GitHub (@github) header
GitHub (@github) profile picture

The AI-powered developer platform to build, scale, and deliver secure software.

San Francisco, CA
Joined February 2008
Photo by GitHub (@github)Photo by GitHub (@github)Photo by GitHub (@github)Photo by GitHub (@github)Photo by GitHub (@github)Photo by GitHub (@github)Photo by GitHub (@github)Photo by GitHub (@github)Photo by GitHub (@github)Photo by GitHub (@github)
Both Slack and Teams surfaces are GA and on a weekly release cadence. Keep your team in flow 🏎️ github.blog/changelog/2026-1…
6
13
21
52
19,540
GitHub retweeted
Confession: I’ve scrolled past dozens of comments on a PR just to find out why I couldn’t merge it. More times than I’d like to admit. Agents have made this a lot worse. They push commits and leave review comments of their own, and all of it lands in the timeline. PR timelines have gotten dramatically noisier, and the few things you actually need to know get buried. My team is rethinking the foundations of the PR experience around that problem, and today the first piece went into public preview. The new Overview page puts merge readiness and your next step right at the top. A summary catches you up on review activity, and you can filter the conversation down to unresolved threads. It’s opt-in and rolling out through the weekend. This is a much-needed start, and there’s a lot more coming as we modernize PRs for the way software gets built now. If you try it, we’d love to hear what still sends you back to the classic view. github.blog/changelog/2026-1…
51
38
12
499
80,689
How we can secure 50% of the world's software. Traditionally, formal methods have been mostly used for safety-critical systems like operating systems, hypervisors, and databases. We're extending this to formally and empirically verify code correctness and security for full-stack web apps, one of the most common types of applications*, using the Proof-Driven Development Kit (PDD Kit). Coding agents now write code faster than anyone can review effectively. PDD Kit turns what the developer meant into a Verus specification. It then proves the AI-generated code meets that spec for every input. Researchers @alexlavaee, @MatthaiP39719, @Mappletons, and @k_cieslak break down Proof-Driven Development x Chopin in the blog here: githubnext.com/projects/pdd-… *44.4% of respondents work as full-stack (27.3%), back-end (13.5%), or front-end (3.6%) developers. Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2026, n = 25,767.
10
47
5
316
29,257
Makerspace + Hack the Badge = two of my favourite activities at #GitHubUniverse! 🚀 Couldn't stop hacking when I got home. Now I can control the Octolamp from my conference badge over my home network. The fun doesn't end when the conference is over!
2
4
21
10,093
Built my first mechanical keyboard! Some mistakes were made but I got it all working eventually! 😂
24
4
133
18,972
After we shipped PR limits, you asked for more control over who they apply to. Now you can apply limits only to contributors who don’t meet your account age or merged PR history thresholds. Quick demo below 👇
Replying to @moraes_c_ @github
This is a good start. I’d still like a way to say “automatically allow PRs from people who have had at least X PRs merged already.”
6
9
2
39
14,440
GitHub retweeted
GitHub just shipped exemption rules for pull request limits. Automatically let established contributors open PRs beyond your limit, by account age or merged PRs. Here's how to configure it.
8
8
1
49
16,676
time to add the nameplate from @github universe to the book shelf
4
1
45
11,395
GitHub retweeted
dressed up as the Octocat so she'll finally commit to me
22
24
1
650
32,732
aaaandd @githubuniverse is over and i hate it. it honestly feels like it was never supposed to end 🥹😔 everyone here is so brilliant and so kind. being around these people changes you, every year you leave as a different person. every year i wait for universe like a kid waiting for summer break. it's the best and craziest developer event in the world! period. (computers as badges, think about it) huge thanks to every single @github hubber (every of them) who made this happen. you treated us github stars like actual stars and made us feel truly valued ❤️ see you next year, universe! 😭
1
6
131
16,889
GitHub retweeted
The internet is a pretty magical place. One day, you're collaborating with someone through issues, PRs and GitHub discussions. The next, you're standing next to them at @github Universe, talking about everything except code. A few days of good conversations, familiar faces, new friendships and endless inspiration. Open source is really just people finding each other through things they love building. And I think that's beautiful 🖤
3
1
1
83
13,268
GitHub retweeted
I made a Photo Booth complete with printer on my conference badge
16
5
141
21,753
The @github engineering team built a best-in-class, truly multi-model harness, which we've implemented across Microsoft products. Introducing Microsoft Copilot harness in Foundry Agent Service, a simpler way to build agents without rebuilding the execution layer. It handles orchestration, tools, context, and controls so you can focus on your agent’s skills and outcomes. Watch @jeffhollan's demo to see it in action.
18
44
14
430
1,330,827
GitHub has released Copilot Fusion in GitHub Copilot, which orchestrates between Anthropic and OpenAI models. It scores 2 points below Opus 5.5 in Claude Code at half the Cost per Task in the Coding Agent Index GitHub describes Copilot Fusion as a runtime orchestration system, which selects and coordinates models to optimize performance, cost, and latency for each task. Copilot Fusion chooses between a number of models from Anthropic and OpenAI, including Claude Opus 5.5, Claude Sonnet 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, and GPT-6 Sol. We benchmarked its max setting in GitHub Copilot CLI in the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v2.0. Token costs are charged based on the underlying models used to complete a request. Key takeaways: ➤ Cost-efficient for near-frontier performance: Copilot Fusion in GitHub Copilot costs $5.59 per task, versus $11.42 for Claude Code with Opus 5.5 (max). Devin Fusion with Opus 5.5 (max) + GPT-6 Luna (high) scores 62 at $8.00 per task. ➤ Slight lead in Terminal-Bench 4.0: The Coding Agent Index v2.0 weights its three constituent benchmarks equally. Copilot Fusion in GitHub Copilot leads Terminal-Bench 4.0 with a score of 71. It ranks third on FrontierCode in the chart at 51, behind Claude Code with Opus 5.5 (max) at 56 and Devin Fusion with Opus 5.5 (max) + GPT-6 Luna (high) at 54. Its SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA score lags at 57, between GPT-6 Astra in Codex and Gemini 4 Argon in Antigravity CLI. ➤ Half the token use of Opus 5.5 in Claude Code: GitHub Copilot Fusion used 7.2M tokens per task in the Coding Agent Index, approximately half of the tokens used by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, and 30% less than Devin Fusion with Opus 5.5 (max) + GPT-6 Luna (high).
153
35
84
602
130,739
GitHub retweeted
We sold out in-person tickets this year, but hoping you can still show me what you got. I’ve got a few extra customizable GitHub keyboards that we’ll ship to three people who can build a wild custom canvas that makes their workday better in the GitHub Copilot app. May the odds be ever in your favor. 😄
9
15
4
152
22,127
Going to @GitHub Universe? Join myself, @pierceboggan, @Jujujuliakasper, @okatiesavage and @JamesMontemagno for a look at how your team can work seamlessly with @GitHub Copilot...pretty much everywhere. reg.githubuniverse.com/flow/…
10
9
3
62
15,715
GitHub retweeted
Spent the weekend testing out our new Universe badges with my son. He gave it a 10/10. RP2350 on MicroPython, 2.8" TFT, accelerometer that auto-flips the screen, capacitive gaming controls, and an AGENTS.md so Copilot can code + deploy to it. 🤓
13
10
2
102
15,452