I am nearly 100% certain this retarded restriction only applies to models shipped to consumers, as when it comes to the models for the government it is always a matter of ["national security", "social cohesion", "insert_dogshit"] to have an unrestricted model
JUST IN: Democrats propose requiring AI companies to obtain federal government permission before training AI models, with up to 20 years in prison for violations.
8
67
Now this is outright fucking malicious, pretty much every god damn company on the market will use AI filters on candidates before even handing their resume to a "human" to review and I am not even mentioning how retarded average HR is
You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
1
37
You use AI because u want to be productive;
I use AI because I want to kill the environment and take the water from african children.
We are not the same
the problem IS AI usage. while you’re using AI to fix bugs or polish up your mod, the data center it’s running off is using up water and killing the environment
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
US data centers used ~17B gallons water directly in 2023 (LBNL), vs US withdrawals of ~322B gal/day. AI queries use ~0.3 mL cooling water each (Google/OpenAI). Much less than golf (~531B gal/yr) or farms. Scale is small nationally.
eta-publications.lbl.gov/publications/2…
aiwateruse.org/how-much-water…
usgs.gov/faqs/how-much-…
> Be fat retarded 'igger
> Somehow manage to block datacenter construction by convincing 25k retards that datacenters are evil o algo
> Block $5Bn on investment into your local community, which would've created thousands of jobs and economic activity
Whr is da win?
I can't stress how retarded the idea of a slowdown is. Oh yeah we are in a shit ton of debt and the entire system is probably gonna collapse soon, so let's just destroy the only thing capable of saving the economy, sounds like a perfect idea, right?
You have pretty much no billionaires in your shitole, 'igger, yet I struggle to see any innovations coming from your shithole, not even mentioning GDP per capita
It’s absurd that we have all these so-called billionaire geniuses, yet their greatest innovation has been harvesting our personal data to sell us targeted ads.
1
11
153
This would've been true, but in most countries now the employment system is fucked up, as you can't just fire people, you have to "have a reason", which makes hiring people a huge bet, as firing them would be ridiculously expensive and don't even get me started on the min wage
My wildly optimistic view of AI's impact from here:
1- It struggles to go beyond coding when it comes to job destruction, except one*
2- Workers get more productive.
3- Companies provide more value.
4- More workers get hired.
5- This supercharges the American economy
*As a bonus: AI makes social media so bad that young folks get off their phones, get mentally healthier, and have more IRL experiences like dating.
It'd be crazy if AI caused a baby boom. I'm here for it.
I will never understand this logic: AI is only as good as the person behind. And guess what? You still have to give your chatbot clear instructions, and the more precise the instructions are, the better results you can get. General instructions will result in worse output quality
If you're 150 IQ without charisma or comms skills you are about to be unleashed by ai in a way that will rock the world
4
127
Considering that war is still ongoing and that the strait is still closed the only reason the prices could've fallen is investor expectations about the war ending because of the results of the elections
