Del Bigtree

I’ve spent 28 million dollars over the last nine years suing the United States government to find out what science actually backs the claim that vaccines are safe and effective. Here’s what I can tell you for certain. There has never been a safety trial using a saline placebo injection- one group vaccinated, one group given saline- for any vaccine we give our children. Not one. So when someone says there’s a mountain of evidence, that autism has already been studied and debunked, that statement is categorically false. The small amount of research that exists was conducted by the pharmaceutical industry itself, nobody independent. The same companies standing to make billions of dollars are the ones who produced the only data we have.

How detrimental are the ingredients in these vaccines? Nobody knows because no study has ever been done. Aluminum specifically has never had a human safety study... Not once. The reason you run a study like that is simple. You need one group that gets the ingredient and one that doesn’t, followed over time, to find out what it actually does. They have NEVER done it... What we have is a total absence of science. @OverDogsPodcast

Ding dong the witch is dead! apnews.com/article/susie-wil…

Bill Gates talks about overpopulation. Everyone at the World Economic Forum talks about it. So what would the most effective way to reduce a population actually look like? It would look like a doctor you treat as a priest, someone you never question. You hand them your baby, and they tell you how many shots to give, one, two, twenty, and you give every one, even while your baby is screaming, because you’ve been trained not to ask what’s in it. If you did ask, the honest answer would be that it doesn’t matter, because your child needs these for school anyway. That’s control over who lives, who doesn’t, who’s sick and who’s healthy, the moment any of us can be injected with something we have no say over. That’s why they hated a film like Vaxxed. An Inconvenient Study is going to draw even more of that hatred, because it shows people getting sick from these products, and that’s not something they’re willing to let go of. @dreadematteo @ULTRAFREEPODCST

Want an Independent perspective on Election Night? I’ll be joining the live stream at 10:30 EST. election2026.live/

Glyphosate started as an industrial pipe cleaner. Pour it into a pipe and it pulled the rust straight out, left everything spic and span. Then someone spilled it on the ground and it killed every single thing it touched. That’s when they rebranded it as an herbicide. Then came the REAL innovation. Genetically modify food crops so they wouldn’t die when drenched in the same chemical that kills everything around them. Spray the field, wipe out every weed, and the crop survives. That’s what genetically modified actually means: a plant engineered to withstand a poison built to kill. Half of America doesn’t even know what glyphosate is, let alone that 80 to 90 percent of our food supply is made up of these engineered plants, soaked in that same chemical, something that never once existed in nature. And somehow we’re supposed to believe none of it touches us, as if our own bodies are exempt from what kills everything else it comes into contact with. Sure. @dreadematteo @ULTRAFREEPODCST

I fight for your right to vaccinate exactly as hard as I fight for your right not to. This has always been about freedom. Your body is yours, and if it isn’t, you’re property of the government, whatever you want to call that kind of country. In about five states in America right now, the government can inject you with a product you have no control over. That gives you the exact same rights as a farm animal. What we need is complete transparency on the science and real investigation into how many people are being injured and how. What we have instead is assumption, bravado, and a real lack of understanding. COVID was no different. Nobody fully knew how that vaccine worked or whether it worked at all. It was let’s do this and see what happens, dressed up as science, and that’s genuinely dangerous.

Why America? We’re supposed to have the best food supply in the world. We’re supposed to have the best water systems. And yet we have the sickest generation of children this country has ever produced. In the 1980s, about 12.4 percent of American kids had a chronic disease, a neurological disorder or an autoimmune condition. That number is now approaching 50 to 54 percent. We are the sickest nation on earth, and that should shock every single one of us.

Vaccines only work as a product if everyone takes them. That’s the scam built into the whole model. COVID’s real death rate was 0.35 percent, based on numbers from Brownstone, Jay Bhattacharya, and other respected epidemiologists. A bad flu season, nothing more. A product built to protect the genuinely vulnerable population only needs to reach that 0.35 percent. Call it a vaccine instead, and the argument flips. Now the only way to protect that small group is for everyone else to take it too. A product meant for a third of one percent of the population becomes one sold to 99.97 percent of the population. That’s the genius of it. And it only works as long as we all stay confident enough to keep buying in.

In England, vaccine uptake landed around 70 percent, meaning 30 percent never took a single dose. Denmark came in the same. So did Finland. Africa was even lower. America lands in that same range, roughly 30 percent who never vaccinated. That number is worth sitting with. Under the largest coordinated propaganda campaign I’ve ever seen, every government on earth, the WHO, the WEF, the UN, all working in lockstep with a twenty four hour news cycle, 30 percent of humanity still said no. Different countries, different media systems, and the number held steady everywhere. We didn’t even know there were this many of us. People were too afraid to talk about it at work. When employers mandated vaccination to return, I told people to start talking to their coworkers. If the numbers held true in their own workplace, 30 percent of the room could have walked out together. Thirty percent changes governments. This is an international movement, and we have to keep speaking up loudly, or we lose both free speech and the most powerful chance for change we’ve had in a generation.

A patient tells their doctor, my arm started losing feeling two days after the vaccine, and now I’m losing feeling in my chest and I’m having trouble breathing. The doctor’s answer is that it couldn’t be the vaccine. That’s the argument happening in exam rooms right now instead of the one that should be happening. Nobody is asking which vaccine, or when, or what we should be doing to help this person’s body recover. No doctor anywhere is working on how to stop a vaccine injury once it starts, how to keep something like transverse myelitis from spreading through the whole body and paralyzing someone. There should be an entire field of science dedicated to treating adverse reactions as they unfold. Instead our doctors and scientists have spent decades looking away, and an entire group of people has been injured and had their lives destroyed in the dark. That’s not fair. It’s not right. It is not humane.

Some children are going to die from vaccines this year. Others will be maimed and permanently injured. How rare is it? And does that rare group matter? That’s the entire question behind medical freedom advocacy. We’re not talking about the kids having a great experience with vaccines. We’re talking about the ones nobody studies, the ones whose parents say they were fine and then regressed, fine and then paralyzed, screamed for days in a way that matches encephalopathy, the brain swelling listed on the warning label itself. Science should study them. Find out if there’s a genetic predisposition. Find out if a blood test could identify which kids can’t handle three vaccines at once, or ten in a day, whether it should be one at a time, whether some vaccines should never be given to certain children at all. We have artificial intelligence. We have machine learning. We have more capability than any generation before us, and none of it is pointed at this question, because anyone who tries gets called a bad person for asking.

Vaccines didn't eradicate disease. The only thing they eradicated was herd immunity. The entire goal of the vaccine program was to wipe a disease off the planet, to leave no dry grass anywhere for it to catch fire on. That goal failed. Anti-vaxxers didn't start getting loud until about ten years ago, and this program has been failing since long before that, through the 70's, the 80's, the 90's, the 2k's. It never actually worked. Here's what actually used to happen. In America, you'd see something like one case in five hundred thousand, because most people carried lifelong immunity after having the disease once. A community needed enough new children born into it before the disease could circulate again, and when it did, that same community wouldn't see another case for years. That's natural herd immunity, and you cannot replicate it with vaccines, because of primary and secondary vaccine failure. Herd immunity requires lifelong protection, and this product was never capable of providing that. So when these outbreaks hit, the first question has to be who's actually carrying this disease right now, symptomatic or not. Test everyone in the affected areas and find out. If the adults who were vaccinated as children have lost their immunity, that tells you exactly where these outbreaks are coming from. @alixm

CVS launches its new “Truth in Advertising” campaign ….

A vaccine only gets liability protection under the 1986 Act once ACIP votes to recommend it and the CDC puts it on the schedule. That’s the exact moment the shield activates. Move a vaccine off the recommended schedule and into shared decision-making instead, and it starts losing that protection. There are more steps after that before it’s fully gone, and whether Bobby completes all of them is still an open question. But watching him take that first step is watching him line up a path to undo the 1986 Act.

Sitting next to Dr. Sears, I kept thinking about how astounding it is that he took all that heat alone, before any of the science we have now existed, before there was any movement behind him. In California, families were desperate with nowhere to go, and he stood in that gap at the worst possible time. We’ve watched this pattern repeat since, during COVID, with doctors who stood their ground and lost their licenses. I’ve been lucky enough to do this work surrounded by people, starting with Andy Wakefield and growing to thousands. Dr. Sears did it alone. He's a hero.

They’ll tell you we don’t need placebo trials anymore because these vaccines have been in use for fifty years and have proven themselves safe. Really? You want to point at the health of our children as the evidence of this product’s quality? Let’s look at that evidence then. We have the highest rate of chronic disease in the industrialized world. The CDC itself now says seventy-five percent of adults in America have a chronic disease, up from twelve percent. And when I bring that up, the same people will tell you that you can’t blame vaccines for that. You can’t have it both ways. You used these children as proof your product works. The moment I point out they’re not actually healthy, suddenly that’s not the vaccine’s fault anymore. If the outcome doesn’t count against you, you don’t get to claim it as your evidence either.

When we made Vaxxed, it got kicked out of the Tribeca Film Festival, and a full firestorm broke out around us. The media went after us, calling us baby killers, saying the film was going to get people killed. In the middle of it all, Robert De Niro, the festival's founder, went public on our behalf. He said he believed in the film, that he had a child with autism, and that he was standing behind us. Two days later, we were kicked out anyway. Even Robert De Niro, in his own festival, couldn’t stand up against whatever force was actually making that decision. We got on a call, asked them directly what they thought they were doing, and told them that censoring a film like this would hurt the festival’s credibility. Their answer was that a scientific body had reviewed it and found misinformation and inaccuracies. We asked which parts and they wouldn't tell us. Think about that. They wouldn’t name a single inaccuracy, they took the film out from under the festival’s own founder, and the owner of the festival couldn’t override the decision. That tells you there’s a “they.” @Maveapproach

Glyphosate is a pipe cleaner... It started as an industrial pipe cleaner, pulling rust and metal out of pipes. Someone spilled it on the ground and it killed everything it touched, and that's when it got rebranded as a weed killer. Then came the real move. Modify the food plants so they wouldn't die when sprayed with it. That's how GMO seeds started, engineering crops to survive a chemical built to kill everything around it. Nobody stopped to ask whether we'd be eating that chemical ourselves. It's all over our food supply now. This is a dark, demented company. My dad called them Monsatan back when I was in elementary school, and I've had a problem with them ever since.