Bought my 1st BTC March 2017 โฎ iTRADE โฎ iMARKET โฎ iWRITE โฎ AI Agents, RWA & Prediction Markets โฎ ๐๐ผ DM open for Collabs
Web 3.0
Joined July 2015
- Tweets66.2K
- Following5.4K
- Followers13.1K
- Likes71.5K
Why Blockchain Life 2026 (Dubai, Dec 1-2) is on my list:
> 200+ speakers
> AI Future Forum debut
> trading tournaments and the Afterparty
> ๐ฑ๐๐ผ๐๐๐๐๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ: I'll be there.
๐ grab your ticket here ๐๐ผ blockchain-life.com/?utm_souโฆ
10% off with promo code KOLAYER
๐ฑ๐๐ผ๐๐๐๐๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ retweeted
love is sweet, but imagine pulling up in a Lamborghini Urus SE.
the Lucky Drive giveaway on @1win is getting closer, with the draw just 4 days away.
someone is about to have a very different love story.
try your luck: 1win-pro.app/freemoney
Love is... Lucky Drive
love gets even better with a Lamborghini Urus SE
Weโre giving it away on 1win in just 7 days
Try your luck: 1win-pro.app/freemoney
๐ฑ๐๐ผ๐๐๐๐๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ retweeted
Made 4 figures mid this year from clipping
But some people would think to make this is easy, when this Ws they gon be like pmo
And when you pto they wouldn't be able to do it, they would say it's difficult ๐
To make 4 figures easy to you?
Billing choke my 4 figures ๐ญ
๐ฑ๐๐ผ๐๐๐๐๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ retweeted
something worth paying attention to on @vangrid_io is repeat demand for spatial data.
the same buyer address recently had two $600 bounties accepted in Denver.
one for a coffee shop and another for a laundromat.
looking further back, that address also funded requests for a storage corridor and a hardware store aisle.
i'm curious how this develops.
if buyers keep returning for different environments, that could tell us quite a bit about the demand for Physical AI data.
the bounty history is public:
data.vangrid.io
๐ค Paid partnership
๐ฑ๐๐ผ๐๐๐๐๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ retweeted
Jogging across hectares of track won't make you an Olympic winner.
I travelled on a yacht to Dakar, Senegal, on November 8, 2026, to witness Gift Bright and Rosemary Nwankwo win the 100m finals. Watching them compete reminded me that showing up and putting in the work matters, but preparation and consistency are what help turn effort into results.
That same thinking applies to becoming a GenLayer validator.
A lot of people may want a validator seat at mainnet, but wanting one is not the same as preparing for one. @GenLayer has laid out a path through Pre Mainnet Staking, and each step matters.
First, stake GEN and start accumulating Staking Points. Your points reflect your participation over time and contribute to your position on the leaderboard.
Next, run a node on Clarke for 30 days. This gives you practical experience operating a node before mainnet, rather than simply competing for a position without preparing for the responsibility.
Then, keep building your position on the leaderboard. The Foundation will use Pre Mainnet Staking to determine which validators receive its GEN backing when mainnet launches.
The path is straightforward: stake, run your Clarke node for 30 days, build your points and compete for a validator seat.
What stands out to me is that the opportunity is not just about holding GEN. It is about demonstrating commitment and preparing to participate in the network.
Watch the quoted one minute video and tell me which part of this journey would require the most attention from you if you were preparing for a validator seat: building Staking Points, maintaining your Clarke node for 30 days, or staying competitive on the leaderboard?
that whole lily phillips ai twin review caught me completely off guard, crazy how fast tech moves.
9
10
111
THIS IS F*CKING UNREAL, CLAUDE CODE BUILT A 3D CARTOON FROM ONE TSX FILE ON RAEA, JSX DRAWN BY RUST
NO BLENDER, NO RUST BY HAND
raea dropped nov 9: you write the scene in react, the bevy game engine draws it. a habr post traced it from a cube to a cartoon:
in remotion headless chrome draws the frame. raea has no browser: react computes props, a custom reconciler sends create / append / update to rust, bevy builds entities and renders on the GPU
cube check: at frame 15 the center sits at 1.5 m and the turn is 45ยฐ. `raea scene explain` returned exactly that
the agent's job: a man walks in, sits down, reaches for the mouse and knocks coffee onto the laptop. what you see: a 1920ร1080, 30 fps cartoon, a bit over 9 seconds
what claude code wired into one file:
โ the man: the anny body + CMU mocap, motion matching picks walk and sit frames
โ the hand: inverse kinematics pulls the palm to a target
โ the coffee: <Goo solver="sph">, SPlisHSPlasH fluid baked ahead, table and laptop collide with it
โ the look: <Look mode="cartoon" /> adds outlines, paint gives a flat illustration
where the agent got it wrong:
v1: the man slid to the desk like on a conveyor, perform kept picking standing frames. fixed by splitting walk and idle clips
v2: the cup fell before the hand reached it. then the man looked like he drowned the laptop on purpose
a successful render doesn't mean the man made it to the chair
numbers: the scene was rendered on a macbook pro M3 Pro. linux with no GPU on software vulkan: cube 0.18 s per frame, one studio frame with shadows 28 s. version 0.1.1-rc4, license FSL-1.1, read it before commercial use
give claude code raea and one sentence of scene, then ask:
"1. build the scene in one TSX. don't open blender, don't write rust.
2. render a low-res preview and run raea scene explain --json on 3 key frames. check positions against what the code says they should be.
3. watch the whole clip and list problems: sliding feet, objects that move before contact. list first, fixes after.
4. final 1080p render and new dependencies only after my yes."
start with a cube, then add the man
next clip: remotion or raea?
SAME FILE, SAME QUESTION. OPUS 5.5 IS STILL THINKING. XERJ READER ALREADY POINTED AT THE LINE
XERJ Reader doesnโt write answers. it highlights the exact words in your document, or says "no answer"
$0.01 per 1M input tokens. output free. 80 ms per answer
โน the bill, 1 question on a short doc
Reader $0.0000065
Claude Haiku 5.5 $0.000172 (26x)
Claude Opus 5.5 $0.00688 (~1,050x)
per 1M questions: $6.50 vs $172 vs $6,880
โน the speed
Opus 5.5 needs ~5s before its first token, Haiku 5.5 ~7s (Artificial Analysis). Reader returns the whole answer in 80 ms with batching
โน why it canโt make up a value
it only returns text that already sits in your data. PDF, Word, email, JSON, CSV, logs, no schema
ask "how much notice stops the auto-renewal?" and you get the clause, highlighted, with its position
I usually ignore โweโve been building since 2014โ lines.
This one is harder to ignore.
The team behind one of the original Ethereum clients in Haskell was already building before mainnet.
Then came Microsoft Azureโs Ethereum offering, early real-world asset work on Ethereum in 2016, and a founding role in the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance.
Today, that experience sits behind a live chain working with tokenized gold and silver, USDST borrowing, and real protocol activity.
Joe Lubin is an advisor. The team has also raised over $41M.
None of that guarantees what @strato_net becomes.
But it does change what I look at when judging the project.
If you're asking people to trust tokenized physical metals as on-chain collateral, a long history of building financial and blockchain infrastructure matters more to me than another polished roadmap.
The interesting part is that the history isn't the product.
The product is already live. The history is long.
That combination is what makes STRATO worth watching closely.
@strato_net
The most destructive force in any token launch is the sniper bot, which drains liquidity in the first seconds and leaves retail buyers holding the bag. @RebateLaunch addresses this with a mechanical solution rather than just a promise. They offer an optional snipe protection feature where the tax starts at 99 percent in the first second and halves every second until it reaches zero at the ten second mark.
What makes this brilliant is where that tax money goes. It is not burned or sent to the developer. It is redirected straight into the holder payout pool. This means the very bots that try to exploit the launch end up funding the rewards for genuine long term holders.
Furthermore, every launch requires a minimum of 7 percent of the supply to be locked in a treasury. Sell fees refill this treasury, and the only way tokens leave it is through the buyer bonus mechanism. There is no function that allows the creator to withdraw these funds, eliminating the classic rug pull vector seen on standard launchpads.
The tradeoff is clear. This heavy protection and locked supply mean that early insiders or the project team cannot dump their allocations for a quick pump. It sacrifices the artificial early hype that some projects rely on in exchange for genuine, sustainable price discovery.
Analyzing these security layers is exactly what the @starlisting Round 3 campaign rewards. The platform is built to protect the user first. The top 15 creators share a 500 USDT prize pool, with 50 USDT for ranks 1 to 5 and 25 USDT for ranks 6 to 15. The deadline is November 17 at 22:00 UTC.
๐ค Paid partnership
๐ Good evening, traders! โค๏ธ
5 Rules I Follow Before Choosing a Prop Firm That Will Save You Millions! ๐ธ๐ธ
1๏ธโฃ Drawdown: I prefer static over trailing.
2๏ธโฃ News Trading: Must allow trading during major news.
3๏ธโฃ Consistency Rule: I prefer no daily profit caps.
4๏ธโฃ Payouts: Always check real payout proofs & reviews.
5๏ธโฃ Hidden Rules: Check all restrictions before buying.
6๏ธโฃ Huge Discounts: I avoid firms offering unusually high discounts without a proven track record.
๐ก A reliable 80% payout beats a fake 100% promise!
๐ฌ Whatโs your biggest red flag in a prop firm?
I just set up my first Watchlist on the @GeckoTerminal app.
It is a mobile DEX tracker from the CoinGecko team.
I named mine Swing trading and added 5 tokens.
Here is what I see on day one. What is on it and why:
โ CASHCAT. $51.8M market cap, down 12.8% today. I want to see if it holds its volume while it cools off.
โ PONS. $98.8M market cap, down 4.3%. The biggest on my list, so I use it as a reference point.
โ SEPPUKU. Up 16.7% and tagged as 2 days old. It traded $2.7M against $386.4K of liquidity.
โ BOW (Longbow). Up 62.3% on a $3.3M market cap. Small and fast moving, so I want it where I can see it.
โ Chillmas. $64.6K market cap, up 0.9%. The smallest one on the list.
The top of the screen shows 13.12K transactions and $5.36M in 24h volume across everything I added.
That is a quick read on how active my list is.
The Vol/Liq column is the part I am learning from.
It compares 24h volume to the money in the pool.
SEPPUKU is about 7x.
CASHCAT is about 1.4x. Same screen, very different pictures.
Before this, I had no single place for the tokens I follow.
Now I have one screen, and I will check it daily to see how it changes.
I recorded the setup from start to finish. Watch it below.
This is just my personal list for tracking. Not financial advice.
My Watchlist: geckoterminal.com/watchlist?โฆโฆ
What would you put on your first GT Watchlist and what is the first number you would check?
Clip is showing how I set up my watchlist.
julian just broke down how the spotify wrapped share card gets tens of thousands of users for $0. people see it and think โwhat would mine say.โ wild.
7
22
812
One thing I wish more people considered about onchain finance is that sharing information and sharing everything are two very different things.
Imagine a business working with multiple financial partners.
One partner may need proof of a specific financial condition. Another may need to verify a transaction. But neither necessarily needs access to the company's entire financial history.
Why should accessing one piece of information mean exposing everything else?
This is why selective disclosure is such an important concept for institutional finance.
@primus_labs is building around the relationship between confidentiality and verification, helping address the need to protect sensitive information while still proving what needs to be trusted.
I like this direction because privacy should not be treated as an obstacle to transparency.
It should give businesses better control over how they participate in an open financial system.
The goal isn't to hide trust.
It's to make trust possible without unnecessary exposure.
Explore Primus XP:
points.primuslabs.xyz
34
33
265
๐ฑ๐๐ผ๐๐๐๐๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ retweeted
Paid ads are getting crazy expensive the real move now is organic distribution through real people.
@clipur approach with thousands of creators posting authorized clips feels like one of the better ways to stay visible without burning money on ads.
๐ฑ๐๐ผ๐๐๐๐๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ retweeted
Transparency proves. Privacy protects.
The real system does both at the same time.
@primus_labs
It strikes exactly the same balance:
Data is hidden by default.
Only what needs to be seen is visible.
Proof without disclosure.
Control without sacrificing usability.
By combining zkTLS and FHE, you can verify off-chain data, compute on encrypted data, and simultaneously have private transactions, confidential yields, and real-time Proof of Reserves โ without exposing balances, positions, or sensitive details. Itโs no longer a choice between โeverything is hiddenโ or โeverything is exposed.โ
This is the infrastructure layer that institutions really need. Those in the ecosystem and AlphaNet right now are experimenting with and using this standard before anyone else.
If you're late, you'll just be watching from the outside to see how everyone else is dealing with it.
๐ฑ๐๐ผ๐๐๐๐๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ retweeted
If you joined the $1WIN Token Sale, there's something worth checking before the Lucky Drive deadline.
@1win is offering extra tickets for the Lamborghini Urus SE giveaway, but eligibility depends on a few important rules.
Here's what matters:
โข Every full $100 contributed between Oct 15โ30 earns 1 extra ticket.
โข Tickets are calculated from your original contribution, before any refunds or allocation adjustments.
โข Maximum 32 Lucky Drive tickets per account, including regular tickets.
โข You must deposit to your 1win account from the same Solana wallet used for the Token Sale.
โข Deadline: Nov 12, 20:59 UTC.
โข Tickets will be credited before the Nov 15 draw.
One detail I think people might overlook: if you connect the same wallet to multiple accounts, the tickets go to the account with the most recent deposit.
My advice? Double-check your wallet and the eligibility rules before the deadline.
Missing a small requirement could mean missing your extra tickets.
Quick reminder for those who deposited into the $1WIN Token Sale
Youโre participating in the Lamborghini Urus SE giveaway as part of Lucky Drive.
Rules (read them pls):
โข For every full $100 contributed to the Token Sale pool between October 15-30, you get 1 extra Lucky Drive ticket.
โข Tickets are calculated based on the total amount you contributed, before oversubscription allocation/refunds.
โข Extra tickets are added to your regular Lucky Drive tickets, with a maximum of 32 tickets per 1win account in total.
โข You need a 1win account and must make a deposit from the same Solana wallet you used for the Token Sale so we can match your wallet to your account.
โข The deposit must be made by November 12, 20:59 UTC. Deposits made later wonโt be included.
โข If the same wallet is linked to multiple 1win accounts, all tickets will be credited to the account with the most recent deposit. Tickets will not be split or duplicated.
Tickets will be credited once before the draw on November 15.
Participation link: 1win-pro.app/freemoney
Good luck
just watched julian break down how consumer AI and crypto apps are actually getting thousands of users with $0 in ads.
share card loops, viral launch trailers, and the GTM stack that turns signups into paying users. This oneโs worth sitting through.
Funny how some 13-year-olds in the space are already complaining about the bear market
They get liquidated today, run to their parents asking for money for toys, and somehow they're back in the market tomorrow.
Meanwhile, some of us actually have to sit with our losses and figure things out.
Not everyone experiences the bear market from the same position
you are probably going to look stupid before you become good at anything meaningful.
your first video might be terrible.
your first business might fail.
your first attempt might make people question what youโre doing.
but there is something far more embarrassing than being a beginner.
Itโs spending ten years watching people who started with less experience than you build the life you were too afraid to attempt.
being bad at something is temporary.
never starting can become permanent.