when President Obama, who's actually a great president, had addressed the risk of a nuclear threat via diplomacy without war. And then this idiot president became president. This man takes office, doesn't like anything Obama did because he sees it a s a personal affront to himself because he didn't do it, tears up that agreement, and then in the next term goes on and makes war. To what? To teach the Iranian regime that they have a chokehold on the Strait of Hormuz, which is why we're all paying more for gas and groceries.
1
71
xitter.twitterapi.xyz/HiddenHistoryYT/status… Very sad ending to a good ship and admiral. HMS Good Hope was a Royal Navy Drake-class armoured cruiser sunk with all hands on November 1, 1914, during the Battle of Coronel off the coast of Chile. Serving as the flagship of Rear-Admiral Sir Christopher Cradock, her destruction marked Britain's first naval defeat in over a century.
71
John Bulkeley retweeted
Replying to @LionLeonidas3
Don’t even know why NATO even claims to be a credible military organization anymore. Parades are supposed to show off military precision and discipline. Both are seriously missing here.
Und ja die Russen Lachen jetzt schon drüber . Das ist ja toll! 🙈🤣 Eine Gedenkparade zum Tag der Kriegsveteranen in London.
2
2
347
John Bulkeley retweeted
Replying to @clashreport
What happens when you let the barbarians inside the gates. This frustrated Muslim megalomaniac will gladly help destroy the Senate and this nation to advance his antisemitic and anti West agenda. Can’t believe the people in Michigan were that stupid. Well, maybe I can.
2
2
3
440
Terrible end to a fine ship.
On this day in 1937: Arethusa-class light cruiser HMS Aurora (12) was commissioned. During the Second World War, she served extensively in the North Atlantic, Mediterranean and Aegean, escorting convoys and participating in operations against German and Italian shipping. She took part in the hunt for Bismarck, the Battle of the Duisburg Convoy, Operation Torch, the invasion of Sicily and the Salerno landings. In October 1943, she was severely damaged by a German air attack off Castellorizo, killing 47 crewmen, and underwent repairs until April 1944. She subsequently supported the Allied landings in southern France and the liberation of Athens. In May 1948, Aurora was transferred to the Republic of China Navy as compensation for British wartime seizures of Chinese vessels and renamed Chung King (Chongqing), becoming the navy's flagship. On 25 February 1949, following a mutiny over unpaid wages, her crew defected to the Communist forces. She was sunk by Nationalist aircraft the following month, salvaged with Soviet assistance and subsequently stripped of her machinery. Renamed Huang He and later Pei Ching, she served as an accommodation and barracks ship before being scrapped during the Cultural Revolution.
1
2
209
John Bulkeley retweeted
Replying to @mercoglianos
Very sad and tragic for anyone who appreciates magnificent ships. It wasn’t just a thing that disappeared, but a big piece of American history.
1
3
318