Citizen Journalist, whistleblower. 2 time cancer survivor. Editor of El Diablo News Letter. Disruptor
In my World!!!!
Joined March 2012
- Tweets215K
- Following8.3K
- Followers7.9K
- Likes151K
Pinned Tweet
My old pinned tweet was deleted by mistake:
Update on Court proceedings.
@WaseemZaffar’s application for a strike out and summary judgment was thrown out. Councillor Zaffar had to pay £60.000 costs to my legal representative @MLewisLawyer
@BrumLeader @WestMidsPCC @RedMajid
#BCCLive
It didn’t take long for the useless Kashmiri journalists to find a new a person for them to start following. Shoaib Rajput was a Cllr Waseem Zaffar follower. He was attached to him like @wntvuk’s Irfan was. Now Shoaib has found his new home following the idiot Harris. @TruthTellerDotC @Nadeem83Shafqat @RedMajid @SandwellSkidder @BrummieGerryM @DarrylMagher
@BBCNews report about the man Chris Cash who was acquitted of spying for China.
However, Parliament has not done anything about the groomer Saraya Hussain who worked for Labour MP Khalid Mahmood. Saraya was a known blackmailer and victims and survivors of her grooming and sexual and financial exploitation told @elainacohen5 that Saraya Hussain should not be working for Khalid, as Saraya would abuse her power.
Within a couple of months of her employment, Saraya Hussain tried to get speeding points taken off herself, using Khalid’s office. Working for Khalid, Saraya would have access to information about vulnerable people.
Saraya had access to vulnerable people at The Amirah Foundation, the domestic violence charity. She was outreach worker there and victims / survivors told @WMPolice about her in video statements and how she would blackmail, exploit people, groom and blackmail them.
There were incidents when Saraya did this in Parliament and targetted my bro @RedMajid & @elainacohen5 with false police claims and harassment on line.
@elainacohen5 made protected disclosures, based on the statements of victims / survivors and emailed everyone including @CommonsSpeaker Lindsay Hoyle about Saraya Hussain as she was working there, but nothing was done. It was about Home Land Security and nothing was done.
@elainacohen5 lost her job which she was good at. She supported victims / survivors of Cllr Waseem Zaffar, his mistress Saraya Hussain and their friend Former Assistant / Deputy West Mids PCC Waheed Saleem. Elaina sat through all the video statements made to @WMPolice. She even tried to get them legal support but she couldn’t.
Even Khalid admitted that Elaina was good at her job in the tribunal and he finally accepted the protected disclosures which he said were all lies prior to the tribunal. He claimed all victims, witnesses etc are liars. He even called my bro @RedMajid a liar,
The cover up of grooming, sexual and financial exploitation, rape and other sexual assault goes all the way to doors of the PM and Parliament, and the vast majority are connected to the @UKLabour Party
@recusant_raja @claire_adams694 @fionagoddarduk @TruthTellerDotC
@SandwellSkidder @DarrylMagher
.@vicderbyshire The list of enablers who ignored and accepted the behaviour of people in the Birmingham Labour grooming, sexual and financial exploitstion scandal is a long list. It involves even Jess Phillips MP, who was on @BBCNewsnight tonight. @elainacohen5 who was helping the victims / survivors spoke to Jess Phillips about it and other Senior @UKLabour politcians, such as Former PM Keir Starmer and officers such as the General Secretary of the Labour Party at the time. Even the speaker of the house was told about it all. Elaina’s protected disclosures detailed victim statements which she sat through and are on video with @WMPolice. Nobody did anything.
@WMPolice is arguably one of the most corrupt forces in the country and like other police forces just simply protected perpetrators because of the connection to @UKLabour
@RedMajid @recusant_raja @TruthTellerDotC @claire_adams694 @fionagoddarduk @misrikokhan @Nadeem83Shafqat @SandwellSkidder @DarrylMagher
I am going to describe some painful and personal things in relation to Russell Brand because I have been put in a position now where I feel that I have no choice other than to do so, given the misleading reports and speculation around the facts of a harassment injunction that was taken out to protect me and my family.
Firstly, and most importantly, I am and have always been strongly and unequivocally on the side of all of Brand’s victims. I am in awe of the courageous women who came forward at Brand’s trial, told their stories, testified and ensured justice was done. I have had my own personal experience of his violence, coercive control and abuse. I had to call the police to have him removed from my house in 2014 during a violent incident. I chose not to press charges at the time and not to go public with this, as I was worried about the impact of the press attention on my then teenage children. I have neither seen nor spoken to Brand since that period in 2014. Whilst my pain in relation to this, pales in comparison to what the women have testified in court have suffered, this was a difficult period in my life which has had a lasting impact.
Over several years, I assisted the journalists who finally exposed him; Ros Urwin, Louisa Compton and Dorothy Byrne. I also undertook to testify in court to his abusiveness, if the newspaper that published the victims’ accounts were ever to be sued.
I have spent much of my professional career trying to support unfairly demonised and silenced women, such as Monica Lewinsky and defending free speech.
In 2014, a harassment injunction was taken out against a woman called Szilvia Berki which was made final in 2015.
I fully understand the good intentions of those now advocating on her behalf online and agree with their demand for this harassment injunction to be varied, as my lawyer made clear to Berki’s lawyer in December last year.
However, the commentary and media reporting this week has presented an untrue narrative, which has opened me up to vile hatred and abuse online.
For this reason, and to correct the record, I am providing the factual background to that injunction to explain why The High Court found the campaign of harassment by Berki against me to be, "oppressive and unacceptable” and made the order permanent.
The background to this is that Ms Berki came to my house for roughly 30 minutes in June 2014, after I booked her to give a massage to Brand. By the time she arrived he had decided he didn’t want a massage and asked her to leave. She was clearly offended. I was present the whole time he was with her, and I did not see anything untoward, despite the fact that he was later found guilty of sexually assaulting other women and he later physically assaulted me. If I saw any man abuse any woman under any circumstances, I would do my utmost to stop them, without hesitation.
Ms Berki later reported to the police that Brand had pushed her in the back whilst she was leaving the house and that she also said she was “attacked” by my dog, which she described in her police statement as my dog licking her face. The police rightly investigated Ms Berki’s complaint. I cooperated fully with the investigation, provided a truthful statement about what I saw and also provided CCTV footage, which showed my overly exuberant but totally unaggressive dog jumping up.
Following an investigation into Ms Berki’s allegations, police concluded that there was no case to answer and that no criminal offence had been committed.
According to the police, at no time did Ms Berki ever state to them that she had been assaulted, threatened or falsely imprisoned.
There was also a subsequent review of the investigation by the IPCC and Thames Valley Police Professional Standards which found that the original police investigation had been correct in its findings.
In the meantime, several untrue stories appeared in the tabloid papers. Ms Berki forwarded an email to me confirming a payment for one such story she had received from The Sun newspaper. Articles were also published in The Telegraph, The Mail and The Mirror at Ms Berki’s instigation which contained her account of the alleged incident.
Then having at first said in a story published by the Daily Mail that she had found me to be “really very nice, very, very nice,” she later embarked on a campaign of vicious antisemitic and threatening abuse online and in emails.
Below is just a sample of some of those tweets and messages sent over many months (which were submitted to the judge who granted the harassment injunction)-
(Jemima is a) “deeply rotted JEWISH Bitch”
“Did you know that if your life is in danger you can LAWFULLY kill your attacker as defence?! … by now I could have lawfully kill at least 5-6 people who were hurting me”
“Also happy birthday (Jemima). I hope you have more. In other words I hope you don’t die this year.”
EMAIL- “If you make me very upset…you can expect the worts from me – I think you know this – without that I need to remind you”
“What is going on in Britain is a dictatory of J evils. English Jewish Evil dictatory”
“Would like to see justice, and I do not think that I should do it myself but what can I do when every organisation is scared of Jevils! ;)”
“They say … Do not hate all Jews because you know a few Jewish evils. They are on top always decadent and evils”
“Fortunately there are many mansions outside of the UK where Jewish money aristocrats are still not welcomed
#Germany #Austria #Italy #Hungary”
"Judge on High Court: I ordered her to shut up Jew. Do I have a case or not? soon we will kill her then".
“A pity that I was in the UK. BB In Hungary if you would report the Police they would for sure find it without an investigation already that the Jews are guilty. Sad”
“Every organisation is scared of JEVILS”
“When my great grandparents see what Jews did to me they do something in heaven to solve this. I will not make my hand dirty with Jews.”
“J evils … Rob, lie, crime”
“I am so happy I am free from the English Jewish Evil dictator and outside of England the High Court cannot rule”
“Probably I wait a bit more and than go public. What is going on in Britain is a dictatory of J evils.”
She sent an enormous volume of similarly disturbing emails and tweets to or about me, to my family, to my workplace, to journalists from the national media to members of my family, to UNICEF UK where I had been a goodwill Ambassador for decades, and to organisations my ex-husband was associated with, and to MPs.
She began disseminating on social media wild and untrue allegations about me, ranging from kidnap to cyberhacking, to having someone bump into her and laugh at her in the tube station, having her followed by two men, bribing the police, paying off a judge, and other false and alarming conspiracy theories based on my Jewishness.
The number, tone and content of these messages was extremely frightening. It was distressing for my then teenage children and my family. I was concerned that Ms Berki was potentially a real danger to my family and me. I have had stalkers before and this behaviour felt similarly threatening.
Although I was at this point no longer in contact with Brand, I agreed to the suggestion by his lawyer of a harassment order. My sole reason was to stop Ms Berki targeting me and my family. The harassment injunction was upheld by the High Court and Court of Appeal on several occasions.
I engaged a lawyer of my own when I was made aware that Berki was applying to the court to vary the terms of the injunction. And I instructed my lawyer in December last year to approach Ms Berki’s barrister to say that I agreed to vary the injunction so that she could speak to the police again if she wanted to. I also instructed my lawyer to engage on her other requests.
I did this despite my real fears that the harassment would re-commence and that her threatening antisemitism, if again unleashed, might exacerbate the danger to my children and me that we continue to face because of our Jewish heritage and their father’s political career and incarceration in Pakistan.
Her barrister has not responded to my lawyer since May of this year despite trying to engage him. I was informed by her lawyer that any change to the injunction must also be agreed by Brand. I have no ability to compel Brand in this matter, as I have not seen or spoken to him in over a decade.
I hope this information will help clarify speculation about my involvement in the anti-harassment order.
I am glad and relieved that Russell Brand has finally faced justice.
1
134
If people think that that Brand sentencing is a watershed moment, then you are more deluded than I thought. Jimmy Saville was meant to be a watershed moment and things have got worse. It’s not just the media and entertainment industry that protects perpetrators, @UKLabour @WMLabour @BrumLabour facilitates and protects perpetrators. It’s part of the establishment as proven by the national grooming gang scandal. Whistleblowing policy is not worth the paper it is written on.
@TruthTellerDotC @recusant_raja @claire_adams694 @RedMajid @elainacohen5 @fionagoddarduk @Nadeem83Shafqat
3
101
I don’t need to say much to be honest 😂😂
@CllrMajid has said it all.
The litmus test was whether Cllr Harris Khaliq can do his job as waste man. Well it’s been proven that he can’t. He is a complete idiot who hasn’t got a clue and the officers are running rings around him.
I don’t care what people say, and people had disagreements with @CllrMajid but at least he knew what he was doing
@Nadeem83Shafqat @TruthTellerDotC @RedMajid
Why are we making it harder for residents to recycle? 🤦🏽♂️♻️
The council is bringing back booking requirements at Castle Bromwich Household Recycling Centre despite previously having unrestricted access.
And the irony? 😂
📅 Residents have been given just days’ notice
❌ Ward councillors weren’t consulted
💻 The booking system STILL isn’t working
⏰ And you can’t book with less than 48hrs notice
Do residents need a crystal ball to know when they’re going to need the tip? 🔮😂
Meanwhile, Birmingham is already behind on the wider recycling and food waste rollout and now residents are being asked to jump through even more hoops to access recycling facilities.
And Birmingham’s coalition includes the Green Party.
🌱♻️ So what exactly does the Green Party stand for when it comes to recycling and the environment?
If we’re serious about recycling, we should be making it easier, not harder.
My message is simple:
👉🏽 Scrap the booking requirement.
👉🏽 Bring back unrestricted access to Castle Bromwich AND Tyseley, as originally planned.
👉🏽 And don’t turn residents away while this mess is being sorted out.
You don’t build a Better Birmingham by making everyday life harder for residents.
@TruthTellerDotC @Nadeem83Shafqat @SandwellSkidder @DarrylMagher
@habibi_uk post below.
I stayed out of this but time for some home truths and maybe some of the thick Muslim’s in their ward’s might read it.
1 The motion has no control over the pension fund, it’s Wolverhampton that does.
2 There’s unethical people on their own doorsteps that the corrupt @BhamCityCouncil gives funding too, like in Lozells, Alum Rock and Small Heath to name a few areas.
3 Any mention of the Uyghur Muslims in this motion. There’s mention of Sudan and Syria and other places but nothing about the Uyghurs who the Chinese Govt have de Muslimified in camps a clear breach of human rights.
4 I’ve not seen any proof of taxpayers funds being spent in the illegal Israeli settlements. @rogerbhx @Bobby_Alden @JexParkin @CllrMajid @martinibrooks have you seen any proof of tax payers money being spent in illegal Israeli settlements?
Harris the twat can’t even end the bin strike and he is worried about foreign affairs. He swears in his Tik Tok about council stuff, and as much as I dislike Nicky Brennan, Harris wrong in his abusive attack on her.
5 Harris claims that people on the doors talked about Palestine. The top priority in Birningham, was cleaning the waste and ending the bin strike. Harris is the cabinet member for waste, and the idiot can’t even end that.
6 You’ve heard his views on Zionism in this too. I will continue this in the next post.
1
Birmingham journalism is so bad that working alongside elected members of Birmingham City Council, they cause stress, anxiety and start a narrative of lies against innocent people, which are clearly defamatory!!
@TruthTellerDotC @elainacohen5 @Nadeem83Shafqat @SandwellSkidder @DarrylMagher
The West Midlands Pension Fund was the focus of @BhamCityCouncil at full council. I don’t know why because it’s Wolverhampton that administers. That’s another story. 😂😂
I’m sure those who had focused on it will be very concerned that global tech stocks have plunged which will hit pensions.
But NEVER fear El Diablo is here 😂😂
Hang in there and don’t panic. 👍
inews.co.uk/inews-lifestyle/…
@Bobby_Alden can we have a motion at next council at @BhamCityCouncil so that West Midlands Pensions fund is NEVER allowed to drop 😂😂
@TruthTellerDotC @Nadeem83Shafqat @Losrafascartel1 @RedMajid
1
168
@TruthTellerDotC @Nadeem83Shafqat @RedMajid @SandwellSkidder @DarrylMagher
It was inevitable that Cllr Marcus Bernasconi was focused on sooner rather than later. I did warn people.
@shuranjeetsingh you need to calm down mate, as I can tell you, you are on the radar too. Not even I can save you…….well I could but I won’t 😂😂
thejc.com/news/politics/reve…
Far left in France causing problems just like they do in the UK. Those in power putting kids on the frontline just like the riots in Birmingham which saw a Sky News presenter chased
@Nadeem83Shafqat @TruthTellerDotC @RedMajid
113
@TruthTellerDotC @SandwellSkidder @Nadeem83Shafqat @DarrylMagher
She has to be the worse journalist ever.
Haynes didn’t know what Investigative Journalism was 😂😂
I wonder if the woman has made a complaint to the police about Haynes.
This is a copy of my email to @brumlabour Group Leader Cllr Nicky Brennan, in reference to the motion she has submitted with Cllr Rasheeda Begum. I will break it down into sections in this thread.
Dear Birmingham Labour Leader Cllr Brennan,
I am writing about the attached motion submitted by you and Cllr Rasheda Begum concerning Birmingham’s financial settlement and support for vulnerable residents.
It is important to protect essential services and allocating resources to communities in Birmingham. However, I would like to highlight the hardship that Birmingham citizens are facing and the motion you have submitted presents your distorted account of the previous administration’s record and your motion lacks clear financial explanations, measurable commitments and deadlines.
Within my email to you, I am copying the Leaders of the other political group's including Better Birmingham Independents, including Harborne Independents and Workers Party.
1. The political message which is hidden in the motion
The opening of the motion asks the council to endorse three propositions:
A. the previous administration left a balanced budget;
B. Labour delivered additional funding,
C. Conservative austerity damaged Birmingham’s services.
Labour to claim credit for financial recovery is a complete distortion of the facts and it is trying to deflect by putting the responsibility for future service decisions onto the incumbent administration.
This also creates a voting difficulty: councillors might support protecting vulnerable residents but disagree with the account of the previous administration’s record. 1
1
1
289
I propose the following amendments.
2. Recognise the Liberal Democrats’ contribution
Labour did not secure approval at the original budget meeting on 24 February 2026. The reconvened meeting approved the budget on 2 March, incorporating Liberal Democrat amendments. Although the Liberal Democrats voted against the final budget, their contribution should be recognised.
My suggested amendment:
“This Council notes that the balanced 2026/27 revenue budget was approved at the reconvened meeting on 2 March 2026 and recognises the contribution of Liberal Democrat councillors in securing amendments to the approved budget.”
3. Acknowledge local failures and their consequences
National funding pressures do not excuse failures under Birmingham Labour, including Oracle implementation, equal pay liabilities, the financial crisis leading to Section 114 notices and the handling of the prolonged bin dispute.
Residents experienced reductions frontline services in youth provision, proposals affecting youth centres, decisions to close adult day centres, reduced library provision and cuts and bin strike disruption to waste services.
My suggested amendment:
“This Council acknowledges that national funding pressures and failures of local governance and financial management contributed to Birmingham’s financial crisis. It commits to publishing an assessment of the impact of subsequent service reductions, particularly on vulnerable residents.”
4. The funding figures
The motion should distinguish government grants from overall core spending power, which includes council tax and retained business rates.
My suggested amendment:
“This Council requests a public, year-by-year breakdown of the £650 million and 45% figures, identifying the baseline, funding sources and assumptions, and the amount available for service improvements after existing commitments and financial pressures.”
2
1
143
I know people moaned about @Bobby_Alden @cllralexyip @MattBennett29 and their colleagues having the scrutiny chair positions, but the story below empathises why Birmingham residents need their expertise in their positions. Birmingham’s financial woes have not ended, far from it. For those who have watched as many meetings as I have, @Bobby_Alden and his colleagues are brilliant at going through reports forensically and scrutinising the council and the Administration.
We can thank @BrumLabour for the financial problems faced and facing residents
westmidlands.news/birmingham…
@Losrafascartel1 @TruthTellerDotC @SandwellSkidder @DarrylMagher @misrikokhan @BrummieGerryM @Pie1984Red @Nadeem83Shafqat
.@JexParkin @TruthTellerDotC @Nadeem83Shafqat @CllrMajid @SandwellSkidder @DarrylMagher @Bobby_Alden @MorriamJan @shuranjeetsingh
Just been sent this. I don’t know the content of the story but @cllralexyip has been named by Haynes. I will have to read the full story to analyse it properly. I didn’t realise the Sunday Mercury was still going 😳
@RedMajid @elainacohen5 @Nadeem83Shafqat @TruthTellerDotC @SandwellSkidder @DarrylMagher @BrummieGerryM @misrikokhan
So we have had @BBCPanorama & @Shamaan_SkyNews come to Birmingham and do documentaries and reports about the Supported Exempt Accommodation. You will see a clear difference between how national media works and local media, in particular Birmingham Live
The nationals dig and speak to those who are living in this accommodation. Birmingham Live is more cut and pasting, anonymous sources and incorrect reporting.
Only @BBCPanorama mentioned that @BrumLabour were in charge for years, and Cllr Marcus Bellend aka Marcus Bernasconi was asked this and he finally admitted that they didn’t do enough. He claimed he raised concerns during @BrumLabour Group meetings, and people in meetings don’t recall him bringing it up, so he has not provided proof of that.
Why would he bring up things which would be detrimental to Labour? This is a Cllr who allegedly ignored residents when they raised concerns and they some contacted my bro @RedMajid to help them and he directed them to another Cllr.
I give credit to @shuranjeetsingh on the @Shamaan_SkyNews report, he wants the government to speed up reforms and the govt is Labour. He should have been on @BBCPanorama, instead of Bellend
But the facts are simple, @BhamCityCouncil was a Labour run council up until May this year. They were in charge for around 14 years and screwed the city up big style. We can’t change history or ignore it.