Pinned Tweet
The five takeaways from Lift:
1. Nobody is self-made.
2. Look for the person who sees your strength.
3. Build a small circle that tells you the truth.
4. Learn the rules of the room before you follow them.
5. One honest voice.
Jeff Cunningham retweeted
Anyone interested in settler violence should follow this account, which provides straight-from the field accounts of the massive daily attacks Jews face from Palestinians simply for living in their land.
𝗧𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀 𝗧𝗵𝗿𝗼𝘄 𝗦𝘁𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝘁 𝗝𝗲𝘄𝘀 𝗡𝗲𝗮𝗿 𝗞𝗼𝗿𝗻𝗶𝘁 𝗙𝗮𝗿𝗺
Arab channels published a video of terrorists throwing stones at Israeli residents near the Jewish farm of Kornit in the Binyamin Region, boasting that they had managed to “drive away” the residents.
Footage: “Shabakat al-Irsal” Facebook page
𝗝𝗦𝗥 𝗦𝗶𝘁𝘂𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗥𝗼𝗼𝗺
Jeff Cunningham retweeted
🚨 COULD THIS BE ANY MORE SCANDALOUS FOR THE WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE AND ITS DIRECTOR AND PRESIDENT, RUTH LEHMANN?
The confidential settlement agreement between Kristin Knouse, the Whitehead Institute (@WhiteheadInst), and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI, @hhmi_science) contains an extraordinary provision describing financial compensation to Knouse for:
“Dr. Knouse’s loss of the unique freedom, enjoyment and growth in her professional and scientific development”
The agreement further acknowledges that Knouse “experienced no loss of wages” and that her purported losses concerned “the lost opportunity for professional development while a Whitehead Fellow.”
THE CONTRAST WITH PROFESSOR DAVID M. SABATINI’S ORDEAL COULD HARDLY BE MORE OUTRAGEOUS.
While Knouse received compensation for her purported loss of professional enjoyment, Professor @DMSabatini, one of the most distinguished cell biologists of his generation and a scientist discussed as a potential Nobel Prize contender, suffered devastating personal, professional, and reputational destruction.
On October 16, 2026, a Massachusetts jury found KRISTIN KNOUSE LIABLE FOR DEFAMATION AND TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE involving Sabatini’s professional relationships, awarding him approximately USD 10 MILLION in damages, including interest.
Yet the earlier confidential settlement agreement, fully executed on May 20, 2022, provided financial payments to Knouse and her attorneys, reportedly involving a SEVEN-FIGURE PAYOUT, while expressly naming RUTH LEHMANN (@REMLehmann) in contractual releases and preserving joint-defense arrangements.
A SEVEN-FIGURE REWARD FOR KNOUSE AND CONTRACTUAL LEGAL PROTECTIONS FOR LEHMANN—WHILE SABATINI’S SCIENTIFIC CAREER, PERSONAL LIFE, AND REPUTATION WERE DEVASTATED.
THIS IS UTTERLY SHAMEFUL AND OUTRAGEOUS.
Whitehead’s major funders and donors, including the NIH (@NIH), Gates Foundation (@gatesfoundation), Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (@MooreFound), Valhalla Foundation (@ValhallaFound), and G. Harold and Leila Y. Mathers Charitable Foundation, should demand full transparency regarding the settlement payments, their funding sources, and the institutional decisions behind these arrangements.
HOW MUCH LONGER WILL WHITEHEAD’S FUNDERS, DONORS, AND TRUSTEES PUT UP WITH THIS SCANDALOUS FACADE?
📑 EXAMINE THE ORIGINAL COURT EVIDENCE: All SIX PAGES of the settlement agreement are provided individually in high resolution in the original thread below. Scroll down to examine the documented provisions firsthand.
🔱 ScienceGuardians™ Legal and Investigative Team
@SciGuardians 🔱
🚨 BOMBSHELL COURT EVIDENCE EXPOSES A SCANDAL OF SECRECY, DECEPTION CONCERNS, AND DOCUMENTED JOINT-DEFENSE COORDINATION INVOLVING KRISTIN KNOUSE, RUTH LEHMANN, THE WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE, AND HHMI IN THE DAVID M. SABATINI ORDEAL.
A confidential financial settlement. Payments to Kristin Knouse and her lawyers. Legal protections extending to Ruth Lehmann. Documented joint-defense coordination. And an explicit provision restricting disclosure of the agreement to David Sabatini.
🔱 The ScienceGuardians™ Legal and Investigative Team has obtained the six-page settlement agreement filed in Massachusetts Superior Court on February 6, 2025.
The document reveals consequential arrangements involving Kristin Knouse, the Whitehead Institute (@WhiteheadInst), the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI, @hhmi_science), and Whitehead Director and President Ruth Lehmann (@REMLehmann).
These are not speculations. The provisions appear in the court-filed agreement itself.
🔴 1. Whitehead and HHMI agreed to pay Kristin Knouse and contribute to her legal defense.
Section 1 establishes that Whitehead and HHMI agreed to jointly fund a settlement payment, including compensation to Knouse and a contribution toward her attorneys' fees and costs in connection with the Sabatini litigation.
The financial amounts are redacted in the court-filed agreement, although we believe the total settlement may have reached SEVEN figures.
How much money did Whitehead and HHMI actually commit to Knouse and her legal defense?
The scientific community deserves full transparency regarding the financial scale of these arrangements and the institutional justification for such payments.
🔴 2. Ruth Lehmann's leadership was expressly covered by the legal releases.
Section 2 establishes broad mutual releases between Knouse, Whitehead, and HHMI.
Whitehead's release expressly includes its directors and senior administration, specifically naming Ruth Lehmann.
These provisions were not limited to an informal understanding between Knouse and her former employer. They created formal contractual protections extending across the participating institutions and their leadership.
🔴 3. Knouse, Whitehead, and Lehmann agreed to continue their joint defense.
Section 4 is particularly revealing.
It expressly provides for continuing cooperation between Knouse and Whitehead, including its senior administration and Ruth Lehmann, concerning matters related to Sabatini's lawsuit.
The agreement further states:
“Whitehead and Dr. Knouse further agree to continue to work pursuant to their common interest and joint defense privilege in the context of the Sabatini Lawsuit.”
Their lawyers were also expected to cooperate and share work where practicable.
The document therefore establishes not only financial arrangements but also an explicit commitment to continued legal cooperation between Knouse and Whitehead's leadership.
🔴 4. The agreement expressly restricted disclosure to David Sabatini.
Section 5 contains one of the document's most consequential provisions:
“This Agreement shall not be provided to Dr. Sabatini unless required by law.”
The same section establishes procedures allowing parties to seek protective orders in response to compulsory disclosure requests.
A financial settlement and continuing joint-defense agreement, expressly restricted from disclosure to the very scientist who was litigating against these parties.
The existence of this restriction demands serious examination of what was disclosed during litigation, when it was disclosed, and whether Sabatini received the information to which he was legally entitled.
🔴 5. Whitehead and HHMI expressly denied liability while agreeing to the payments and releases.
Section 6 characterizes the settlement as a compromise of disputed claims, intended to avoid further expense, and expressly disclaims any admission of liability.
The absence of an admission does not erase the financial payments, mutual releases, continuing joint defense, or disclosure restriction documented in this agreement.
⚠️ Ruth Lehmann and Whitehead's leadership must answer for these arrangements.
This court-filed document raises substantial questions about the financial and legal relationships among the individuals and institutions involved in Professor @DMSabatini's ordeal.
📑 EXAMINE THE ORIGINAL COURT EVIDENCE: All SIX pages of the settlement agreement are provided individually in high resolution in the thread below. Scroll down to examine the documented provisions firsthand.
🔱 ScienceGuardians™ Legal and Investigative Team
MORE COURT EVIDENCE. MORE REVELATIONS. STAY TUNED. ⚠️
@SciGuardians 🔱
My former home, @ASU, is ahead of Princeton, Harvard, Stanford, and Columbia.
collegerankings.city-journal…
1
136
This is true diversity: six of the 10 are public universities! Only one Ivy!
University of Texas at Austin (#1)
University of Florida (#2)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (tied #5)
Georgia Tech (#7)
Purdue University (#8)
Ohio State University (#9)
College rankings are broken.
We're doing it the right way.
Introducing: City Journal's 2026 College Rankings! collegerankings.city-journal…
142
There is no such thing as irreplaceable. If Huang was negligent in his duty he has no more authority in the company. The employees would find him dented.
1) Jensen is one of the greatest entrepreneurs of this generation
2) he did something incredibly dumb
3) it was bad for America
4) but my guess is there was no bad intention
5) two mistakes don’t make a right, and I believe Jensen is irreplaceable for America’s AI leadership
83
Jeff Cunningham retweeted
hamas dug up the water pipes Israel put in in order to make rockets to fire at Israel
and now Israelis on twitter are guilting each other about being heartless about the flooding in gaza
Jeff Cunningham retweeted
Israel's Ambassador to the US, Yechiel Leiter, sat with 21 New York Times editors.
He brought numbers: how many aid trucks entered Gaza every day, and how IDF soldiers risked their own lives to spare civilians.
They brought feelings. "Ambassador, everybody can't be wrong."
His answer: not everybody thinks it's genocide. And if it feels like everybody does, maybe that's because of you.
Remember the NYT photo of the emaciated Gaza toddler? The boy had a genetic disease and cerebral palsy, and his perfectly healthy brother was cropped out of the frame.
That's not journalism. It's a blood libel.
And blood libels cost Jewish lives.
jns.org/news/antisemitism/le…
Look at this map closely. It holds the secrets to why Israelis and Palestinians live -- never peacefully -- side by side.
In the early 1920s, Britain controlled the territory known as British Palestine -- with Indigenous Arab, Christian, and Jewish villages -- under a League of Nations Mandate. One stipulation was that the Balfour Declaration of a Jewish national home would be achieved, without settling where exactly.
In 1921, Britain decided to separate the land east of the Jordan River and place it under the rule of King Abdullah. In 1922, a formal memorandum excluded the eastern area from being used for a Jewish national home.
This move created a state for the Arabs of Palestine east of the Jordan River while providing land for the Jewish national home west of the river.
Jordan comes from the Hebrew word Yarden (to flow down/to descend) because the river drops from the Mount Hermon to the Dead Sea. In Arabic, Jordan means…nothing, because it’s a Hebrew word.
Jordan and Israel were colonized by Britain who named the entire land “British Mandate of Palestine”. Palestine in Arabic means…nothing, it’s not an Arabic word, which explains why Arabs can’t pronounce it.
That’s why they say “Falastine”.
The majority of people who live in Jordan are today’s Palestinians. The country, however, is ruled by Saudis (the Hashemites).
Before Israel was re established, the area known as Israel and the area known as Jordan was all called The British Mandate of Palestine.
That means, if YOU believe Israel is Palestine, then Jordan IS Palestine!!!
And if Jordan is Palestine, you have a Free Palestine and it’s 400% bigger than Israel!
Moving forward, we are declaring Jordan, Palestine.
You’re welcome!
(The map below shows how big the British Mandate of Palestine was).
1
54
This isn't about adultery -- while the board may want to consider the effect on his authority inside the company, that is not the purview of the average person on the outside to decide. But the possibility that he may have inadvertently abetted an agent of the Chinese government, that would be more than sensational and I think punishable by termination. When I served on a public bank board, I know that we could not condone such an action.
An alert:
@JensenHuang is human. And he is an incredible human. Even incredible humans make mistakes.
He takes full responsibility as he should.
We should all support him and his family.
Onward.
94
“You can tell prospective investors that I would have taken a perpetual bond if you had offered one. I believe Israel is going to be around forever. If you are looking for brains, energy and dynamism in the Middle East, Israel is the only place you need to go.”
-- Warren Buffett
Jeff Cunningham retweeted
Replying to @washingtonpost
Only a craven journo would forget to imagine that the lame duck is time for the best to navigate towards more promising futures that the first two years prepared them for. I guess a Jeff Bezos buyout is your only idea of the next chapter.
Everyone knows Hamas lied about death counts. Even Hamas knows it. But the evidence mounts and yet the trolls fail to take notice. This isn't an argument about technicalities, it is an argument about wanting to hate one group and find sympathy for another, and nothing will change the mind it seems.
I’ve been playing around with May’s Hamas fatality lists today, because what else are Saturdays for?
Gaza’s recorded deaths are heavily concentrated among adult males. In the May 2026 dataset, which contains 72,835 deaths, men aged 18–45 account for 41.12% of those killed, whereas that age/gender group comprised 20.52% of the pre-war population. Their share of recorded deaths is almost exactly twice their population share.
Widening the bracket to males aged 15–45 produces much the same result. They represent 24.39% of the population and 45.68% of listed deaths: 33,268 fatalities against approximately the 17,762 deaths we would expect if deaths had followed the population’s age and sex distribution. Among men aged 25–34, the death share reaches 2.18 times the population benchmark; among those aged 35–45, it reaches 2.35 times.
The 14–18 age group also warrants examination because Hamas has a documented history of recruiting and training minors. The UN’s 2019 report verified the recruitment and use of a 17-year-old by Hamas’s al-Qassam Brigades. Its following annual report recorded Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad camps exposing children as young as 14 to military activities. Hamas itself has publicised children’s military training through its Telegram channel, including instruction in firearms and guerrilla warfare. This evidence requires us to consider under-18 combatants within the casualty figures.
The list contains 5,551 males aged 14–18, against approximately 4,661 under the population-proportional benchmark, a difference of 19%. That disparity is considerably smaller than the adult-male concentration. Of course, it does not mean every teenage boy killed was a fighter, but we cannot pretend that Hamas’s recruitment of children has no bearing on the analysis.
Across all ages, the Gaza list is 69.96% male and 30.04% female.
In Gaza, Hamas’s conduct is central to that examination. In the Henry Jackson Society report I co-authored with @Aizenberg, Hamas’s Human Shield Strategy in Gaza, we documented military infrastructure embedded within civilian neighbourhoods, including tunnel entrances inside homes and weapons stored in residential buildings. The report also examines Hamas’s instructions to civilians to ignore evacuation warnings. These practices placed civilians around military objectives and exploited the restrictions their presence imposed on Israeli attacks. Any account of civilian deaths that removes Hamas’s battlefield organisation from the explanation discards a central cause of civilian exposure to harm.
Israel’s civilian protection measures also form part of the record. OCHA estimated that approximately 50,000 people moved south through an Israeli military corridor on 8 November 2023 alone. It recorded danger and shelling around the route, as well as the extension of the corridor’s operating hours while people continued to leave. This establishes that organised evacuation operated on a substantial scale. The IDF has also published footage of strikes being aborted when civilians appeared. This evidence cannot be omitted from any judgement about Israeli intent.
Even NAZA, a film constructed around allegations against Israel’s conduct, describes intelligence personnel identifying Hamas targets and calculating anticipated civilian casualties. Its most sensational claim, concerning approval for an attack anticipating 500 civilian deaths, comes without any corroborating evidence. The film provides neither a named target nor enough detail to verify its accounts of the alleged high-casualty strikes. Those allegations remain completely unsubstantiated.
A collateral damage estimate belongs within a military targeting process. In its detailed response to the film, the IDF explains that preliminary estimates precede operational review, during which commanders can change the weapon, timing or scope of an attack, require further precautions, or refuse approval. An Israeli targeting source told me 50% of planned strikes in Gaza were aborted due to civilian presence by July 2024. The IDF also distinguishes thresholds requiring senior authorisation from permission to inflict a specified number of civilian deaths. By proving the existence of those calculations, NAZA establishes that anticipated civilian harm was being assessed.
When considered alongside Hamas’s human shield strategy and the evidence of Israeli civilian protection measures, the casualty patterns do not indicate a genocidal campaign. The concentration of deaths among adult males is consistent with substantial combatant losses in a war fought through civilian neighbourhoods. Evacuation arrangements and decisions to withhold fire further undermine any claim of an intention to destroy Gaza’s population.
Great reveal
The Atlantic blames @HarmeetKDhillon for the “destruction” of the DOJ’s civil rights division on the grounds that 70% of the Biden-era lawyers who worked there quit during her tenure.
What The Atlantic does not tell you is that Dhillon’s predecessor was progressive activist Kristen Clarke, an extremely controversial Biden appointment who, prior to joining the DOJ, was best known for antisemitism. She famously invited the author of a hate tract called “The Jewish Question” to speak on the Harvard campus under the auspices of the Black Student Union.
At DOJ, Clarke used the Civil Rights division to force state and local governments to adopt illegal DEI programs and dismantle policing and criminal justice enforcement. She was the threat of government legal action pushing the adoption of the most noxious woke policies during the Biden era.
She did immense damage to the DOJ and the country, she forced the adoption of unpopular and ineffective policies and she filled her department with ideologues, activists and diversity hires who do not belong anywhere near the levers of power.
The transformation of the Civil Rights Division and the removal of Kristen Clarke’s loyalists is one of the biggest accomplishments of the Trump administration. Dhillon is a hero and has done a great service to her country.
1
66
Jeff Cunningham retweeted
I've lost count of how many times I've said this publicly over many months. Midnight Hammer prevented the nuclear breakout; Epic Fury prevented the missile breakout they needed to reconstitute the nuclear program and reach a zone of immunity.
100%
.@SecRubio: “It would have been very easy to do what multiple presidents before him have done, which is just ignore the Iran thing, leave it for the next guy."
“But this president didn't do that. He confronted it because what Iran wants to do is not just destroy our country; destroy our way of life and threaten our children,” he added.
1
1
107
Jeff Cunningham retweeted
.@MizzWelch Podcaster Jennifer Welch laughing at the prospect of killing @charliekirk11 again. An effort below is underway to make sure that Welch’s sponsors are aware of her statements and conduct.
Jeff Cunningham retweeted
Wow. This woman is evil.



































