Connor Stringer (@connorstringer) header
Connor Stringer (@connorstringer) profile picture

Chief Washington correspondent for @Telegraph. Got a story? e:connor.stringer@telegraph.co.uk DM for signal

Washington via Belfast
Joined March 2013
Photo by Connor Stringer (@connorstringer)Photo by Connor Stringer (@connorstringer)Photo by Connor Stringer (@connorstringer)Photo by Connor Stringer (@connorstringer)Photo by Connor Stringer (@connorstringer)Photo by Connor Stringer (@connorstringer)Photo by Connor Stringer (@connorstringer)Photo by Connor Stringer (@connorstringer)Photo by Connor Stringer (@connorstringer)Photo by Connor Stringer (@connorstringer)
RT @WSJ: Breaking: Nvidia’s board is preparing to oust CEO Jensen Huang, its founder and chief executive after he had two extramarital affa…
95
28
Connor Stringer retweeted
This is pretty wild: From a jail in New York, a commander of an Iranian terrorist proxy group helped direct a failed plot to attack RAF Fairford — a key UK air force base used by the US to execute the war with Iran, federal prosecutors allege in a new indictment. The man, Mohammad Dawood Al-Saadi, a duel Iranian and Iraqi citizen, is accused of using coded messages in calls to his family to give instructions to two other people who attempted to help carry out the attack on the base, where US B-1 bombers were stationed. cnn.com/2026/11/10/politics/…
20
292
26
592
75,590
Connor Stringer retweeted
***EXCLUSIVE*** Gianni Infantino could be hauled before Congress within weeks. Democrats are preparing to escalate their investigation into FIFA’s ties to Donald Trump, with congressional subpoenas potentially issued as early as January. Jamie Raskin, who is in line to chair the powerful House Judiciary Committee, is examining fresh allegations involving Infantino, including revelations that he asked a FIFA intermediary to help secure a work permit for a maid at his luxury Miami home. FIFA denies wrongdoing. A committee source tells @Telegraph all investigative options are very much on the table”. W/ @Tom_Morgs
17
314
29
1,094
66,591
Connor Stringer retweeted
Gianni Infantino at risk of congressional subpoenas within weeks as his most powerful US critic expands investigations into Fifa’s ties with Donald Trump. With @connorstringer telegraph.co.uk/football/202…
3
7
1,379
RT @TeleFootball: Gianni Infantino faces congressional subpoenas within weeks as his most powerful US critic expands investigations into Fi…
2
51
Connor Stringer retweeted
The U.S. evacuated American aircraft from a Royal Air Force base in England on Monday in the wake of a threat from Iran. The precise nature of the threat to RAF Mildenhall—whether imminent or more general—remains under discussion among U.S. officials.
2
25
2
33
6,418
Connor Stringer retweeted
Great reporting by @nytimes. The US Commerce Dept was approving sales of Nvidia chips to companies in China which either did not exist, were on the sanctions list, and/or had ties to China's military. A brief visit by journalists in China found that two of the offices were just empty shells. Was Jensen Huang a "victim" of a honey trap or was he just trying to make as much money as possible? Was his $25 million donation to Trump's ballroom the price of pay to play? In the US - China tech competition, has the Commerce Dept been co-opted by other interests? Here is a gift article which raises deeply troubling questions. Explore this gift article from The New York Times. You can read it for free without a subscription. nytimes.com/2026/11/07/busin…
112
1,477
143
3,495
307,089
Connor Stringer retweeted
Steve Bannon, who was calling for Wiles to be sacked this week, tells me: "Miller is a hammer — and we need a hammer now."
Wiles out. Stephen Miller is the new White House chief of staff, President Trump announces on Truth Social. @Telegraph story coming shortly.
1
5
1
13
2,934
Connor Stringer retweeted
Wiles out. Stephen Miller is the new White House chief of staff, President Trump announces on Truth Social. @Telegraph story coming shortly.
2
2
10
4,603
Connor Stringer retweeted
***EXCLUSIVE*** Democrats are preparing to use their new power in Congress to force the DoJ to hand over the unredacted Epstein files needed by Scotland Yard to pursue a case against Lord Mandelson, @Telegraph can reveal. The party plans to use its incoming control of Congress to compel the release of documents that could prove crucial to bringing criminal charges against the former ambassador. Democrats are also planning a renewed push to summon Lord Mandelson before Congress to answer questions about his links to Jeffrey Epstein, after he rebuffed previous invitations to give evidence, sources said. The intervention could throw a lifeline to Scotland Yard’s investigation, which has stalled amid delays by the Justice Department in handing over the original documents. w/ @bsmithjourno
59
465
30
1,248
179,367
Connor Stringer retweeted
Thomas Markle hauled away in cuffs after FBI swoop on US care home over ‘hoard of child sex abuse images and videos’ thesun.co.uk/news/40939755/t…
6
9
1
21
7,841
Connor Stringer retweeted
The genuine question here is under what definition are we using ‘right’? If that means MAGA then ok. But tariffs and hostility to allies are not usually part of the agenda of the ‘right’.
NEW: JD Vance fired off yesterday’s stunning intervention without the President’s approval, two sources tell @Telegraph. And it wasn’t just about distancing himself from an unpopular war. Those close to Vance see it as a signal that he’s ready to claim the crown as leader of the American Right.
2
8
850
Connor Stringer retweeted
Russell Brand has been found guilty of rape and sexual assault charges telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/11…
133
201
96
526
151,387
Connor Stringer retweeted
NEW: JD Vance fired off yesterday’s stunning intervention without the President’s approval, two sources tell @Telegraph. And it wasn’t just about distancing himself from an unpopular war. Those close to Vance see it as a signal that he’s ready to claim the crown as leader of the American Right.
43
22
7
109
29,146
Connor Stringer retweeted
JD Vance knows he cannot win in 2028 without separating himself from the disastrous decision to go to war in Iran. The spiralling cost of living, diesel shortage and the death of yet more American troops in another foreign war are the nose around his neck. You might have thought the Republicans would have taken a few days to assess the damage, lick their wounds and figure out where to go next. But Mr Vance fired the 2028 starting gun on Day 1 with a blistering denunciation of Donald Trump's war in Iran. His lengthy dissection of what went wrong in the midterm elections—in which the Republicans lost control of the House and the Senate—does everything but name the president for the failure. It reads like a manifesto to return to the America First values that he has, until now, privately briefed were being eroded by the war in Iran.  All eyes will turn to the president. He has been picking up the phone all night to journalists, but what will he say about the act of disloyalty from his number two?
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
2
2
497
Connor Stringer retweeted
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
69,482
30,810
21,228
284,816
73,181,044
Connor Stringer retweeted
'Donald Trump abandoned the voters that put him in power. His successors cannot afford to make the same mistake.' Read @connorstringer's analysis 👇 telegraph.co.uk/us/politics/…
51
42
2
258
19,570
Connor Stringer retweeted
President Trump is still watching the election results in the East Room tonight, where I am told the mood remains "defiant". One White House official offers this assessment of how the night is going: "President Trump was not on the ballot, and it’s proven that Trump voters show up when he is on the ballot. "Also, candidate quality matters, and President Trump did a better job promoting many of the candidates on the ballot than the candidates did themselves."
2
3
4,448
Connor Stringer retweeted
Right then, here we go. A blue wave sweeping Trump’s Republicans out of power? Or proof that, despite everything, America still isn’t ready to turn its back on The Don? Follow each twist and turn with @Telegraph telegraph.co.uk/us/politics/…
2
2
431