I find it distasteful, almost unethical, to say this when you have 18 million subscribers. Hard to explain why, but with great reach comes great responsibility. Potentially killing someone else’s nascent project reeks of carelessness. First, do no harm.

Apr 15, 2024 · 6:07 AM UTC

7,544
365
3,389
10,276
23,005,080
RelevantRecentLikes
We disagree on what my job is
199
524
54
36,187
702,291
Why didn't you use the same sensational title on X? This was honest. The YT title wasn't: xitter.twitterapi.xyz/MKBHD/status/177964128…
NEW Video - Humane Pin Review: A Victim of its Future Ambition Full video: youtu.be/TitZV6k8zfA This clip is 99% of my experiences with the pin - doing something you could already do on your phone, but slower, more annoying, or less reliable/accurate. Turns out smartphones are pretty incredible. BUT there are occasional small glimpses of a future where this product could actually peel you away from your phone, reduce your screen time and help you live more in the moment. And i can’t be mad at that
170
5
12
380
628,171
I’m surprised you’re calling it unethical to tell the truth. Nascent project? It’s been going on for 5 years and they had unlimited money. Usually you are on the side of the solo entrepreneur and not the ridiculously over-funded underperforming VC-backed startup.
24
127
7
20,728
990,071
I feel little sympathy for overfunded companies. But with that title MKBHD wanted to show us he can crush them with one thumbnail. Just like he did with Fisker a few weeks ago. It’s a show of power.
341
4
78
533
924,778
So he should leave a fake review that says it’s great despite the product being not great? His opinion is irrelevant? I don’t get this take – at Geneva, Switzerland
7
24
6,517
338,060
He could have titled the video: “I wouldn’t buy it”. It would have been equally critical, without the sensational title that was likely chosen to cause maximum damage.
160
2
13
364
308,881
You’re basically calling for censorship? How distasteful.
4
17
4,168
249,462
Can you read? Who’s saying that?
64
100
226,119
Reviewing a product honestly = unethical. Wild take.
5
6
3,535
199,768
It’s sensational not honest
55
1
63
176,987
What’s more unethical? Reviewing a product honestly, or raising millions of $$$ from VCs, doing nothing with it for years, and then pivoting to AI to raise another $100m? This company was founded in 2018...
12
46
6
2,520
281,800
I’m no fan of VCs, but it’s their money, and unless they misled investors I see nothing wrong. Projects can fail, it’s fine.
43
4
82
196,304
"First ethical rule: If you see fraud and do not say fraud, you are a fraud" – @nntaleb
5
24
2,043
101,826
An uncompetitive product is not fraud.
28
1
75
93,127
But they have to take criticism right? It costs $700, consumers have the right to know what the product does and make their own decisions.
3
7
1,423
168,182
That title is not a fair critique. It serves neither his audience nor the maker. It only serves MKBHD. The collateral damage is not his concern apparently.
47
1
3
82
153,480
Strongly disagree. This is what makes YouTube so great. Honesty.
4
1
1,029
96,703
This is sensationalism not honesty.
39
4
49
91,168
so marques being honest about the product and saving millions of people time and money is careless? he did the company a favor by being honest. hopefully they can figure out how to provide real value to world.
6
9
780
42,734
The title is careless. It was chosen to be sensational. The title of the same video posted on X is a lot better: xitter.twitterapi.xyz/MKBHD/status/177964128…
NEW Video - Humane Pin Review: A Victim of its Future Ambition Full video: youtu.be/TitZV6k8zfA This clip is 99% of my experiences with the pin - doing something you could already do on your phone, but slower, more annoying, or less reliable/accurate. Turns out smartphones are pretty incredible. BUT there are occasional small glimpses of a future where this product could actually peel you away from your phone, reduce your screen time and help you live more in the moment. And i can’t be mad at that
12
1
1
28
42,512