Sunday: Jeffries says he's a "hard yes" on impeaching Hegseth. Tuesday: no whip, 11 Dems no-show, GOP buries it 211–204. Every day in the job is an audition for the next one. If you can't find 11 votes in the minority, you don't get the gavel in the majority.

Nov 11, 2026 · 12:40 PM UTC

78
981
20
8,134
66,927
RelevantRecentLikes
@ewechtaluk
Image from Mogul Mc (@MonteMFMogul)
5
202
That was for Massie's soap box. Wait until he has influence to impeach and convict.
1
9
520
Pete Hegseth saves his ass, thanks the 11 Dems -- like Haley Stevens -- who didn't show up to vote
🤖 Made with AI
3
1
8
999
and what was the Dem Whip doing..apparently nothing
1
7
818
xitter.twitterapi.xyz/benigma2017/status/212…
🅲🅷🆄🅲🅺 (@benigma2017) profile picture🅲🅷🆄🅲🅺@benigma2017Nov 10
There are no progressives in the Democratic Party. Once they strap-on the (D) they start fucking you with it.
2
423
@RepJeffries different day same shit
2
1
183
xitter.twitterapi.xyz/nikkibarnes/status/212…
𝓝𝓲𝓴𝓴𝓲 𝓑𝓪𝓻𝓷𝓮𝓼 (@NikkiBarnes) profile picture𝓝𝓲𝓴𝓴𝓲 𝓑𝓪𝓻𝓷𝓮𝓼
@NikkiBarnes13h
Y’all do know that yesterday’s vote was NOT a vote to impeach Pete Hegseth, right? It was a procedural vote on whether to REFER the articles of impeachment to the Judiciary Committee. A YES vote meant sending the articles to committee rather than proceeding immediately with impeachment. A NO vote meant rejecting that procedural maneuver so the impeachment effort could potentially move forward. Nobody voted on whether to actually impeach Pete Hegseth yesterday. And yes, I understand why some of y’all are upset that several Democrats got stuck in traffic and missed the vote. The vote was reportedly open for approximately 23 minutes, and some members arrived after it closed. But even if those Democrats had made it and defeated the referral motion, that STILL would not have meant Pete Hegseth was impeached. The House would have needed to vote on the actual articles. We can discuss accountability without misrepresenting what happened. The misinformation on this app is dangerous, especially when people are repeating things they clearly do not understand. Learn the difference between a procedural vote and a substantive vote before telling everybody what Congress did.
1
2
617
The fact that you're so obsessed about impeaching someone for doing absolutely no crimes in the in the country just because you knee from gone for Colorado lotion doesn't mean it's going to work
1
205
Typical demsoc ratfucker
82
He was so bold about it on Sunday because he already knew there would be eleven abstentions.
1
54
1,205
The vote quite literally meant nothing He will be impeached in January Why would Jeffries stop it now?
1
12
298
You are contributing to the misunderstanding and untruths about what happened. You and your followers would be better served if you researched what actually happened and present it to them.
2
20
822
Is it just me or are the Dems well on their way to F’ing up the mandate just handed to them? Hakeem and Chuck must go or a steep price will be paid in two years.
2
13
502
1. Your count is missing 20 Republicans who would have voted if they had been needed to win 2. Why are you so eager for Dems to support a Republican led Impeachment process? GOP still controls house & Senate and would have easily sabotaged the process. 3. Dems can act in January
1
28
@ewechtaluk
Image from Concetta (@notyourmamajoe)
12
It will be easier to remove Heggy in January with 9 more Dem Senators
2
75
You do realize that impeachment doesn't mean removal? All it means is the House must prepare Articles of Impeachment to send to the Senate. The House and Senate are currently controlled by Republicans. Do it when Dems get control of both houses of Congress.
1
20
@shame on @RepJeffries for being such a bad leader. He needs to go. We should have had the representation and the vote. Hakeem was too busy going on talk shows rather than getting the votes.
1
1
50
No more word salad. Look at what Jeffries does. All in for Israel not so much voters
4
311
All of your logic rests on Dems having their no-shows show up by surprise and the Republican no-shows being caught with their pants down. You know nothing about whip operations in Congress lol. You're just being a saboteur.
1
17
Bout time we the voters treat @RepJeffries like what they are. OUR workers. They work for us. We are their bosses. Clown ass Uncle Tom got it mixed up
5
Lmao @ in the minority. Almost 7k assholes liked this post so far.
1
4
80
And Jeffries voted no!
2
61
You make excellent & accurate points. Epic Failure on the part of Jeffries. Ignored opportunity for "Accountability" as supported by Millions of Voters. IMO
1
2
248
They had better have a great long-game plan to account for this absolute failure. We can’t return to “don’t rock the boat” Bidenism.
108
It's kinda a silly outrage. Republicans still have a majority and would have continued the vote until no Dems were left. Besides, Democrats can't navigate a little traffic they are in no position to handle the war. It will continue, Hegseth or no Hegseth.
2
2
264
The Minority Whip was the one who scheduled an event for EDW (elect dem women) overlapping the vote. Run by Katherine Clark, Whip. Both funded by AIPAC. Clark & Jeffries need to go.
33
This was a ploy by republicans to make democrats look bad and it's working. There was never going to be an impeachment.
12
Well he will be, unless the American people rise up.
12
This vote doesn't mean squat. A new resolution will be introduced in Jan when the new Congress is sworn in.
20
They only needed 8. An absolute failure. This should have been the easiest vote ever.
1
1
53
IN THE MINORITY.
17
And people arguing that this wasn't technically an impeachment vote. Can't get to an impeachment vote if we can't get through this vote.
1
18
Hakeem Jeffries is a joke, and the Dems will lose everything in 2028 if he and Schumer are allowed to lead them.
1
1
72
On the one hand it’s probably true that it would have changed nothing. If the 11 had been corralled in, the Rs would have dug up a dozen to outvote them. On the other, sometimes it’s not the outcome—it’s the appearance of effort. This implies a “why bother trying” attitude.
6
Sunday, Jeffries did not say when.
45
Load more replies