Edinson Carranza

I just launched 3 products. One mission: $30K MRR. 🌐 VIAINTI.com — Democratizing AI with model routers, shared credit pools, and access for builders. Powered by the solana:8T3suJtKUGrWRytVNKe7RLV81AumvmBPQfEkyeHtpump ecosystem. 📈 XBID.pro — AI-powered X growth, content strategy, analytics, and monetization. 🎬 DEUS.marketing — Generate AI videos, images, audio, and avatars using multiple models in one platform. 3 products. 3 markets. One founder. No VC funding. Just building, shipping, and learning. I'll share the journey from $0 to $30K MRR publicly. Which product would you bet on?

Junior devs in 2026 aren't competing with AI. They're competing with juniors who use AI and can explain every line it wrote. Hot take or obvious?

Before you merge a PR an AI agent wrote: 1. Run it locally. Not just CI. 2. Read every changed file, not the summary. 3. Search for duplicated functions it "invented". 4. Check what it deleted. 5. Ask it why. If the answer is vague, so is the code. Bookmark this for your next "LGTM".

$SHIB will always be the original ERC-20 token. That’s the true vision of decentralization. All other projects are just decoration.

Be honest: Did you actually read the last PR an AI opened, or did you just skim it and hit approve?

Looking for a vibecoding crack. Not someone who generates a landing page and disappears. Someone who ships fast, then stays to fix what broke. Remote. Builders only. Show me: 1. Something you vibe-coded 2. What broke in production 3. How you fixed it without starting over Drop it in the replies. The best one hears from me.

A company mandated 100% AI-generated code a year ago. Per the Reddit post going around: the codebase tripled, duplicate functions everywhere, and almost nobody left who can review it. That's not an AI problem. That's an ownership problem. AI writes the code. Someone still has to own it. Who owns the code your agents wrote last month?

Cursor just made Projects multiplayer, per its Nov 10 post. Teammates can share agent context, a task board, and let agents coordinate with each other. It's rolling out in beta to all Cursor users. The real question: who owns the mess when two agents edit the same thing? Would you let your team's agents share a repo unattended?

Google just made Gemini 4 Carbon generally available. It's already in Copilot and Cursor. Per Cursor's CursorBench 4.0, Carbon High scored 60.4% at $9.22 per task. Fable 5.2 Max scored 60.0% at $32.79. Almost the same score. Roughly 3.5x the cost. Cursor itself says small score gaps may not be meaningful. Would you switch your default coding model for that, or stay put?

Be honest: How many side projects did you start this year with AI… and how many are still running? 0 / 1 / "don't ask"

Finish this sentence: "I stopped trusting AI the day it..." Best answer gets pinned.